Category: Columnists

  • Kwankwaso’s paranoia

    Kwankwaso’s paranoia

    Of all the demons gnawing at the North’s liver, New Nigerian People’s Party (NNPP) leader Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso‘s problem is Lagos State’s alleged effort to colonise the North. Speaking at the convocation ceremony of Skyline University in Kano last Sunday, he argued that the former federal capital had become meddlesome. He said: “Today, we can see very clearly that there are significant efforts from the Lagos axis to colonise this part of the country. Lagos wouldn’t allow us to choose even our Emir. Instead, they want to impose their own Emir on Kano. Today, we are aware that the Lagos young men are working so hard to impose taxes and take away our taxes from Kano and this part of the country to Lagos. Even the telephones that we make or register here in Kano, efforts are there to take all the taxes to Lagos. Even our sons and daughters who have bought factories, many of them here in Kano and northern Nigeria, and even banks, somehow, are forced to take their headquarters to Lagos because taxes will now have to go to Lagos. Lagos, today, feels they are the only Nigeria, interfering in other states’ affairs. We will not tolerate such actions here in Kano…”

    Read Also: Gov Otu appeals to workers to suspend proposed warning strike

    It didn’t seem an easy accusation for Mr Kwankwaso to make for obvious reasons. But repeatedly using Lagos axis interchangeably with President Bola Tinubu, he argued that Lagos (or President Tinubu) was expropriating the North through taxes, imposing emirs, and generally attempting to become the centre of the universe. This would be resisted, he thundered. He was indirectly making reference to the controversial tax bills before the National Assembly, and his unhappiness over the stalemated struggle for the Kano emirship. Mr Kwankwaso tried to become president in 2023. He has the right to nurse any kind of ambition. But to make facile and superfluous arguments on the tax bills without any financial exposition, and to surmise Lagos/Tinubu’s domination politics without evidence, not to talk of ignoring the incitement his statements constitute, disgrace his ambition and question his leadership credential. Surely, there is a limit to paranoia.

  • DO YOU KNOW WHO I AM?

    DO YOU KNOW WHO I AM?

    SNAPSONG 238    

    The food which ate my dream

         Had no teeth to call its own

    Canines which sprang out of the mouth

         Like the spikes of a laughing comb

    The shoe which bit the shoemaker’s foot

         Came straight out of a leopard’s skin

    Trodden countless times without compassion

         From pebbled patches to thorny spots

    The song sang the singer

         And the hearer trembled between the lines

    The wind which came between the trees

         Laid limp between the lips

    The night’s silence shouted

         So loud the roof rattled below the sky

    The corrugated whisper above the moon

    Read Also: Aremu Afolayan reunites with brother Kunle, offers heartfelt apology

         Relieved the stars of their soundless wait

    Those who shun the light

         Need not regret their lack of shadows

    They who plant the midnight rainbow

         Will reap a famine of eyes

    Every house we build

         Finds habitation in our inner selves

    The wardrobes therein

         Wear us like absent costumes 

  • NFF: Medicare for everyone

    NFF: Medicare for everyone

    Watching European football always leaves you with a lot of lasting impressions. The ambience around the stadium is inviting. You immediately want to belong as the clock ticks towards the commencement of the game. The enchanting atmosphere inside and outside the stadium soon gets you to align with whichever side you have chosen to support – that is if you aren’t dressed in the country’s or club’s colours, making your choice apparent.

    Back to the settings in our different living rooms and choice spots where matches are shown, the contrasting styles of viewership among those watching the games are diametrically opposite except that the choice spots are volatile largely because  bets are placed on the outcome of key matches. In fact, it is worse to sit and watch European club football.

    But last Sunday, I discovered that I was alone watching the Netherlands’ game against Hungary at the Johan Cruyff Arena in Amsterdam, with three Liverpool FC of England’s players, Cody Gakpo, Ryan Gravenberch, Virgil van Dijk on the Dutch side and one of them, Dominik Szoboszlai on the Hungarian side. Interestingly, the two nations’ captains Dominik Szoboszlai and Virgil van Dijk play for Liverpool.

    The game started with the Hungarians missing two easy goal scoring chances, especially the one missed by Szoboszlai, until the eighth minute when the game had to be interrupted due to what was termed a medical emergency at the sidelines close to the technical area. Note that before the game was suspended,  the Dutch had taken a corner kick in which the ensuing melee in the Hungarians’ penalty box necessitated a review to find out if the ball actually touched the hand of one of the Hungarian players. This review was Kept In View (KIP), with attention focused on the person under medical emergency.

    Read Also: Succour for Delta community as NGO delivers water projects

    I missed the English with their theatrics in handling the same setting. They would have shown us the waiting ambulance revving (the standby in the event of unseen occurrences), live videos of the hospital where the patient be taken to and how the hospital’s personnel were waiting to ensure that the chain in the medical emergency train was iron cast. In this case, the Dutch kept theirs simple, choosing to hoist a medical canopy to shield the patient away from public view to some extent while both countries’ medical crews supporting those in the stadium for such medical emergencies to revive the patient.

    Happily, we were spared the drama and precision in taking the patient from the place to the hospital because the patient was revived within 13 minutes and taken away on his feet from the technical area for further treatment. The rapturous clapping of hands inside the stadium was electrifying just as it showed that the Medicare of everyone watching games was sacrosanct. The game was held for 13 minutes and what excited me was the line of communication among the players seeking to know if the patient stood any chance of being resuscitated.

    Several times, I saw Holland’s captain, Virgil van Dijk walk towards the closet where the patient was getting cherry information about the patient which he conveyed to them. The least of the 22 players walking around the playing field to loosen up their muscles had their minds on the continuation of the match with the individual still distressed.

    When the referees, however, sounded his whistle for the game to continue, the focus went straight to the Video Assistant Referee (VAR) machine for an interpretation of the goalmouth melee incident before the game was stopped. There wasn’t protest from the Hungarians as they stood hands akimbo to watch the obvious as revealed by the VAR. This writer looked towards the Hungarian coach whose countenance showed that he accepted the decision.

    What was clear before the penalty kick was taken was the power of country over club when there was the need to choose between them in match situations. Just before Gakpo shot the ball beyond the Hungarian goalkeeper’s reach, the captain walked towards him to whisper where Gakpo would whip the ball into. Of course, Gakpo saw his Liverpool mate passing instructions to his goalkeeper and sent the ball in the opposite direction.

    I waited to see how the indications of the 13 minutes spent on the medical emergency case and the normal time wasted in the course of the game. The reserve referee raised the changing board which was 0:13 which was played out before raising the board for two minutes extra time. I marvelled at what I was watching and my mind raced to the domestic game in Nigeria and how we would have handled the same situations flawlessly like the Dutch did.

    Back home Nigeria, the domestic game runs without the VAR machine which effectively won’t match what the VAR did in resolving the hand ball from a corner kick taken by the Dutch in the eighth minute during the European Nations Cup game between Holland and Hungary in Amsterdam. And like I have told those who cared to listen that the VAR machine would continue to be a mirage for the beautiful game until FIFA makes it a mandatory prerequisite for hosting any international game.

    Except for such strict instructions from FIFA would Nigeria deem it appropriate to install the VAR machine?

    The seamless manner in which the Dutch FA handled the medical emergency case underscored the need to interrogate how the NFF and indeed those in charge of organising ours would treat medical emergency cases. Deep inside me, I prayed fervently that such medical emergencies should not happen here. My fear rose from the indolent manner in which we handle such critical functions in Nigeria.

    Nigerian doctors can match their counterparts anywhere in the world, but the attitude of those in the medical chain could inhibit a seamless act beginning with the absence of power and if the ambulance’s driver would be at alert. No disrespect to the drivers

    Perhaps, the question to the NPFL is, are the medicare for everyone inside the stadium across the country are? Are there plans such that patients can be easily be driven from the stadium to hospital and treated based on the contractual terms? It would be foolhardy for patients to be taken to the hospital and be subjected to the harrowing of waiting inside the ambulance until clearance from the owners of the hospital is received before the distressed person is treated. No one would blame the owners of such a business enterprise if such contractual partner is a habitual debtor.

    Can the NFF and indeed the NPFL tell us how many Nigerian clubs with brand new ambulances fitted with the state-of-the-art facilities to handle emergencies before excavating patients to the hospital? How many stadia in Nigeria have fully equipped medical rooms to serve as the first place of contact to stabilise distressed patients? Can NFF and NPFL tell us where patients with medical emergencies can be taken to without any delays arising from debts owed such hospitals?

    There is, therefore, the need to align our football leagues calendar with the rest of the world for August to July so that we can have a football season that will be devoid of any rancour and will be a source of pride to its sponsors as well as its followers. There is a need for a well laid out and functional football structure in the country that will engender active involvement of private and public partnership.

  • Thoughts and non thoughts of OBJ

    Thoughts and non thoughts of OBJ

    So pungent, incisive, convincing and irrefutable have been the several reactions to former President Olusegun Obasanjo’s recent address at Yale University in the United States in which he not only excoriated the President Bola Ahmed Tinubu administration but, characteristically, held his own leadership record up as the ideal to follow, that there is no need to reiterate the well known arguments here. Sermonizing endlessly on the ills plaguing Nigeria and magisterially pronouncing solutions to them has been the routine pastime of the former military head of state and then elected President for two terms despite the fact that he did not avail himself of his latter day wisdom when he had the opportunity to steer the affairs of Nigeria and shape the destiny of the nation.

    The truth of the matter is that the Owu Chief, perhaps more than any other past leader, cannot escape culpability for the state of Nigeria today – her continued underdevelopment and poverty despite an abundance of natural, mineral and relatively qualitative Human Resources. Had he seized the opportunities placed on his laps seemingly on a golden platter to steer Nigeria’s ship of State particularly between 1999 and 2007 to deepen the country’s federal practice, diversify the economy, lay the foundation for the modernization and expansion of key infrastructure, revamp the country’s security architecture, institutionalize electoral integrity through the conduct of credible polls and pay more than lip service to the fight against corruption, the trajectory of the country’s socioeconomic and political development would be far different from what it is today.

    In his book, ‘Not My Will’, a personal memoir of his years in power as military Head of State between 1976 and 1979, Obasanjo, with characteristic lack of charity, derided the late Chief Obafemi Awolowo asserting that what the legendary politician and statesman had sought in futility all his life, which was to be elected President of Nigeria, he (Obasanjo) had attained at a relatively young age. Yet, he did not address his mind to the critical issue of whether or not he had maximally utilize this opportunity to pursue and promote the best interest of Nigeria and her accelerated developmental transformation. His military regime’s political transition programme ushered in a civilian dispensation in 1979 that was one of the most venal, corrupt and inept leading to the collapse of the Second Republic and the return of military rule within four years. Given another opportunity to redeem himself as elected President of Nigeria from 1999 to 2007, Obasanjo demonstrated that he had learnt nothing from his past foray in power.

    In his address at an event to honour the memory of the great novelist and intellectual, Chinua Achebe, at Yale University, Obasanjo’s unsparing criticism descended heavily on the incumbent Tinubu administration in the same way that he had subjected every government to since his exit from power in 2007. It little occurred to him, as many analysts have pointed out, that the naturally reticent Achebe was forced to trenchantly criticize bad and lawless governance under the Obasanjo presidency and even rejected the national honour bestowed on him by the Ota farmer as a gesture of symbolic protest.

    Read Also: Yigit: My passion for Nigeria is unwavering

    Some have attributed the former President’s relentless criticisms of successive administrations after him to a desire to be the focus of attention as well as the urge to portray his administration as the best in this dispensation if not in the post-independence history of Nigeria. Unfortunately, any such pretensions fly in the face of indisputable facts and cannot be supported by objective, serious minded analysis. It is my view that the former President’s serial critiques of Nigeria’s political economy under successive administrations and habitual indulgence in self-glorification stem from an innate lack of capacity to transcend superficiality in analysis as evidenced by the ephemerality of most of his books in which he makes magisterial pronouncements that have minimal impact on the polity because they are hardly deeply reasoned and well thought out. This is in sharp contradistinction to the immortal thoughts and works of Awolowo that still remain pertinent and relevant to Nigeria’s quest for a viable socioeconomic and political order decades after they were written.

    For instance, Obasanjo loves to flaunt his self-proclaimed patriotism and incomparable love for Nigeria. Yet, from his conduct when he had the opportunity to preside over the country’s affairs, there was no indication that he had reflected deeply on what patriotism really means beyond mere cliches and empty sentimentality. For instance, when a 20-man delegation of the League of Northern Democrats led by a former Governor of Kano State, Ibrahim Shekarau, visited him in Abeokuta recently, the former President reiterated once again his fabled love for Nigeria. In his words, “You said I am a believer in the greatness of this country. Yes, I am. I am also an incurable optimist in this country. I am totally committed to the goodness of this country. But I believe if we look back and we want to be sincere with ourselves, we can see some of the mistakes of the past which we must not fall into again”.

    But it is no less a person than Chinua Achebe who gives us an insight into the shallowness of Obasanjo’s understanding of patriotism and love for country. On page 15 of his slim but powerful classic, ‘The Trouble with Nigeria’, Achebe writes, “In 1978 or 79 General Obasanjo paid an official visit to the University of Nigeria, Nsukka. Of the academic community assembled in the Niger Room of the Continuing Education Centre and which rose respectfully to its feet on his entry, General Obasanjo made a totally unexpected demand. He asked them to recite the national pledge! A few ambiguous mumbles followed, and then stony silence. “You see,” said the General bristling with hostility, “You do not even know the National Pledge”. No doubt he saw in this failure an indictable absence of patriotism among a group he had always held with great suspicion”.

    Achebe then goes on to dilate lucidly on patriotism. His words, “Who is a patriot? He is a person who loves his country. He is not a person who says he loves his country. He is not even a person who shouts or swears or recites or sings his love for his country. He is one who cares deeply about the happiness and well-being of his country and all its people. Patriotism is an emotion of love directed by a critical intelligence. A true patriot will always demand the highest standards of his country and accept nothing but the best for and from his people. He will be outspoken in condemnation of their shortcomings without giving way to superiority, despair or cynicism. That is my idea of a patriot”. It is thus obvious that Obasanjo’s address at Yale and his several scurrilous denunciations of previous administrations both of the PDP and APC fall far short of Achebe’s thoughtful and exacting standards of patriotism.

    In the same address to the League of Northern Democrats, Obasanjo spoke on the vexed issue of Igbo presidency which is yet to be a reality in the country. According to him, “I think all of us in Nigeria have to rethink…It bleeds my heart when people say because the Igbo had carried out a secession and so an Igbo man cannot be the President of Nigeria. I say what nonsense? There is no section of Nigeria that has not planned secession? What is “Araba” in the North? The North planned to break up Nigeria…What is treasonable felony? So, who among us can say I am better than the other? None!”.

    In the first place, it is untrue that there is no part of the country that has not planned a secession. There were certainly tensions in the relationship between various parts of the country leading to threats and heated exchanges at various times which is natural in a complex, plural polity like ours. But it is only the Igbo of the Southeast that had actually carried out the threat of secession, an attempt that was militarily crushed after three years of bloody conflagration. Even then, I am unaware as Obasanjo posits that anybody worth taking seriously has ever suggested that an Igbo man cannot be President of Nigeria because of the abortive secession attempt. Indeed, as I have previously said in this column, within nine years of the end of the civil war, an Igbo man, Dr Alex Ekwueme, had become the Vice President of Nigeria. There is every possibility that within the dynamics of democratic politics an Igbo man would have since become President of Nigeria but for the truncation of democracy by military intervention in 1983.

    In the last presidential election, Mr Peter Obi, directed his campaign mainly at his fellow Igbo as well as Christians of the North and South and his support base was restricted to that limited constituency which cannot deliver a presidential victory in a vast country like Nigeria. A candidate who engaged in church tourism campaigns and openly called on Christians to “take back your country” understandably did not win a single state in the core Muslim North which constitutes at least one half of the electorate. In any case, if Obasanjo is so passionate about Igbo presidency, why did he emerge from nowhere to snatch the PDP presidential ticket from Dr Ekwueme in 1998 with the support of retired northern Generals even when Ekwueme, one of the founding fathers of the PDP, was on course to winning the ticket?

    Reporting Obasanjo’s address to the visiting League of Northern Democrats, The Punch newspaper wrote, “The former President blamed regionalism as practiced before obtaining independence in October 1960 as the foundation of the country’s prolonged lack of cohesion, adding that “the truth is that at independence, Nigeria emerged with three leaders and so it is a situation of three countries in one ever since”. Again, it does not appear that this submission is a reflection of rigorous thought.

    For one, it is simplistic to base an analysis of post-independence Nigerian politics on the three major ethnic groups when ethnic minorities have increasingly asserted their influence within the polity. Again, it is as misleading to blame the regional structure of the first republic for the collapse of democracy in 1966 just as it is to proffer a return to regionalism as the solution to current challenges. Rather than regionalism per se being the problem with the First Republic, it was the attempt by the ruling NPC/NCNC coalition at the centre to forcibly seize control of the Western Region from the Action Group (AG) and impose an unpopular Ladoke Akintola of the NNDP on the region through the brazen massive rigging of the 1965 Western Regional elections that ignited the flames of anarchy in the region which then had national implications bringing down the democratic edifice on everybody.

    Obasanjo lectured his northern visitors to the effect that “Yes, you have identified your group as the League of Northern Democrats, but how I wish you had called your group National League of Democrats, because where you come from should not be a problem. Where I was born should not be the enemy of my ‘Nigerianess’. I will be increasing by being a Nigerian rather than being a member of the Republic of Oodua”. This is hardly realistic. When asked to respond to allegations that he was a tribalist during his campaign for the presidency in 1979, Chief Awolowo submitted that he could not be a good Yoruba man without first and foremost being a good and responsible indigene of Ikenne and that he could not claim to be a good and patriotic Nigerian without first being a good and responsible Yoruba man. This sounds eminently sensible, practical and honest to me. The point, as the Premier of the Northern Region, Sir Ahmadu Bello, was said to have told the great Zik is not to deny our differences but to understand them.

  • ‘Navigating uncertainty: Trump’s global legacy and Nigeria’s strategic challenges’

    ‘Navigating uncertainty: Trump’s global legacy and Nigeria’s strategic challenges’

    Donald Trump’s second emergence and continued influence in American politics represents one of the most significant political developments of the 21st century, with ripple effects that extend far beyond U.S. borders. His unconventional approach to politics and policy has reshaped international relations and carries particular implications for the globe  including developing nations like Nigeria.

    Trump’s initial rise to power in 2016 marked the acceleration of a global populist wave that has influenced political movements worldwide. His “America First” doctrine, characterized by skepticism toward traditional international alliances, preference for bilateral over multilateral agreements, and protectionist economic policies, has inspired similar movements across continents. This shift has fundamentally altered the post-World War II international order that emphasized globalization and multilateral cooperation.

    The Trump approach to governance – prioritizing nationalist interests over global consensus – has emboldened leaders worldwide to adopt more assertive nationalist positions. This trend has particular relevance for Africa’s most populous nation, Nigeria, which must navigate an increasingly complex international environment while managing its own internal challenges.

    Trump’s first stint as president introduced significant volatility into global trade relations through tariff wars, renegotiation of trade agreements, and skepticism toward free trade principles. For resource-rich countries like Nigeria, this shift has several implications:

    1. Commodity Markets: Trump’s policies and rhetoric can significantly impact global commodity prices, affecting Nigeria’s oil-dependent economy. The uncertainty surrounding U.S. trade policies can lead to market volatility, complicating economic planning for petroleum-exporting nations.

    2. Investment Flows The “America First” doctrine has influenced global investment patterns. Increased protectionism in developed economies could either redirect investment toward emerging markets like Nigeria or lead to a general retreat of international capital to perceived safer havens.

    3. Trade Relations: The emphasis on bilateral rather than multilateral trade agreements could affect Nigeria’s trade positioning, potentially requiring more direct negotiation with major economic powers rather than working through international frameworks.

    On immigration, Trump’s strict stance on immigration has implications for countries with significant diaspora populations in the United States, including Nigeria. The Nigerian diaspora in the U.S. contributes significantly to Nigeria’s economy through remittances and knowledge transfer. Any policies affecting immigration or visa regulations can have direct economic and social impacts on Nigerian communities both in the U.S. and at home.

    Read Also: Supreme Court rejects 36 states’ suit to compel FG to account for gas earnings since 1999

    The Trump administration’s inclusion of Nigeria in travel restrictions highlighted the potential vulnerability of international mobility to political shifts in Washington. This has implications for:

    – Educational opportunities for Nigerian students

    – Business travel and investment flows

    – Family reunification

    – Professional development opportunities

    Again, Trump’s approach to international security cooperation has emphasized greater burden-sharing among allies and a more transactional approach to international relationships. For Nigeria, this has implications for:

    1. Counter-terrorism Cooperation: Nigeria’s fight against Boko Haram and other security challenges requires international support. Changes in U.S. foreign policy priorities can affect the level and nature of security assistance available.

    2. Military Aid: The emphasis on allies paying their “fair share” could affect military cooperation and assistance programs, potentially requiring Nigeria to shoulder more costs or seek alternative partnerships.

    3. Regional Security: Any reduction in U.S. engagement in West Africa could create opportunities for other global powers to expand their influence in the region.

    Likewise, Trump’s skepticism toward climate change agreements and environmental regulations has implications for global climate action. For Nigeria, this matters because:

    – The country is vulnerable to climate change impacts

    – Environmental degradation affects agricultural productivity

    – Climate finance and technology transfer depend on international cooperation

    – Energy sector development strategies must consider global climate policies

    As Nigeria navigates this evolving international landscape, several strategic considerations emerge:

     Diversification of International Partnerships

    The uncertainty surrounding U.S. policy directions suggests the wisdom of maintaining diverse international partnerships. Nigeria’s relationships with China, Europe, and regional powers become increasingly important as hedges against policy shifts in Washington.

    The volatility associated with Trump’s approach to international relations underscores the importance of building economic resilience through:

    – Diversification away from oil dependency

    – Strengthening domestic manufacturing

    – Developing internal markets

    – Improving institutional capacity

    Nigeria’s role as a regional leader in West Africa becomes more critical in an international environment where traditional powers may be less engaged. This presents both challenges and opportunities for Nigerian leadership in:

    – Regional economic integration

    – Security cooperation

    – Diplomatic initiatives

    In conclusion, Trump’s emergence and continued influence in American politics represents more than just a temporary deviation from traditional U.S. policy approaches. It signals lasting changes in how the world’s most powerful nation engages with the international community. For Nigeria, this requires careful navigation of an increasingly complex global environment while building greater resilience and self-reliance.

    The implications extend beyond immediate policy impacts to fundamental questions about the future of international cooperation, economic development, and global governance. Nigeria’s success in this new environment will depend on its ability to adapt to changing circumstances while maintaining focus on its core development objectives.

    As the global community continues to grapple with these changes, Nigeria’s size, resources, and regional importance position it to potentially benefit from the evolving international order – provided it can maintain domestic stability and implement effective strategic responses to these global shifts.

  • Obasanjo and his ‘failing state’ theory

    Obasanjo and his ‘failing state’ theory

    A leopard cannot change its spots.

    This age-long apothegm utterly beggars the cacophonous vituperations of former President Olusegun Obasanjo about other Nigerians, especially the nation’s leaders – past or present – except himself.

    For a personality that ought to stay peacefully in the glasshouse of respected statesmen, Obasanjo has been throwing stones all his life at fellow citizens as a fancied self-entertainment.

    The former President thinks he laid a foundation of exemplary leadership as a military and civilian leader. He is inclined to blaming every administration and other leaders for not measuring up. But, an x-ray of his leadership style reveals otherwise.

    The all-knowing General, civil war commander, former military Head of State, ex-President of Nigeria, Ekerin Egba, Ebora and Balogun Owu, and seasoned letter writer, is yet to overcome the shock of last year’s presidential election.

    His anointed candidate, Peter Obi, could not fly during the poll. Therefore, anything done by the winner and President, Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu, is a precursor to a “failing state,” which exists only in the imagination of the self-appointed monitor of Nigeria.

    Delivering a keynote address at the Chinua Achebe Leadership Forum at Yale University in New Haven, Connecticut, United States, the former leader, combative as ever, blamed the one-and-a-half-year-old Tinubu’s presidency for the nation’s cumulative woes.

    In the lecture, titled: ‘Leadership failure and state capture in Nigeria,’ OBJ, as fondly called by some people, said the country’s pervasive corruption, mediocrity, immorality, misconduct, mismanagement, injustice, incompetence and all forms of iniquity confirmed Nigeria’s failing state status under the President.

    The General deliberately closed his eyes to the courageous steps and bold reforms of the Tinubu administration. He cleverly manufactured fables and tissues of lies to dent the image of a government tackling the mess created by the previous leadership.

    Obasanjo posed as a scholar and pontificated on good governance. He uncritically confused “state fragility” with “state failure,” creating panic.

    At issue is governance legitimacy, which is dictated by the people’s perception of the government’s capacity for role fulfillment and the unhindered exercise of sovereignty and authority over the nation’s territories.

    A failed state implies the extreme weakness of the political or economic system and the colossal loss of control by the government. A state does not fail suddenly. There is a spectrum of fragility. There are abnormal circumstances that may ultimately culminate in failure, including wars, comprehensive weaknesses of the military and bureaucracy, as well as the prolonged, unmitigated collapse of social order throughout the country. States can move from fragility to failure if there is no remedy; if the government and the people are helpless, and if disintegration is inevitable.

    However, at a time Tinubu is recording more successes in steering Nigeria away from “state fragility,” what Obasanjo could see through his self-fabricated lenses is only “state failure”.

    The General stirred the hornet’s nest through his highly inflammable statement. Assessing the nation’s electoral system by his yardstick, he also called for the removal of the current leadership of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to restore integrity and sanity. Would he want Professor Maurice Iwu, the former INEC chairman who conducted the most controversial election that resulted in the longest electoral litigation, to return?

    The former president, as some observers would say, is entitled to his personal opinion, even if his view is laced with bile.

    Read Also: Supreme Court rejects 36 states’ suit to compel FG to account for gas earnings since 1999

    If previous governments, including the ones Obasanjo headed, had laid good examples, the country would have been much better.

    But what are the legacies of OBJ, Africa’s statesman and self-acclaimed democrat who some observers have also described as a symbol of imaginary purity?

    Obasanjo presided over a very ‘secure country where the chief legal officer, Attorney-General and Minister of Justice, Chief Bola Ige, was murdered. Throughout the life of the administration, there was no clue. The killers remain at large.

    He conducted the best presidential election which produced President Umaru Yar’Adua, who confessed that the poll that brought him to power was severely flawed.

    At the tail end of Obasanjo’s administration, allegations of a third-term agenda filled the air, and the report of the Constitutional Conference was sacrificed on the altar of deceit.

    Under his leadership, the hand of the centrist Federal Government was heavy on the sub-national units, as underscored by the seizure of allocations to states and councils.

    Is the administration not also remembered for turning the anti-graft bodies into a veritable weapon for witch-hunting, intimidation, and oppression of perceived foes?

    What about the Odi bloodletting? What about Zaki Biam? Did his government not receive condemnation of the international community?

    Too numerous acts of political aggression were peculiar to his regime. No one was insulated from his venom. His life outside power has not been dull. But his pastime is a subjective assessment, most times, of the state of the nation.

    Confronted with the awful memory of electoral horrors, Obasanjo’s do-or-die statement confounded most Nigerians. Yet, in 2019, he feared what his administration did to the opposition. Ahead of the poll, the Ota farmer regressed into a curious defence mechanism, alerting the international community to an imminent rigging that should attract punishment by powerful Western countries.

    Also living up to expectations as a crafty actor, Obasanjo alleged that a former Vice President was buying Permanent Voter’s Cards (PVCs) from prospective voters at N10,000 per voter. The Doctor of Theology said the vice president could not be a man of God, urging the General Overseer who inducted him as a priest to terminate his priesthood.

    In another outburst, Obasanjo, in a letter, said Muhammadu Buhari should not run for presidency. He inspired the formation of a political party, the African Democratic Congress (ADC), which could not attract a huge following. Later, he turned his back on the youths by abandoning his push for a generational shift. He has been dreaming of what he called a third force in the nation’s polity; whatever that means.

    Highly inconsistent, the man who opposed Atiku Abubakar in 2003, 2007, 2011, and 2015 suddenly woke up from slumber in 2019 and became Atikulated.

    Less than a month before the 2019 presidential election, Obasanjo resumed his old tricks of maligning, intimidating, and blackmailing candidates, reminiscent of what he did to Atiku in 2007 as the flag bearer of the defunct Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN) and ex-President Goodluck Jonathan in 2015.

    In 2007, Obasanjo left the stage with a perception that has continued to hunt him in public life. As president, he was the lord of manor whose word was law. Power drew the wool over his eyes. As the PDP leader, he was the party. In eight years, the PDP as the ruling party had four national chairmen. That leadership instability in the party was, to a large extent, his making. He cleverly pushed away the pioneer chairman, the late Chief Solomon Lar. Later, he subjected his successor, Chief Barnabas Gemade, to the same ordeal, making him curse the party. Also, Chief Audu Ogbeh, who succeeded Gemade, had a bitter experience. When former Anambra State Governor Chris Ngige was abducted under the former president, he did not haunt the perpetrators of such a heinous constitutional breach.

    Under his watch, a gale of impeachment hit the polity. The victims were former Governors Joshua Dariye (Plateau State), Senator Rashidi Ladoja (Oyo), Ayodele Fayose (Ekiti), and Diepreye Alamieyeseigha (Bayelsa). The impeachment did not follow the laid-down procedures. The court later reinstated Dariye and Ladoja.

    In Rivers State’s PDP, Obasanjo objected to Rotimi Amaechi’s choice as the candidate the party’s delegates should choose, saying the selection had a k-leg. Senator Ifeanyi Araraume suffered the same fate in Imo State. The party lost to the Progressive Peoples Alliance (PPA) candidate, Ikedi Ohakim.

    Obasanjo successfully plotted the removal of former Senate President Chuba Okadigbo, who succeeded his ousted anointed candidate, Evan Enwerem.

    When former Minister of Housing and Urban Development, Dr. Olusegun Mimiko, defected from the PDP to the Labour Party (LP) to contest the governorship election in Ondo State, Obasanjo threatened him with the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC). He said: O su s’aga (he defecated on the stool). But the people of Ondo ignored the former president.

    In 2004, President Obasanjo withheld allocations to the local governments in Lagos State, following the creation of an additional 37 local council development areas (LCDAs).

    Earlier in 2003, he orchestrated an electoral earthquake in the Southwest. Governors Adeniyi Adebayo (Ekiti), Lam Adesina (Oyo), Olusegun Osoba (Ogun), and Adebayo Adefarati (Ondo) were the casualties. Only Tinubu of Lagos State survived the electoral terrorism. There was panic when INEC initially indicated on its website that the PDP had won Lagos.

    Although Obasanjo secured a second term, it is instructive to note that at the Supreme Court, where the final verdict was given on the 2003 presidential poll,  the judges were split. Some jurists were not convinced that he defeated his challenger, Muhammadu Buhari of the defunct All Peoples Party (APP), at the poll.

    In 2006/2007, Obasanjo foisted on the ruling party a personal succession agenda. Presidential aspirants, including Dr. Peter Odili, Donald Duke, Ahmed Makarfi, and Adamu Abdullahi, were edged out of the selection process. His anointed candidate, the late Umar Musa Yar’Adua, was imposed on the party.

    In 2007, Iwu’s INEC operated from Obasanjo’s armpit. Losers were declared as winners during the governorship polls; PDP candidates were the beneficiaries. The mandates were later restored in the court. Affected states included Anambra, Edo, Ondo, Osun, and Ekiti. That rigging is responsible for the scattered off-season governorship polls in the country today.

    Although Obasanjo has become an emergency advocate of judicial independence, he demonstrated a lack of respect for court orders. Emergency holidays were even declared to frustrate the move by courts to deliver their judgments on sensitive cases. Court orders were disregarded.

    The history of Nigeria is incomplete without a mention of Obasanjo. He was the General Officer Commanding (GOC) the Third Marine Commando when his juniors, including Lt.-Gen. Alani Akinrinade (retd.) and Brig. Godwin Alabi-Isama brought the rebels to their knees. In his book, ‘Military Leadership in Nigeria,’ General James Oluleye said: “[Yet] Obasanjo claimed he won the civil war by solo effort.”

    He craved political relevance as a military officer. The agitation for political power resulted in the pressure on former military Head of State, Gen. Yakubu Gowon, to make him Minister of Works and the late Gen. Murtala Ramat Mohammed the Minister of Communications.

    In 1979, Obasanjo made history again. He handed over to civilians. He became a moral voice of sorts.

    Twenty years after leaving power, he bounced back as a civilian president in 1999. However, many observers believe that he had lost the steam by 2007 when he handed over power to Yar’Adua.

    Outside power, he embraces the pastime of attacking other leaders, some of who had made greater contributions to national development than him. Today, some of these leaders are celebrated by Nigerians more than him.

    Obasanjo had mocked Chief Obafemi Awolowo, the first Premier of defunct Western Region, for not becoming the president of Nigeria. In his book: ‘Not My Will,’ he described the late Dr. Nnamidi Azikiwe as a leader who fell from his pre-eminent national position and carried on with life in his old age as a tribal chieftaincy holder, the Owelle of Onitsha.

    Obasanjo also described the late President Shehu Shagari as colourless; Aminu Kano as a placard-carrying protester, and Waziri Ibrahim as a rich but unserious contender. Buhari and Idiagbon, to OBJ, were autocratic rulers and Ibrahim Babangida a fool.

    Ahead of the return to civil rule in 1999, he once asked what has ‘Jack’ (General Yakubu Gowon) left behind in Aso Villa that he wanted to go and take. To OBJ, Moshood Abiola was not the messiah Nigeria needed. The option of an interim government, instead of the June 12 election de-annulment, was regrettable but understandable, according to Obasanjo.

    Out of over 200 million Nigerians, nobody else is clean, honest, and knowledgeable enough. Only OBJ is.

  • It is still dusk in Ogoni land…

    It is still dusk in Ogoni land…

    “Darkness cannot drive out darkness: only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate: only love can do that.” ― Martin Luther King Jr; Political Philosopher and Activist

    The tragedy of injustice and internal conflict

    It is now 29 years since the writer and activist Ken Saro Wiwa and eight of his comrades were tried by a military tribunal, and sentenced to death for incitement and murder. They were executed in what many believe was an act of injustice.

     While a lot of Nigerians believe that Mr. Saro Wiwa and other 8 other Ogonis, – were put on trial under the false pretext that the group had incited the murder of four Ogoni chiefs in May 1994, and that they were innocent on one hand; on the other hand, the relatives of the Ogoni 4 who were lynched and murdered by a mob that they believe was incited by late Mr. Saro Wiwa, feel deeply aggrieved that Ken Saro Wiwa, who was alleged to have been publicly critical of the Ogoni 4 and verbally denounced them with leaflets that were widely distributed, in which Saro Wiwa was alleged to have called them ethnic traitors, and evil government collaborators.

     At the crux of the crisis that ensued was the agitation led by late ken Saro Wiwa and the other Ogoni leaders called “The Ogoni 9” who were a group of nine activists from the Ogoni region of who opposed the operating practices of the Royal Dutch Shell oil corporation in the Niger Delta region.

     My heart goes out to all parties, i.e.; the family of the Ogoni 9 and the family of the Ogoni 4. This is a sad story that reflects our reality in Nigeria. A family tussle that culminated into a tragedy of brothers killing brothers, and we are where we are today with Ogoni land deeply divided and in agony. I totally agree with the fact that what happened to Ken Saro Wiwa and the other eight Ogonis was also a miscarriage of justice. Maybe if proper judicial process was followed, by the General Sani Abacha administration, maybe if Ken Saro Wiwa and others were alive; the family of the Ogoni 4, could have had the opportunity to seek justice, in which case Ken Saro Wiwa and the Ogoni 8 would have had a fair hearing and in the end, justice would have been served, or seem to be served. Ironically, the Ogoni 9 and the Ogoni 4 were all fighting for the betterment of their people, and now they are all gone, Nigeria has moved on, while the families of the Ogoni 9 and the Ogoni 4 are still agonizing over what happened. Importantly the state of mind of the Ogoni 13, the entire Ogoni family, and how they will be able to go through this painful process and get healing as a family is still a concern.

     There is no peace without reconciliation and healing

    Sadly, instead of the Ogonis being united in the fight for a better Ogoni land; 29 years have been wasted due to internal conflict, which has made the efforts of Ken Saro Wiwa and all the other Ogonis that died on both sides of the struggle – to be ineffectual. The vested interests have rather been beneficiaries of this unfortunate internal strife, as they will continue to enjoy while the Ogonis suffer. Indeed, there will be no unity without genuine peace, and there will be no peace without objective and genuine reconciliation. Therefore, due to the underlying issues, there are mutual suspicions, deepening acrimony, and building generational hatred amongst the Ogonis, and sadly so. With this situation a united, peaceful, and prosperous future for Ogonis is bleak.

    However, unless the underlying issues are addressed, the Ogonis will not get closure on the issues that are bedeviling them and their society, enjoy inner peace, and consequently continue to collectively fight for the betterment of their people. As the saying goes, “United, we stand, divided, we fall”. It is the responsibility of Government at the Federal and State levels to mediate a process that will lead to amicable resolution and closure, on both sides; like the ability of the Ogoni 4 to be able to locate their loved ones and give them proper burial and closure, the recognition of not just the Ogoni 9, but also the Ogoni 4 on equal terms by the Federal and State Governments with regards to national honors, compensation (if any), etc. A reconciliation process that will bring the families of the Ogoni 13 to at least learn from the mistakes of the departed leaders and build a better community, etc. is very important. Unless such a process is facilitated, the Ogoni’ will continue to suffer and continue to be easy prey to vested interests as they remain in disunity.

    Read Also: DHQ lauds Simon Ekpa’s arrest, key victory in anti-terror fight

     Furthermore, the current recalcitrant position taken by the current leaders of Ogoni is not helping matters. They should make efforts to achieve peace. Only then could governments or people of goodwill, could contribute to the peace process. External forces/ stakeholders will not bring peace to Ogoni land unless the Ogonis allow it. Peace cannot be installed by force or coercion, because if that happens, then, it is not peace but “uneasy combustible calm”. Accordingly, I say to the Ogoni elders; “you should not think of your selfish or political interests. Think of your children, your grandchildren, and great-grandchildren. Think of your community and your society – which is your collective identity. How could you collectively fight for better positions/ opportunities at the state and national levels in Nigeria, when you are so divided at the kit and clan level? As elders you can only leave legacies if there is peace and progress in Ogoni land. Otherwise what you will leave behind is a worsening toxic society full of hate and stories of infamy on both sides of an internal conflict that may be more catastrophic as your children grow, bottled up with issues that you are unable/ refuse to resolve during the remaining days of your lives. Please, I ask that you make all your efforts thus far in life worthwhile, and leave a collective lasting legacy such that united you can stand and succeed.

    Indeed, the tragedy of the killing of Ken Saro Wiwa and the other 8 Ogoni leaders, as well as the murder of the Ogoni 4 is unfortunate. I cannot imagine the trauma that the families of all the fallen leaders have been going through which will remain etched in their psyches and ways of life for the rest of their lives.

     Natural resources host communities deserve better in Nigeria

    The injustice and inhumanity of maltreating oil and gas communities and other natural resources host communities, as the nation basks in the wealth that is being drained from those communities, as the communities wallow in abject poverty, and environmental degradation with attendant physical, mental, and emotion health calamities, is pathetic and speaks loudly of “man’s inhumanity to man”. Those people and their communities deserve much better. I have seen in other countries where the people from whose land such wealth as Oil, Gas, etc. are extracted for national development are treated with respect, love, and care – so much so that they become the envy of their fellow citizens. Consequently, they feel a deep sense of belonging to their communities and nations and also feel a sense of pride in their Countries. In fact, even in cases where such locals had to be relocated, they hardly regret being removed from their ancestral lands due to the way their Governments take care of them and their families for their entire lives. Of course, the deep connection to their ancestral lands will remain with them. Therefore, the way that their histories are preserved by their governments gives them a sense of belonging, as efforts are continually made by their respective Governments to preserve their historical cultural heritage and values while containing the environmental impacts of the resources’ exploration and management.

     From my professional and business experience in the Gulf region particularly, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Bahrain, and Saudi Arabia; I have witnessed a classic example of how other Countries where the people from whose land such wealth like Oil and Gas are extracted for national development are treated with respect, love, and care. For instance, in the United Arab Emirates, particularly in Abu Dhabi and Dubai, where decades ago the Governments at subnational and national levels, undertook the process of Oil exploration, environmental impact management of the exploration, stakeholder management, and even when and if relocations of the locals took place how a holistic approach was undertaken such that the citizens were well taken care of to this day. It is such a beautiful example of how to treat our people.

     I wish that our Governments at the Federal and state levels will change the ugly trend, while I also wish that there will be peace and unity in Ogoni land and Nigeria in general.

  • American elections and aftermath

    American elections and aftermath

    All predictions of close presidential election in the USA have been proven to be wrong. I was so shocked that I could not eat after the initial results were declared. Although in September I had written in this paper that Donald J. Trump would win the election stating that the dice was loaded against Kamala Harris. I had argued that the time to make herself known to the American electorate was too short. Biden only withdrew in July leaving the poor lady just about three months to campaign while Donald Trump had four years to run Biden out of town so to say.

    I further said America was not ready for a female president especially a non-white woman after rejecting Hilary Clinton in 2016. The Democratic Party was very weak on issues of inflation and immigration which proved to be the Achilles heels of Harris. The war in Ukraine was also seen as an unwinnable war draining American resources. This was a proxy war between Russia and the United States in which America had no direct leadership but was largely funding it. The Israeli war against the Arabs in Gaza and Lebanon was infuriating not only to Arab -Americans but the intellectual and the intelligentsia in the whole world and the weakness of Biden in supplying lethal arms to Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister but with absolutely no control of the murderous use of them made America look weak in relation to her puny ally Israel.

    I also thought that it would have been too difficult for Mrs Harris to detach herself from Biden’s poor image because she was still his vice president.  Apart from all these was the deep rooted racism in America where to be non-white was an unbearable burden. All these reasons made me feel that winning the contest was an uphill task for Harris.

    Read Also: Tinubu’s enemies planning campaign against military leadership, says Arewa forum

    But as the campaign went on and the pollsters bombarded us with polls after polls, I began to feel that Mrs Harris had a fair chance of winning particularly after debate with Trump in which she showed that Trump was a hollow giant with feet of clay. The lady demonstrated tremendous energy during the campaign and went to all the states of America apart from Hawaii. When the voting started, the whole world was given the impression that the results were a toss-up. But it turned out a clean sweep by Trump. This was because the Democratic constituencies in previous elections deserted Harris and the party. The women, the visible minorities of Blacks, Latinos, Asians, the elderly, workers and educated whites did not deliver as they used to do in previous presidential elections.

    Trump won in all the so-called blue wall states of Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Nevada, Arizona, North Carolina and Wisconsin. It seems what decided the election in Trump’s favour were two issues of immigration and inflation. Even though on paper the American economy is the envy of the whole world, this did not translate to prices in the supermarkets and the shopping malls. The hordes of immigrants billeted to cities all over America brought the issue of poorly managed borders home to everyone. The campaign emphasis of Harris on Trump’s character as a  misogynist, rapist, convicted felon, fraudster, tax evader, philanderer,  racist  and a bad man  generally did not gel with many Americans who felt Trump was as American as apple pie. Unfortunately for the Democrats, the defeat of Harris led to losses in the two Houses of the Congress- the Senate and the House of Representatives leading to Republican control of the presidency, the Senate, the House of Representatives and some will say the Supreme Court because unlike most western democracies, the Supreme Court in the USA is very political. What this means is that come next January when Trump is pronounced president, he will be able to carry out the most radical program in the government of the United States since F.D .Roosevelt. Any challenge against his program will easily be thrown out eventually when it gets to the Supreme Court. He has been assembling a cabinet of “disruptors”  whose mandate will be to shake up the United States and vicariously the world with it because America remains a global hegemonic power whether one likes it or not.

    He is bringing as his Attorney General, a previous member of Congress who was being probed for sleeping with underage children and of using illegal drugs. As Secretary of Defence, the greatest military establishment in the world, he is nominating a defence TV journalist who has never run any small organization before. As Secretary of Health, he is bringing the scion of the Kennedy family who does not believe in inoculation and vaccination and other accepted western medical practice that has become standard practice all over the world. He is bringing in as Communications Secretary someone who believes in the control of the media and possibly cancelling the licences of media houses critical of Trump. He is even threatening the CIA (Central Intelligence Agency) and the FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigation) He is asking Elon Musk, the richest man in the world to help him trim the bureaucracy and fire any member of it not Republican Party compliant. He has asked the governor of the central bank to be prepared to go even though the gentleman has two more years to go in his tenured appointment.

    “America First” would be his watchword in his foreign policy and the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation NATO will be subjected to this test. This means he will be withdrawing hundreds of thousands of American troops from Europe and presumably from Japan and South Korea. The new Trump administration will certainly be interesting for the whole world. Perhaps when in reciprocity the world will also react to his regime of high tariffs, deportation of immigrants and sabre rattling, he may yet settle down and realise that a tree does not make a forest.

  • Sanctimonious OBJ

    Sanctimonious OBJ

    Former President Olusegun Obasanjo is at it again, doing what only him knows how to do best. Running down others, and hailing himself as the best thing that ever happened to mankind. Obasanjo, aka Baba or OBJ, believes solely in Obasanjo. To him, he is the best leader to have ever come out of Nigeria, nay Africa. It is good to believe in oneself, but it should not be at the expense of rubbishing others.

    Whether in open letters or public lectures just as the one he recently delivered in Yale, United States of America, Obasanjo speaks well of himself as a leader and ill of others that either came before or after him. He is never short of what to say about them. Was Obasanjo really a fantastic leader as head of state (1976-1979) and president (1999-2007)? Time will tell.

    Come to think of it. What legacies did he bequeath to the nation following his exit from office in 2007, after his eight year tenure? He virtually left the nation in chaos following his botched attempt to elongate his tenure to enable him serve a third term, contrary to the provisions of the Constitution. Although, he vehemently denied nursing a third term ambition, his protracted battle with his deputy, Atiku Abubakar, because of the latter’s bid to succeed him indicated the extent he was ready to go to remain in office.

    The refusal of the National Assembly to play ball nipped his plan in the bud. The failure of the project led to the making of his famous statement that if he actually wanted a third term, all he needed to do was to ask God, who had never refused him anything. Really? So, he is the only one who knows God like that out of the millions of people that populate the country. The thing is Obasanjo is full of himself and believes that he is better than any other person. Leadership is not cut that way.

    Read Also: Nigerian children suffer poverty more than adults – FG

    Leadership is not about self, but the collective. It is the ability to rally others to get things done. A tree does not make a forest, it can only make a difference which others can key into to make things work for the betterment of the society. Obasanjo is a lucky person. From his military days as head of state to when he became president on the nation’s return to democracy in 1999, fate has always smiled on him. Not many men have such a destiny. Rather than appreciate the place of the providence in his life, he is carrying on as if it is of his own making that things have turned out the way they did for him.

    I am not in anyway attacking the messenger and leaving the message, as some may want to say. No. The fact is one cannot look at the Obasanjo message which he delivered at Yale without looking at his person, the messenger. As the Yoruba would say, you first look at the apparel of the person who wishes to give you an attire. What was Obasanjo’s track record in office whether as military or civilian leader to warrant his trenchant criticisms of other leaders, especially his successors since he left office in 2007?

    He did not even spare Umoru Yar’Adua who he singlehandedly installed in a flawed presidential election in 2007. Today, this same Obasanjo is pontificating on credible, free, fair and transparent elections conducted by a truly independent electoral umpire. If he knew this, why then did he not lead by example by laying the foundation for such elections and the composition of such an electoral body? Obasanjo appointed two chairmen for the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) during his tenure, without following the steps he is today outlining for the appointment of those electoral umpires.

    The Obasanjo we all know would snub anybody that comes to him to tell him to follow the due process that he is now advocating for the appointment of INEC chairman. He would have told those people: ‘due process my foot’. There is no doubt that the appointment of INEC chiefs could be improved upon for the sake of our elections. But at what stage did Obasanjo know this? Is he now wiser after the fact of what he did while in office? If he had followed the steps he is outlining today in appointing Chief Abel Guobadia and Prof Maurice Iwu as INEC chiefs in 2000 and 2005, respectively, perhaps, people would have listened to him.

    They would have commended him for practicing what he is preaching. His do what I say and not what I do approach is not helpful. By the provisions of the Constitution, a sitting President is entrusted with the responsibility of appointing the INEC chairman after briefing the Council of State (CoS), which is just an advisory organ on his intentions. Obasanjo cannot in his own time exercise this constitutional power and now seek to stop his successors from taking the same path in their own time.

    His economic policies too were full of holes despite the killing the nation made from oil during his tenure. Of course the high oil price then had a concomitant effect on the economy, with our robust foreign reserves and impressive gross domestic products. But how well did he invest the oil earnings? If he and his economic team had initiated critical investments, the nation will not be where it is today. That he negotiated a debt forgiveness of $15 billion for the country from the London and Paris Club is not an investment. The debt relief came at a cost which the nation is still battling it with today.

    The nation is neck-deep in debts again because of the bad planning and negotiations that went into that 2005 debt relief. Obasanjo is not a messenger of truth. Whenever he speaks, he embellishes it in order to create the impression that he has the nation’s love at heart. His fighting the civil war to keep Nigeria one, which he always refers to, does not make him a better Nigerian than any other Nigerian. He is not the only one that fought the civil war. He was just lucky to have collected the instrument of surrender from Biafra’s Philip Effiong.

    Obasanjo reaped where he did not sow, as the war had been won and lost before he was posted to take over from Benjamin Adekunle at the Third Marine Commando. Obasanjo has a lot of baggage. He should take it easy so that he is not called out now and again whenever he speaks. He should first remove the beam in his own eyes before he sees the log in others’. If he continues to talk like this, people will always assess him, the messenger, and not his messages, because of his biases. 

  • Buck-passing

    Buck-passing

     Banks can never be understood. They beg you to bring your money and at the same time refuse to release the money when the arises. I talk from experience. It is not the first nor the second or even the third. But this experience leaves a sour taste in the mouth. On November 4, I transferred N30,000 from my Sterling Bank to GTbank account. I was immediately credited only for the transaction to be reversed almost at the same time. Till today, the money has not hit my account despite the bank’s claim that I was credited.

    I lodged a complaint at Sterling on November 11 and followed up on November 18, only to be told that GTbank had sent a mail to Sterling that I have been credited. I obtained my statement of account from GTbank and saw on it that the transaction was reversed. But the mail sent to Sterling by

    Read Also: Nigeria vows to appeal $25m judgment in favour of Chinese firm

    safurat.ojikutu@GTB claimed that I have been credited. It bore the log code: SBP00117222831. The mail and account statement vary. I believe the statement more than the mail.

    Why can GTbank not put its house in order? Why will the account statement and the email sent by its staff member be saying different things? What is up? With Sterling insisting that the money is not with them, it was hell on Monday morning as I shuttled between both banks to know the true position of things. For now, the money is hanging somewhere and it is probably with GTbank. When will it look into its books and rectify the problem? I will continue to call both banks out until the issue is addressed.