Category: Sunday

  • Polytechnic Education: A Recipe for Visionary Leadership and Governance in Nigeria

    Polytechnic Education: A Recipe for Visionary Leadership and Governance in Nigeria

    The 19th Convocation Lecture of the Lagos State Polytechnic, Ikorodu, Tuesday, March 8th, 2010.

    Excerpts.

    But what is a polytechnic?  As the name implies, a polytechnic is not a university. But this ought not to be a crime but a mere emblem of distinctive identity. In its classical state, a polytechnic  is a non-university higher educational institution focusing on vocational education. There are three factors at play here which often account for the erosion of parity and esteem when the polytechnic community is compared to the university community.

       First, is the false notion that because polytechnic education is mainly vocational, it is merely functional and work-driven. This notion ignores the fact that in certain disciplines, a polytechnic education is more rigorous and quality driven than their university-based counterparts. This explains the preference of employers in fields such as banking, Finance, Engineering, Accounting and Technology for polytechnic graduates over their universities counterparts. In these fields of human endeavour, the polytechnic graduates often arrive “perfectly tuned” and programmed for easy and immediate absorption.

         Second is the binary divide traditionally erected between university education and polytechnic education which makes one inaccessible to the other. Although a carryover from our colonial heritage, this divide ignores the reality  of cross-breeding, cross-carpeting, cross-fertilisation and the transfer of talents and human resources between the two types of education that have existed across age and human societies.

      The third factor arises from the fact that entry-level qualifications for polytechnics tend to be lower than those for universities and the staff generally less qualified. While this is true, this stigma ignores the human capacity for self-improvement and continuous exertion. There are sandwich degree programmes and other avenues for self-realisation for those who start the relay race of education at a disadvantage. In certain circumstances, teachers with lesser qualifications, because they have more to prove, are generally more focused and more ferociously determined to impart quality education than their better qualified colleagues. Although there is usually no short cut to pedagogic distinction, it is so that under the right atmosphere, these disadvantaged students and teachers often come into their own, and it is where you end up that matters rather than where you begin from.

      The example of Albert Einstein again readily comes to mind. The German-Jewish genius was a famously lazy, sloppy and inattentive student. But this was not because he was mentally challenged but because the precocious boy had greater issues on his mind. Einstein was bored to death by the banality of his teachers and as he himself was later to put it: “Since I hated authority so much, God made me an authority”. How many potential Einstein would have been destroyed in the grinding gridlock of the Nigerian educational system?

    Read Also: Senate Face-off: The many lives of Natasha

      In Nigeria, the stigmatization and discrimination against polytechnic education began right after independence when the first Cookie Commission of Enquiry set up a salary differential between university graduates and their polytechnic counterparts. Even worse is the fact that in universities, you cannot join the council in congregation unless you are a degree holder.

    In 2006, the Nigerian federal authorities took what at first appeared as a bold and courageous step to harmonise  and consolidate tertiary education in the country by virtually abolishing polytechnic education. Inaugurating the technical committee, Ufot Ekaette, the then Secretary to the Federal Government, noted that no country could achieve scientific and technological breakthrough when less than fifteen per cent of the populace have access to university education. According to him, the existing facilities were so oversubscribed that the entire educational system faced an apocalyptic meltdown.

    On the face of it, this seems to be a revolutionary and radically innovative development; an admirable example of visionary and proactive governance. But on closer examination, there seemed to be something sinister and radically obtuse going on. There is no evidence that the momentous conclusions were arrived at after a holistic, exhaustive and comprehensive study of the country-specific needs of tertiary education in Nigeria. Had there been a more crucial interrogation of the dynamics of technological and societal under-development in the nation, the conclusions might have been different.

      Several decades later, the country is still jogging in the jungle of misguided modernization. Once there is no organic nationalist elite bent on driving the project and process of modernity, a nation labours in vain.

  • Donald Trump: How Europe must react to the Disruptor-in-Chief

    Donald Trump: How Europe must react to the Disruptor-in-Chief

    Concluding his essay, ‘They say Zelensky wont walk alone’, last week, Palladium asserted, and  correctly too,  that after nearly half a century of close relationship with the US and dependency on the Transatlantic accord to guarantee global order and security, Europe should now begin to acknowledge  that such hopes

     have become anachronistic, all because of President Donald Trump’s shambolic politics since his second coming.

    Which, of course,  is quite a shame because in his first term in office, President Trump did so much for the Transatlantic alliance in spite of his acerbic  comments regarding  Europe’s defence spending which in many cases was as low as 2 per cent of the respective country’s GDP.

    During those 4 years, President Trump did, arguably, more to bolster Europe’s security than any US president since Ronald Reagan. It is on record, for instance,  that his administration implemented policies that significantly strengthened NATO, and US commitments in Europe.

    As reported by Luke Coffey in his article ‘Despite the Bombast, Trump Never Turned His Back on Europe’,

    of 8 November, 2024 Trump’s administration  ensured that there were more American troops stationed in Europe than when he took office. The US also increased military exercises and stationed forces further east, including in Poland.

    Under him, US defense spending for Europe, through the European Deterrence Initiative, was more than 40 percent greater than under the Obama administration. His record on Ukraine equally deserves mention. He was the first US president to provide advanced anti-tank weapons to Ukraine, where his predecessor, Barak Obama, offered only non-lethal aid. Trump also supplied air defense and anti-tank systems to Georgia within his first year in office, something the Obama administration  resisted for a whole eight years.

    Read Also: The case for a Tinubu second term

    As an aside, Nigerians would recall that as against Obama’s refusal, citing rights abuses, President Trump enabled the sale to Nigeria, of the Super Tucano A-29 aircrafts which can be used for both surveillance and attack for use  against Boko Haram.

    In Europe, President Trump championed the Three Seas Initiative, led by Poland and Croatia, which aimed at enhancing infrastructure, connectivity, and trade across Central and Eastern Europe. His administration withdrew from the Open Skies Treaty, and welcomed North Macedonia and Montenegro into NATO, thus strengthening the alliance”.

    At his second coming in January, 2025, Russia had not only invaded Ukraine, it has engaged in a merciless war with Ukraine since the previous two years.

    For Trump, this would appear to have changed everything.

    So unremittingly has he supported and canvassed the Russian viewpoint, in the process obdurately pressurising Ukraine’s President Zelensky, that the suggestion has re- echoed again,  that the Russian President probably has something on Trump with which  he could be blackmailed.

    Under Donald Trump’s presidency therefore, the idea of relying on the Transatlantic accord to bring peace to Europe has become unthinkable.

    The Transatlantic accord, which has been the cornerstone of European security since World War II, is no longer a viable solution in today’s complex geopolitical landscape.

    During his first term, his rhetoric often made European leaders uneasy, but in spite of that, and as shown above, his administration  demonstrated copiously that he was committed to European security.

    However, his second term, barely a month and a half, has sparked great concern in Europe. As things stand in Europe today, EU’s largest economic powers, Germany and France, are presently weakened by economic and political crises, making them seamingly more vulnerable to external threats than hitherto. This, unfortunately, is the point at which Trump has made the US completely unreliable. Happily, however, Europe has become well aware that it can no longer rely solely on the Transatlantic accord to ensure its peace and security.

    Besides the above, the Transatlantic accord was forged in a different era, at a time when the US and Europe shared a common enemy in the Soviet Union. Today, the geopolitical landscape has dramatically changed. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and Trump’s complete volte face, have reshaped the  alliance. 

    Additionally,  Europe is now facing new challenges, including terrorism, migration, and economic instability, among others.

    In this new era, therefore, Europe must take greater responsibility for its own security. Her increased defence spending, and greater commitment, to her  security as demonstrated at the recent meeting in France are developments in the right direction, and therefore, welcome even though, more needs to be done.

    Europe must develop her military capabilities as well as improve its cybersecurity, and enhance its cooperation with neighboring countries.

    NATO remains a vital component of her security, but its role must evolve to address the new challenges.

    There is urgent need for increased defence spending to a minimum 5 per cent by member nation as Trump has never ceased to urge.

    NATO’s expansion into Eastern Europe has created new tensions with Russia.

    Indeed, many say it is the ‘casus belli’ for the Russian – Ukraine war. Europe must find a balance between its commitment to collective defense and how to avoid Russia hiding under that to pursue its expansionist designs.

    There is also the additional challenge of the impact of US tariffs on the economies of Europe. The EU’s decision to impose retaliatory tariffs on US goods has further escalated the trade war to a point Trump has been bandying about the possibility of imposing a 200 per cent tariff on goods from Europe.

    Unfortunately, you do not know exactly when the man is serious as he imposes tariffs today, postpones it for 30 days but doubles it the next day, making it of immediate effect.

    Thank God not many statesmen are wired like that.

    It is heartwarming that before Trump introduced this new global trade instability, the EU was already far into looking for new trading partners amongst countries in Asia, South America and Africa.

    It is gratifying too to know that no matter how difficult it may be initially, Europe will never permit Trump and his MAGA accomplices run roughshod over her.

    But above all, she must not give up on Ukraine. It must not let that beautiful, and mineral rich, country become one for a deal between an extravagant Deal Maker and an unreflecting Russian leader whose only wish is to run over Eastern Europe.

    For its precious minerals, President Trump will give Ukraine away without batting an eyelid.

    Even if the Russian – Ukranian war will become a 30- year war, Europe must stand ramrod behind Ukraine knowing, for a certainty, that Trump will be history in 4 years.

  • Fubara and Politics 102

    Fubara and Politics 102

    In a 31 December, 2023 article titled “Fubara and Politics 101,” this column outlined aspects of politics that Governor Fubara needed to pay attention to. These include: “One, the interest of the Governor and the state, on one hand, and those of the Governor’s presumed supporters, on the other, may be diametrically opposite. … Two, a good politician knows that genuflections and affectations of love for an incumbent office holder are superficial and usually end as the tenure of the holder ends. … Three, as in play-fighting by goats, real politicians do not normally fight with their eyes closed, do not fight to finish and rarely hurt one another fundamentally while fighting. … Four, political feuds between political associates are like elixirs.”

    With his governance style, it is not clear how much Governor Fubara has given these lessons consideration. But his standing in the eyes of the law is clear. The Supreme Court in its lead judgement of 28 February, 2025 delivered by Emmanuel Akomaye Agim, Justice, Supreme Court, remarked: “The Appellant [Governor Fubara] that has passion in violating the provisions of the Constitution that he swore to uphold with impunity, disobeying Court’s order at all will using his immunity under Section 308 of 1999 Constitution as a cover is breaking the bridge over which he himself will cross. … My Lords, democracy is anchored on the rule of law not on the rule of might.”

    Justice Agim further noted: “A government cannot be said to exist without one of the three arms that make up the government of a State under the 1999 Constitution. In this case, the Head of the Executive arm of the government has chosen to collapse the Legislature to enable him govern without the Legislature as a despot. As it is there is no government in Rivers State.”

    The first lesson in Politics 102 which Governor Fubara therefore needs to hold dearly is that, whatever his motives may be, he should subject his actions to the test of due process and the rule of law.  In this regard, the lead judgement by Jamilu Yammama Tukur, Justice, Supreme Court, held that “In consequence of the failure to abide by the extant provisions of the Electoral Act Regulating the conduct of the election to the Local Government Areas in Rivers State of 5th October 2024 the said election is hereby declared invalid pursuant to the Provision of Section 150(3) of the Electoral Act 2022.”

    Read Also: The case for a Tinubu second term

    Moreover, on the presumed defection of the 27 lawmakers, the Judgement delivered by Uwani Musa Abba Aji, Justice, Supreme Court, ruled: “Similarly, the media was agog also with the charade and façade of defection from PDP to APC by the Hon. Martin Amaewhule-led members of  the Rivers State House of Assembly. However, while the media most times may deal with public opinions and comments, the court of law deals with facts, which are sacred. … In the instant case, the evidence of defection of the 27 lawmakers of Rivers State House of Assembly to APC has been left in the limbo or completely not present for this court to act upon.”

    Citing Section 96 of the 1999 Constitution which provides that “The quorum of the House of Assembly shall be one third of the members of the House,” Emmanuel Akomaye Agim, Justice, Supreme Court, noted: “4 out of 31 members of the Rivers State House of Assembly cannot by any stretch of imagination constitute required quorum for transacting a legislative business of the Rivers State House of Assembly. The conduct of the Appellant in presenting the Appropriation Bill to 4 out of 31 members of the Rivers State House of Assembly is a gross violation of Section 91 of 1999 Constitution as amended he swore to uphold when he took the oath of office and oath of allegiance of the Constitution.”

     As a result, the Court ordered as follows in the lead judgement read by Justice Agim: “(1) The Central Bank of Nigeria and the Accountant General of the Federation should forthwith stop releasing and paying to the Government of Rivers State, its organs, departments and officials any money belonging to the Rivers State until an Appropriation Law is made by Rivers State House of Assembly constituted as prescribed by the 1999 Constitution. (2) The Right Honorable Martin Chike Amaewhule and the other 26 members should forthwith resume unhindered sitting as Speaker and members respectively of the Rivers State House of Assembly. (3) The Rivers State House of Assembly should resume sitting with all elected members forthwith.”

    The second lesson in Politics 102 which Governor Fubara has, incidentally, learnt through direct experience is that political relationships are dynamic, and that old mindsets cannot be used to conduct new businesses.   This is exemplified in the Governor’s visit to the Rivers State House of Assembly on 12 March, 2025 without a clear and mutually agreed understanding of what the preliminary processes should be.

    According to the Governor, speaking in front of the locked gates of the Rivers State House of Assembly, he was at the House “to comply with the Supreme Court judgement. Before my arrival, I’ve already made several attempts by phone call to reach the Speaker and other members. I also did a letter personally which was transmitted to the Honourable Speaker for this particular invitation. But it’s unfortunate that, at the gate, you can see that the place is completely sealed and there’s no sign that anything is going to happen today. … Well, I don’t think there’s anything to worry about. Maybe, they’re working on the letter. I expect to hear from them, maybe after this hour.”

    In the letter personally signed by the Governor and dated 11 March, 2025, and published by Channels Television on 12 March, 2025, he wrote: “[We] wish to notify Mr. Speaker of our desire and intention to present the 2025 Rivers State Appropriation Bill to the Rivers State House of Assembly on Wednesday 12 March 2025 by 10:00 a.m.” It appears as if this letter and the unsettlingly short ‘notice of meeting’ rather than ‘request for meeting’ did not make allowance for due bureaucratic processing of the letter. It also seemed to have been underlain by the attitude that the Governor, rather than the Speaker, had the overriding say in the scheduling of the legislative budget presentation meeting. The Governor himself probably recognised the problem with this presumption when he said: “Maybe, they’re working on the letter.”

    Moreover, was an advance party of the Governor’s aides not expected to have been at the House of Assembly to assess the situation on ground and advise their principal appropriately? The spectacle created at the gate to the legislative complex where a helpless Governor Fubara was shut out was not sufficiently elevating, especially considering the fact that he had in the past called that same complex “my property”. The status of the legislators has been immensely enhanced since the 28 February, 2025 Supreme Court judgement. The Governor should therefore desist from any conduct that has the potential to demystify him or attract indignities to his office.

    The third lesson is that any politician who intends to go far should identify successful or influential politicians and read their lives like a book. Governor Fubara should realise that the only shortcut to experience is vicarious experience. He needs to ask himself the following questions: How have or do they handle benefactors, ingrates and political peers? How have or do they navigate obstacles? How have or do they deploy silence? And when they decide to speak, how have or do they do it to ensure that their opponents pay attention?

    To cite one example, if Governor Fubara didn’t know of President Tinubu’s political sagacity as at 18 December, 2023 when he brokered a peace deal between the feuding sides in Rivers State, at least he knows the President’s political far-sightedness now that the Supreme Court has settled the legal issues in the Rivers State Peoples Democratic Party crisis. In both the Abuja resolutions and the Supreme Court judgement, Governor Fubara has been asked to recognise the 27 pro-Wike lawmakers and re-present the state’s budget to the whole House of Assembly to repair the travesty of having questionably presented it to only 4 or 3 lawmakers loyal to him. At a meeting with a delegation of the Pan-Niger Delta Forum (PANDEF) at the Presidential Villa on 11 March, 2025, President Tinubu advised Governor Fubara to obey the Supreme Court judgement, and enjoined PANDEF to help him to do so.

    The fourth lesson of Politics 102 is that a politician needs to maintain a very sharp focus. The focus dictates consistency, prioritisation of interests and sacrifice. Governor Fubara has noted that a lot of the state’s resources have been wasted on the crisis. It was therefore hope-inspiring that while commissioning the Judges’ Quarters on 11 March, 2025, the Governor acknowledged, with due deference, the presence of legal luminary Sir O.C.J. Okocha, SAN, whom he had publicly demeaned in the past. However, he followed this with the crisis-perpetuating act of treating the House of Assembly members with less than due respect with regard to the ill-advised hasty attempt to visit the legislature to re-present the budget on 12 March, 2025.

    Governor Fubara needs to be advised that paying the 27 legislators their withheld salaries and entitlements does not require a meeting between them and the Governor.  There are records of the value of each legislator’s salary and the number of months for which it was withheld. As a measure of goodwill, the Governor should just direct the appropriate financial officers of the state government to pay the outstanding salaries and entitlements. He should avoid any foot-dragging that could question his sincerity regarding working towards enduring reconciliation.

    The fifth lesson is that, as William Shakespeare put it, sweet are the uses of adversity. All of the crisis in Rivers State may yet make the state a model of democratic practice. Since there seems to be a balance of forces between the Executive and the Legislature in the state, it may not be misplaced to hope for free and fair Local Government elections. If that happens, it would present the nation with a salutary model different from the cases in some states where, in their Local Government elections, election victors emerge without election figures.

    The situation has become so bad that there are widespread calls for the scrapping of the so-called State Independent Electoral Commissions charged with organising Chairmanship and Councilorship elections. Should proper Local Government elections be held in Rivers State, Governor Fubara would be the acknowledged champion of that democratic rebirth.

    In the coming days, the Governor will be receiving all sorts of advice. May the ones which will ease his troubles be sweeter to his ears.

  • Rise, rise and rise of capitalism XI

    Rise, rise and rise of capitalism XI

    We left the statesmen of Europe luxuriating in the euphoria of the success of a conference which had been called to ensure that the continent of Africa was parcelled out among interested European countries. The  dismemberment of Africa was the main reason for the Berlin conference. But more than that, to do so without letting slip, the dogs of war. Germany which was determined to find her place in the sun could not have been satisfied with the result of the conference. Even then, at least she came away with the satisfaction of not having to put her new army in the field to fight for that desirable place in the sun.

    The Napoleonic wars came to an end with the defeat of Bonaparte, the self crowned emperor of the French at Waterloo in 1815. This can now be recognised as being the last act of the French revolution which had convulsed Europe for more than twenty years. This made it possible for the industrialists in the different countries of Europe to really come into their own as the relative calm within the continent allowed them to concentrate on business. The serious business of industrialisation. The only downside was that the unity which had brought about the defeat of the French could not be maintained. The rivalry generated became increasingly militarized as each country pushed their trade agenda into other parts of the world. After all, each country needed overseas areas of interest within which to thrive and were not shy of doing whatever was necessary to stake their respective and competitive claims. Britain, with her massive claims on the markets of India, the USA and indeed all over the world was the preeminent industrial power within this period and was in the position to rule the industrial roost.

    Given the tremendous flow of riches into Britain at this time, one could be forgiven for thinking that Britons living in that period were well fed. On the contrary, the situation on ground was dire and on the verge of being desperate. In the closing years of the eighteenth century, the situation in Britain was best captured by Thomas Malthus. According to his observation, the population was growing exponentially but good availability which was growing in arithmetic progression was lagging far behind. It was only a question of time before the system descended into utter chaos if not total war.  It was made clear that this observation applied to the members of the working class. After all, the members of the upper crust has the wherewithal to cater for their own physical needs and It could have any number of children they wanted without let or hindrance. The future of humanity was therefore in the hands of the intemperate working people who were given up to all kinds of vices. Down the ages, it has become clear that the dire predictions credited to Malthus have not come to pass but they have not gone away either. There are still many people, some of them, quite influential who equate large populations with sexual and other incontinences. Recently however, enlightened views have shifted from this position. The realisation is that, managed sensibly, global resources can be stretched out to cover many more billion people than are currently accommodated on the planet at this time. The  Chinese experience on this matter deserves some exposition.

    Read Also: Senate Face-off: The many lives of Natasha

    Worried by the demands of a population growth which mirrored Malthusian concerns, the Chinese government, in an attempt to slow down the rate of population growth imposed a policy of one child per couple. In typical Chinese fashion, this policy, in spite of several unforeseen circumstances succeeded to bring the desired halt to what was regarded as an impediment to desirable rate of population growth. Within a short period of time there was such a hefty turn around that the one child policy was not only scrapped but has been replaced with incentives for people to aspire to have more than a replacement value of 2.1 children per couple. The success of this new policy will not be seen for quite a while but this period is likely to be stretched to cover two of more generations. This example shows up the fundamental importance of population growth to societal development.

    The Indian situation provides another example of population dynamics. In the sixties, the fear was that extreme poverty had become hopelessly endemic in India and the situation was viewed by the Indian government with Malthusian specs firmly in place. The objective adopted was to slow down what was regarded as a runaway juggernaut through a vast programme of sterilisation of both men and women. Many tubes were tied in both men and women. Nobody knows how many births were prevented through  this crude exercise. What was immediately clear was the political fallout. In the first place, a state of emergency was declared by the Congress government of Indira Ghandi and it was under this pressure cooker environment that compulsory sterilisation of men and women took place. It was not a good time for the sexual health of men and women in that country and before long, the government became extremely unpopular and the programme had to be reversed. Ironically, the programme also failed and today, India is the most populous country in the world, having recently knocked China off the top spot in the global population league table. It is intriguing that today, the size of the Indian population is no longer perceived as a threat to human development because not only are there close to 1.5 billion Indians, the dehumanising poverty and hunger of the sixties have been drastically reduced and her huge population has been converted into an asset. This is what is happening all over the world. Nigeria at more than 2.1% annual growth rate is currently the fastest growing country in the world. The implication of this on our development is best left to the purveyors of demographic studies.

    It should be pointed out that demography has been identified with the initial rise of capitalism in eighteenth century Britain. For reasons which are not yet transparent, the population of Britain and indeed the rest of Europe began to rise quite dramatically from around 1750. This coincides neatly with the beginning of the Industrial revolution. Some scholars think that there is a cause and effect situation here and the jury is still out on this. Over the two or three centuries preceding this date, the rate of urbanisation increased in Britain. Although the conditions in the early cities were incredibly hostile to population increase, they were still better than what obtained in the rural areas. This being the case, a slow but steady increase in population took place so that by the time the industrial revolution kicked off, there was a large number of potential workers on ground to drive the process forward. Thereafter, both population growth and the level of production of industrial goods went forward hand in hand. There were hands enough to work in the factories and mouths enough to consume the goods being produced. It is not difficult to imagine that a new world was being created.

    Over time, the appalling conditions which were characteristic of the factory towns of Britain were gradually ameliorated. This made it possible for the  people to begin to enjoy improved standards of living. This led to a precipitous drop in the rate of infant mortality which allowed the population to increase.

    As Malthus pointed out, the availability of food was a crucial factor to longevity in Britain at the end of the eighteenth century. His fears about this was shown up graphically when less than fifty years later, successive potato crop failures forced a million Irish people to emigrate, most of them to the USA whilst another million of them starved to death. This proved that Malthus was correct in his assessment of the situation in his time. What he could not take into consideration was the imminent improvements in living conditions, healthcare, including the availability of vaccines. His concern about food was reduced drastically with the increase in the volume of global trade which made the importation of food into Britain possible. However, it was not until 1846 when the Corn laws which allowed the importation of grain into Britain were passed that food became relatively cheaply available to working class Britons. This situation soon spread to the rest of Europe except Russia thereby fuelling the rise of capitalism on that continent. All the changes occurring at that time gave a great encouragement to the increase in global population which reached the figure of one billion for the first time in human history in1830. The next billion took just ninety years to arrive. The next six billion additions arrived in the next one hundred years leading to fears once again that global population was going to outstrip global resources. But then, we have been there before. Those fears may never be translated into reality.

  • Tinubu’s promise to the youth

    Tinubu’s promise to the youth

    There is no greater wealth in a nation than its youth. President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has made it clear that his government is not just aware of this fact but is actively working to secure a future where Nigerian youths thrive. His actions this past week underscore his commitment to investing in young Nigerians, a population that makes up approximately 60% of the country. From inaugurating the Planning Committee for the National Youth Congress to reflecting on Nigeria’s past economic missteps, Tinubu’s vision remains clear—Nigeria’s progress is tied to the strength, intellect, and adaptability of its young people.

    On Monday, President Tinubu fulfilled a promise he made in his October 1, 2024, Independence Day address by inaugurating the committee tasked with organizing the National Youth Congress. This initiative, he stressed, is not just another political gesture but a crucial step toward ensuring that the voices of young Nigerians shape the nation’s trajectory.

    “You represent over 60% of our population”, Tinubu told the committee members. “You’re the heartbeat of our nation, and I hope you’ll take this opportunity very seriously”. His words reflect an understanding that the youth are not just the leaders of tomorrow—they are the force of today. With their energy, intellect, and adaptability, they can drive the changes needed to create a prosperous and self-reliant Nigeria.

    But Tinubu’s commitment goes beyond rhetoric. He assured the youth that his administration is open to their ideas, urging them to speak freely about their concerns and aspirations. “Look at me in the face, tell me whatever you think is wrong and the way you want things done or suggestions. We’ll try to implement all of it as long as it is for the prosperity of this country”, he declared. This is a rare and powerful invitation—one that positions young Nigerians not as passive beneficiaries of government policies but as active participants in shaping the nation’s future.

    While the President’s engagement with the youth signals his focus on the future, his remarks on Thursday, when he met with his former National Assembly colleagues from the aborted Third Republic, provided an honest reflection on Nigeria’s past. Tinubu did not shy away from acknowledging the economic missteps that have plagued the nation for decades.

    Read Also: Senate Face-off: The many lives of Natasha

    “For 50 years, Nigeria was spending money of generations yet unborn and servicing the West Coast of our sub-region with fuel,” he lamented. “It was getting difficult to plan for our children’s future”. These words reveal a painful truth: successive administrations had failed to invest in long-term economic sustainability, instead opting for short-term fixes that jeopardized future prosperity.

    Tinubu’s decision to remove the fuel subsidy, a move that initially sparked hardship, was borne out of necessity. “When you remove oil subsidy, you’re protecting the future of generations yet unborn”, he explained. His reforms may have been difficult, but they were necessary to prevent economic collapse and build a stronger foundation for national growth. Today, those reforms are beginning to yield results—exchange rates are stabilizing, investor confidence is improving, and food prices are starting to decline.

    Despite these economic challenges, Tinubu remains optimistic about the potential of Nigerian youth. His message is clear: the future is in their hands, but it is up to them to seize the opportunity. “Mine is to help navigate and push and lift the heavy weight problems so I can clear the path for you to have a very great future”, he told the Youth Congress Planning Committee.

    This is not just talk. The President is backing up his words with actions—creating platforms for young people to contribute, implementing reforms to stabilize the economy, and encouraging youth participation in governance. He understands that empowering the youth is not just about providing jobs; it is about equipping them with the skills, opportunities, and confidence to drive innovation and national development.

    As Tinubu humorously admitted, “I like you, I can’t be youth again, maybe in the next life, I’m envious of all of you”. This statement, while lighthearted, underscores a deeper truth: Nigeria’s young population has an unparalleled advantage. They possess the energy, creativity, and resilience to shape the country’s future in ways no generation before them could.

    Tinubu’s government has set the stage, but the work is far from over. The youth must take this opportunity seriously—not just as participants in a congress, but as architects of a new Nigeria. They must engage, innovate, and hold the government accountable to its promises.

    For the first time in a long time, Nigeria has a leader who recognizes the power of its youth and is willing to listen. The question now is—will the youth rise to the occasion? If they do, Nigeria’s future is not just secure; it is bound for greatness.

    Steering Economic Recovery and Political Stability

    Besides making good of his word of assurance to the nation’s youth demography and highlighting the ruins the profligacy of past leaderships have inflicted of the future, for which reason he has decided to take the harsh path to growth, President Tinubu’s week was defined by two other key engagements—an Iftar dinner with governors and ministers, focused on economic progress and a meeting with Pan-Niger Delta Forum (PANDEF) leaders addressing the political crisis in Rivers State and other issues. In both, he reinforced his commitment to economic stability and political resolution.

    At the Iftar dinner, which held in the State House, Tinubu reviewed Nigeria’s economic trajectory, acknowledging the collective effort that has begun stabilizing the country. Reflecting on the challenges faced upon assuming office, he said, “When we started, it was like fetching water from a dry well”. However, progress is evident—food prices are stabilizing, investor confidence is returning, and reforms are taking root.

    His message to governors was clear: “Continue doing what we’re doing, do more for our people.” He emphasized prudent financial management, urging leaders to “spend the money, not the people.” Reinforcing national unity, he described Nigeria as a “house with different rooms,” highlighting the need for regional harmony within a united nation.

    On Tuesday, Tinubu met with PANDEF leaders, who raised concerns about the Niger Delta, particularly the political turmoil in Rivers State. Despite his previous interventions, the crisis persists, with both sides involved in the crisis resisting reconciliation efforts.

    “I have intervened and counseled the governor. I told him again to pursue the path of peace and stoop to conquer,” Tinubu said, placing the responsibility back on PANDEF. He urged them to ensure the implementation of peace agreements and respect for the Supreme Court’s ruling.

    “This is a nation ruled by law,” he reminded them. “I should not be here as President if there was no rule of law.” While acknowledging past missteps, he assured the people of Rivers State, “They will not suffer for the democracy we all pulled together.”

    Beyond politics, Tinubu highlighted ongoing economic and infrastructure projects, urging PANDEF leaders to support regional development. He cited the coastal highway and port upgrades in Uyo and Calabar as game-changers for the region’s economy. “Send someone to see the progress. This is a huge economy with opportunities,” he encouraged.

    He also praised the Niger Delta Development Commission’s leadership and reaffirmed his administration’s commitment to education and healthcare, noting funding improvements for universities and medical colleges. “Yes, there’s an infrastructure deficit in some areas, but we will fix it,” he assured.

    Tinubu’s week, besides other highlights, as indicated earlier, also showcased his leadership style—balancing economic governance with political pragmatism. While urging governors to sustain economic recovery, he placed the responsibility for resolving the Rivers crisis on regional leaders. His message was clear: reforms must continue, laws must be upheld, and leaders must act in the best interest of their people. The next moves are now in the hands of those he has called to action.

     Tinubu’s week was a testament to his leadership, balancing governance with empathy. His engagements reflected his commitment to institutional growth, national unity, and people-centered leadership.

    On Sunday, he approved the conversion of the General Hospital, Kumo, into a Federal Medical Centre and upgraded Tai Solarin University of Education to a federal university. That same day, he condoled with the Agbaje family over the passing of their matriarch, a distinguished educator.

    Monday saw him mourning the loss of legal scholar Professor Kharisu Sufiyanu Chukkol while renaming the Federal University of Education in Kano after Yusuf Maitama Sule. On Tuesday, he appointed new leadership for NABTEB and UBEC, named principal officers for two federal institutions, and honoured the late Dubem Onyia while celebrating Justice George Oguntade’s 85th birthday.

    His role as a statesman was evident on Wednesday when he mediated in the Lagos Assembly crisis and hosted the National Assembly leadership for Iftar. By Thursday, he approved the upgrade of Maiduguri Airport to international status. On Friday, he welcomed the Catholic Bishops Conference of Nigeria, underscoring his commitment to national unity.

    It was a week of action, reflection, and a reaffirmation of his dedication to Nigeria’s progress and the new week promises to offer more than we had the last week. From today to the end of the week, a lot will happen, just wait and see. Have a great week.

  • Fubara’s humble pie

    Fubara’s humble pie

    • The governor had opportunities for fence-mending but frittered them

    How Governor Siminalayi Fubara of Rivers State thought he could have got away with his serial disregard for due process and rule of law beggars belief. True, many of our governors are emperors. They want to control virtually everything: from local governments to state assemblies, etc. And they can go to any length just to achieve those ignoble objectives.

    The crisis in Rivers began when in December 2023, Gov. Fubara stopped working with 27 lawmakers, including Martins Amaewhule, following an alleged defection from the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) to the All Progressives Congress (APC). The governor is PDP and a protege of the former governor of the state, Nyesom Wike, now Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT).

    But the scales soon fell off the eyes of the hitherto romantic pair of lovers and, like many instances of other political godfathers and their godsons, both men have since gone their separate ways.

    That is the main cause of the political

    brouhaha in Rivers State.

    Both Wike and Fubara are now in the battle of their lives for the control of the state’s jugular.  With neither set to retrace his steps, the situation is like that of the bird that perches on a tree; neither the bird nor the tree is at rest.

    But Fubara would seem to have got to his wits end, with the Supreme Court judgment delivered on February 28. I guess this was the last straw that broke the Fubara government’s back, as the apex court upheld an earlier judgment barring the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) from releasing the state’s monthly allocation to the state government until it has seen the need to present the state budget in accordance with constitutional stipulations.

    The governor had earlier derecognised

    27 of the state assembly members led by Amaewhule, and had been dealing with only four members, including in the passage of the state budget.

    In fairness to Fubara, he is not the first governor to do this. Some governors had travelled the same route before and many others may be eyeing it if the appropriate lessons are not taught.

    Fubara’s mistake, however, was that he did not appreciate the fact that all circumstances and situations might only be similar, they may not exactly be the same.

    Fubara did not seem to appreciate the fact that Wike is a solid rock behind the Amaewhule-led Rivers State House of Assembly. And he is today politically relevant if only by virtue of his position as FCT Minister.

    So, it is not like that of Edo State under

    former Governor Godwin Obaseki, for instance, where Obaseki successfully muzzled the state house of assembly and got away with it.

    Politics apart, any right-thinking person would have known that Gov Fubara would soon get to a brick wall in the path he chose to tread.

    Our 1999 Constitution may not be a perfect document; no document or constitution is. But, as in all democracies, the constitution recognises the importance of the principle of separation of powers. But many of our governors don’t want to have anything to do with that.

     It is Fubara’s immaturity and naivety that his opponents continued to exploit by taking actions that continually made him sink deeper and deeper into gubernatorial impunity that has ended up putting him in his present cul-de-sac.

    Yet, it is not that the governor did not have options. He could have tried to break the ranks of the legislators. Or, could it be that Wike’s grip on his own was too much for him to tackle? Or, did Fubara think coming down from his high horse to the level of the legislators was demeaning for him as the executive governor of Rivers State?

    Whatever it is, the backbone of the majority legislators, that is Wike, may be politically correct today and so could be winning. The tide may turn tomorrow and God may turn what is a masterstroke of political correctness or sagacity today to the height of foolishness.

    But until then, one lesson from this Rivers episode is that it is not in all cases that governors can pocket the state legislators. Where there is unanimity of purpose and determination, the legislators can really assert their independence, especially when, like the whirligig, they have something underneath the water that is beating the drum for them. 

    The Rivers gladiators had the advantage of presidential intervention. But they did not take full advantage of it.

    Just as they also had other options that could have given them an amicable settlement that would have been a win-win for all. Again, they ignored that path. At this stage, we cannot say there is no victor, no vanquished in the matter unless we want to deceive ourselves. There is a victor; there is a vanquished, and all those involved know. Even those of us watching developments from the sidelines know. Egos have been bruised.

    There is a saying in Yoruba land that we cannot return from court and still be friends. This could be true.

    But then, there is still hope only if the gladiators decide to sheath their swords. The fact is; there is a job to do. Governance has suffered in the state since the beginning of the crisis, forget the governor’s braggadocio about his programmes and projects not being affected by the crisis.

    Read Also: Supreme Court and Fubara V. Wike

    A governor having impeachment axe dangling on his head cannot truly say all is well.

    But this is where Amaewhule and his colleagues must tread softly. Fubara can only be pretending not to be perturbed. Nigerian governors know the privileges they get in office, so Fubara won’t just go down if he is impeached. He would fight back. But since nothing guarantees that he too would win if things degenerate, he has to eat his humble pie. He should stop issuing threats. The fact is; he doesn’t have what it takes to dislodge Amaewhule & Co. So, he must find a way to reach an amicable settlement with them. Just as the majority legislators too must realise that they can only know the beginning of a crisis; they may not know how it would pan out. The deadline they are giving the governor to present the budget before them, for instance, seems unrealistic to me. There should be room to accommodate likely changes in the light of the new political reality. The point I am making is that whatever deadlines they are giving must have human face and should not be the product of the animosity between the two parties.

    I can understand how they feel but they must show they have the maturity that their opponents seem to lack.

     And if there are still elders in Rivers State, this is a time for them to stand to be counted. The head of a baby that is on his mother’s back can never be bent in a place where there are true elders.

    There is need to douse the tension in the state.

  • NAF personnel’s attack on Ikeja Electric

    NAF personnel’s attack on Ikeja Electric

    Nothing under the sun can justify the assault on workers at the headquarters of Ikeja Electric (IE) in Ikeja, Lagos, on Thursday, by some personnel of the Nigerian Air Force (NAF). Absolutely nothing.

    The Sam Ethnan Air Force Base in Ikeja was said to have been disconnected by IE on account of about N4 billion accumulated debt. So, the base has been without light for over 10 days.

    The NAF personnel not only went on the rampage at the company’s premises, destroying vital equipment, beating up some members of the staff and forcing

    some of them to lie down, etc., they also reportedly left with some personal belongings of their victims.

    These are despicable conducts, particularly coming from NAF personnel, an arm of the military that is reputed for its discipline and finesse.

    Of course some Nigerians have said it served IE right. That the experience was the comeuppance for some of the company’s disregard for its customers. I don’t think so. If only for the simple fact that anyone, just anyone, including Ikeja Electric visitors and customers could have been victims because the NAF personnel did not differentiate between the workers and others.

    Incidentally, I was at the Egbeda office of the company when I heard of the incident on Thursday. Meaning if that was where the incident took place, I could also have been a victim.

    I cannot remember when last I visited that place. As a matter of fact, I dread going to such places. But, it was one of the things I also dread most that took me there on Thursday: estimated billing. I had been at peace with IE ever since I got prepaid meter some years back, but the meter was retrieved in October, last year, when it became faulty and in just four months, I am already having issues over estimated billing.

    But my experience at the Egbeda office is an admixture of both the good and the ugly. As a matter of fact, I had to tell two of the workers that attended to me that their faces were not customer-friendly. Yet, I was impressed by the conduct of two other workers in the place. Fair enough. That is what obtains in several establishments.

    Read Also: NAFDAC raises alarm, says over 14.3million Nigerians affected by drug abuse

    If the NAF personnel had complained over estimated billing and taken to the appropriate channels for redress, I might have been sympathetic to their cause. But to owe a debt of about N4 billion (I have not seen anywhere this has been contested by the Air Force), and still expect to have light beats one’s imagination. I guess some of us having issues with estimated billings are the ones defraying some of the debts owed by institutions like NAF, otherwise IE would have closed shop.

    The Federal Government must quickly wade into not just this matter but other military installations in the country and work out a sustainable arrangement on how the institutions would be paying for their essential services.

    But the soldiers need to be educated that power sector is now privately owned, therefore they need to pay for services rendered. As government ‘pikin’, they could afford not to pay for services rendered by their ‘father’s’ agencies before privatisation. Not anymore.

    Meanwhile, who picks the bills of those injured during the attack? Who pays for the damaged equipment? NAF must ensure those involved in the attack are identified and punished.

    The optics of Thursday’s incident at Ikeja Electric headquarters is bad for foreign investment; it is equally bad for democracy.

    We should be done with the era of  ‘Unknown Soldier’ for good.

  • The rise, rise and rise of capitalism (X)

    The rise, rise and rise of capitalism (X)

    ONE of the most important, if not the most important dates in colonial history is 1884 because that is the year when the famous or perhaps, from an African point of view,  infamous Berlin Conference was convened in the capital city of the brand new German kingdom. The rampant German eagle had just taken to the skies of Europe and as far as eagles went, was not to be ignored. For example, the French had just been chastised in a short, brutal war which ended in the occupation of Paris, capital city of the then defunct French empire together with the loss of  the province of Alsace and Lorraine which was absorbed into the German empire. This loss was reversed by the Treaty of Versailles at the conclusion of the First World War. It is that reversal that has made it possible for the legendary Arsenal manager, Arsene Wenger to be recognised as French today as his home province is Alsace and his first language was a form of German dialect. But, as usual, I digress to make a point which a few of my readers may find interesting or even entertaining but nothing more. To all intents and purposes anyway, the new kid on the block, sitting as it was squarely in the middle of the politically evolving continent of Europe was the rising German empire. Empires have a way of making a point and the German empire was not going to be different and so, Bismack decided to make a point by inviting fourteen countries, including the USA to Berlin to discuss how best the dismemberment of Africa could be achieved around a conference table. It is pertinent that no African kingdom or territory was represented around that table in Berlin. That singular observation has put the purpose of that conference in its proper perspective. It was never in the interest of Africa or Africans.

    The Berlin conference was an exercise in naked imperialism as it had become clear that the factories of Europe needed both raw materials for their machines and ready markets for their finished products. Virtually all other parts of the world had been fought over and divided up among the industrialised countries of the world with only Africa left for grabs by whoever wanted a portion of the continent.

    For the British at that point in time, India was their prime colony and a great deal of their energy was given up to protecting India from all comers. They were however not indifferent to opportunities elsewhere in the world. By that time, they had been carrying on their trade in African flesh even longer than they had been dealing with Indians but their extractive activities were with human beings and were more or less restricted to the coastal regions from where they loaded up their ships with human cargo and ferried them across the Atlantic into slavery at great, if not exaggerated profit. In any case, their curiosity about the interior region was dampened by malaria, an affliction which was rapidly fatal to strangers from Europe. By the time of the Berlin conference however, quinine had become available and quite dramatically, the ability of Europeans to survive in Africa had increased to such an extent that Africa no longer held any terror for visiting Europeans and because of this, Africa lay prone before the invaders.

    The Europeans knew very little about the interior of Africa, at least until the geography of the place was laid bare by adventurers like Mungo Park and the Lander brothers who for example traced the course of River Niger from it’s source in the Fouta Jallon hills right down to her discharge points in the massive Niger delta. Unknown to them therefore, powerful kingdoms were rising and falling in succession, people were living out fulfilling lives and cultures were mixing and reforming as they had done for centuries before. But, with the Berlin conference, change, profound and deadly had come to Africa, dragging her into the strange new world of rampant capitalism and destructive colonialism. Above all, the map of Africa was being whimsically redrawn in Berlin, leaving Africa with a legacy of chaos and great potential for conflict. The Berlin conference ended a hundred and fifty years ago and presented Africa with a fait accompli which has become increasingly difficult to live with. For reasons of convenience, African countries have come to the conclusion that those unwieldy borders have become sacrosanct because it is feared that any boundary readjustment however slight will lead to a cascade of readjustments which will bring all our houses crashing down on our heads. This subject is worthy of further interrogation.

    Read Also: The rise, rise and rise of capitalism (IX)

    Unlike Britain, Portugal and France which had places on that table in Berlin, Germany had come late to the Africa party as she did not take part in the slave trade. This is not to say that Germans were completely excluded from the African trade as it was in the days of the slave trade. It has now been discovered that the manilas with which payment was made for slaves purchased in West Africa were traded out of Hamburg and other German ports. The Germans were however not directly involved in the slave trade. Bismack, the spokesman for Germany was anxious to make up for this disadvantaged position. He was therefore interested in finding a way to promote German interests in Africa. Unfortunately for him and Germany it was already too late to make any sizeable claims to any real estate in Africa. A look at the map drawn in the immediate aftermath of the Berlin conference shows that Germany came away with a few disjointed scraps of territory in Togoland, a part of Cameroon, South West Africa as well as Tanganyika, Rwanda and Burundi in East Africa. Reports show that the Germans ruled their colonies with a heavy hand even though they seemed to have made some effort in building some modern infrastructure. They however spent far too much energy and effort in suppressing revolts than in setting up any workable form of government. And they really blotted their copy book in South West Africa where they had intended to develop as a settler colony to accommodate emigrants from Germany in the same way that Australia, New Zealand, Rhodesia and Canada were doing for Britain. By that time however, the British had completed the work of exterminating the indigenous peoples of the lands they had seized. The Germans had theirs to do in the cold light of international examination. The indigenous peoples of South West Africa were never going to disappear with a whimper and they put up a desperate resistance which pitched the might of the modern German army against the Hereros and the Nama who in the end were murdered in cold blood or herded into concentration camps in imitation of the British in South Africa who had done the same to the Boers. It has been said that these camps were resurrected by the Germans during the Second World War and was the rehearsal for the extermination camps in which no less than twelve million people were murdered. There is therefore a direct relationship between German policies at the beginning of the twentieth century and the holocaust less than fifty years later in the heart of Europe.

    Germany organised the Berlin conference but gained precious little from it. The greatest beneficiary from the conference was not a country at all. It was the king of the Belgians, King Leopold II who was given vast tracts of land covering present day DR Congo in the name of some amorphous body called the Congo Free State. His rule over this entity was calamitous to say the least. No less than 10 million people were calculated to have died under his watch during the torrid period of his rule between 1885, immediately after the Berlin conference and 1908 when his predatory behaviour could no longer be ignored nor hidden and the Congo Free State was put under the authority of the government of Belgium and became the Belgian Congo . The only public institution of note in the entire colony in 1908 was the Force publique, the army which had been formed by Leopold to terrorise the people into submitting to the tyrannical demands of King Leopold for wild rubber, ivory and other natural raw materials. By the time the Congo was granted political independence in 1960 there was still a severe shortage of functional institutions in a country which could only boast of two university graduates. Those of us who grew up in those turbulent days of the sixties carry in our heads the dysfunctional situation of the Congo at a time when our soldiers were deployed to keep the peace as part of the United Nations peacekeeping force drafted to the Congo to keep the disparate armed groups ravaging the country apart. The situation in the Congo may not be directly associated with capitalism but without capitalism, the situation would have been completely different.

    • To be continued.
  • IBB: That the youths may know or never forget

    IBB: That the youths may know or never forget

    This week we continue where we left  off with our examination of the Babangida years, the same years he did everything to glamorise in his biography.

    As part of the offering last week, we brought on board Professor Steve Egbo who, a whole 24 ago, was prescient enough to devote a whole chapter of his book to the self-proclaimed evil genius. We bring him back today in a full throttled article which is, however, constricted by space.

    We also bring the views of an active participant in the affairs of those evil days in Nigeria. Wale Adeoye, a multi-award winning journalist who, for his efforts, was also detained at the time, writes in his article

    ‘A Victim’s Review of Babangida’s Journey in Dis-Service” which I described on the Ekitipanupo web portal as a “first rate, analytical chronology of the Babangida years” wherein he wrote:

    “Babangida was also silent on many critical issues of human right violations under his tenure. His regime unleashed one of the worst human right abuses on the students movement while he was responsible for the deaths of hundreds of innocent students apart from creating the nursing bed for violent cultism on Nigerian campuses. I recall 1986 and 1987, the years of clubs, daggers, guns and knives.

    Four students of the Ahmadu Bello University had been killed after his government ordered ‘Kill and Go’ police to invade the campus. The invaders raped and killed some students. It became a national upheaval. At the University of Nigeria, Nsukka, we joined the national resistance.

    I was in the leadership with the late Emma Ezeazu and Chima Ubani. The IBB regime recruited students, trained and armed them. Their duty was to attack, kidnap and maim students’ leaders. At Eni Njoku Hall, where we were having our rally, four students led by a student, now somewhere in the Philippines, stormed the venue and kidnapped a student, Lanre Ehonwa.

    Not satisfied, that night, they stormed the hostel of Chidi Omeje and Kunu Harmony, two radical students. They maimed them. They did the same at other Nigerian University campuses. Many of these students were later recruited to join the State Security Service. At least I saw three of them later in years, who confessed to their atrocities. 

    At ABU, Patrick Wilmot was arrested and deported from Nigeria. What about the kidnap of Omoyele Sowore and his being injected with poison by sponsored armed men? What of Igboku Otu who was stabbed to death by unknown assailants one evening in his private Ikeja home?

    His memory failed him on the disappearance of people like my friend and colleague in The Guardian, Chinedu Offoaro, Prince also of The Guardian, the murder of Tunde Oladepo, Taiwo Lukula and many others across the country as consequences of the successors he bequeathed. Oladepo was killed in the presence of his family. They took away his suits. On the day of his burial, the killers came, putting on the suits they had stolen from their victim. They audaciously stared at Oladepo’s wife who was caught by awe and trembling. He fled the country.  How do we explain the controversial accident that led to the death of ASP Dare who was investigating the death of journalist, Dele Giwa? Can we easily forget the torture of many soldiers like Digifa Werenipre, now leader of Egbesu Assembly, my friend who was kept in underground cell in Kano? What of Col Gabriel Ajayi who was kept in the cemetery for many years, only to be released to the hands of harrowing, cold death? How can one forget Major Nya and others that I met while I was in detention at the Directorate Military Intelligence and reports that people were being shot and taken away for burial in secret places having been picked on the road on suspicion of being anti-government?

    Babangida militarised the mentality of Nigerians through his adoption of violence and brute force, over logic and clear thought.

    Under Babangida, state terrorism was elevated and idolised.

    The people soon began to adopt violence as personal norm. The militaristisation of values, of culture, of politics, of debate, of the family, of the mental state finds expression in the current culture of violence in Nigeria today.  

    The least one can say is that the families of all these victims should band together and sue Babangida so that their estates can, collectively, make a good dent on his N17  freebie, sourced mostly from those who were made to profit, unfairly, from the national patrimony.

    Still On Ibb’s Journey In Dis-service

    In his own contribution this week, Professor Egbo writes:

    Ibrahim Babangida’s memoir, “A Journey in Service”, has continued to generate interest across the nation. Babangida was a man who took Nigeria by storm much more than any before or after him. Forty years after his catastrophic incursion, he has simply refused to allow Nigeria rest. So much has been said in response to, and condemnation of his endless deceit. Perhaps, the launch of his memoir, and the huge cash it raked in for him, is his final act of defiance as he prepares to make his exit from the public stage.

    Read Also: IBB’s journey of revisionism, the Nzeribe saga

    Babangida’s atrocities have been properly chronicled by historians, analysts and commentators over the years, by those who participated in his perfidy; those who merely observed and the millions whose lives were blighted by the contempt and greed of this individual. His biography is an attempt to change the narrative, to re-write history and perhaps, perform one more act of defiance against Nigeria and Nigerians.

    But whatever Babangida may have written, whatever efforts he may have exerted to twist and upend the facts, the truths of his mis-rule and the bungling of Nigeria’s destiny under his watch  remain unhidden and will remain a testimony against him till eternity.

    Of  his numerous atrocities against the fatherland, the greatest was the annulment of June 12 – an election globally acknowledged as  Nigeria’s finest outing ever. June 12, 1993, marked Nigeria’s date with history.

     But sadly, a history that was cruelly aborted.

    The cancellation of that election brought to fore Babangida’s design to keep Nigeria permanently enslaved to his personal whims and caprice. June 12 was the climax of a secret plot by Babangida and his cult of predators to sustain an illegitimate oligarchy that had since lost its bearing.

    As I noted in my book, “Political Soldiering”, the tragedy of June 12 “marked the precariousness of the state of the union called Nigeria, a country of many ethnic nationalities groaning under an ill arrangement where the preponderance of power is arbitrary and hegemonic.”  The success of June 12 election and the deliberate sabotage that followed “marked a date that exhumed the contradictions within the Nigerian contraption which the political class has worked so hard to pretend never existed”.

     June 12 annulment and the upheavals that erupted “marked a culmination of years of frustration and discontent, jealousy and mischief, incompatibility, self destructive anomalies, perfidy and thralldom. It  was another climax of what Ahmadu Bello famously described as ‘the mistake of 1914’.”

    When the heat generated by the gruesome cancellation became unbearable, Babangida sneaked away into the night to plot and scheme for another opportunity. Despite stepping aside, he remained attuned to the vagaries of Nigeria’s political firmament and continued to bid his time. Babangida was a big man – wealthy, ambitious and cunning – and with vast resources at his disposal, he convinced himself that someday, he would be back.

     But his determination to realize his dream of a come-back never materialised,  despite his numerous schemings to bring it about as even the most cunning of men must someday, come to the end of  the road.

    Babangida’s greatest desire was to come back as a civilian president. But despite how much he desired it, schemed for it and plotted for it, he failed.

    Abysmally.

    The chain of events that followed in the wake of June 12 annulment has thrown Nigeria into a bottomless pit, one from which it has been impossible to wriggle out. From trepidatious ING to Abacha’s brutal reign, from the National Assembly Trade Fair to years of misrule, incompetence, ethnic supremacists, religious irredentism, nepotism, banditry, judicial panic, grinding poverty, legendary corruption by both the political class  as well as the private sector, and so many ills, Nigeria has never had it so bad.

    But all put together, General Ibrahim Babangida must be held supremely responsible for whatever tragedy Nigeria has suffered since he stepped in and  stepped aside. This was a man who had the opportunity to do good, but deliberately, and consciously, chose to do so much evil he named himself the evil genius. And he has continued to sit in cross-legged pomposity atop the heap of his evil.

    Otherwise, his memoirs would have been a true confession and an act of penance; a show of remorse and a plea for forgiveness by Nigerians, a people he has so wronged and betrayed.

    Babangida would also have seen this window as an opportunity to seek the forgiveness of the Almighty God who allowed him an opportunity to do good but he  rather chose the opposite.

    That the cream of Nigeria’s political and economic elite gathered in the poshest hotel in Abuja last month on behalf of this badly flawed human being shows our legendary capacity to condone evil. Babangida did not deserve the honor done him by those who heeded  his call.

    He deserves only the courtesy and embrace suitable for a leper.

    The gathering of who is who to honor a man like him shows the moral decadence of our leadership elite. In a country where the laws are of no consequence on the conduct of office holders, success and progress are measured by how much public funds one is able to steal. Here, the institutions created to guard against such grandiose larceny become accessories to the heist.

    Presidential Library? What a joke. What purpose will Babangida’s library serve to generations of deprived, poverty stricken, uneducated, abused and abandoned Nigerians? And make no mistake, Babangida was never a president. He was and will always remain an impostor and a pretender. A usurper.

    Babangida may be having the last laugh; and if that were actually the case,  Nigerians do not have to humor him any longer.

    The gap-toothed general is a chameleon and a vampire. He has no heart.

    No amount of image laundering will convince Nigerians that Babangida is a new creature, that the vulture will turn away from the rotten carcass in disgust or that the he-goat will feel a pang of conscience at the prospect of mounting his own mother..

  • The Lagos House of Assembly theatrics

    The Lagos House of Assembly theatrics

    The primary purpose of the Lagos State House of Assembly (LSHA) is to make laws for the smooth running of the government for the benefit of the people. It is not clear how much of that has been done in the last eight weeks. But you can’t but notice the one-per-day theatrics of that legislature. And how did it all start? The Speaker of the House of Assembly, Right Honourable Mudashiru Obasa, had gone on vacation in the United States. While away, reminiscent of how the Nigerian military used to execute coups d’état, disaffected members of the House of Assembly, without consulting major stakeholders in the politics and governance of the state, impeached and replaced him with Honourable Mojisola Meranda.

    When Obasa returned from the United States, believing that he had actually not been impeached, he endeavoured to take back his position as the Speaker of the House on 27 February, 2025. Since Meranda and her supporters had been digging in, they resisted Obasa’s move. And that was where the drama started, with even the Nigeria Police Force being dragged in. It therefore became necessary for the Governor’s Advisory Council (GAC) to intervene. GAC, by the way, is a body of eminent personalities with vast political and cognate experience set up by then-Governor Bola Ahmed Tinubu to provide guidance to whoever is the governor and to maintain the stability of the ruling party in Lagos State.

    Exonerating the GAC of any responsibility for the crisis, its Chair, Prince Tajudeen Olusi, was quoted by Leadership newspaper, in a 3 March, 2025 report, titled “Count GAC out of crisis rocking Lagos Assembly – Olusi,” to have stated: “Members of the GAC are not part of the Lagos State House of Assembly to allegedly be behind the removal of Obasa. It can’t be true. We read it also that morning. The lawmakers carried it out without consulting the party and those of us in the GAC. … The lawmakers have no absolute power to remove and install their leaders. Nobody can become a member of the House of Assembly unless sponsored by a political party, and the sponsors are the inspectors.”

    This position of the GAC Chair is consistent with Section 106(d) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 as amended which states that “Subject to the provisions of section 107 of this Constitution, a person shall be qualified for election as a member of a House of Assembly if …  he is a member of a political party and is sponsored by that party.” The position also coheres with Section 29(1) of the 2022 Electoral Act which provides thus: “Every political party shall, not later than 180 days before the date appointed for a general election under this Act, submit to the Commission, in the prescribed Forms, the list of the candidates the party proposes to sponsor at the elections, who must have emerged from valid primaries conducted by the political party.”

    Moreover, the position of the GAC Chair is in agreement with the following provisions of the Constitution of the All Progressives Congress (APC) on the INEC Website at (https://www.inecnigeria.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/APC-Constitution.pdf) Article   7(iv-v) of the APC constitution states two of the objectives of the party as follows: “(iv) To sponsor eligible candidates and canvass for votes for election into all elective offices in all tiers of government. (v) To consciously pursue the implementation of the policies and programmes of the Party, through those of its members that are appointed or elected into government, legislative houses and Boards throughout the Federation.” In addition, Article 21 (A)(ii) of the APC Constitution states: “Offences against the Party shall include the following: … Anti-Party activities or any conduct, which is likely to embarrass or have adverse effect on the party or bring the party into hatred, contempt, ridicule or disrepute.”

    The contemptuous action of the legislators to remove Right Honourable Mudashiru Obasa as the Speaker of the LSHA and replace him with the Deputy Speaker, Honourable Mojisola Meranda, through subterfuge, thus seemed to have had a tinge of treachery about it. The action was probably motivated by a desire to hand the GAC a fait accompli which would be difficult to reverse without earning the members of that distinguished body some bad press. But the legislators probably forgot that the members of GAC were not spring chicken as far as political maneuvering was concerned. The legislators also seemed not to have been aware of the English proverb, “Cunning is the dwarf of wisdom.”

    Meanwhile, the drama continued, and as in every theatre, especially where contradictory emotions are evoked by the respective actors, the audience of the LSHA drama have been varied in their response, with some applauding and some condemning. This audience has been composed of newspaper columnists, opinion writers, electronic media analysts, social media commentators and sundry experts. And those who were gladdened by Obasa’s tribulations had been most resourceful in terms of logical fallacies and propaganda. These fallacies ranged from false analogies (such as comparing the situation in the LSHA to the crisis in Rivers State) to red herrings (such as ignoring the lawful role of political parties to guide their respective legislators on critical issues and then magnifying the point that it was with a majority of votes in the LSHA that Obasa was removed). In fact, some have been agonsing over the GAC resolution of the crisis.

    Those who have been arguing that the GAC intervention undermines the independence of the legislature, and democracy at large, need to be reminded that while the legislature does indeed have independence with respect to the executive and judicial arms of government, they have less independence with respect to the party that nominated and sponsored them for elections. Legislators who discountenance party supremacy are therefore inexcusably delusional, because we do not yet have independent candidates in Nigeria. That is why it is partys’ names and logos that appear on ballot papers, and not candidates’. In effect, the platform on which the legislators stand belongs to the party, and party leaders have the moral duty to stop it from being weakened. Should the platform collapse, the individual legislators have the escape route of defection to other parties. The legislators are thus like what is picturesquely described, in Yoruba, as “Igi dá, eye fò” (‘Birds that fly away as the twig breaks.’)

    Read Also: Lagos House of Assembly aspirant promises better representation

    It is for this reason that political parties have their respective party caucuses in Houses of Assembly to prevent members’ legislative actions from jeopardising overall party interests. Incidentally, the election of Meranda (who is from Lagos Central like Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu) on 13 January, 2025 created rumpus outside the House of Assembly, because it upset the geopolitical balance that the GAC had ensured with regard to the distribution of party and government leadership positions as a means of maintaining the stability of the party. The impeachment of Obasa (who is from Lagos West) therefore led to grumblings about marginalising his constituency. This is the deleterious kind of development that the GAC intervention has nipped in the bud.

     The wisdom of the GAC and key national figures in the party has seen Meranda resign as Speaker, along with some other officers. It has also seen her re-elected as Deputy Speaker, and Obasa re-elected as Speaker. In her resignation speech, Meranda stated: “I took the above decision in order to save this legislative institution from further unnecessary conflict and embarrassment … and in deference to … our esteemed political leaders. … Just like we know, … the party decision is supreme.” Also, in his speech as Speaker, Obasa said to the legislators: “I want to thank you for your support, your dedication, your loyalty and your staunch belief in our party and the utmost respect for our party leaders.” Both speeches acknowledge and express respect for party supremacy; and that is commendable, because, as a Yoruba proverb puts it, “Odò tó bá gbàgbé orísún rè á gbe.” (‘A river that forgets its source will dry up.’)

    There was ample arrogant display of unfamiliarity with or mischievous discountenance of the Nigerian constitution, the electoral law and political party constitutions and conventions by some very vocal or influential commentators on and analysts of the LSHA crisis. Some seemed to see the crisis as more of an opportunity to denigrate the APC or President Bola Ahmed Tinubu. Critical issues surrounding the legislative misadventure were therefore disregarded. Some were also commenting as if they had an axe to grind with Obasa and got a wonderful opportunity, in the crisis, to even up with him and rub it in as harshly as they could. And they did kick the fallen Obasa with gusto.

    If you didn’t know what the word ‘schadenfreude’ meant before now, just take a look back at the exuberant joy that some people expressed at the 13 January, 2025 military-coup-like ordeal of Mudashiru Obasa. According to Cambridge Dictionary, schadenfreude means “a feeling of pleasure or satisfaction when something bad happens to someone else.”

    This brings to mind the story of the Swedish chemist, Dr. Alfred Nobel, the sponsor of the world famous Nobel Prizes. He invented dynamite and other explosives, originally for use in mining and related activities. However, people later started to use them as devastating weapons of war, and Alfred Nobel made a fortune from his deadly inventions. Then as reported by Radleys.com in 2015, in an article titled “On world humanitarian day, remember the story of Alfred Nobel,” his brother Ludvig Nobel died in 1888, and a French newspaper mistook the deceased for Alfred, and wrote an obituary on him scathingly titled “Le marchand de la mort est mort.” (‘The merchant of death is dead.’) An 8 August, 2021 article in a publication of the Office of Science and Society at McGill University, in Canada, also reported that Alfred was described in the obituary as a man who “became rich by finding a way to kill more people faster than ever before.”

    As Britannica put it, perhaps to burnish his reputation, “In the will he drafted in 1895, Nobel instructed that most of his fortune be set aside as a fund for the awarding of five annual prizes ‘to those who, during the preceding year, shall have conferred the greatest benefit on mankind.’ These prizes as established by his will are the Nobel Prize for Physics, the Nobel Prize for Chemistry, the Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine, the Nobel Prize for Literature, and the Nobel Prize for Peace.”

    Like Alfred Nobel, Mudashiru Obasa has had the opportunity to read his obituary, even if metaphorically-speaking. Like Alfred Nobel’s, the obituary has been to some measure unflattering. He should therefore, like Alfred Nobel, emplace a sustainable humanity-enhancing programme to guarantee for himself a noble reputation among posterity.