Category: Dayo Sobowale

  • When corruption corners leadership and security

    It is always a thing of joy when an economy is growing and performing as planned and the dividends of democracy, hard work and diligence are consumed as and when due in any nation in any part of the world. Hard work and growth galvanise wealth and its enjoyment, usage and distribution. However, it is in the management of wealth and who has it, when, and how, that the problem of corruption arises to throw spanner in the works for even the best planned economy, again, in any part of the world. Today we look at the way and manner corruption has bedevilled the political, and economic management of some nations in recent times and, how it has in turn, taxed the leadership styles of such leaders in such a way as to threaten the political stability and security of their nations. These nations are Turkey, Brazil and Nigeria which are rich or well off in terms of economic bounties, endowment and natural resources and Central African Republic – CAR- a poor nation whose mismanagement by its leaders has turned it into a failed state, whose leader on Thursday was asked in a meeting in another nation, namely Chad, to resign for sanity to return to the CAR. In the last few days and weeks, the leaders of these nations have been in the news with the cross of corruption dangling around their necks like a modern, proverbial sword of Damocles. In Turkey a rattled but powerful PM Reccep Tayyip Erdogan sacked 350 police bosses in many Turkish cities for the way and manner they have brought corruption charges against and arrested sons of his ministers leading to the resignation of three of such minsters – with one of them saying on his way out of office, that the PM too should resign. In Brazil, President Dilmar Rousseff had to assure FIFA President Sepp Blatter that Brazil’s stadia will be ready for the World Cup this year, whereas protests and city riots in 2013 over corruption and inequalities in the Brazilian nation had stalled construction of stadia and sports facilities needed for the World Cup in Brazil this year. Nigeria presents a different scenario amongst the nations being considered here. The Nigerian President Goodluck Jonathan is unrattled or unfazed by corruption charges especially those concerning the Aviation Minister who was also reported to have changed her credentials several times over on the internet this week, in response to accusations that she did not attend a school in the US which said it never offered the Accounting degree in her credentials. Indeed the Nigerian President said he is a good example of how anyone can reach the top in Nigeria as all that is needed is education. He also emphasised that those calling themselves’ progressives’ in Nigeria qualify for the tag because they are criticising him and he is not bothered by that as the economy is on course. CAR too provides a different kettle of fish in terms of political mismanagement and injustice leading to anarchy arising from religious violence. The Interim President who was forced to resign at a conference of neighboring states in Chad was the first Muslim president in a nation where 50% of the population are Christians and only 15 % are Muslims. Already over one million people have been displaced in that nation with many Nigerians sent packing home by the crisis. These then are just the tip of the ice bag of the quagmire these nations and their leaders face in their battles with the stigma or reality of the cancer of corruption in their polity. It is necessary to now dilate on how they have reached the sorry pass that is now rocking their various political and economic systems. In Turkey’s case the PM – Reccep Tayyip Erdogan – is confident that the police are using corruption charges to smear the integrity of his government and has ignored calls for his own resignation. He surely has cause to be that confident because his party the Justice and Development Party- AKP – has won three elections back to back and he is preparing to be nominated for the more senior position of President of Turkey having exhausted his constitutional term as PM. He however should not be too confident on that score as he has stepped on a few powerful toes in the way he has used his sweeping mandates at the polls . Indeed what has emboldened Erdogan is that he has emasculated the army which is the guarantor of Turkey’s secularity under its constitution handed down by founder Kemak Ataturk in 1923. Under Erdogan’s three terms many generals in the Turkish army have been tried and jailed for plotting coups. Erdogan had the support of a religious leader now in exile in the US as well as that of the police in rounding up military officers and trying them for treason and jailing such officers. Now the religious leader and the police are at loggerheads with Erdogan and it can not be business as usual in Turkey’s volatile politics. This is because the army is lurking and licking its wounds at the hands of Erdogan but bidding its time to strike with the sword of secularity. Will these corruption charges or saga be the death knell of the hitherto success story of the Erdogan- AKP era that had an Islamist party that used the power of elections to successfully handcuff Turkey’s military into a toothless bull dog, afraid to re-enact its time honoured duty of using coups to protect Turkey’s secularity? Surely time will tell, and very soon too, if you ask me. In Brazil, FIFA’s Sepp Blatter said he cried foul over Brazil’s state of preparations for the 2014 World Cup because he said Brazil had more time than any previous host to prepare for the tournament. In addition Brazil is to host the 2016 Olympics and it is both competitions that have brought out the anger in Brazilian youths about corruption and quality of life in Brazil. At the last Confederation Cup in Brazil last year, which was expected to be a test-run for this year’s World Cup, there were protests at the venues and stadia in Brazil. On being interviewed, Brazilian protesters complained of the high costs of the construction sites and the level of corruption in Sports administration in Brazil. A well known Brazilian soccer star called one of the bosses of the Brazilian soccer administration a thief. The protesters also accused the government of presiding over high transport costs and long hours for poor Brazilians in commuting to and from work while executing fantastically expensive stadia projects in the midst of dismal poverty. Luckily Brazilians have a president they can vouch for in terms of integrity and honesty and she has pushed through the Parliament reforms and palliative measures to fund infrastructure, transportation and education from and beyond. President Dilmar Yousseff has also assured FIFA that soccer is the main sports of Brazilians and that the Brazilian Stadia will be ready for the 2014 World Cup. Although I am not a Brazilian I urge Brazilians to believe their president and give her time to clean up the mess in their soccer stable as soccer is one of the high revenue earners for the Brazilian economy all over Europe as at this point in time. Nigeria’s fight against corruption has been an endemic and half hearted one. Right now many Nigerians feel that the fact that the president has not sacked his Aviation Minister is sufficient proof that the fight against corruption has derailed totally. In effect then the Nigerian President reminds one of Frederick the Great of Russia who once told a visitor to his palace – My people and I have reached an understanding which satisfies us both. They are to say what they like and I am to do as I wish. That seems to be the attitude of the Jonathan Administration on corruption and that is a great pity indeed given its reverberating effect on the political stability and security of a great nation like Nigeria.

  • 2013 Person of the Year-Between Putin, Obasanjo and Snowden

    2013 Person of the Year-Between Putin, Obasanjo and Snowden

    It is always a fascinating challenge to me to pick my man of the year for any year, not to talk of a difficult year like 2013, with its superstitious albatross of the no 13 being an unlucky number. Superstition aside, however, 2013 has lived up to its billing of being an entirely nasty year and one that most people in Nigeria, South Sudan and the Phillippines would wish good riddance and goodbye to bad rubbish. All the same, the simple chore for us here is to sift through the year’s massive luggage of political and socio economic actions and inactions to pick a person, who has in 2013, influenced world events for good or bad. Unbelievably, it has not been that difficult for me to pick a 2013 ‘person of the year’ – and this is particularly true of my choice of Russia’s Vladmir Putin as the first in my pick of the trio I have listed above. The Russian strongman was always in my sight through out the year, in the way he ‘outsmarted‘ the US in diplomacy and world politics, even long before Forbes Magazine picked him as the most powerful man in the world in 2013. Edward Snowden was an ambivalent choice, albeit a durable one, in terms of the massive size of his revelations on US Surveillance of friends and foes alike, and their importance to the management of information, communication and global governance, in all ramifications. The former Nigerian President Olusegun Obasanjo was a late comer to my list, as he wrote his famous letter ‘Before it is too late‘ to Nigeria’s incumbent President Goodluck Jonathan in December 2013. All the same, President Goodluck’s response and his charge that the former President had breached National Security and was whipping up ethnic hatred against his government earned Obasanjo the accolade of ‘Man of the Year‘ for his bravery, candor and patriotism which even Jonathan did not question in his apologetic response to OBJ ‘s letter. Let me state that I have picked my persons of the year with a great sense of responsibility and concern for world peace, order and prosperity. I have been guided by the same principles used by Time Magazine which yearly identified those it said have influenced the world‘ for good or bad‘ in the year of their choice. This year the Magazine picked Pope Francis for his concern for the poor. It also picked as runner up Edward Snowden and next Edith Windsor, a long term gay activist for her activism in actualising equal rights for gays in the US and I am nauseated by such choice. But then the magazine was keeping to its time honoured tenets and traditions. When I remember that Iran’s Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini was selected as Man of the Year by Time in spite of the Iran Hostage Crisis in Teheran, and before that even Adolf Hitler had the honor, then I concede the right of the Magazine to live up to its values and criteria, no matter the conflicting cultural values or concerns of its overall global readership. Let me now go about endorsing my choice of Russia’s President Vladmir Putin, Nigeria’s former President Olusegun Obasanjo and American Spy Whistle blower Edward Snowden as my ‘three in one‘ Person of the year for 2013. I start with Vladmir Putin, by commending him and Russia under him, in returning the diplomacy to a bi- polar world, by seizing the initiative in the management and conduct of world diplomacy from the US. This was especially true in the way Putin used the overthrow of Gaddafi in Libya as the benchmark to stop the use of ‘no flying zone‘ at the UN Security Council in any Middle East nation affected by the Arab Spring and street revolutions that dislodged tyrannical rulers in Tunisia, Egypt, Yemen and Libya. The No flying Zone was used to cripple Gaddafi by the US and its EU allies, which obtained a UN Security Council resolution in this regard. Over Syria, Russia led China in the Security Council in putting down its foot that the UN could not intervene in anyway to save or fight the Assad regime fighting for its life in Damascus and Russia had its way. Even the face saving limited strike by the Americans was abandoned for the dubious policy of destruction of weapons of chemical weapons. Over Syria, Russia showed that it had a better grasp of modern diplomacy than the Obama administration and the EU, and while a Cold War could not be said to have resurrected, it was obvious that the US was no longer calling the shots on world order and power, the way it was acting when Obama made his Cairo Speech that set Egypt up on the wrong path to democracy- now with the benefit of hindsight. As at this week the Muslim Brotherhood that won the presidential elections in Egypt, in the wake of the Arab Spring, has been declared a terrorist organisation by the army backed government in Egypt, while its popularly elected president- Mohammed Morsi has been charged with treason. Yet a blood thirsty tyrant like Bashar Assad has been kept in power by all means because Russia wants the US to know that it is no longer calling the shots on world politics and diplomacy and that is the handiwork of only one man –Russia’s President Vladmir Putin. On the global cultural plain, the US and its US allies have been putting pressure on Russia over its stringent anti -gay laws, but the Russians under Putin have not relented. The US has gone on to nominate well known gays to its Olympic Committees on the Olympics slated for Russia, but that can only annoy the Russians more. This can only boost Putin’s credentials at home as standing up for Russian values in the wake of wild American liberalism and cultural imposition and intimidation. On this score Putin and Russia have the support of most African nations, who in spite of religious differences, are united in their fight against gay rights and gay marriages and have made laws to that effect. Lastly, Russia has given asylum to the US most wanted man Edward Snowden and there is nothing the US can do about it. Indeed it is like holding the American by the balls, as European media release intermittently, evidence of the US National Security Agency bugging friendly EU citizens like Germany and Spain and millions of their citizens. The US has been put on a lower moral pedestal in the way it has carried out its surveillance in apparent contempt for human rights and privacy and that is good for Putin and Russia whose human rights records have always been ridiculed by the West. In Edward Snowden’s Xmas message from his asylum in Russia he mentioned the book 1984 By George Orwell which I read at a time when one thought 1984 would never come. Now its gone. 1984 was about life in the former Soviet Union when Russian citizens had their lives watched by the Russian communist government and the book was quite popular then. Snowden said his revelations were spurred by the gory details of 1984 continued by the American government under Obama. Definitely the US government 2013 global surveillance surpassed the rich imagination of even George Orwell who wrote 1984 and that is very bad for the sovereign reputation of a leading global power like the US in the comity of nations. Again, one must commend Russia for giving refuge to a wanted man like Edward Snowden and again give kudos to Vladmir Putin. Next we consider Olusegun Obasanjo, the former Nigerian Head of State’s credentials for this award. That he is charged with threatening ‘National Security ‘by the nation’s Commander in Chief means he has spoken correctly on a most nagging issue and boldly too. For security is an open sore for the Nigerian security authorities, and not only the president. Even the Pope at the Vatican during Xmas 2013 mentioned Nigeria and asked the whole world to pray for Nigeria. Was the Pope breaching our security? Definitely not. Obasanjo has spoken out of deep concern and he remains relevant in Nigeria’s politics as the APC, the expected Salvation Army Nigeria’s politics in 2015 went to greet him even after his letter to the president. Obasanjo’s letter was not a cry of wolf where there was none. It was not a false alarm. It was a letter saying that no leader should go to sleep while there was fire on his thatched roof. Whether OBJ was in a position to build a house with corrugated iron when he lived there, as he did, rather than leave a thatched roof, is not the issue. The issue is that the president, the incumbent can not afford a wink while there is fire on a thatched roof on a house in his care. Nobody, but OBJ’s sense of patriotism has called him into an action – an action that he himself admitted could jeorpadise his personal security as under Abacha. That was a risk above the call of duty or self righteousness regardless of the language or manner of delivery of the letter For that clarion call OBJ like Putin has my kudos, again as a Person of the Year for 2013. Lastly, I wrestle with my choice of Edward Snowden, the ultimate whistle blower as part of this trinity of the Person of the Year 2013. Under normal circumstances, and in any nation and clime, Snowden should be condemned to death for revealing state secrets and thereby threatening state security. This, indeed was what the US had in mind in asking for his repatriation first from Hong Kong, a strong US ally and later Russia a member of the UN Security Council like the US. The response of both nations is now history and both negative. That Time Magazine almost made Snowden its Person of the Year, for good or bad, means the US is not sure what to make of Snowden, who in his Xmas message said that he felt that all that the US needed for information from anybody was to ask and not to spy on them. Yet the US values human rights and that goes with respect for privacy and truth. Snowden is a product of both and the US government after him cannot deny both or him. So Snowden to me has become the Galileo of the Information Age in 2013. Just as the Catholic Church intimidated Galileo, the Astrology sage into refuting the Copernicus theory that the world is round and not flat and that it revolves on its axis, the US Administration is pursuing Snowden for damaging revelation on equally damaging and unexpected surveillance of nations and their citizens. For daring to draw the line in the use of the Computer and Communications and using his technical skills to prod a sleeping world to an apparent misuse of power and technology, Edward Snowden has my commendation and endorsement as a Person of the Year for 2013.

  • Mandela’s legacy, Obasanjo and Jonathan

    Mandela’s legacy, Obasanjo and Jonathan

    Tomorrow in S/Africa , Madiba Nelsonn Mandela , whose body has been lying in state in the Government Building in Pretoria for three days will be buried in his home town. This week 91 heads of state attended a memorial service for the former president of S/Africa as if the UN General Assembly has shifted base to S/Africa to honour the man who served a prison term of 27 years in defiance of the system of apartheid that discriminated against the majority blacks of S/Africa for decades.This was before former President de Klerk called a truce and released the world’s most famous prisoner from prison in 1990. Mandela went on to become S/Africa’s first elected black president in 1994 and refused to serve a second term after his single 5 – year term ended in 1999. This was a man who could have been life president of his nation for the asking but instead he stepped aside to give the younger generation an opportunity to prove their mettle at political leadership. With a single act of denial Mandela showed African leaders that it is not mandatory to cling tenaciously to office and that it is more honorable to quit while the ovation is loudest. For Mandela the ovation was louder out of office and loudest at his Memorial Service this week. Today I pay tribute as a Nigerian to Nelson Mandela and it is not an easy task for me .This is because I have a lot of admiration for the great S/African leader whose body will be interred tomorrow and I hope I will be able to do justice now to my self given undertaking. In truth, I acknowledge that Mandela’s life, sacrifice and leadership evoked in people emotions of guts, courage, defiance and a dogged commitment to principles in the face of overwhelming odds. To many Africans and even to the whole world, as President Barak Obama attested at the Mandela Memorial Service this week, Mandela inspired a global audience to stand up for human rights and dignity without counting the costs, no matter the odds. Today I salute Nelson Mandela, the tall man with the winsome grin, the dancing, arms shuffling S/African leader with the trade mark three piece suits as president. Later, in retirement, Mandela wowed the world with the famous, flowery Philipino shirt which he wore and with which he gave joy and pleasure to the people of the world in the way he carried himself, as if 27 years of incarceration on Robben Island was an ordinary event – when indeed the world is yet to recover from the incredibility and amazement of his surviving such long punishment , even as he makes his final journey to immortality tomorrow . In William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar Mark Anthony said that ‘ the evil that men do lives after them, the good is oft interred with their bones ‘. Mark Anthony might have been speaking of Mandela in Ancient Rome although in different terms as he mourned the great but fallen Julius Caesar in the great Roman Empire then. For unlike Julius Caesar Mandela’s good deeds lives after him while his lapses are easily forgotten. But then, Rome was at the center of the civilised world and this week, and God willing tomorrow, the world will stand in awesome salute of respect and love as Mandela’s body descends for ever into his hallowed grave. As Mandela returns to Mother Earth tomorrow he goes with the fanfare, pomp and pagaeantry reserved for the Emperors of Ancient Rome in those days of yore. For in life as in death, Nelson Mandela bestrode our world like a Collosus just as Caesar was said to have done in his time. Indeed Mandela was our modern Ceasar who represented human dignity, honour and respect and we must thank him profusely for coming this way and leaving us with such pleasant memories of his sojourn of 95 years, albeit with 27 of them in prison, in our midst. We take consolation however in the fact that the spirit of Nelson Mandela like that of ‘Johnny Walker at 120, keeps matching on’ and this time not only globally but very much so in Nigeria. Last week I invoked the spirit of forgiveness and tolerance inherent in Mandela’s life to prevail on ASUU and the FGN to end the strike in our universities and it is nice to see that this week, the two have resolved their differences and signed an agreement which means that studies can resume in our universities. We thank the two bodies for their positive response and resolution of the crisis and wish them the best in their future endeavors. My concern today however is with regard to correspondence between two Nigerian leaders who attended the Mandela funeral but came back at loggerheads from the event. The two are former President Olusegun Obasanjo and incumbent President Goodluck Jonathan. I do not think their disagreements started at the funeral. If so, they will not be alone in that as S/Africans seized the opportunity of the Mandela Funeral to give their President Jacob Zuma a piece of their mind by booing him before an audience that included 91 heads of state. Obviously Zuma must belong to that category of leaders that US President Barak Obama castigated at the funeral for praising Mandela publicly while not emulating his virtues of forgiveness and tolerance in their leadership style at home. More embarrassing for the S/African authorities was the fact that a sign interpreter who was prominently working alongside heads of state as they made speeches at the Memorial was said not to be qualified for the job and has gone missing since the assignment, as the S/African authorities are said to be looking for him. Which sadly showed the state of porous security and corruption in S/Africa and coming with the booes for the S/African president, clearly showed that the ANC government in power in that nation needs to put its house in order urgently, now that the holding presence of Nelson Mandela on the masses is gone. In Nigeria again the spirit of Mandela was manifest in a letter written by former President Olusegun Obasanjo to President Goodluck Jonathan titled ‘Before it is too late‘. The letter as its title said was a desperate call by an equally desperately concerned former head of state to a sitting president that the ship of state is desperately floating rudderless towards a dangerous rock. Given tha OBJ said he was ready to die for what he has said and that he will speak the truth no matter whose ox is gored in the interest of the nation, you could call the letter his’ last testament‘. Also since the letter made gross accusations against the president in his handlingof the PDP crisis, his giving presidential reception to a murderer and using facilities by Abacha’s goons to train security personnel perhaps for the same purpose Abacha used them, then you could label the letter a’ suicide’ note. OBJ’s letter portrayed the president as a serial denier of his intention to contest the 2015 election and the former president said the incumbent president has failed in his imporimportant role in the five dimensions of presidential power that he identified. These are as party leader, as political leader of the nation, as head of government, as chief security officer of Nigeria and as Commander in Chief of the Armed forces of Nigeria. These indictment included the fact that the president was hobnobbing with a drug baron in the ruling party in Ogun State who had an extradition order on his head from the US, a fact he claimed had been ignored by the PDP overall leader. Of course it is easy to tell off the former president for washing the dirty linen of his ruling party in public which this time he has really gone out of his way to do. Even one can tell OBJ that in accepting that he fought and worked hard for those he wanted to succeed him he had opened another can of worms on tampering with the electoral process in Nigeria. Having said that however this missile from the Nigerian leader again showed his bravery and candor in the best spirit of Nelson Mandela , who respected OBJ immensely for Nigeria’s contribution to the anti apartheid struggle during his tenure as a military president and admired him for his courage in telling Abacha off and going to prison for that. Now OBJ in this his ‘testament ‘recalled that he was in prison in Yola where he was sharing facilities with inmates of an asylum nearby during his incarceration by Abacha and wondered what change of status was worse than that for a former head of state . Since OBJ himself is not a saint on the Nigerian political scene, having been twice president with 20 years in between a military and a civilian president when he served for 8 years, I am sure a lot of people will tell him that those who leave in glass houses should not throw stones. But that is for another day as here today we pay tribute to Nelson Mandela who was also a great friend of the former Nigerian president. We can therefore safely speculate that perhaps Mandela’s death opened OBJ’s eyes to Jonathan’s many iniquities and denials like Apostle Saul’s eyes were open on the way to persecute Christians in Damascus. Now OBJ has decided to make a clean breast of the mistrust and misdemeanor of his protege and in the process has opened a can of worms on the security and politics of Nigeria. Surely Nigeria’s politics has been given a big jolt by the OBJ letter and whether you like it or not, it cannot be business as usual. For OBJ has blown a whistle with a loud crescendo and the dogs of war in Nigerian politics cannot wait to make a kill. Like Tony Enahoro reportedly said in 1958 as he moved for Nigeria’s independence in Parliament – This is the beginning of a chain of events the end of which no man can predict. To me really, the OBJ letter is fighting for the soul of the Nigerian state and as he himself said – in a bloody fight no one knows whose blood will be shed last. So for now, we can say – every body for himself, God for us all. Amen.

  • Mandates, strikes and negotiations

    THE Federal government’s threat to sack striking members of ASUU and the digging in , of members of the union , in distributing food stuffs to its members in anticipation of government sack, are two sides of the same coin to me. Both are extreme actions just as alarming as the Boko Haram invasion of Maiduguri that had the Governor of the state wailing that no matter what, Boko Haram will not succeed in driving the people of Borno out of their land. It is my candid opinion that both the Federal government and ASUU want Nigerians to lament like the Borno state governor, before they realise that they are not at war, but are expected to oversee and manage university education in Nigeria, no matter the odds in their way in making a success of that assignment. The FGN and ASUU have no mandate to close down the University system in Nigeria for what ever reason .It follows therefore that Government’s insistence that it had deposited 200bn naira for ASUU in the CBN and ASUU’s food distribution to its members as if in anticipation of a long drought in Nigeria cannot hold water. Why I think along this line is what I intend to say here today, no matter whose horse is gored. I start with a conceptual analysis of mandates , strikes and negotiations with regard to both government and ASUU and proceed to draw conclusions in the light of the performance of both in the Nigerian context. Let me state that I have assumed that both antagonists have lost sight of the clear and ordinary meaning of these terms, or else they would not have reached the present unbelievable impasse and socially debilitating imbroglio. This is inspite of the ivory tower erudition, knowledge and expertise available to ASUU on one side, and the huge resources and experience in terms of helicopter view and huge responsibility expected of government in ensuring that the future of Nigerian youths and education are not derailed by any group of people in Nigeria. On mandates , the responsibilities of both parties are clear. The Federal government has the political mandate to rule Nigeria according to its rules and regulations, as stated in the Nigerian constitution. It is the FGN’s mandate to maintain stability and law and order and to prepare an enabling environment for all institutions to thrive and achieve the objectives for which they were set up. It is the contention of ASUU that the FGN has failed in its mandate to provide the enabling environment for members of ASUU to teach in the universities. But then what is the mandate of ASUU? The mandate of ASUU, as with that of any industrial union , is to look after the interests and welfare of its members . The union went on strike because it accused the FGN of not living up to its mandate of providing infrastructure for the lecturers to teach in a conducive environment in the universities. But then a conducive environment is relative and while certain provisions and conditions are basic, the enabling environment depends on the resources available to government as expected of any employer. No where in the world will employees dictate the type and quality of facilities the employer must provide for them to perform their functions. Similarly if employees see that their employer has the means to provide the wherewithal for them to function optimally, but is indulgent on wasteful spending on other non productive ventures, they can proceed to call the employer to order through a strike as ASUU has done to the FGN. Yet a strike is an instrument of negotiation to call employers to order within a given period. When a strike is ad infinitum then it becomes a weapon of war of attrition, as it is being used by ASUU for now. In European history it was Attila the Hun on invading the ancient Roman Empire who famously said that – ‘ there where I have passed, the grass will not grow again’. I hope this is not the motto of ASUU on university education in Nigeria given their fight to finish approach to their demands on the Federal government and the insistence to be paid arrears before resuming. Similarly I hope the FGN is not being advised by modern Attilas who do not give a dime about university education in Nigeria as they got their appointments in Nigeria because they went to the best universities overseas. Such government advisers should be reminded that ASUU has better qualified products in its ranks who went to ivy league universities overseas and there was no need for the apparent contempt and arrogance with which these government officials have handled negotiations with ASUU on the present impasse. It is my candid opinion that both government and ASUU should always leave opportunities for negotiations open and unending. This is to allow for new ways at looking at issues and reolving them instead of issuing deadlines and ultimatums which lead to confrontations , and recriminations. This is especially necessary as ASUU is fighting for the future of our youths which is entwined in such youths getting the best education in our universities here in Nigeria rather than overseas. The FGN too has to be seen as living up to its mandate and willing to fund education. A nation whose legislators are about the highest paid in the world becomes a laughing stock of the international community when its universities are shut for years, because those teaching there are on strike because they dont have facilities to teach their students. That really is a massive shame on all Nigerians and not only the FGN. Perhaps a story on an ancient feud can still move either the government and ASUU to resume negotiations and open the universities for teaching of students as expected. It is the story of Sultan Saladin the Muslim ruler of the Middle East during the Middle Ages who resisted European Christian warriors and Kings sent by the Pope during the Crusades to capture the Holy sites in the bible in the area . Richard the Lion Heart was a prominent English king who had several battles with Saladin and both grew to respect each other’s fighting skills and prowess. According to the story, Richard had an illness peculiar to the area and could not lead his men against Saladin who asked captured soldiers of Richard where their leader was. On being told he was sick Saladin sent medicine to his foe who took it in good faith, in spite of the forebodings of his aides, and was healed and the two leaders continued their gallant battles, now the legend of history . Both government and ASUU leaders have a lesson to learn from this story in terms of trust and mutual respect. These are the basic basis of negotiations both ancient and modern . In addition, the leaders of Boko Haram should be reminded of the gallantry and heroism of Saladin who cured a Christian king with whom he was at war. Boko Haram’s burning of churches and mosques and the slaughtering of human beings is against every thing, especially the peace that Islam stands for, and should be condemned by all right thinking people all over the world. More importantly it is necessary to remind actors on the industrial relations divide of this ASUU strike that no nation enjoys stability while it youths are idle and unemployed because of crisis in its teaching or education sector. The US, UK and Western Europe from where our present crop of leaders got their glittering array of degrees that have landed them their plomb jobs placed a premium on education and devoted a massive chunk of their state financial resources to develop their universities. That is why we have today the high technologies and communications facilities that have improved the lot of mankind globally today. These nations did not cut corners to give edication to their youths and they never had the sort of money Nigerian leaders are managing and mismanaging today at the expense of the larger Nigerian society especially our youths who are willy nilly the future of this great nation. Without mincing words the way out is for the FGN to review the sack order in the interest of the Nigerian students and undergraduates. For ASUU it should pull back from the brink and ask its members to resume work while it negotiates the payment of arrears. Industrial relations is always work in progress and gains should be gradual and beneficial to all parties and not treated like a once and for all bounty of war. Anything short of this is like saying like the French– apres moi la deluge –which is, after me, destruction- to which I say – God forbid As this piece was ending the news of the death of the great Nelson Mandela broke and old as he was at 95 the news broke the heart of millions all over the world and not only in S.Africa. We mourn Mandela but we shall find time later to pay homage to the global symbol of freedom, dignity and accomodation. For now we urge the FGN and ASUU to pay tribute to Mandela’s memory and Nigeria’s immense contribution against apartheid which led to Mandela’s freedom from Robben Island after 27 years of incarceration. Mandela suffered in prison but came out of it unembitterd. He drew his enemies to himself in reconciliation and did not keep his friends far behind. His life and leadership was a lesson in perpetual negotiation and accommodation that created the beautiful rainbow nation that has survived him. ASUU and the FGN can raise their act to a higher positive level by borrowing a leaf from the book of the departed icon of human dignity and accommodation. It is not too much of an act to follow. Even in Nigeria. Amen

  • Global politics, agriculture and  transportation

    Aside  the  realignment of political forces on the Nigerian political terrain inherent in the defection of five governors from the ruling PDP into the nascent APC,  two  issues on  the Lagos state style of governance engaged my attention and time this last week. The first was the way  the state  under its Governor Babatunde Raji Fashola  is handling  the issue  of achieving its set  goal of  food security through the strategies and plans of its Ministry  of Agriculture and Cooperatives. The second was  the focussed determination  of the Governor  to keep traffic flowing  in the Lagos  Metropolis  for the comfort of its citizenry.  In  stark terms and clear words  the  State Governor told a gathering of  Lagos State Traffic Management Authority – LASTMA  personnel, executives and stakeholders that if they have to choose between booking a traffic offender  and obstructing the flow of traffic, they should let the offender go and let the Lagos traffic  flow  like water at all times.

    Given  the merger of APC  and  PDP  mentioned earlier,  an immediate  media analysis of the political  spread, strength  and national power of the  two  major  political parties in Nigeria has 18 states for the ruling PDP, 16  for  the APC, one  for APGA in Anambra and one for the Labor  Party in    Ondo  State.  If  you do a mental arithmetic  that the governors  of Jigawa  and Niger State did not append their signature to the APC  merger  because they would rather wait till the new year,  together with the EFCC investigations   or  harassment of the Jigawa governor’s sons for  money laundering, you may safely add  two states  to APC’S 16  to  get 18. In addition,  if  you  recall that Ondo’s Labor Party  is closer to APC and  is indeed in its catchment area, then you  can give APC 19 states  out of 36  nationwide.  That  is really  over 50 per cent of the states in Nigeria and that is before the 2015 elections. Indeed the PDP  scribe in reacting to the merger of the New PDP  and APC seemed to  be accepting defeat before the elections when he said that the defectors would come back to the party after the 2015 elections and the PDP  would welcome them with open arms.Which  means that the PDP  has given up  on its defectors while acknowledging their strength and its loss in electoral  and voting prospects  in these  governors’ states.

    However  it  is with regard to the Anambra State elections on which a supplementary election is slated  for today that I want to make some observations. After  this I will  go  back  to  how  Lagos State  is tackling agriculture  and transportation  with focussed  innovation and commitment.

    Almost  all parties  that took part in the Anambra State  elections last Saturday  admitted that it was  and shoddily  organised and that  INEC  officials performed below expectations in terms of availability of materials on time and  on integrity. Post  election, however Anambra State outgoing Governor Peter Obi,  whose party APGA  won the elections said that his government only prevented the other  parties that wanted to rig from doing so and that if the elections were held ten times over APGA  would still win. Which  is not surprising given the fact that no less a person than the President of the Republic came to Anambra to campagn  surprisingly  not for the PDP  but for the return of Obi’s APGA  successor. The President even announced that he was not going to Commonwealth Heads  of Governments Meeting –  CHOGM –  in Sri LANKA    because  of the Anambra state guber elections. Since this was after the President’s pilgrimage to Jerusalem during which he was very much in the company  of the sole APGA  governor in Nigeria,  it is not difficult to guess  why personal loyalty has taken pre eminence over party loyalty. This is because even as the PDP,  the President’s  party  was announcing  that it will take part in the supplementary elections  today,  its candidate at the elections who could not find his name and that of members of his family on the ballot last  Saturday,  was  calling for fresh elections like the other parties that contested last Saturday’s Anambra  state  guber polls. Which  shows that the Anambra state elections has just  jump  the usual  and expected post election razzmatazz and rig marole peculiar  to Nigeria’s elections. These invariably end up in legal gymnastics at the law courts where lawyers and judges determine who wins  elections in a blantant usurpation of the rights of voters who in a free and fair election  in a genuine democracy should choose the winner  the ballot box as at last Saturday in Anambra State.

    As  elections in Anambra  State  were  making a mockery  of democracy in Nigeria, the two events I attended  in Lagos State this week provided a silver lining in the cloudy  horizon of Nigeria’s murky electoral politics, first in agriculture and secondly in transportation. An  army,  it was often  famously said  in ancient times, marches  on its belly. In  modern times however, so also do states, and nation -states, and no state in Nigeria knows and aims at achieving  this more than  the present BRF Administration through its Ministry of Agriculture under the leadership  of its permanent Secretary  Dr  Bashorun.

    I  got  a rare  insight  of  the lagos State food security strategy when  I attended  a retreat organised by the Favorites Club of Lagos under its flamboyant president and the State Commissioner  for Home Affairs,  Prince Oyin Danmole in Badagry last weekend.  The  theme of the retreat was – ‘Social Clubs and Economic Empowerment‘. The State  Ministry  of Agriculture’s  Permanent Secretary-PS-led a team of the Ministry’s Directors  on a presemtation on Agriculture in Lagos State  but it was the PS himself who  was the high priest  and

    high pitch salesman  of the State’s people oriented  approach  to agriculture.  This  strategy  has  the  sole aim of making Lagos State feed its awesomely large population from within the state in all aspects of food  availabilty, production  and sufficiency. More importatntly the state is asking anyone who cares to come and have a stake in the ‘food basket’ project as investors because it knows it cannot go it alone. Which is like asking Lagosians to  come and get wealth and prosperity on a platter of gold by investing in Agriculture with the state providing the infrastructure and helping out with the needed credit and facilities for potential investors and stake holders. To  me that was unbelievable and almost un Nigerian but then, when we  went to the Songhai farm project and I ate an harvested sweet corn,  uncooked  and so delicious, I  knew  something great was happening in Lagos state.  When  I saw Nigerian youths on  training on the farm on the YES- Youth Empowerment Scheme – then  I conceded that there is still hope for Nigeria  in    terms  of meaningful economic planning and development,  starting with the way  Lagos State    government is tackling  food security  pragmatically  and heads on  for positive, socio  economic  transformation of society and the environment in Lagos State.

    The  state’s  transportation strategy has been no less proactive than that in agriculture. I was at a ceremony at which the state governor inducted volunteers from a certain social niche like social clubs and professional bodies as Special Traffic Mayors -STMs.  More importantly the State government made  sure that LASTMA  personnel and officials were present  at  the ceremony. Before  that day my opinion of Lastma  and its officials  was that of  overzealous and crooked street and highway officials bent on ruinning the business land scape of Lagos through daily extortion of road users and business vehicles for one traffic violation or the other. Such  bad eggs in LASTMA – including  the one caught  on video soliciting for bribe mentioned by the governor who said his dismissal was  a fait accompli even though he was still on the run-will certainly sit up knowing that STWs  are on  the prowl and can identify them  if they are involved in corrupt practices . The  way the governor showed his commitment to flowing traffic  left no one in doubt that he knows the importance of transportation to the growth of trade and commerce and political stability of Lagos state and the entire Nigerian nation.

    It  is necessary to look  again  at what Lagos state has done,  from an historical and global  perspective. In  Egypt  where  the government is clamping down on  protests on the streets and in the universities because it deposedthe  elected government of President Mohammed Morsi, a  government  had  been brought down before by food riots in Cairo  and the major cities in Egypt. This was the regime of Anwar Sadat  who brokered peace with Israel.  Sadat  himself was assassinated by a soldier who was a member of the Islamic Brotherhood which resurfaced    recently to win Egypt’s first  free  elections in history. Before  Sadat  was assassinated his regime was unpopular because of the high prices  of bread,  the staple food of Egyptians.

    Since Sadat was a dictator he repressed the food riots until an assassin caught up with him. That clearly  illustrates the importance and relevance  of  food security to political stability in any political system.

    Similarly  in Brazil  during the  last  FIFA  organised Confederation  Cup  won by Brazil  there were riots in  many cities in that nation  as the competition approached  and during its duration. The  protesters were agitating that even though they love soccer their  standard  of living did not reflect that of  citizens of a nation hosting the  Confederation Cup  not to talk  of the World Cup which Brazil  is hosting next year and the Olympics  which it is hosting in 2016. Which  meant  all  the hard work Brazil’s former President Lula da Silva did to  secure hosting rights for Brazil would have come to nought because the Brazilian government did not carry its people along while gunning for  the highly  prestigious  sports

    hosting rights for their pleasure while they suffer in the midst of plenty. Really  what  did the protesters ask for? They complained of long hours – about 4hours- in commuting to work daily to and  fro, high food prices, poor infrastructure and high education costs. The Brazilian government has reacted favourably and has committed  a certain percentage of its new oil revenues to education and infrastructure especially transportation.  But really the Brazilian government  not need to wait for street riots before looking after the welfare of  its people by carrying them along  government  plans to  entertain  them  as  well as look after their welfare.  May  be the  Brazilians  need  to borrow  a leaf  from the Lagos State  book on agriculture and transportation  that I narrated before    Perhaps Lagos State can offer  a helping hand  to  our Brazilian brothers especially as they  and our Governor have a mutual love of the lovely game  of soccer . That will certainly be  a pleasure and  yet another people  and export-  oriented  approach following on the clear  success in agriculture and transportation  in Lagos State, here in  Obodo  Nigeria.

  • How elections create legitimacy

    As Nigerians go to the polls today to elect their legislators it is necessary to dwell on the issue of legitimacy again as I have done in recent past in the hope that this time around Nigerians will not vote in vain as in the last three elections of 1999, 2003 and 2007 in our great country. Legitimacy is the legal authority for power of rulers or political leaders. In a democracy, elections are the main rituals for elected leaders to obtain legitimacy. The more transparent the democratic process especially in terms of free and fair elections the better the quality of legitimacy and respect for any political system in the comity of nations and vice versa. Especially nowadays when democracy is the fashionable and ascendant ideology after the collapse of the defunct USSR under Mikhail Gorbachev’s policy of glasnost and perestroika which focused on openness and transparency in government. By the way a birthday concert was held last Wednesday for Gorbachev’s 80th birthday in London’s Albert Hall at which a prize named ‘The man who changed the world’ named after Gorbachev, who was the last head of state of the defunct Soviet Union which collapsed in massive street demonstrations similar to the on going ones in the Arab world, in 1991.

    There is no gainsaying that in Nigeria the 2011 elections and campaigns have generated more interest and excitement amongst the competing contestants and the political parties than among the electorate which is supposed to vote the contestants for power into office.The reason for the apathy and apparent suspicion of the Nigerian electorate is both historical and sociological. Elections have rarely been free and fair in Nigeria and a political culture has evolved around the pattern of a prostrate electorate acquiescing with the results of a manifestly rigged election in the hope that this time around the crumbs from the table of power of the new or renewed government will be more generous than hitherto. This has made rigged elections acceptable as a way of life, albeit a bitter pill to swallow, so that the business of governance can go on as usual in all tiers of government in the name of our unique democracy.

    The difference this time around however is that those organizing the elections have promised that the electorate will not be shortchanged in terms of rigging and that the elections will be free and fair. I hold four centers of power in the electoral process responsible for this promise based on the crucial role of their antecedents predecessors in earlier elections in this nation. These centers of power or institutions are the Presidency, the Police, INEC and the judiciary. The Presidency, Police and INEC are largely credible in my estimation of their preparations but I can not honestly say the same of the judiciary and I will explain.

    The President of the Republic who is a contestant has gone out of his way to say that people should not rig, but just vote for him and I believe him for the simple reason that no incumbent seeking reelection has ever said that in this nation before. Some of his supporters say he is suffering from inexperience and naivety and that he has shot himself in the leg for disowning the time tested weapon of re -election in our unique brand of democracy. All the same I believe this incumbent president and presidential contestant.

    The Police Inspector General has moved Police State Commissioners unexpectedly out of their domain to new places for the duration of the elections and I believe these movements will stem the tide of rigging somewhat. Although the ACN has called for his removal over events in the South East I doubt if that is possible for this 2011 elections. Also the fact that the INEC Chairman has called on the SSS to help monitor INEC staff at polling booths nationwide to ensure they follow the electoral process to the letter shows that INEC will not cover up for its erring officials as has been its modus operandi in the past .

    It is with the judiciary sadly that I see the Achilles heel of our latest electoral odyssey of great expectations for a free and fair election starting today. The leadership of the Nigerian judiciary as at the start of this election is a divided house. The Chief Justice of Nigeria has a petition against him on corruption from a colleague the President of the Federal Court of Appeal who has also refused promotion to the Supreme Court. The two are the leading lights of the temple of justice in Nigeria and are expected to deploy judges to handle election petitions arising from the elections starting from today Nobody has spoken so far of their being removed or suspended for conflict of or divided interest so as not to rock the boat of the electoral process which is bound to hit a judicial rock sooner than later with such litigious captains in charge.

    Yet, the judiciary is the vehicle expected to give legitimacy to our electoral process. It is expected to adjudicate in electoral disputes and its high priests in the temples of justice at all tiers of government are to swear in elected officials according to our constitution. The law says he who comes to equity must come with clean hands but I do not think that is applicable to the Nigerian judiciary at the beginning of these 2011 elections and the consequences and prospects of that are quite grim to contemplate for now. In judicial terms one can only hope for the best and prepare for the worst in terms of justice in our electoral system this time around.

    Nevertheless , every cloud has its silver lining and our 2011 elections can not be an exception. Nigerians like all electorates globally have an opportunity that come once in four years to elect their leaders. Fortunately or otherwise we are doing this at a time when the Arabs of the Middle East have taken to the streets to throw out their leaders for corruption, dictatorship, autocracy and decades of misrule. The street demonstrators have found sympathy with the leaders of the democratic world led by the US, and EU nations namely France and Britain. Indeed at the EU and NATO Conference on Libya attended by US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton this week it was resolved that Libya’s dictator Muammar Gaddafi had lost all legitimacy to rule his people and should just go. This is in spite of the UN resolution which is the mandate of the Coalition, saying explicitly that the Coalition forces are in Libya to provide a no fly zone over that country and are not there for regime change.

    Since then no less a person than US President Barak Obama has said in a state broadcast in the US that living Gaddafi in charge after Coalition intervention makes Libya a dangerous place for world peace. Obama stressed that it is the duty of the international community to protect unarmed Libyans against Gaddafi but it is the responsibility of Libyans themselves to determine the manner of his exit. Both David Cameron the UK ‘s PM and Obama have stressed that UN resolution restraint not withstanding, they will not rule out giving arms to Libyan rebels to dislodge Gaddafi. Which means the die is cast for the Libyan leader and his days are very numbered since he cannot match the fire power, experience, military skills and technology of the Coalition out to save his people whom he called rats and varmins at the start of the Libyan uprising.

    In terms of our own elections and the choice of who to vote for we can learn something from the reasons and causes of the fury of the Middle East masses against their dictators and political leaders. From Tunisia to Egypt to Saudi Arabia to Yemen to Bahrain to Libya and now to Syria the ruling elites and families have been in power for too long and have remained insensitive to the economic needs and yearnings of their people. Instead they used the police and a highly motivated quasi- military security apparatus to monitor their people; to cut them to size and jail any dissident without trial while using torture with impunity as a form of deterrence against any opposition. This was the situation in Tunisia under Ben Ali for 24 years; in Mubarak’s Egypt for 32 years; in Saleh’s Yemen for 32 years to date; for decades to date under the ruling House of Saud in Saudi Arabia; and in the 41 years of late Haffez Assad dynasty and his son who has been in office after succeeding his father 11 years ago .So the fury that drove the Arab masses into their streets and squares which the dictators built for celebrations consisted of corruption, nepotism, tyranny, high handedness, aloofness, and lack of respect for democratic values generally.

    To me then the virtues we should look for in choosing who to vote for in these 2011 elections are the opposite of what led the Arabs to revolt so massively against their leaders in the on going street revolution convulsing the Middle East as we know it today. Which means that Nigerians should from today vote for leaders who hate and do not practice corruption and nepotism ;leaders who have respect for democratic values of the rule of law ,accountability and transparency; leaders who are responsive to the wishes of those who elected them.

    We can of course add the Nigerian flavor by pointing out or reminding ourselves and our political contestants of our present needs and problems which could lead to street democracy and demonstrations like those in the Middle East if they are not attended to by the elected leaders in the elections starting today. These are rampant lack of electricity for good quality of life and for growth of industries leading to unemployment and redundancies; lack of security of life and property in our cities and villages; poor health facilities; poor and dangerous roads and infrastructure generally. Since election times are times of great promises by power seekers and great expectations by the electorate we ask Nigerians to vote wisely and pick new leaders who will be responsive to their needs as promised during campaigns. For now at least electing our leaders through the ballot box is infinitely better and less rowdy than the ongoing massive street democracy of the Arab world.

  • Technology, the Military  and Disasters

    The  typhoon that hit  the Philippines so  cruelly this week has shown in stark terms that  the war between man and nature is far from over. It  has also  shown that  even though  technology can identify disasters  like typhoons as well  as their deadly speed-  which was 310 km per hour in the Philipines typhoon – no technology can as yet predict the level and volume of human and physical disasters to follow. That  was what made the Philippino disaster so gruesome  and awesome to beholdand  its fury brought to a global audience suck in by the unique majesty and brilliance of information technology and  the unique  ubiquity  of the internet. Global  empathy was instant and profuse and whilst one wept at  the sight of nature  making nonsense of humanity with impunity,  right before our eyes,  the US military

    shown like a million stars  in the gallant way its cargo planes brought desperately needed relief materials and succor to  the far flung areas of the Phillippines devastated  by this highly destructive   typhoon.  From  the bottom of my heart I say ‘ God bless America’ for that and I  really mean that,  no matter what I may have written about the US  of recent especially with regard  to  its policy on Syria.

    Let  us  put  emotions  aside  now  and look  today at the good, the bad and the ugly side of the Phillipines disaster  and the reaction of its government , and  the international community. We shall also  appreciaite  the satellite TV stations whose reporters brought the carnage wrought by nature to us  all in our living rooms and places of work. The  role  of the military  in Egypt where the imprisoned former President Mohammed Morsi has issued a letter through his lawyer telling Egyptians that Egypt will never regain stability unless the  rule  of  the military that removed him from office is terminated by the Egyptian people. Which is like a call to arms. This call will be examined along side the news that  the Russians are talking with the Egyptian military on many issues including the sale of arms. Which  means that in diplomacy  as in life itself,  nature abhors a vacuum given the fact that the US recently stopped arms sale of F16  fighter jets to Egypt in protest  at the military coup  in Egypt. We  finally examine the implications for Nigeria of the US designationg Boko Haram and Ansaru  militant groups  as foreign terrorist  organisations and thereby blocking all US  financial transactions with them.

    Again,  I doff  my hat to the US  military’s  humanitarian intervention  in the Phillipines  to save lives, although  given the US  military’s pedigree in logistics and movement  of men and material, one should not be that surprised. I  once read  a case study from Havard University detailing how the US navy moved men and materiel  to Saudi  Arabia during the first Gulf War  involving coalition of 15  nations mustered for the war by  the UN  and  US President George  Bush Snr  and it was the greatest movement of personnel  and equipment in history at that time. This time speed and size were also in dire need and the US military responded in kind. A war  ship was moved towards  the Phillipines to enable navy helicopters deliver relief materials faster  and in greater quantities . The US  military has shown its human face in saving lives and human dignity  by  its reaction to the typhoon in the Phillipines and it is   a  face of mercy and kindness  which is scarcely associated with the same military  that the Pakistanis and Afgans will  forever associate with drone strikes and missile attacks. More importantly the US has shown the Philippino  people that it is a friend in need while  China which promised half a million dollars but increased that to $1.6m has shown  that the typhoon disaster  has not built  bridges over territorial disputes it has with  the Phillipines .And that  really shows the Chinese in poor light in terms of humanity and that is really a pity.

    In  addition some Philippines  news media have criticised their President  Aquino and government for not reacting fast enough and I think  that was unfair given the fury and speed of the Typhoon which was said  to be the fastest and largest on land unlike Katrina that landed on water. This  is  because there is no way any human capacity can spontaineously meet  such a massive challenge of nature and the Philippines leadership is no exception . In addition when CNN’s seasoned  reporter Amanpour was interviewing a  Phillipino Minister immediately the disaster struck she was asking questions about corruption in the Phillipines which I thought  was uncalled for at that stage and I am happy that  that  trend of coverage was abruptly ended  by the  well respected network  . It was replaced by the stories of professional CNN reporters  who betrayed no emotions as they narrated and showed  moving episodes  and faces of those grieving for their loved ones . I salute  the devotion to duty of these reporters but I do not think some bit of emotion to show at least that they are not drained of it or,  are, at least not enjoying the tragic  spectacle,  would have been out of place .

    In  Egypt however the face of the military  which has seized power and is preparing its Commander in Chief to contest in the next presidential elections is  anything but inviting or humanitarian given the challenge posed by Egypt’s deposed but democratically elected President  Mohammed  Morsi. There  was no natural disater in Egypt this week but the  politics, events  and  demonstrations  of the last few months have claimed almost as many lives as the typhoon in the Phillipines.  Now  the military  have  lifted  emergency rule but  the elected president is on trial and has called for a jihad  to remove the military  which deposed  him  from  power  and is trying him in court.

    The  problem in Egypt is a ding dong battle between democracy and the miltary and the miltary are winning . The Americans were  supposed to check mate them but they looked elsewhere  instead and even refused to recognise  a coup in plain sight. Instead they  scuttled  an arms deal involving high tech F 16  war  planes . But  the  Egyptian military dont need war planes to disperse demonstrators. They  need batons and tear gas,  tanks  and masks  and they have them in abundance in Cairo. In  addition I am sure  that the Russians  will provide  any way the equivalent of F16 jets to the Egyptian military. The deal  will surely be consummated before the US  comes back from the diversion created by China and Russia over Iran’s nuclear sanctions talks  and change of attitudeby its new leader at the last UN General Assembly. However  by the time the Iran sanctions talks collapse ,as it will soon do,  it  will be clear that the Americans have been sold another dummy  as in Syria . By that time however  the Russians would have put their  feet in the door  firmly  at least to sell high tech jets to the Egypptian  military  and dig in as they have done with Assad  in Syria.

    Lastly the  immediate effect  of the categorisation of Boko Haram and Ansaru  as foreign terror groups to the US  is  to freeze the accounts of these groups and those associated with them. It  also means that it is not only the Nigerian army that is fighting them. More importantly it may mean that the US  may send drones to Nigeria. That then takes the war on terrorism to a new dimension in Nigerian terms. Which  to me shows that the Boko  Haram threat  has been  handled with kid gloves by Nigeria  and the US has taken the fight out of our hands. What  then are we having the  big ,  well trained military at our disposal for ? Even though some time ago the Nigerian president asked the US  not to  do what it has just done, I  have no doubt in my mind that it pays some vested interests  in our security  apparatus to internationalise the Boko Haram menace and they have surely succeeded. How  the army or the military will react to this Americanisation of the Boko Haram threat will define the success or failure of the Nigerian state in the months to come.

  • Changing cultures, transparency and development

    Edward  Snowden , the  American  whistle  blower on spying was like a traitor when the news broke on the internet that he had exposed intelligence on the US government spying on its allies. Last week however there was serious talk that he was being considered for the Nobel prize for transparency. In  Europe , the EU  court ruled  this week, that Africans asking for asylum in Europe on grounds of persecution in nations where gay  marriages and homosexuality are banned,  can be considered for asylum in Europe. In  Nigeria, at long last , the president of the Republic finally met with University teachers who have been on strike for four months , asking that funds be provided to make infrastructure available to teach in the  nation’s university environment for which the Coordinating Minister of Finance had  earlier  said  the  striking lecturers were asking for the moon.  In  Italy  the Catholic Pope Francis called  a conference on what he called modern slavery including child labor and prostitution to save the world’s poor and fight global poverty. In similar mood  the World Bank and the EU  pledged $8bn in aid to develop the Sahel from where Al Qada  and Boko  Haram  have sprung to threaten  the political stability of not only Nigeria but the entire  ECOWAS  sub region and indeed Africa as a continent.

    The  news items  and issues I have highlighted today look  interesting and  innocuous enough,  but they  are deceptively so, as they concern  matters  that I have labeled as ‘changing cultures’ but which  are in reality  – culture shocks  – that are highly polemical as my analysis will show. Let  us first dwell  on the amazing and unbelievable situations  that these news items have thrown up  at least  this week alone  . In Britain , the security chiefs  of Britain’s spy industry  were summoned to open questioning by Parliament and these were the bosses  of M5 , MI6  and  GHCQ, powerful  institutions which  have  been the stuff  of James Bond and other spy films that one once thought that such institutions were the stuff  of fiction  and do not really exist.  Again,  who  could have thought that the same EU providing money for African nations to fight a security threat  in the Sahel  they don’t see yet, let alone appreciate,  is also giving asylum to  African  gays and lesbians who are  just  aberrants against the way of life  and culture of the people amongst which they live? Also  who  could have thought that a president –  whose wife went to S Korea to receive an honorary degree whilst  the  universities in her husband’s  nation were closed on strike by lecturers-could have compunction and decide to talk directly to the striking lecturers  that the nations funds  minister had earlier  branded as unreasonable? Similarly, one had  been used to  Catholic Popes living in Palaces  in the Vatican and being chosen  as, ’the best dressed’  men in the world, but now we have the pleasant and humane surprise of a Pope planning how to stop children  and prostitutes drifting into a life of crime, drugs and terrorism. Really  it is a new day  and dawn  in terms of the changing cultures of our times and  the  expectations and  import  of that for  world peace,  security  and economic development. Yet  as we will  soon see,  it is not all that glitters  that is gold.

    Let  us start  our journey  again by looking at the cold facts of the issues raised today and  see the lessons to learn to  improve our world  and  ease  the tensions of  international relations  and diplomacy .First  the downside  of the Snowden revelations is that it has endangered international relations  and introduced conflict and suspicion amongst friends and allies spying on each others citizens and institutions not to talk of incumbent leaders. But as one of the spy bosses told British parliamentarians,  spying involves getting information from other nations that they may not want to give and protecting information that are vital to national interests  and security.

    The  comforting side is  that Snowden or not,  both the British and American legislatures  were impressed with  the response of their spy bosses to the questions prompted by the Snowden revelations  and that was apparent in the hushed reverence with which the spy bosses were  treated, in spite of the hullaballoo that accompanied their summons to the two legislatures. Which  shows again that where security is concerned,  transparency has a limited flight of fancy  and accountability, and that is  a lesson indeed for developing nations adopting democracy hook, line and sinker as the panacea  or solution to every    problem  of  governance,  economic management and environmental equilibrium in the real  world.

    In effect then,  the Snowden revelations have blown the cover of Western intelligence and spy bosses but the governments are adopting a response strategy of crisis management that  I  have called ‘dog does not eat dog’ – which is another way of allowing sleeping dogs to lie in the overall  security  interest  of all  friends, stakeholders and parties  concerned. That  to me is a sensible  response to an embarrassing intelligence  quagmire  that  Snowden willfully created to bring the  security  roof  down  albeit  unsuccessfully  in  the western hemisphere.

    I  shall  take the three  issues  of asylum for gays fleeing homosexuality ban  in Africa,  the EU  and World  Bank  fund to develop the Sahel  and the Pope’s devotion to help children and prostitutes escape modern slavery as he put it, together. Again the issues that bind the three developments together  are cultural  and humanitarian with a tinge of ethnocentrism  and  urgent security need.  I see ethnocentrism in the European court ruling in a case brought from Holland on Africans alleging persecution on account of being gays. Though the European Court has ruled that such Africans can be considered for asylum which is binding on all EU nations, the court also asserted that the existence of a ban is not sufficient ground for granting asylum as evidence of persecution has to be shown. Which is what brings in the issue  of ethnocentrism. The EU Court has deemed European culture superior to those of nations like Nigeria  and Uganda where homosexuality is banned, and that is a sociological blunder as no culture is really superior  to the other. Indeed the implementation of the ban in the nations concerned is not a problem as that is the African way of life. The implication of the EU ruling is to provide cheap  opportunities for those Africans  fleeing from other problems to cash in on the persecution proviso  when indeed they cannot really stand up to be counted on their sexual disposition in such societies.

    On the massive $8bn  aid  to the Sahel , I see the hand of the World Bank boss Jim Yong Kim  at play . This new Group MD  of the World Bank  has committed himself  and the global bank to poverty alleviation by 2030  and is pursuing that goal. He deserves commendation for bringing  the EU  on board. The EU  is contributing $ 6.75 bn – 5bn euros  and the World Bank, $1.5bn . But, again, the EU  is  investing in its security as it knows that the Sahel  has been the new home of militant terrorism especially Al Qada that fled Afghanistan  only  to show up in Islamic Maghreb  and North Africa and has resurrected in Boko  Haram in Nigeria’s North East  and  lately the Syrian  crisis.

    That  was why France had to intervene militarily in Mali to stop the invasion of that nation  when ECOWAS was getting too slow to act. The rationale for the World Bank  and EU aid is to provide infrastructure, jobs and security for the nations bordering the north of west Africa which is called  the Sahel  in the hope that that would reduce ready recruits for Al Qada from the jobless, roaming and idle millions of Africans youths looking for ways to make ends meet and make a future  for themselves. By  strengthening the Sahel economically  and sustaining its growth the EU hopes to reduce terrorism targeted at the European mainland by Al Qada and militant groups recruiting African youths effortlessly by giving them  training and  ammunition to  disrupt the stability of African nations in the Sahel  on religious grounds  and excuses. That  really  is a promising venture  and one expects the EU  and World Bank  to have enough monitoring skills to ensure that the funds are used for the desired purposes  and not high jacked for selfish ends by politicians and thieving bureaucrats very active in the Sahel environment.

    It  is in such light that I look  at the never too late intervention of the Nigerian president in the ASUU  strike  and pray that it  is concluded positively and the students return to their schools.

    Inevitably  such idle students  have drifted to prostitution, drugs, terrorism  and crime  from  which the EU, World Bank, and the Pope are trying    to help  out. One  expects this president not to yield to pressure from the owners of the private universities who think they cannot prosper except they kill the public universities by making sure that they encourage government to starve them of funds. It  is not in the interest of such private universities as the environment will be so charged that sooner than later they too  will not function on security grounds. That  is the stark truth to face on the  urgent need to resuscitate  university education in Nigeria  in the best interest  of the future  and  security  of our nation. What  is good for the goose should  surely be sauce for the gander.

  • Power, business and politics

    The  influential  and well known Forbes  Magazine has released  its annual list of the rich and mighty  of the world  and as a Nigerian I am proud  that Nigeria’s Business  mogul,  Alhaji  Dangote at No 41 on the list,  is the most powerful  man in Africa . I  am sure that  the self – effacing  Nigerian business man who  made Dangote Sugar and Dangote Cement household  consumer  products in Nigeria  will be very amused by the categorization  which puts his assets at $16.1  bn .This   really should have made him the richest man in Africa and not the most, as even in Nigeria he himself will  be the first to admit that  he is not the most powerful, not to talk  of Africa.

    The list  has the first four most powerful persons  in the world as Russia’s President Vladmir Putin who  displaced US President Barak Obama to second place, with China’s President Xi Ping in third and Pope Francis, leader  of the Catholic Church,  as fourth. It  is my contention today that Forbes  erred in categorizing our Dangote as the most powerful man in Africa and should have categorized him as the richest and most socially responsible African,  given his public spirited philantrophy which  marks him out as a rare fish  in the murky waters of African politics and business; not to talk  of the corrupt cesspool in Nigeria from where somehow and some what, Dangote  has been successful to raise his head and those of  his many businesses above water  and  shine  globally like a million stars. I go  on to tell the publishers of Forbes Magazine that in Nigeria the most powerful man is the occupant of Aso Rock,  our presidential palace  and  it does not matter whether  he comes from Sokoto or Kano or from the creeks of the Niger Delta  or even Abeokuta or Minna  the two  towns  to have produced two former heads of state in this nation to date. The  incumbent at Aso Rock wields enormous power in Nigeria and that is what the 2015 elections is about to confirm and that does not mean the situation is right or wrong . It is plain reality  and political pragmatism which the highly influential Forbes magazine has ignored  to put  extravagant search light  instead  on a hard working Nigerian providing jobs and opportunites  for millions  of Nigerians regardless of their race, tribe or religion  by  assessing him on the wrong criterion of political power.

    Today  however  I comment on the first four most  powerful men in the world  and show why and how they deserve such honor, and my reservations, if any, on the categorization. I then sneak in some observations on the announcement by the President  Uhuru Kenyatta of Kenya that he has opened a web site for Kenyans to  send information directly to him on corruption and corrupt officials in Kenya. Of course I  will  attempt a comparison with Nigeria in the light of Oduah gate  and the  Nigerian government’s approach  to the fight against corruption.

    On  the honor of being the most powerful man in the world,  let me first of  all congratulate the Russian president, especially for displacing the American president from the No1 slot. I say  this with all seriousness because no one has worked harder than the judo black belt Russian to hold on to power by all and any means and restore Soviet pride now ably replaced by Russian diplomatic power and now acknowledged globally by this Forbes Magazine recognition. In similar vein, no one  has been more assiduous than  the current US president and administration in ensuring that the US loses its premiere position or that of its president as the most powerful man in the world and the reasons are there to see even though they appear  lost in plain sight in Washington. To  me the Syrian  crisis and Obama’s handling of it after blowing hot and cold, torpedoed the US president from  the most powerful man in the world and ceded it to Russia, the nation that held the US by the balls and backed the butcher of Damascus to the hilt in spite of the use of chemical weapons which the US said several times it had evidence of its use, but could not muster  the will  topunish the culprit nation-Syria. Instead,  Russia under Putin put its feet down behind Syria and outsmarted US  foreign policy by floating a bait of  chemical weapons destruction which the US swallowed  blindly and forgot its pursuit of limited strike for the use of  chemical weapons on its own people by  the Assad Regime holed up in Damascus.

    The US diplomatic blunder in Syria has given a global boost  of recognition  to President Putin which can only magnify his hold on power and boost his popularity  at home, while making life more difficult for opposition Russian leaders who  have been encouraged to challenge Putin’s leadership in the last parliamentary and presidential elections  at US instigation and  offer to provide local support and international monitoring of violations of human rights by the Putin  regime. This categorization of Putin  as the most powerful man in the world makes his position in Russia unassailable as  this  has boosted the ego,  pride and patriotism of Russians that  now  has returned to its  pre eminent position as a rival to the US as in the Cold War  era  of the Soviet Union. Certainly  the US loss  of prestige in this Forbes categorization is Russia  and Putin’s gain indeed.

    With regard  to China’s President occupying the position of the third most powerful man in the world  I  see that as a very temporary situation indeed. In  a couple of years I see the Chinese leader occupying the No 1  slot as the most powerful  man in the world. I see him overtaking the US  president  who in a year’s time would have become a lame duck president and who right now is battling with even his allies to explain why the US National Security Authority has been bugging the leaders of friendly sovereign states –  especially Germany as revealed by the Snowden files being published at random by the European press. Again, as  if adding salt to injury the US

    Treasury Department in its latest report  this week queried the manner  and  direction of  economic growth of Germany based on exports and said that it is not good for EU growth which really was in bad taste at least in terms of timing.  On its own, in terms of global diplomacy China has been a consistent ally of Russia in foiling US attempts to act on Syria  and  is  also  the largest buyer of US treasuries. Given new Snowden files revelation that the US  asked Japan  to help it spy on China and Japan refused,  there is no limit to how low US prestige will plummet over the Snowden spy revelations especially with China. For  now China is busy making new friends with low interest infrastructure loans in Africa  especially Nigeria at a time when developing nations are shying away from IMF  loans and its never ending repayment arrangements and    socially destructive conditionalities. Yet  China  is a communist nation de facto and de jure,  with one million Communist Party of China card carrying members, lording it over a billion Chinese people. For now China holds five year party conferences to review party and government programs and changes its leaders once in 10 years  and that creates stability according to Chinese leaders. Which really is contentious but it depends on the type of democracy you want or hanker after  and its objectives and values.

    With regard to the fourth most powerful man in the world, Pope Francis, there is not much to say other than that he is certainly very different from his predecessor Pope Benedict xvi  the first Pope in 600  years  to abdicate. Benedict  XVI  fought cultural wars against gays and lesbians, abortion and insisted that the Catholic church must resist such’ fashions of the times‘ and remain  loyal  to its dogmas. But  the church  under him was plagued with the stigma of charges of child abuse  by priests and massive compensation  by the church  to avert embarrassing  trials. Pope  Francis has come in to highlight the plight of the poor and the care of prisoners like

    Francis of Assisi before him. In  addition Pope  Francis  seems to be asking for reprieve for gays and a need for married priests which may roughen some nerves in Africa  on cultural grounds. Yet  the Pope commands a lot of respect and love as his first act on being  made pope was to ask  the multitude to pray  for him. I have no doubt that he has the intellectual fibre to carry  the  millions  of the world’s Catholics with him but he certainly needs prayers  on gay rights and same sex marriage in Africa where the Catholic Church is growing fastest,  globally.

    Lastly  President Uhuru Kenyatta’s web site on corruption is a step in the right direction but Kenya should learn to respect cctv footage first to combat crime, terrorism  and corruption. This week two security operatives were  sacked  and jailed for looting during the West gate Mall nightmare in Nairobi. But  instead of Kenyan authorities acting swiftly on the clear cctv footage, they first asked the press  how it got the information and ominously  on  the use of unauthorized information. That certainly will deter people from visiting the Kenyan president’s web site to give information on corruption as no one wants to enter a  powerful security booby trap.

    It  is similar to the situation on our own Oduahgate when government‘s  first reaction was to find out  who  the whistle blower  was instead  of swooping  on the  NCAA  with security operatives. In the interim in spite of the daily revelations the Minister travelled to Israel to meet the president on pilgrimage and to sign an aviation treaty. Meanwhile  the National Assembly Committee on the matter was quarelling that the Minster had refused to meet it as requested for over 10  times which really is a grave charge if true. On  my part I

    think the Minister  should be given her day in the National Assembly when she returns from her Israeli  trip. Who  knows what spiritual transformation she could have undergone to make her explain  the reasons for the armored car purchases. Certainly if Saul  could be transformed on the way to Damascus a similar thing could happen to our besieged Minister as Israel is not far from Syria. The danger however is that modern Damascus  is under fire and going to Abuja may seem the same  to this Minister. Which  really, under the circumstances is a  great  pity indeed.

  • Leaders charting new paths and deals

    Today  I deal with personalities  as I  take  on the topic of the day. The aim is to show  how the personalities, reputations  and even utterances of  certain leaders precede them in what they do   or   say, in or out of office. We  take on global  leaders, incumbents in position of power   including   those widely regarded  as opposition leaders,  alternative leaders, or leaders in waiting in their various political systems  or sub regions   on   the actions   and news concerning them in the last one week.

     We  focus on    first on     Nigeria ‘s  APC  leader  Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu  and the business lecture delivered on his behalf by the Governor of Oyo State Senator Abiola Ajimobi   on the topic – Nigeria: Charting a  New Path to National Rebirth, last  Wednesday  at the 70th Anniversary  of Nigeria’s premier social club, the Island Club.  We  then take  a look  at US  President Barak Obama’s legacy project Obamacare and the challenges   facing it when its web site collapsed as people tried to access it  and the socio- economic  impact of   that development on Obama’s   legacy as  the first US  president to initiate such a  massive  Health Care project in the US. Next  we consider the views of Nobel Laureate Aung San Su Kyii  of Burma that Burma’s dictatorial  constitution has to be changed before she can ever hope to be president. We also  examine the US bugging of the phone of German Chancellor  Angela Merkel and the insistence of the German Iron lady  that the US  must be called to order  in spite of the very close ties   between both nations.

    We  go back to the Island Club 70th Anniversary lecture  of Asiwaju Bola Tinubu  whose  announced topic was Nigeria :  Yesterday, Today  and Tomorrow  until  Senator Abiola Ajimobi  announced the n topic’s  theme as  –  Nigeria: Charting A New Path  to National  Rebirth,   a title   which also determined the topic of this column  today. Naturally one would expect the Asiwaju,   as Nigeria’s virtual  and  foremost    opposition   leader  to do justice to the   announced  topic given his well known   devotion  and dedication  to analyzing Nigeria’s political and historical problems  as a pragmatic  and respected  participant observer of the growth and development of the Nigerian nation state. But  Asiwaju  switched   the topic and praised the Island Club  to high heavens before  dissecting and analyzing   the nation’s history  and growth or descent to decay, in his  usual vivid and enticing style reminiscent of the  witty anecdotes in his book – Financialism –  Water From An Empty Well; How  the financial system drains the economy, co  authored with former US  Consul, Brian  Browne.

    According to Asiwaju – ‘Drawing its  members from innovative  and   creative  segments of society, Island Club  was  from the start  set  to be great …Though   older than  Nigeria, the Club still shines. Unfortunately the glow of Nigeria has turned to dross ; the nation is a gem  obscured  by the grime  of      venal  and  menial leadership.‘   Actually  in adopting the new title as his theme, one   could again expect at  the lecture the usual  tirade of an opposition leader against a present political leadership that he has scant respect for,  which perhaps would have made the lecture boring. But  that was not to be, and that was due to the genius of Asiwaju’s  representative who delivered the lecture with such humorous  and witty jokes such that there was not a dull moment throughout the business lecture. Senator Abiola Ajimobi showed at the lecture what Former Minister of Sports Chief Akinyele meant  when representing former head of State  IBB at  a similar function  he said –  ‘when you  have seen the hand  of the tiger, you  have seen the tiger’  . The  Oyo  State Governor was in his element in terms excellent service delivery in the way and manner he   presented his leader’s paper. His jokes had the audience reeling with laughter  most  of the time. His  assertion during the Question and Answer Session, anchored  by  me, that he was  speaking for himself  on the answers  but was sure that his views and that of Asiwaju would coincide on most matters because they have been together for so long,  earned him and his leader  the respect and attention of a captive audience at  the lecture.

     The  witty Oyo  state governor set the ball rolling with the funny  story of how he came to be chosen by the Asiwaju to represent him at the lecture. At  a meeting in Abuja,  he said, Asiwaju wanted to show his APC  colleagues that he was fully fit after his knee surgery so he asked the governors to join him in a 100 meter dash with the proviso that the last man would represent him at the Island  Club lecture  –  and while Asiwaju came first  he Senator Ajimobi  came last and that why he was in Lagos. In addition he told his  wildly  cheering and laughing audience that he was selected because he was the oldest of the APC governors who were members of Island club – and there  was  no way the result of the race could  have  been different.

    Humor aside,  the contents of the lecture were brilliant,  decisive and vintage Asiwaju. I will  illustrate with  some juicy comments and quotes . Asiwaju  lamented in the lecture   thus  – ‘And  where  does  Nigeria   stand today? Today  we  loiter on the road of confusion because we are guided  by leaders who  themselves need guidance. The dream of a robust and great nation hood has been deferred . Nigeria now limps  and pleads for crutches  to help it,  just to stand.’  On  the proposed National  Dialogue which he called a Greek gift  on his return  from surgery  Asiwaju  noted – ‘Yes   we  need to talk. I remain an ardent supporter of the  call for a national conference  that is sovereign and open to all . That  is the only route out of the woods. We  must bring Nigeria back  on the path of true federalism. A  stage managed  affair  scripted   and monitored  to achieve the narrow political aims of narrow  political minds in Abuja will do nothing but whet  confusions appetite . Anything short of a Sovereign National   will be  like trying to apply a bandage to a tornado ‘. On  manufacturing Asiwaju noted that – No  populous nation ever reached   prosperity without a vibrant manufacturing sector. It is this sector that is  the  mainstay of urban employment, just as farming is the main stay of rural jobs. However our manufacturing sector shrinks under the policies of the present government. As   it shrinks so do the job opportunities of that vast army of city dwellers‘

    On security,  Asiwaju noted that the present administration said  it has the situation under control. ‘If  this is control he  concluded,‘ I  dread to  see how lack  of control looks. In  Boko  Haram, the nation faces  its largest challenge since the civil war. In  conclusion the APC  leader lamented painfully –‘We live in a land that is ours but is ruled by a government  that does not belong to the people because it does not like them. Nigerians want   democratic  governance, economic development, broad prosperity, justice, equality, moral purpose and human dignity. At  that point,   he   concluded  the state of the nation can be a state in which we are all proud and in which we  can live as a free people‘

    Surely  it  is such sentiments that Asiwaju has highlighted to drive Nigeria forward from  premises  of the Island club that has motivated the other world leaders we are focusing on today  albeit  in a different context. Obamacare is about more Americans getting heath care access and insurance  in the richest nation on earth where such favors are absent . President Obama has made this the flagship achievement of his administration and Congress has approved it. Yet  at the last dialogue on expanding the US debt ceiling, the Republicans wanted to make it a bait for discussion and scuttling it and Obama put his foot down that the deal had been done and that was why he was elected for two terms and Obama care was  not to be debated. Now  the website for accessing Obamacare  by an enthusiastic millions of potential beneficiaries has led to a crash but Obama  is not fazed. He  has acknowledged the problem and  has announced that the best IT brains in the world have been assembled to sort out the problem and keep Obama care afloat by all means. That  is how leaders should behave as they are not   expected to sleep on their watch  and see their  legacies derailed either by design, unintended results, sheer sabotage or outright enmity and lack of goodwill as in the issues surrounding ObamaCare and its implementation in the US.

    The  same dilemma faced  Burma’s Opposition leader  over a law directed at preventing her personally  from becoming president of her nation . This is a law  that bars women with  sons for foreigners from becoming president of Burma.   Suu Kyi  has two sons for a Briton who died while she was  in prison. The law was put in place when Suu Kyi was in detention after the Military  prevented her from claiming the victory  in the presidential election she won in that nation before. Now  the Military government through her role and intervention is getting global recognition  for  moving towards  democracy,  but has not removed the vile law and Suu Kyi  is not ready to buy that and is crying foul. She  is also alerting a gullible world  that the dictatorship  in Burma while seeming to move towards  democracy on the surface, is still a wolf in sheep’s clothing, until it amends  the obnoxious  part of Burma’s constitution concerning her.  Again,  the Burmese Nobel  Laureate  has  spoken boldly no matter whose ox is gored especially as the amendment concerns her and not with standing the fact that the military  in Burma still has total control  of the constitution  and any intended amendment. Again  a global leader  has shown bravery  in drawing attention to a human right flaw in the face of great personal danger and I cannot but doff my hat to her.

    Similarly German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s insistence that the US and Germany must reestablish the  trust  in their relations over the bugging of her phone is brave, timely  and correct.The US  has denied as expected  and has assured Germany that this never and would not happen ever. Yet  the US  is feverishly looking for the US security contractor whistle blower that Russia has given asylum somewhere  in Russia. It  was interesting seeing the German Chancellor fretting with her hand phone while seated by  US President Barak Obama  at a previous state  function on CNN. One  was left wondering what could have  been going on in the US president’s mind in the light  of Angela  Merkel’s phone being bugged as now revealed. Anyway,  the German leader has shown the US that even though their two nations may  be close allies and Germany may be a junior military ally  of the US  and in NATO,  such bugging of friendly leaders is indecent and is not to be tolerated. Which  is like saying  clearly  that  even amongst friends ‘your freedom ends  where my nose begins’. Which, again  is fine by me, no matter  the security or diplomatic closeness, protocols  or camaderie   of all parties  involved.