Category: Opinion

  • Asaba Massacre: Let’s meet half-way

    Asaba Massacre: Let’s meet half-way

    Injustice in any form, is a depredating act; traumatizes and in the extreme reaction, has the potential to stunt development of the parties to the act, as the sense of guilt eats up the perpetrator while sorrow and sense of deficiency does same to the victim.

    Let’s make man in our image was purportedly the resolve that made man different from all that was created.  Consequently, a righteous man is assumed God like.  Conscience, an individualized righteousness sensory control valve is what keeps every human conscious of his/her state of godliness.  It follows therefore that an individual knows when he/she is doing the right, the wrong or just what duty/survival demands, as his being reacts to the potential consequence of each.

    The Head of State, Muhammadu Buhari knows he did what his soul – conscience expected of him – do the right at all times and to all manner of peoples – when he reversed – I beg your pardon, ameliorated the injustice done to Abiola and Nigerians in June 1993 – 27 years ago.

    This write up hopes and prays that the injustice done to the people of Asaba and humanity in October 1967 – 53 years ago will by His Grace receive similar ameliorating gesture from the Head of State.

    The President’s June 12th noble act has raised our hopes that in spite of perceived age old obstructing, ungodly vested interests we hopefully and finally have in place an era able at the very least to “white wash” over the blood spray – how we wish it was just a stain – on the nation’s ethnic body politics and national consciousness occasioned by the Asaba, Nigeria civil war era, massacre.  An orgy of extreme inhumanity and beastly act in which over 700 Asaba men and women were slaughtered on one spot (Ogbe Osowa Square), in one day, 7th day of October, 1967.

    Read Also: The Lekki Tollgate ‘Massacre’: What Next?

    Why Asaba? Why us? Had since been the traumatizing question – no answer(s) yet for 53 years. However, for the avoidance of doubt/confusion, let it be known that we are not asking for pity – far from it; that is never in our character!!

    A call by the town crier had gone out that inhabitants assemble in their numbers at the square to accord befitting welcome to the liberating 2nd Division of the Nigerian Army.  Expectedly many came out gayly dressed in their Asaba traditional white attire and shouts of “One Nigeria” joyously echoing out of their mouths, only to be unexpectedly appreciated by hot bullets.  Consequently, many had the chorus of “One Nigeria” eternally stock in each of their throat courtesy of instant death, as groans of pain and whatever goes through the consciousness of dying minds, and death slowly overwhelmed others.

    A house to house orgy of killing – over preceding days – thereafter commenced. The play out of events was as if the “gallant soldiers of the 2nd Division had a task that must be done.”  All that is now history, but to us the victims, it still hurts, and hurts very deep.

    However, as godly people, we appeal to Nigerians of good will, and humanity at large to earnestly call on the Head of State, to do the needful, and on behalf of Nigeria, and Nigerians extend the basic courtesy a hurt and hurting people expect of their kit and kin.  Amongst the peace loving people of Asaba the singular mode of settling any manner of dispute and assuaging all manner of accompanying fall outs is ever simple.

    All we ask is for Nigeria and Nigerians through our Head of State to sincerely say “Asaba ndo nu! Yaliba nu!” – which translate to “Asaba sorry! Forgive and forget!”

    That assumedly simple gesture will erase a burden and accompanying fall out that for eternity would ever weigh negatively on the nation’s conscience, though more importantly, assuage the sorrow and pain destined for that long to be Asaba people’s portion.

     

     

    • Dr. Chizea, wrote from Lagos.
  • Where are the Borno  billionaires and elite?

    Where are the Borno billionaires and elite?

    So overwhelmed was Babagana Umara Zulum, the governor of Borno state to the unparralled contribution and disposition to the plight of the victims of Boko Haram insurgency in Borno by Dangote Foundation that the irrigation engineer Professor, eulogized Alhaji Aliko Dangote in his goodwill message to the business magnate who turned 63 years old on April, 11, 2020.

    The governor’s message contained in a tweet, he sent out from his handle, @ Prof. Zulum reads: “My dear elder brother, it is such a great honour to join millions of your well-wishers in wishing you Allah’s continued grace as you turned 63 today.

    “I always remember with so much gratitude, the many times you have offered bold interventions to help address humanitarian causes whether on areas of food supplies for our displaced brothers and sisters in Borno, or in building resettlement homes.

    “Benevolent interventions from the Dangote Foundation have remained the highest from an individual and the private sector. We, grateful people of Borno state, will always wish you more of Allah’s blessings for good health, strengthened faith and the continued expansion of your huge investments that benefit humanity.

    “We wish you a happy 63rd anniversary and Insha’allah, the people of Borno will ceaselessly celebrate you till the end of time. Allah Ya baka tsawon rai cikin rayuwa mai Albarka!

    “Allah Ya sa ka gama da duniya lafiya, kuma Allah Ya sa ka cikin Aljanna firdaus! Congratulations, sir!” Governor Zulum said in his tweet.

    The provoking, pricking and possibly prodding question is how many of the prominent Borno citizens especially, the plutocrats politicians and stakeholders can deserve such encomiums. This question which is within the context of what is seen, heard and said of the good Samaritan, however is without prejudice to the concerned citizens of Borno who might have contributed one way or the other their quota in this regard in cash or kind and chose to remain anonymous. Certainly, to denigrate such group is uncharitable and unfair. However, there is the group of Borno prominent stakeholders in business, commerce, politics and the bureaucrats who are endowed, privileged and in ocean of wealth and expertise turned their back on their mother state (Borno) for the past decade watching Borno in agony, downward precipice and in survival battle. They jet into Maiduguri now and before the shout of Jack Robinson jet out. This group of indigenous citizens in “Siddon Look” (apology to Bola Ige) disposition either with deep rooted prejudice against the establishment in the state or for reasons best known to its members watch Borno deceitfully and diabolically gravitating to Shakespeare’s “architecture of ruins,” a landscape of shattered homesteads, severed limbs, tattered lives, ravaged farmlands and looted barns.

    It would be recalled as Governor of Borno state, Governor Kashim Shettima sowed the wind and dared the whirlwind when he accused some indigenous politicians and elite of Borno state of not only trying to subvert his administration, but also distanced themselves from the reconstruction and resettlement programme of his administration. For example, he pointed out of a wealthy politician from Borno who never gave a dime or Kobo for rehabilitation of the Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) in the state, but could give billions of naira to a political party as a donation. And for those trying to destabilize his administration, Shettima warned at the same time that he would expose the masquerade though he knew the consequences of doing so.

    Read ALso: DJ Cuppy: I feed about 70,000 children in Borno daily

    Even, the Nigerian Army has warned in statements of attempts by some politicians and elite from Northeast and Borno state in particular of moves by the concerned to frustrate all efforts at bringing the insurgency to an end.

    In such statements, the army pointed out that the politicians were in collusion with some marabouts and others to ensure the failure of the military in the terror war for their self-ambition.

    It would be recalled also, that when President Muhammadu Buhari visited Maiduguri last year to condone the people on the deadly attack and destruction of human lives and property by suspected members of Boko Haram in Auno village of Borno, the President wondered during his visit to the Shehu of Borno palace whether it was possible for the insurgents to move all the way from the Chad region in northern Borno all the way to Maiduguri to commit havoc without the prior knowledge of some people?

    It would be recalled some years back some prominent leaders in Borno accusing one another of masterminds of Boko Haram insurgency.

    At a three-day conference on Peace and Unity organized by Arewa Consultative Forum (ACF) during the administration of President Jonathan, the Senate President, David Mark, asked, why have the northern leaders been unable to condemn the terrorist group, Boko Haram that had claimed responsibility for the deaths of hundreds of people.

    To cap it up General Yakubu Gowon, who was the chairman of the conference told northern leaders to stop being hypocritical or “Speaking from both sides of the mouth,” while dealing with issues of insecurity and ethno-religious killings in the north.

    Coming back to Borno, unlike most elders, money bags of Borno and grandstanding elite, the youths of Borno have paid their price in the ongoing terror war. The young men in the terror-afflicted state some years back chose to meet the lion in its own den notwithstanding the price when caught between the devil and the deep blue sea. They came on their volition to collaborate with the Military Joint Task Force (JTF) to identify and, if necessary, to arrest suspected terrorists and hand them over to the authorities. They know most of the Boko Haram members because they live together with them. Due to this courageous efforts of the youth in Maiduguri and other parts of the state, thousands of members of Boko Haram have been taken into custody. Their coming into scene in the terror war changed the scenario as the emergence of the youth sent the insurgents into the bush and they had since made the bush their habitat as the cities and towns have become too hot for them. Patriotic Nigerians hailed the youth who are determined to restore hope to Borno. Kashim Shettima as Governor of the state described them “Our Heroes”.

    Notwithstanding, the disposition of most prominent Borno stakeholders who fled, abandoned or outright rejected their ancestral home for greener pasture or safe haven when their roof is on fire, there are few indigenous dedicated, committed and outright in pains and accord with the unfortunate situation in their home state and would not abandon it. In this class is Alhaji Mohammed Indimi, a business mogul whose foundation, “Indimi Foundation” has contributed in no small measure to Reconstruction, Rehabilitation and Resettlement programme of Borno state government and beyond in cash and kind and in billions of naira. Similarly is Engr. Mele Kyari, the Managing Director of NNPC who along with others made possible the 50MW gas plant under construction in Borno state to bring to an end, the persistent power disruption of the state by the insurgents who for the past nine months held Borno hostage without light as they destroyed some of the existing power towers and poles.

    Let us not forget, the Vice-President, Yemi Osibanjo who in no small measure identified both officially and in private capacity his commitment to the orphans of Borno.

    Above all, is President Muhammadu Buhari who showed keen interest on the happenings in Borno.

     

    • Izekor can be reached at victorizekor@gmail.com
  • Millions of Americans say they’d support violence to restore Trump to power

    Millions of Americans say they’d support violence to restore Trump to power

    Two weekends ago, Trump loyalists gathered in Washington for the “Justice for J6” rally, a supposed show of solidarity with the “political prisoners” arrested for their alleged (or confessed) participation in the Jan. 6 Capitol attack.

    Trump’s Republican-fascists and their propagandists have elevated these hooligans, vandals and (in many cases) terrorists to the status of martyrs and patriots as a way of legitimizing their anti-democratic movement, creating sympathy among Trump’s faithful that can be exploited for fundraising and, of course, recruiting and encouraging more extremists to the cause.

    Despite warnings from the Capitol Police, DHS and other authorities that more violence was possible, the rally on Sept. 18 was a tame and peaceful affair. No more than a few hundred Trump cultists attended, greatly outnumbered by law enforcement and the news media. This low turnout was widely mocked among the chattering class,  liberals and progressives of the “resistance” and others who oppose Trump and his movement.

    As I have argued before, such reactions are shortsighted and ill-advised — another example among many of the way America’s political class, news media and the public at large still does not understand the nature of the threat they face from the Republican-fascist movement and the larger white right.

    Experts on domestic terrorism have repeatedly warned that in the aftermath of Jan. 6 many militant Trumpists and other neofascists are operating more covertly, perhaps by breaking up into small cells that are difficult for law enforcement to track and apprehend. Right-wing militants and terrorists are more likely to attack “soft targets” as opposed to widely publicized events and locations where law enforcement is sure to be present.

    As seen in Michigan and elsewhere, right-wing militants are likely to focus their attention at the state and local level where law enforcement assets are more porous and likely targets are, in general, more vulnerable to attack.

    But in fact the real power of Jan. 6 and its aftermath is difficult to measure by such standards. Those events, and Republican efforts to rewrite the history of that day, have increasingly normalized right-wing political violence — if not in fact made it a preferred and desired way of obtaining and keeping political power.

    In keeping with Nazi propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels’ “Big Lie” strategy, a large majority of Republican and Trump voters actually believe that the 2020 presidential election was “stolen” from Donald Trump — and, in effect, from them as well. Public opinion polls also show that a significant percentage of Republicans believe that the violence and coup attempt on Jan. 6 was a “patriotic” or at least understandable action that was necessary to “defend” democracy and Trump’s presidency.

    On a daily basis, neofascist white supremacist opinion leaders and other propagandists on Fox News and across the right-wing propaganda echo chamber are radicalizing millions of white Americans. Most will not personally commit acts of violence against nonwhites, Muslims, “radical socialist Democrats” and others designated to be the enemy. But they are ever more likely to tolerate or condone such crimes.

    Ultimately, fascism is a type of political and social poison which manifests as violence and other antisocial and anti-human behavior. New research by Robert Pape and the University of Chicago Project on Security and Threats demonstrates how far that poison has spread among the American people.

    In a new essay at The Conversation, Pape summarizes these findings, beginning with the most startling result:

    We have found that 47 million American adults – nearly 1 in 5 – agree with the statement that “the 2020 election was stolen from Donald Trump and Joe Biden is an illegitimate president.” Of those, 21 million also agree that “use of force is justified to restore Donald J. Trump to the presidency.”

    Our survey found that many of these 21 million people with insurrectionist sentiments have the capacity for violent mobilization. At least 7 million of them already own a gun, and at least 3 million have served in the U.S. military and so have lethal skills. Of those 21 million, 6 million said they supported right-wing militias and extremist groups, and 1 million said they are themselves or personally know a member of such a group, including the Oath Keepers and Proud Boys.

    Read Also: What Ever Did Trump Mean When He Tweeted That Kirsten Gillibrand “Would Do Anything” for Campaign Donations?

    Only a small percentage of people who hold extremist views ever actually commit acts of violence, but our findings reveal how many Americans hold views that could turn them toward insurrection.

    Pape’s polling found that 9% of American adults agreed that “Use of force is justified to restore Donald J. Trump to the presidency, while 25% agreed that “The 2020 election was stolen from Donald Trump and Joe Biden is an illegitimate president.”

    Pape reports a margin of error of 4 percentage points, meaning that the proportion of American adults who hold both those views is somewhere between 4% and 12%. “The best single figure,” he writes, “is the middle of that range, 21 million.” He continues:

    People who said force is justified to restore Trump were consistent in their insurrectionist sentiments: Of them, 90% also see Biden as illegitimate, and 68% also think force may be needed to preserve America’s traditional way of life.

    In an interview with the CBS News podcast “Intelligence Matters,” Pape further explained what this new research reveals about the relationship between the white supremacist “great replacement” theory, the QAnon cult and right-wing violence:

    Sixty-three percent of the 21 million adamant insurrectionists in the country believe in the “Great Replacement,” the idea that the rights of whites will be overtaken by the rights of Blacks and Hispanics. The second most important driver was a QAnon belief, where 53 percent of the 21 million believed that our government is run and controlled by a satanic cult of pedophiles. Those are the two radical beliefs that are really … the key drivers of the insurrectionist sentiments in the country today.

    Pape also sounded the alarm about the prospects for right-wing political violence and terrorism in the months leading up to the 2022 midterm elections:

    This is about, what are the prospects for other instances of collective violence, especially related to elections going forward? … I think that we need to be aware that we are moving into already a politically tumultuous 2022 election season just in the last month with the events in Afghanistan, which has created tremendous amount of anger in many of our military circles, military communities; with the new mandates for COVID, which President Biden has just announced, which are already generating tremendous pushback against the federal government. … We need to understand the risks that that could break out into violence.

    For all of these escalating warnings about the potential for serious right-wing political violence, America’s political class remains largely unwilling to properly respond to the clear and present danger. Such an outcome is in part explained by the very language that is most often used in these discussions.

    For example, “right-wing terrorism” or “right-wing extremism” is often presented in a race-neutral fashion.

    A more accurate description would be to say “white right-wing terrorism” or “white supremacist violence.” Similarly, the events of Jan. 6 could be described as a “white insurrection” or “white riot,” which more clearly captures the role of race and racism in the violence of both that day and the Age of Trump as a whole.

    To be clear, there are Black and brown people who belong to Trump’s cult. Some are among his most militant supporters. Regardless of their skin color, such people are loyal to Whiteness as a social and political force. As such, Black and brown Trumpists and other neofascists want to access white power and white privilege for themselves. For them, the end goal is to somehow “earn” a type of transactional honorary whiteness.

    Trumpism and other forms of American neofascism and racial authoritarianism are an extreme personal and existential problem for nonwhite people and others who are marginalized as the other. They are also a problem spawned by and of White America.

    Until that distinction is internalized by America’s elites, and widely accepted as common sense by the American people, neofascism will continue to gain momentum and the country’s democracy crisis will continue to escalate toward full-on disaster, from which no return to “normal” will be possible. America’s past and America’s present (again) runs along and through the color line.

    • This article was first published in www.salon.com with the title ‘White terror: Millions of Americans say they’d support violence to restore Trump to power’

     

  • FIRS vs MultiChoice: Between assumptions and cold facts

    FIRS vs MultiChoice: Between assumptions and cold facts

    Media reports of the last Tax Appeal Tribunal hearing of Multichoice Nigeria’s appeal against the N1.8trillion tax bill slapped on it by the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) revealed more than a few issues that were hitherto hidden from the public. That those issues were not made public prior to 23 September, when the TAT sat, was largely due to the fact that much of what is available about the dispute was from the FIRS which apparently sees attrition as an effective strategy.

    Disputes, let alone taxation-related, it has to be said, are not events that lend themselves to backslapping. As such, the adoption of an attrition is understandable.

    At the hearing, where the TAT adjourned to 20 October for its ruling, the directive earlier issued that MultiChoice should make a statutory deposit for the continuation of its appeal was the major item. On 24 August, the tribunal, relying on the provision of Paragraph 15(7) of the Fifth Schedule to the FIRS Act, had, according to a FIRS statement, ordered MultiChoice to deposit N900billion, half of the disputed sum to the FIRS for furtherance of its appeal.

    “The Tribunal may adjourn the hearing of the appeal to any subsequent day and order the appellant to deposit with the Service, before the day of the adjourned hearing, an amount, on account of the tax charged by the assessment under appeal, equal to the tax charged upon the appellant for the preceding year of assessment or half of the tax charged by the assessment under appeal, whichever is the lesser plus a sum equal to ten percent of the said deposit, and if the appellant fails to comply with the order, the assessment against which he has appealed shall be confirmed and the appellant shall have no further right of appeal with respect to that assessment,” states Paragraph 15(7) of the Fifth Schedule to the FIRS Act.

    The FIRS’ take on the TAT directive was contested by MultiChoice and by taxation experts, which branded it as wrong and an opportunistic stick-up. “The directive issued by the TAT in accordance with paragraph 15(7) of the Fifth Schedule to the FIRS Establishment Act requires MultiChoice Nigeria to deposit with FIRS an amount equal to the tax paid by MultiChoice Nigeria in the preceding year of assessment or one half of the disputed tax assessment under appeal, whichever is the lesser amount plus ten per cent. The lesser amount is the tax paid by MultiChoice Nigeria in the previous assessed year, which is substantially less than the disputed assessment,” MultiChoice had said in a statement.

    At the hearing, MultiChoice said it had complied with the TAT directive by depositing an amount required by the law with the FIRS. This, it said, it did by paying N8 billion in two tranches plus 10 percent mark-up to the FIRS account as instructed by the tribunal as per the provision of the FIRS Act.

    Before the hearing, many holes had been found in the position of the tribunal and FIRS by tax experts.

    Professor Mohammed Abdulrazak of the Lagos State University Law Faculty, in an article, argued that the directive for N900billion as a condition for the continuation of the appeal was tantamount to procedural rule breach and was indicative of denial of fair hearing. Titled “MultiChoice Nigeria, Tax Tribunal Ruling: Issues and Doubts,” Abdulrazak, a professor of taxation, argued that to ask the appellant to make such a huge deposit for the continuation of the appeal “is a failure by an administrative tribunal to observe procedural rules that are expressly laid down in the legislative instrument by which its jurisdiction is conferred and a miscarriage of justice from denial of fair hearing.” He questioned the TAT’s reliance on paragraph 15(7) as a basis for its directive because the FIRS failed to supply proof that MultiChoice neglected to file returns to the FIRS or for the year of assessment as prescribed by law.

    He equally expressed doubts that the tribunal’s conclusions were based on facts, given that the FIRS needed to show, with proof, that MultiChoice was in breach of FIRS Act before issuing the assessment notice. He noted that it was FIRS that applied for accelerated hearing, following MultiChoice’s appeal, and was required to show that the appellant was in violation.

    PricewaterCoopers (PWC), the professional services consulting giant, also took a scalpel to the directive on statutory deposit issued to MultiChoice. Analysing the ruling, PwC said MultiChoice is only required to pay the lower of the two amounts under the referenced provision of the law. It added that the referenced provision is only applicable on three conditions. These, according to the firm, are that the appellant has neglected to prepare and file returns for the year of assessment concerned as required by the tax laws; that appeal the constitutes an abuse of the appeal process or frivolous or that it is expedient to require the appellant to pay an amount as security for the prosecution of the appeal.

    Read Also: VAT: we may go to Supreme Court, says Fed. Govt

    It expressed surprise that the tribunal failed to cite any of the conditions as a basis for the directive.

    “The tribunal did not mention which facts were placed in proof of such condition(s), or how it considered that the FIRS’ facts were cogent enough to trigger the provision. The tribunal ignored this critical part of the provision and focused on the order for statutory deposit,” stated PwC.

    The only conditions required for the hearing of such an appeal, PwC added, is that the appellant files within 30 days and pays filing fees.

    PwC described the directive as indeterminate.

    “A simple confirmation of the amount paid by MCN in the preceding year of assessment, if any, would have enabled the tribunal to make a definite order that would not be open to misinterpretation by both parties involved in the dispute,” said PwC.

    Perhaps more than the legal arguments, I and other commentators had wondered how the FIRS arrived at the N1.8trillion tax bill. In its statement announcing its onslaught, the agency had claimed that Nigeria contributes 34 per cent of the aggregate revenue of the MultiChoice Group in addition to other parameters which, to be charitable, I will describe as unscientific. My position is backed, among others, by tax advisory consultancy, Andersen.

    The firm, in a 7 September piece posted on its website, questioned FIRS’ methods, charitably branding them as misleading. It just stopped short of saying that one flawed parameter invalidates everything the FIRS came up with.

    “This premise may be misleading. According to the 2019 Audited Financial Statements of the MultiChoice Group, Nigeria accounts for 34 per cent of the group’s Rest of Africa (RoA), with the RoA accounting for 29.96 per cent of the group’s revenues. Thus, the effective total revenue of Nigeria to the group is 10.19 per cent. It is arguable that 10.19 per cent is significantly different from 34 per cent of total revenue. However, one cannot help but question whether some other parameters in the computation of the alleged tax liability are also misleading,” Andersen stated in the article.

    Looked closely at, the FIRS’ strategy appears to be to throw as much as mud as possible at a wall, hoping some will stick.  Media reports of the last hearing indicated that the FIRS relied on assumptions to arrive at the tax bill. Aside from the claim of 34 per cent of total revenue attributed to Nigeria, the FIRS also claimed that MultiChoice receives remittances from abroad. Bizarre, given that the company’s operations are a jurisdiction-specific. A company not providing services in other jurisdictions cannot earn revenues from beyond the one in which it operates.

    The revenue agency equally claimed it arrived at its figures from its audit of MultiChoice’s income streams, which include payments from third parties such as DAAR Communications and Channels Television, both free-to-air offerings on its platforms, the carriage of which earns it nothing. Another flawed parameter is the assumption of the FIRS that third party payment platforms like Quickteller and Interswitch, through which MultiChoice receives payments for its services and products, contribute to its revenues. What the FIRS views as a smoking gun, from what is available, is everything but one.

    • Oladekojo, a public affairs analyst, writes from Akure

     

  • Decaying state of education under Obaseki’s watch

    Decaying state of education under Obaseki’s watch

    Good education is the best legacy any parent, guardian or government can bequeath to the next generation and young ones. The reason why the late Sage, Chief Obafemi Awolowo is still revered thirty-four years after his demise is because of the free primary school education he introduced in 1955 when he was the Premier of the Western Region.

    Dr. Nnamdi Azikiwe who went through hell and high water in getting an American education established the University of Nigeria Nsukka with the motto ‘To restore the dignity of man.’ It was the good education that Chief Anthony Eromosele Enahoro received from Kings College Lagos without a university education that made Azikiwe appoint him as the Editor of the Southern Nigeria Defender in Ibadan at the age of 21 – the youngest ever editor in the country.

    It is tragic that education has been thrown to the dogs under the ill fated administration of Governor Godwin Obaseki who doesn’t give a hoot about the extremely poor state of education in the state. Edo State has Edo College which produced many illustrious sons in the state but which is now a shadow of its former self due to criminal government neglect. How many of its alumnus would gladly send their children or wards to the school that ironically made them who they were today?

    The level of youth unemployment is extremely high. The National Bureau of Statistics puts it at about 33%. A way to tackle this societal malaise is to re-introduce vocational and technical education which was abandoned when the nation was awash with petro dollars. Igarra Technical College, Afuze Technical College, Uromi Technical College and Government Science and Technical College (GSTC) have been left to rot without any critical governmental intervention.

    The level of unemployment is extremely high in Edo State due to the fact that the state is largely a Civil Service State. Edo State with its large land mass has what it takes to be a heavily industrialized and agricultural driven economy. Sadly, over the last four years the Governor has shutdown all the Colleges in the state in the name of renovation, including College of Agriculture, Iguoriakhi which ought to be at the vanguard of agro-preneurial training and production. Governance has been absent since his swearing in last one year and he is just naming his cabinet after over a year of his winning his second term.

    Despite his acclaimed robust private sector experience which saw him establishing a Securities Dealing Firm – Afrinvest, he has failed in innumerable ways to industrialize the state. Imagine if many industries were functional in the state, it will lead to the concomitant high demand for highly skilled technical labour as their services will be needed to effectively run these industries and factories! It is bad enough that these schools have been left to rot, it is worse that even the few that manage to survive the rigours of an education there have no jobs to look forward to due to a visionless and rudderless leadership that is ideas bankrupt.

    The state of many of the government owned primary and secondary schools leaves much to be desired. The schools lack good toilet facilities, fields for sports, high population in the classroom, few teachers. The students study under the most excruciating conditions not even befitting for animals.

    Read Also: Obaseki: It’s sad people are making COVID-19 vaccination political issue

    We currently live in a globalized world where the world is now flat according to prominent American Economist, Thomas Friedman whose New York Times bestselling book ‘The World is Flat’ exposes the reality of globalization and how your nearest competitor could be someone millions of miles away. The covid 19 pandemic which changed the world of work to remote working is a lesson for our political leaders to adequately prepare the young minds for a fast changing world of work. This is an era where secondary school students in former war torn

    Rwanda learn about the use of drones. Yet, the students in Edo don’t learn with computers. How will they be able to compete in the future against their peers from all over the world? What sort of future is the Edo State Government under Obaseki preparing the children for?

    Despite the dictatorship of Cuba’s Fidel Castro which spanned over four decades amidst many assassination attempts and embargo by the United States after he defeated the US backed Cuban forces in the Bay of Pigs Invasion, his greatest legacy was his sturdy investment in education. He ensured that medical doctors in the country got the best training and created a system whereby they are exported to the rest of the world. Today, the exportation of medical doctors from there is their largest revenue earner dwarfing sugar which was their previous economic mainstay. Cuban doctors helped Italy effectively tackle Covid 19 which badly hit them.

    Crude Oil exports will be irrelevant anytime from now. Smart leaders are preparing their citizens to be relevant in a knowledge driven economy. The legendary Lee Kuan Yew prepared Singaporeans for this reality as he moved them from being a third world into a first world nation in less than three decades. Saudi Arabia has already saved up over two trillion dollars to be managed by Global Consulting Giant, Mckinsey in their preparation for a post oil economy. The UK has said that by 2030 they will completely phase out fossil fuel run cars in favour of electric cars. Imperial College has scrapped the Masters Degree Program in Petroleum Engineering because of the irrelevance of crude oil in the nearest future. What is Obaseki doing about this new trend? How is he preparing Edolites sons and daughters to compete in the knowledge economy that our curriculum is ill prepared to address? What are his educational legacies as he will be out of office in less than 38 Months time?

    It is sad that Edolites have the stereotype of prostitution as the bad policies of the leadership have pushed many of its young, pretty girls to prostitution abroad especially in Italy. A good education will equip these emotionally battered and financially emasculated ladies to a life of financial independence where they will be able to live their life solely on their own terms and not being dependent on male beasts for their sustenance.

    The Edo State House of Assembly is supposed to question him on the sorry state of education there but alas it is yet to be fully inaugurated since last year which has now transformed him into a full blown dictator.

    We call on the Civil Society and Public Spirited Individuals to mount pressure on this Pharoah of a leader to do the needful and rescue Edo State education from the mire and ensure that our students who will take up the mantle of leadership someday are well prepared for this challenge which will prevent them from perpetually playing the second fiddle both in their country and in the Diaspora.

     

  • Ogun: Abiodun stops teachers from teaching with tears

    Ogun: Abiodun stops teachers from teaching with tears

    If we remarked that the foundation of Ogun State was laid on education, we would not be wrong as the first Nigerian professors from the fields of  Philosophy, Paediatric , Psychiatry, Agriculture, Medicine, Nursing, Linguistics and so on are from Ogun State. And the first African to win a Nobel prize in Literature? Yes! If we continued that the administration of Prince Dapo Abiodun has a soft spot for education and has, in many ways which would be proven in what follows, improved the state of education and teaching in Ogun State, we would be right.

    The livewire of any nation at all is education. Therefore, at every point in time, a nation stands between education and destruction. A nation survives and triumphs on promoting its quality education and it dies and perishes on neglecting its education. Education is life; ignorance is death. And this serves the main reason Prince Dapo Abiodun has decided to resuscitate, in Ogun, the excellence and eminence that is attached to education in the developed parts of the world.

    On Tuesday, 5 October, 2021, World Teacher’s Day was celebrated within and around the globe but it took another commendable and elated dimension in Ogun State as a result of the activity of Prince Dapo Abiodun where he approved the immediate release of engagement letters to successful candidates of the Ogun Teach Programme to relieve the workload of teachers in the state, just as he also noted that he has approved the establishment of the Ogun State Education Intervention Fund (OGSEIF) to achieve improved funding for the educational sector of the state. Similarly, he announced the allocation of lands to the All Nigeria Conference of Principals of Secondary Schools (ANCOPSS) and Association of Primary School for their secretariats, Headteachers of Nigeria (AOPSHON) for the construction of their secretariats in the state.

    Here is a government, on assumption of office some 28 months ago, that ordered the release of promotion letters to deserving primary and secondary school teachers who are due for promotion between 2016 and 2017; the process of supplying new furniture to all primary and secondary schools for the use of learners to cushion the effects of acute shortage of furniture in our Schools is on-going; rehabilitation of over 956 classrooms in our primary and secondary Schools; upgrading of 42 of our Secondary Schools to Flagship Schools for better performance and productivity; and he gave the approval for the commencement of Ogun Digitalized Multimedia Lesson Plan where the teachers would be equipped with the wherewithal resources for effective delivery in line with global standards.

    It is noteworthy that Prince Dapo Abiodun’s administration is working in collaboration with a non-profit organisation; and has integrated 100 Fellows into Teach for Nigeria Programme. Also, it has successfully introduced the Pre-Shaded Optical Mark Recognition (OMR) objective answer sheet for the conduct of Basic Education Certificate Examination (BECE); a 50% increase in feeding allowance for learners in Special Needs Schools; full sponsorship of public school students to all academic competitions; resuscitation and relocation of Ogun State Braille Book Production Centre which has been moribund for many years; annual distribution of wheel chairs to the Special Needs Learners; commencement of the renovation of all the five Special Needs Schools in the State including provision of modern toilet facilities; approval of scholarships for outstanding students in all our tertiary institutions; approval for the establishment of Ogun State Education Intervention Fund (OGSEIF) to achieve  improved funding; reinstatement / Appointment of Headmaster/ Principal General— all of the aforementioned had been done in the last 28 months. If we call it a government that operates on productivity, meticulousness, speed and accuracy, we would be on point!

    Read Also: Lagos-Ota road ready in December, Abiodun assures

    Dr Ben Carson, author of “Gifted Hands”, reports that one of the orientalists said: “If you want to destroy the civilization of a nation, there are three ways of doing so: destroy the family structure, destroy education and lower the role models.” It is self-evident that teachers are the ladder that children and students climb to a bright future. If the ladder is wobbly, the outcome is woeful. Therefore, the best way to destroy a nation is to destroy its education. To destroy education, you should give no importance to the Teacher and lower his place in society so that students despise him. Against the destruction of education and the debasing treatment of teachers, it is clear that this administration is working to restore the glorious days where teachers enjoy a pride of place in our society

    For the primary and secondary school teachers, the society treats them with scorn. We are living at a time when not just the society despises teachers, their own students humiliate and mock them. The comedisation of ridiculing teachers is symptomatic of the general trend where abnormality becomes the norm.  People and students waste no time these days in demeaning their teachers, making them feel worthless just because those teachers are decent enough to live on their meager salaries. This is one of the dark sides of teaching that has permeated our society; and it is one thing Prince Dapo Abiodun has been tirelessly working to eliminate in Ogun State.

    As a result of that, one of the icing on the cake of the celebration of World Teacher’s Day in Ogun State was the showers of gifts on teachers in order to clean up their tears. Ogun State Governor, Prince Dapo Abiodun, yesterday, rewarded the best teachers in the state with cash prizes ranging from 1million Naira to 2million Naira; and the governor equally gifted a semi-detached bungalow to the best overall teacher for the year 2020 in the state. He remarked that he had done that because the State must continue to attract bright-minded young teachers to the teaching profession so that they will not miss the young creative minds who will become great educators and build both the state and the country in the near future. In other words, the Ogun State government is one that is focused on youths, their academics and the cultivation of brilliant minds.

    In his attitude of appreciating education and brilliance, on Thursday 22 April, 2021, Prince Dapo Abiodun splashed a two-bedroom bungalow and a sum of N2million on Oladimeji Sotunde, an indigene of the state who emerged as the Overall Best Graduating Student of the Lagos State University, Ojo, Lagos. Similarly, he pledged that his administration would set up an Education Endowment Fund with a seed money of N5million in honour of Faith Odunsi, a student of the Ambassadors College, Ota, who emerged winner in the Global Open Mathematics Tournament. All of the aforementioned made him clinched the awards as the best Education friendly Governor by All Nigeria Conference of Principals of Secondary Schools (ANCOPSS) in the South-West and Best Governor in the Educational Sector by the National Parents Teachers Association. Clearly, in education, like many other aspects, the administration is making laudable progress and it is an attestation to the gigantic status of Ogun State as both the Education capital (of) and the intellectual melting-pot in Nigeria. Education remains one of the biggest industries in Ogun State.

    It is the revival of workshops, seminars and other training programmes for teaching and non-teaching staff of the state public schools— to enhance their efficiency and productivity— that has led to the significant feedback that is visible in the State’s Education Sector through the recent exploits of the State’s young academic laureates where: Ogun State contingent won 11 laurels in different categories of awards in the areas of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM). Ogun State Institute of Technology (OGITECH) also won the best compliant Institution in Nigeria to the tune of N75 Million from Joint Admissios and Matriculation Board (JAMB) amongst other things.

    In all, as depicted by the programmes and policies of the state which is evident in the results that emerge daily, it appears that the administration of Prince Dapo Abiodun is confident that to rescue education, a nation must prioritise teachers’ welfare and one way of doing this is by paying them joyful salaries, hold them in high esteem and reward them for jobs well done and example of the gifts he rolled out yesterday. Research has shown that the better teachers are prioritised, the higher the outcomes achieved by students. Conversely, poor attitude towards teachers also results in poor student performance and education structure because poorly treated teachers lack motivation and passion for work. And this is what the administration of Prince Dapo Abiodun stands to eliminate.

    • Olalere writes in from Abeokuta via Olale0156@gmail.com
  • A state of emergency in Anambra

    A state of emergency in Anambra

    The people of Anambra look forward to November 6 with eagerness, optimism and anxiety. But, will the governorship poll hold in the tension-soaked state?

    It is a trying period for the entire Southeast. The Independent People of Biafra (IPOB) has issued a more devastating warning. It is another battle cry, which may put the exercise in jeopardy. According to the outlawed group, led by Nnamdi Kanu, who is now standing trial for rebellion, the entire Ndigbo should brace up for a month sit-at-home as from October 25.

    In fact,  the Chairman of Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Prof. Mahmood Yakubu, has raised the alarm that the November poll date may not be sacrosanct because of the threat to peace.

    Election ought to hold under a conducive atmosphere to be free, fair and credible. But, Yakubu feared that judging by the threat by IPOP, polling materials may be attacked. He also feared that electoral staff, particularly corps members who may be hired as ad hoc polling assistants, may stay away because the climate is cloudy. He said the perpetrators of the violence were targeting the poll.

    The fears are not without justification. The state has been hit by a curious pre-election violence. For months, certain elements have been on the prowl, disturbing the peace of the region. The lawful orders of six governors have  largely been ignored. But, the stay-at-home has been religiously obeyed. IPOB has denied being the sponsor of the recent sporadic attacks. But, the violence has persisted.

    Read Also: Anambra monarchs slam Malami over emergency rule threat

    The sit-at-home on Mondays have taken its toll on the zone. Socio-economic activities are disrupted. Students were prevented from sitting for school leaving examinations. It was an agonising experience. Shops and markets have remained closed. Free movement of persons and vehicles were forbidden. It is risky to violate the order of the ‘invisible’ enforcers. Scores had been killed. Properties have been damaged beyond repairs. The Southeast is worse for it.

    Last week, the residence of notable politicians who had criticised the group responsible for the disruptive tendencies were torched. There is no end in sight to the carnage.

    The electioneering has been grossly affected. Campaigns had been held as a huge cost to the three main political parties-All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA), All Progressives Congress (APC) and Peoples Democratic Party (PDP). Party leaders are now afraid to organise campaigns, which are important elements the process.

    It appears that the Southest governors are helpless. The arsonists have defiled the police. The entreaties by the ethnic mouthpiece, Ohanaeze Ndigbo, have fallen on deaf ears.

    Who are the faceless agitators? What are they fighting for? Where did they derive their mandate? For how long would the apprehension continue?

    Periodic governorship elections are important components of democracy, backed by the constitution. Elections offers a constitutional opportunities for the electorate to make choices on the type of leadership they prefer. If the poll does not hold until the expiration of the second term of Governor Willy Obiano, then, there will be a constitutional crisis. What next?

    It is therefore, important that the Federal Government and Anambra State government should work together to prevent an ugly situation and safeguard electoral democracy. The difficulty of restoring security and orderliness in Anambra should not be attributed to the incompetence or deficiency of the state government, as the Attorney General and Minister of Justice attempted to portray in his stern warning during the week.

    Is Obiano, the paper-weight, camouflage chief security officer of Anambra, in charge of the police and other security agencies? Are the agitators up in arms with the federal or Anambra government? If the highly centralised security agencies cannot restore order, what can the somehow powerless governor do?

    But, if the people of the Southeast resolve that sepatist agitations should be put on hold, would the few armed deviants have the impetus to remain on the firing line?

    The Southeast is enveloped in contradictions. The elders are pushing for power shift to Ndigbo. Some youths are calling for secession from Nigeria. In the kingless society, the youths have refused to listen to their elders.

    In his attribution, Obiano, while chiding the Attorney-General, rationalised that the miscreants usually invaded his state from outside. He boasted that he will deal with them. There is nothing to suggest that he has the capacity to stem the rot.

    Obiano attempted to downplay the gravity of the situation. He played down on the casualties. The governor wondered why a state of emergency has not been declared in the crisis-ridden North, despite the consistent onslaught by Boko Haram sect and bandits. In the North, it appears that banditry has not really interfered or disrupted any governorship election, thereby making  political succession impossible.

    A state of emergency is a bad omen. It is not a sign of development. It amounts to seizure of democratic rights, suspension of legitimate government, deprivation or denial of franchise or abolition of a mandate. Emergency may also pale into a manipulative weapon; a tool of oppression, suppression and subjugation.

    However, it may be the only logical option, especially when it is difficult to hold an election that will herald an orderly transfer of political control.

    The implication is that the Federal Government will assume authority and responsibility for the affected component unit.  The administrator is not elected, but imposed. He only takes order from the appointing authority at the centre. He may be estranged with the popular and legitimate aspirations of the people to whom he is not accountable. The State Executive Council is dissolved. The parliament is subdued. It is more or less constitutional dictatorship. The rationalisation would be that law and order had collapsed.  Certain freedoms or rights may be foreited under the pretex, Ironically, of safeguarding law and order or protecting lives and properties.

    The first state of emergency was declared in the defunct Western Region for six months in 1962 during the Obafemi Awolowo/Ladoke Akintola crisis. The administrator, who was Federal Health minister, was accused of partiality. The chain of events in the ‘wild wild’ West culminated into the fall of the First Republic and the civil war.

    The second state of emergency was declared in Ekiti in 2006 by former President Olusegun Obasanjo, following the escalation of the PDP crisis when Ayo Fayose was governor. An administrator, a military General, was posted to Ekiti, reminiscent of the posting of colonial resident.

    The third was the declaration of another state of emergency by Obasanjo in Plateau State and replacement of Governor Joshua Dariye with an administrator, another Army General. Dariye, unlike Fayose, was lucky to regain the lost seat.

    The threat by the Attorney-General is not an empty one. Certain conditions may make it logical. There may be a basis for it in law and history. But, a state of emergency can be averted. The condition is restoration of law and order in a state thirsty for tranquility.

    Many have called for force. It is not yielding results. Now, some are calling for maximum force. Others believe that dialogue is key.

    The solution lies with the Federal Government,  Anambra government, Ohanaeze Ndigbo, security agencies, the aggrieved youths, the political class and the people of the state and the region.

  • Zoning and Atiku Abubakar’s ‘Agabagege’ dance

    Zoning and Atiku Abubakar’s ‘Agabagege’ dance

    The Nigerian politician never ceases to amuse me, somehow like that part of scripture in Lamentations 3:23, like the mercies of the Great Architect, there are new amusements by Nigerian politicians on a per second basis, little wonder why the Nigerian nation despite its numerous challenges seems to have Nigerians smiling amidst the shuffering, perhaps it is one of the very many reasons that we were sometimes adjudged to be the most happiest of people on planet earth.

    The Nigerian politician I had written sometime earlier had mastered the art of saying two things at the same time or saying one thing today and another different thing entirely at the very next opportunity availed him. He has mastered the art of appropriating the very words ‘Is’ and ‘Was’ to suit his political posturing, and so today a Fani Kayode can dismiss Buhari as worse than Kim IL-Sung, Kim Jong-Il and Kim Jong-Un and tommorow address him as Africa’s most respected president with the same mouth. The Nigerian politician also has a toxic attribute and that is he or she must believe that Nigerians have or suffer from some kind of amnesia or dementia, they must believe again like that scripture in the Holy Book, the Bible, that “Old Comments, Posturing and convictions are passed away”  he stands by the new convictions, every other conviction is old news, his new or latest stance is the gospel for now!

    Therefore to say that I am amused by former Vice President Atiku Abubakar’s latest stance on zoning is to state the obvious. This is a man who has seen and done it all in Nigeria’s politics, with his emergence in politics dating back to the early 90’s where as a protégé of Umaru Shehu Yar-Adua Atiku began his political journey eventually contesting for the highest office in the land for a record  five times.

    Read Also: 2023: Why North should retain PDP presidential ticket, by Atiku

    Now, amidst the buzz, cacophony and drama that has been witnessed owing to the clamor that President Muhammadu Buhari’s successor must come from Southern Nigeria, Atiku Abubakar is surprisingly living in denial and has embarked on a revisionism of his earlier stance. Hear Atiku:

    “Where the president comes from has never been the problem of Nigeria neither will it be the solution. There is no such thing as the president from Southern Nigeria or president from Northern Nigeria. There is only one president from Nigeria, by Nigeria and for Nigeria.”

    While I agree that Atiku despite his numerous encumbrances is entitled to seek any office in the land as a citizen of Nigeria, I must state that his desperation to be president is nauseating and takes away whatever lustre his political career once possessed.

    This is the same Atiku who had in 2010 insisted alongside a number of top Northern politicians that the PDP should respect the zoning arrangement enshrined in its constitution.

    Atiku had consistently at that period, insisted that following the demise of President Umaru Yar Adua in office, it was the turn of the North to produce the nation’s president for the next four years, how he now attempts to  reconcile both diverse stances of the past and the present smacks of hypocrisy or what the Yoruba’s call Agabagebe!

    To Atiku’s chagrin, why should the PDP zone its ticket to the South, when his almighty ambition to be President is still alive. Readers must however note that while Atiku was quite vociferous in his 2011 bluster on zoning, he has this time rather hemmed and hawed.

    Let us ask Atiku, why was zoning necessary in 2011 and even 2015, to the extent that he even moved to the All Progressives Congress, APC to seek his luck there but not neccesary now in 2023? Why is Atiku Abubakar seeking to circumvent the same zoning arrangement he had championed even after having eight years of President Muhammadu Buhari even though Buhari is from the APC?

    Given the circumstances that continue to stare Nigerians and her future in the face, particularly the challenges that have arisen and continue to threaten the nation’s stability and security is it out of place for the likes of Atiku  to respect the pluralist nature of Nigeria and respect the zoning arrangement?

    Is the same situation ascribed by Atiku as reasons for zoning the Presidency in 1999 to the SouthWest not the same situation playing out in Nigeria today? Is Atiku’s presidential ambition bigger than the unity of this great country? Now if Atiku as a patriot that he claims to saw reason to support a president of SouthWest extraction what stops him now from etching his name as a statesman and supporting a candidate from the SouthEast, a zone that has never produced a president and could surely use such to heal the wounds of the past and stop the appeal of seperatism that is growing in the region.

    For Justice and fairness and to enhance a sense of belonging in this frail nation, Atiku should stop this Agabagebe dance and allow for zoning, it is in the interest of this country

  • Why did Abdulrazak Gurnah win the Nobel Prize in Literature?

    Why did Abdulrazak Gurnah win the Nobel Prize in Literature?

    It finally happened. After years of getting my Nobel Prize in literature predictions wrong—and, in some cases, missing the mark in spectacular fashion—I got one right. On Thursday morning, the Swedish Academy announced that Abdulrazak Gurnah, the Zanzibari British novelist and literary critic, had won the Nobel Prize for “his uncompromising and compassionate penetration of the effects of colonialism and the fate of the refugee in the gulf between cultures and continents.”

    OK, I’m stretching the truth a hair: I ended my annual predictions piece by giving “someone not mentioned on this list from a country not mentioned on this list” 2–1 odds of winning the Nobel Prize. Gurnah wasn’t mentioned; neither was Tanzania (which merged with Zanzibar in 1964, when Gurnah was 16), therefore I correctly predicted the winner. This may be a technicality, but if you have my lousy track record you must take those small victories whenever they present themselves.

    No one had Gurnah on their radar. For the last six years, I have used several oddsmakers—most prominently the British sports book Ladbrokes—as a source for my annual previews. To the best of my knowledge, Gurnah has never appeared as a contender, even with odds of 100–1. He is, in some cases, the reverse of 2017’s Nobel laureate, Kazuo Ishiguro, another writer who emigrated to England at a young age. Ishiguro’s name also never appeared in Nobel speculation, largely because he was believed to be too popular—two of his books have been turned into Academy Award–nominated films. Gurnah, as it turns out, was too obscure.

    A recently retired professor of English literature at the University of Kent, Gurnah was perhaps best known for his work as a critic, which is another reason he was ignored. Ironically, much of his work has focused on writers who are themselves frequent subjects of Nobel Prize speculation: He wrote the introduction to the Penguin Classics edition of Ngig) wa Thiong’o’s A Grain of Wheat and is the editor of The Cambridge Companion to Salman Rushdie. (This version of the Swedish Academy, which awards the Nobel Prize, is particularly humorless—even by Swedish standards—but this may very well be its idea of a joke.)

    Read Also: Tanzanian Abdulrazak Gurnah wins 2021 Nobel Prize in Literature

    Gurnah’s own novels are largely unknown outside of the U.K. and aren’t particularly well known inside of it. While American publishers have put out his books in the past, the print rights to nearly all of his titles have reverted; his books have, per the journalist Jane Friedman, sold only 3,000 copies in the United States—total. Given the ongoing supply-chain issues wrought by the pandemic, it might be quite a while before bookstores will be able to restock his titles for newly curious readers.

    Born in Zanzibar, Gurnah moved to the U.K. as a refugee after a military coup in 1964 that led to the persecution of citizens of Arabic origin. He has lived in Britain ever since and has written exclusively in English, his second language. (Gurnah is a native speaker of Swahili.) His first novel, Memory of Departure, a coming-of-age novel that takes place amid a failed uprising, was published in 1987. He has written nine books since, nearly all of which explore themes of memory, migration, and the legacy of colonialism. His best-known, 1994’s Paradise, was highlighted by the Nobel Prize Committee and shortlisted for the Booker Prize when it came out.

    Gurnah is the first writer from Africa to win the Nobel Prize in literature in more than a decade and the first nonwhite writer from Africa to win in nearly 30 years. He is only the sixth writer from Africa to win overall. He is also the second Black African writer to win, following the Nigerian playwright Wale Soyinka, who won in 1986; he is the first Black writer to win since Toni Morrison was awarded the prize in 1993.

    Many, myself included, had tipped 2021 as a year in which the Nobel Prize in Literature Committee would honor a Black African writer. Still, Gurnah was a surprising choice. Ngig) wa Thiong’o, the most influential and, arguably, important living African writer, has long been considered a front-runner for the Nobel Prize. He may effectively be out of the running, now that Gurnah has won the award—the fact that Gurnah has written extensively about Ngig)’s work suggests a troll on par with what the committee did to Philip Roth near the end of his life. Similarly, a number of African writers who are far more prominent than Gurnah haven’t yet won the prize, including Boris Diop, Nuruddin Farah, and Mia Couto. Five of the last six African laureates have, like Gurnah, written in English, with the Egyptian novelist Naguib Mahfouz the one exception.

    There is, perhaps, a political dimension to the committee’s thinking, given that much of Gurnah’s writing focuses on migration and that he came to Britain as a refugee. Asked directly about this after the announcement, Committee Chair Anders Olsson demurred, saying that the prize was not awarded for political reasons and that “the phenomenon of exile and migration has been there for many, many years.” He suggested, moreover, that the Nobel Prize Committee had been following his work since the 1980s—a somewhat surprising claim, given that Gurnah only published two little-known novels at the tail end of that decade—before adding that he didn’t think the migrant crisis “has had any immediate impact on our decision.” Still, the Nobel Prize Committee is known for making political statements, sub rosa and otherwise, with its choices.

    This is the fourth Nobel Prize in literature that has been awarded since the prize was delayed for a year amid a gambling and sexual assault scandal. The Nobel Committee’s old guard won out in the subsequent power struggle, pushing out the Swedish Academy’s first female permanent secretary, who had no role in the scandal, in the process. The four writers who have won the Nobel Prize since—Olga Tokarczuk, Peter Handke, Louise Glück, and now Gurnah—have all been fairly traditional Nobel laureates: serious, unimpeachably literary, internationally obscure. Of the four, the most famous is arguably Handke, who is hardly a household name. (He is possibly best known for giving a short speech at Slobodon Miloševiæ’s funeral.)

    After years of envelope-pushing—awarding Svetlana Alexievich, primarily a nonfiction writer who often works in oral histories; Bob Dylan, a singer-songwriter and one of the most famous people of the last 60 years; and Kazuo Ishiguro, a literary superstar—the Nobel Prize in literature has settled back into what it has been for much of its history: an unpredictable prize that selects its often obscure laureates for reasons that aren’t always entirely clear. This is, in my opinion, the best use of the Nobel Prize: as a way of highlighting neglected but worthy writers.

    In the past, these neglected writers have almost exclusively been European. (The closest recent laureate to Gurnah is probably Jean-Marie Gustave Le Clézio, the French-Mauritian novelist who was more or less unknown outside of France when he was awarded the prize in 2008.) Gurnah, of course, exists in a nebulous place, having lived in England for most of his life. Nevertheless, the Nobel Prize has, for most of its history, struggled to live up to its mandate as an award for global literature. By awarding Gurnah, the committee is making a small step toward finally living up to that worthy goal.

    • This article was first published in www.newrepublic.com
  • Wike, setting the pace in fiscal responsibility

    By Paulinus Nsirim

    Rivers State is the best performing and most financially viable state in Nigeria today in terms of fiscal performance.

    A report by BudgIT, a highly respected  Non-Governmental Organisation (NGO) which focuses on fiscal performances of both federal and state governments in the country, listed Rivers State at the top position, ahead of four other states, namely: Lagos, Anambra, Ebonyi and Kebbi, in the fiscal performance ranking of states for 2020/2021.

    According to the BudgIT annual report on the state of States, released on Monday, September 27, 2021, Rivers State, once again, topped the overall 2021 Fiscal Performance Ranking, indicating that “the fiscal fundamentals of this state, compared to others in the country, are more prudently managed”.

    To put the ranking in its proper context and perspective, it is important to note that BudgIT, is a civic-tech organisation leading the advocacy for transparency and accountability in Nigeria and three other African countries and it has launched the 2020 edition of its annual States of States report entitled: “Fiscal Options for Building Back Better.”

    This report is BudgIT’s signature analysis that provides citizens, CSOs, stakeholders and policymakers with robust insights on ways to implement financial and institutional reforms that will improve states’ fiscal performance and sustainability levels.

    Gabriel Okeowo, CEO, BudgIT, shedding more light on how the ranking was derived, said that ‘for this year’s report, the organization examined states’ fiscal health using four metrics namely; the ability of states to meet their operating expenses with IGR and VAT, states’ ability to cover their operating expenses and loan repayment with their total revenue, how much fiscal room states have to borrow more, and the degree to which each state prioritizes capital expenditure with respect to their operating expenses.”

    Read Also; Wike, combat and cant

    The nitty gritty of the report as it concerns the excellent fiscal performance of Rivers State under the pragmatic leadership of Governor Nyesom Wike, highlights the critical areas that the State exhibited astute prudential management to include the following:

    1. Rivers State was top and one of Only three (3) states in the country that could meet their operating expenses obligations with a combination of their IGR and Value Added Tax (VAT) as measured in  BudgIT’s  ‘Index A’ ranking.  The others  are Lagos and Anambra states.
    2. Rivers State came out tops amongst five states which prioritized investment in infrastructure by spending more on capital expenditure than operating expenses. This analysis was based on each state’s 2020 revenue and the other states are Ebonyi, Anambra and Cross River states in the south and Kaduna state in the north.
    3. Rivers State, according to the NGO,  was equally amongst seventeen states which were still able to improve their investment in capital expenditure, from 2019 levels, despite fiscal constraints induced by COVID-19.
    4. The report identified States with the highest foreign debt that were significantly hit due to negative exposure to exchange rate volatility. The states are: Lagos, Kaduna, Edo, Cross River and Bauchi.
    5. Furthermore, Rivers State is NOT amongst the five (5) states which accounted for more than half (that is 63.63% or N300.7bn) of the net year-on-year sub-national debt increase of N472.63bn for all the states between 2019 and 2020. The states are Lagos, Kaduna, Anambra, Benue and Zamfara.

    The overwhelming import of this impeccable report is that Rivers State, under the brilliant financial management of Governor Wike, has once again emerged as the best prudently managed state in the country.

    Ironically, some self styled leadership experts had gone to town with concocted and outdated figures allegedly from the Debt Management Office( DMO), to claim that Rivers State was the second most indebted state in the country.

    This unpatriotic, shameful and loquacious attempt to de-market the State for cheap political recognition and tokenist gains, was a very desperate attempt at misleading the people with misinformation.

    This was soon debunked by the DMO, the very establishment they alluded their misleading information to, which published the comprehensive debt profile of all the states and the Federal Government and confirmed that Rivers State was not even amongst the first 10 most indebted states in the country.

    This annual report has once again exposed the pernicious misinformation being peddled by the fake analysts who would deliberately prefer to turn a blind eye to the massive infrastructural development and the astute acumen with which Governor Wike is managing the State’s resources, especially at a time when the global economy has been devastated by the COVID-19 pandemic.

    It is on record that for every project which the Governor Wike’s administration has embarked; Flyovers, dual carriage highways, educational institutions campuses, healthcare facilities, agriculture, housing, sandfilling and reclamation of vast swathes of land in riverine communities across the length and breath of the state, there has always been a structured payment schedule to ensure that no project is delayed as a result of funding constraints.

    Even those projects for which loan facilities have been sourced to execute, like the recently approved N25billion (Twenty Five Billion Naira) loan from Zenith Bank for the funding of the Oyigbo-Afam Road, Chokocho-Igbodo Road, the tenth flyover in Port Harcourt and other projects, a servicing and loan repayment schedule which has ensured that the loan would be repaid within eighteen months from the State Internally Generated Revenue (IGR), has already been put in place.

    Indeed, the most impressive aspect of Governor Wike’s fiscal prudence is the fact that funds are clearly appropriated to defined and verifiable projects like the Nabo Graham-Douglas Campus of the Nigerian Law School at Rumueme, Port Harcourt, the Chokocho-Igbodo Road in Etche Local Government Area, the Oyigbo-Afam Road in Oyigbo Local Government Area,bamongst others, which have been earmarked for the recent N25 billion.

    Governor Wike has also been at the forefront of monitoring the pace of construction and implementation of these projects, with his hands-on, pragmatic, often spontaneous on-the-spot assessment and verification visits to project sites, to ensure that they are delivered to specifications and within the time frame stipulated for the projects.

    It has therefore come as little or no surprise at all that the State has come out tops in the BudgIT fiscal perfomance ranking of states for 2021. The reason for this is simple; Governor Wike’s midas touch in fiscal acumen and the strategic prudential discipline which had been the hallmark in the management of the states financial resources, is unparalleled and yielding fantastic reports.

    Governor  Wike has always sounded it loud and clear that he has no reason to be shuttling to Abuja, cap in hand, to go and beg for funds like some administrators do. He has left no one in doubt since he assumed office in May 2015, that he is not a lazy leader, but is well aware of his avowed pledge and commitment, both in actions and comments, and he is very determined not leave any debt behind for the incoming administration in the state.

    Indeed, for a leader  who has also kept faith with his pledge to Rivers people of his commitment not to leave any abandoned project behind for the next administration, as well as his promise to make sure that he delivers legacy projects to every local government area in the state, the obvious conclusion to be made is that Rivers State will continue to excel in its fiscal perfomance till the end of the tenure of the Governor Wike’s administration.

    • Nsirim is Commissioner for Information and Communications, Rivers State