Category: Commentaries

  • Trump’s crusade to save “Nigerian Christians”

    Trump’s crusade to save “Nigerian Christians”

    Sir: When President Donald J. Trump thundered recently that he might send American troops to Nigeria to “rescue persecuted Christians,” one could almost hear the angels clearing their throats for the opening hymn of a new Made-in-America Crusade. Only that this time, the Saviour is not nailed to a cross—he tweets from a golden throne and preaches deliverance through drone strikes.

    Trump’s sudden compassion for Nigerian Christians would have been heart-warming if not for the lingering smell of hypocrisy wafting all the way from Washington to the savannahs of northern Nigeria. The world has seen this script before. America creates chaos, arms fall into the wrong hands, terrorists multiply like weeds after rain—and then the same America returns, halo polished, claiming to be the redeemer.

    Let’s rewind to 2011. The “moral” United States, under President Barack Obama, turned Libya from one of Africa’s most stable nations into a sprawling marketplace of mercenaries and misery. The fall of Muammar Gaddafi sent truckloads of weapons cascading southward—through Mali, Niger, and Chad—until Boko Haram found itself awash with ammunition and ambition.

    When Nigeria sought U.S. help to fight the very monsters that America’s Libyan adventure helped spawn, the Obama administration withheld critical military equipment—because Nigeria had passed an anti-LGBT law. Apparently, America’s moral compass points toward whichever direction its sexual politics lean, not toward genuine peace.

    And yet, the same Bible that America loves to quote during campaign season already criminalizes homosexual acts. So one must ask: What “Christian values” can a morally bankrupt America export to a country whose real struggle is survival, not pronouns?

    Now enters Trump, the self-anointed Defender of the Faith, claiming he will “save Nigerian Christians.” One might think the man had discovered the Book of Acts last week. But beneath the pious growl of his rhetoric lies a more familiar melody: political opportunism dressed in religious robes.

    He speaks of “radical Islamists” not out of compassion, but calculation. His base—American evangelicals—love such talk. It feeds their apocalyptic imagination while securing their votes. It’s the same logic that turned “Make America Great Again” into a creed and Trump into its reluctant messiah.

    Read Also: How Nigeria can tackle crude oil theft- Ned Nwoko

    But how exactly does he plan to “save” these Christians? Will his Marines parachute into Nigerian villages and ask for baptism certificates before opening fire? Or will the Pentagon distribute Bibles with infrared chips that glow red only in Christian hands? Because in Nigeria, Christians and Muslims live side by side, shop at the same markets, and even intermarry. There are no “Christian neighbourhoods” to rescue. A Trump raid would be an equal-opportunity slaughter.

    Let us be honest: Trump’s concern for Nigeria is not about religion—it’s about regaining America’s shrinking influence in Africa. China is building railways; Russia is signing defence pacts; and the U.S., late to the feast, now arrives waving a blood-stained Bible. Nigeria, rich in oil, gas, and critical minerals like lithium, suddenly looks “spiritually” interesting.

    When empires dress greed in the garb of faith, the sermon always ends in ashes.

    If the United States truly wished to help Nigeria curb terrorism, it would not send sermons wrapped in missiles. It would share real-time intelligence on terrorist movements; provide advanced surveillance equipment to locate camps in forests; offer targeted training to Nigerian Special Forces, and, help rebuild the communities that terrorism has wrecked.

    But those steps do not generate dramatic headlines—or evangelical applause. So, Trump prefers a more cinematic script: “Send the troops, save the Christians, and Make America Feel Righteous Again.”

    Trump’s proposed “sweet and fast” raid on Nigeria is not about rescuing anyone. It is about resurrecting himself—a theatrical crusade staged for applause at home, not compassion abroad. The tragedy is that behind his vanity parade lie real human lives: Nigerians of every faith struggling to live beyond the reach of both terrorists and foreign saviours.

    So when Trump preaches salvation for Nigerian Christians, let the world remember:

    This gospel is not according to Christ—it is according to Trump, chapter Ego, verse Empire.

    •Leonard Karshima Shilgba, <shilgba@gmail.com>

  • President Trump’s war of interest

    President Trump’s war of interest

    Sir: The recent statement from the President of the United States, threatening to cut aid to Nigeria and order military preparations unless attacks on Christians cease, has escalated an already tense atmosphere into alarming headlines. Many interpret this declaration as an expression of moral outrage, which is understandable. However, such an approach risks causing more harm than good, not only to the individuals it aims to protect, but also to U.S.–Nigerian relations and the broader principles that should guide international responses to crises.

    First and foremost, it is crucial to acknowledge that the complexities of Nigeria’s security situation are multifaceted. The country grapples with a range of violence, from the insurgencies of Boko Haram and ISIS-affiliated groups in the northeast to communal clashes and criminal banditry in the Middle Belt and northwest regions. Victims of this violence span various religious and ethnic communities, and the root causes of such violence often lie in local grievances, historical conflicts, governance failures, land and resource competition, and the erosion of security institutions.

    Unilateral military threats carry substantial legal and practical risks. International law imposes strict limitations on the use of force across borders; unless clearly defending oneself or authorized by the UN Security Council, foreign military interventions in sovereign states raise troubling questions about legality and legitimacy. Even when framed as humanitarian efforts, such interventions can have unintended consequences: they may fuel nationalist sentiments, embolden extremists, destabilize fragile institutions, and create power vacuums that further exacerbate violence. Any entity contemplating military action must carefully consider whether it can achieve sustainable protection without aggravating the dynamics that lead to violence.

    Additionally, coercive gestures may undermine long-term partnerships and hinder progress. Nigeria is a strategic partner for the U.S. in Africa, vital for regional stability, counterterrorism cooperation, and economic relations. Sudden aid cuts could have a detrimental impact on civilians who rely on humanitarian assistance and development support. The threat of military force complicates collaboration on shared security objectives. If the aim is to strengthen protections for vulnerable communities, a more effective approach would involve continuous diplomatic pressure, conditional aid tied to specific reforms, and support for Nigeria’s capacity to investigate and hold accountable those who perpetrate abuses—not abrupt aid cuts or threats of military intervention.

    This discussion does not advocate for complacency. Where credible evidence exists regarding systematic persecution, the international community has both a moral obligation and practical means to act responsibly. Options include targeted sanctions against perpetrators, judicial cooperation for accountability, multilateral pressure through the United Nations and regional organizations, bolstered civilian protection programs, and strengthening the rule of law and community reconciliation.

    Read Also: How Nigeria can tackle crude oil theft- Ned Nwoko

    At its core, the ongoing tensions reflect a complex interplay of interests, especially regarding U.S. foreign policy. As the United States faces significant economic challenges, it needs to explore mutual relations that benefit both parties. However, being a superpower does not justify military interventions in resource-rich countries. Historical examples, such as U.S. involvement in Iran and Libya, highlight the unintended consequences of such actions.

    Instead of resorting to force, the U.S. should focus on diplomatic engagement, trade partnerships, and cultural exchanges that foster lasting ties. While the U.S. has specific interests globally, prioritizing collaboration over coercion will lead to a more stable and prosperous future for all nations involved.

    To Nigeria’s leaders, this moment calls for urgency and humility. Protecting citizens, irrespective of their faith, remains the core duty of any government. Authorities should embrace impartial investigations, foster collaboration with partners, and implement proactive measures such as effective policing, support for displaced communities, and robust early-warning mechanisms.

    This is a pivotal moment, a stark reminder of the challenges that lie at our doorstep. It calls for a reassessment of our approach and emphasizes the urgent need for well-coordinated actions to address our national issues. We cannot afford to wait for others to highlight our struggles. Let this be a turning point in our commitment to take responsibility for our future and ensure that we are active participants in forging the path forward, rather than passive observers of our own fate. The time for change is now.

    •Isah Aliyu Chiroma,<aliyuisahchiroma29@gmail.com>

  • Trump wrong to put Nigeria on Country of Particular Concern list

    Trump wrong to put Nigeria on Country of Particular Concern list

    By Mustapha Isah

    The US president, Donald Trump has issued a threat to take military action in Nigeria over what he sees as the persecution of Christians. He has accused the Nigerian government of not doing enough to prevent radical Islamists from carrying out what he refered to as genocide against Christians.

    Trump even claimed that Christianity is facing an existential threat in Nigeria. He warned that the US military would invade Nigeria and deal a severe blow the Islamist radicals responsible for the killing  of Christians in Nigeria if the Nigerian government doesn’t do something fast about it.

    The US President’s claim of Christian genocide in Nigeria is completely wrong. His threat of military action in Nigeria is based on a false premise . Framing Nigeria’s current security challenges as driven by religion is way off the mark.. Christians, Muslims, animists and atheists have all be victims of insecurity in Nigeria.

    The Boko Haram insurgency started in Borno State in 2009 under former President Umar Musa Yar’Adua. He did his best to curtail them until he passed away. The subsequent governments of former President Goodluck Jonathan and Muhammadu Buhari battled the insurgents , in the best way they could. Infact, under Buhari, bandits emerged terrorising the north west and north central zones. These groups do not have respect for the religious affiliation of their victims. It is on record that Boko Haram insurgents have attacked several Mosques and killed thousands of Muslims in Borno, Yobe , Kano and Adamawa, while bandits have decimated hundreds of Muslims in Zamfara, Sokoto and Niger States. If the motive of the insurgents and bandits is  to wipe out Christians as alleged by Trump, why are they also killing Muslims? This is to show that their motive goes beyond religion. The aim of the Islamic terrorists is to set up a Muslim theocratic  enclave in northern Nigeria and are determined to crush anyone who opposes them, Christians and Muslims alike.

    When you claim that there is genocide against Christians in Nigeria, the impression being created is that no Christian is safe in the country. The US government’s framing of the violence in Nigeria as Islamists killing Christians oversimplifies a complex situation.The motives for violent attacks in other areas such as Benue and Plateau States are different. The fertile land in Benue is an attraction to the nomadic herders resulting in conflicts between sedentary farmers who are Christians and the Fulani herders who are Muslims  . A slightly different scenario is playing out on the Plateau where the conflict is between the indigenes who are Christians and the Muslim Fulani settlers. The Plateau situation is largely about land grabbing.Farmers have destroyed herds of livestock worth millions of naira  , and sometimes killed herders in retaliation for the destruction of their crops.

    There shouldn’t be a debate as to whether Muslims or Christians are being killed in Nigeria. No innocent life should be cut short by any violent group. It is the responsibility of the government to protect the life of every Nigerian. Humanity is diminished when life is lost unjustly. In spite of the defective nature of the 1999 consideration ( as amended) , it recognises the fact that the number one priority of government is the protection of life and property.

    No nation is completely immune from violence. The US  itself experiences attacks on places of worship including Churches, Mosques and Synagogues. But the perpetrators of such heinous crimes are swiftly brought to justice. But why is it so difficult for the government in Nigeria  to bring the perpetrators of the killings justice?

    The administration of President Bola Tinubu has made appreciable effort in  dealing with the security situation he inherited.

    The Global Terrorism Index, an acclaimed international organization has reported a drop in terror attacks in Nigeria. Our gallant military is decimating the insurgents and bandits. More than 13,500 terrorists have been killed, over 17,000 suspects arrested and 9,800 abducted individuals rescued in the last two years.

    Leaders of terror groups and bandits are being arrested and some sent to meet their maker. Some leaders of the Ansaru terror group have been apprehended and are facing prosecution.

    Those responsible for the attacks on the Owo Catholic Church in Ondo State and the recent killings in Yelwata in Guma Local Government Area of Benue State have been arrested and have been arraigned in court to face justice. But more needs to be done.

    Read Also: Soludo’s victory shows Nigeria not gravitating to one-party state – Okechukwu 

    President Tinubu has expressed his commitment to defeat terror. He recently told the new service chiefs that Nigerians expect results from them,  rather than excuses, in the fight against insecurity. The Federal Government has also said it was open to receiving the support international partners in the fight against insurgency and banditry, but based on mutual respect.. It is obvious that Nigeria needs international assistance to defeat terrorism. The Federal Government should seek assistance from willing foreign partners.

    Nigeria is a sovereign nation. It’s territorial integrity must be respected by all , including the United States. It  will be a violation of the United Nations charter for the US to carry out any attack on Nigerian soil without the express authorization of the government. The US can assist in defeating terror through intelligence sharing, training of our military, provision of military software and hardwares, but definitely not through threats.

    President Tinubu whose wife is a Christian, who handed over mission schools to their original owners , instituted a Christian annual thanksgiving of  the Lagos State civil servants, promoted religious harmony when he was the Governor of the state cannot be associated with religious intolerance  or  targeting of  Christians. He has repeatedly vowed to uphold the principle of freedom of religion as enshrined in Nigeria’s constitution.

    The government should see Trump’s threat as a wake up call to re-double efforts in the fight against insecurity in Nigeria.

    Nigerians should not allow Trump’s introduction of religion into our security challenges to divide them.. They should instead rise up as one as support the government and our security agencies to defeat terrorism.

    Isah, FNGE, is former President, Nigerian Guild of Editors .

  • Securing Nigeria through town–gown partnership

    Securing Nigeria through town–gown partnership

    By Kayode Egbetokun

    Let me speak first as a citizen before I speak as the Inspector-General of Police. I am deeply concerned about the moral and mental state of our country. This gathering is not just another academic conference; it is an awakening. It calls our minds to think differently, listen deeply, and act wisely. I look around and see the officers who protect and the lecturers who teach are in this hall. The elders who advise and the youths who will inherit tomorrow are also here. Seated among us are our revered traditional rulers; custodians of wisdom, culture, and community harmony; whose moral authority still commands peace where the law sometimes cannot reach. The journalists, chroniclers of truth, whose pens and voices help shape national perception and hold power accountable. And let us not forget the entrepreneurs and business leaders who drive our economy, the artisans and traders whose hands sustain daily life, the clergy who guide our moral compass, and every citizen whose choices shape our collective destiny. Together, we all have a part to play in building the Nigeria we desire, a nation secured not by force alone, but by the united will of its people.

    The truth is that a nation’s first line of defence is not its army; it is its people; educated, disciplined, and united by the rule of law. A belief is formed long before a shot is fired. A notion comes before a bomb is made. Truth is surrendered before peace is broken. That is why gatherings like this matter. They speak not only to the noise of our times but to the conscience of our country. By hosting this summit, LASUED has shown rare vision. You have reminded us that universities are not just repositories of knowledge; they are refineries of the national conscience. So, we are not only here to discuss the police; we are here to discuss peace itself. For safety is not merely the absence of crime; it is the presence of justice, knowledge, and trust. Insecurity is not just a policing problem; it is a societal one, rooted in the failure of values, education, and civic discipline.

    When ideals crumble, ignorance rises. When people stop trusting, fear spreads. That is why the dialogue between the town and the gown is not ceremonial; it is existential. The patrol van and the classroom are fighting the same war: one battles ignorance, the other its consequences. One opens the mind; the other protects what the mind has built. When the teacher and the officer walk together, crime loses shelter. When ideas and enforcement work together, peace begins to take shape. As we deliberate today, let us remember this truth: Nigeria’s future will not be secured by guns, but by brains and moral discipline.

    SECURING NIGERIA THROUGH THE TOWN–GOWN PARTNERSHIP

    The Town–Gown Partnership must no longer be viewed as a conversation between the Police and the universities alone. It must evolve into a national doctrine of collaboration; a model that binds every sector of our society together under a shared mission of peace, progress, and prosperity. The “town” represents the vibrant energy of our people,  the markets, the media, the palaces, the mosques, the churches, the workshops, the farms, the boardrooms, and the communities that pulse with the daily rhythm of Nigeria. The “gown” represents the knowledge powerhouses, our universities, research centres, think tanks, and professional institutions that create ideas, technologies, and policies to shape the future. When these two realms merge; the practical wisdom of the town and the intellectual capital of the gown, a nation moves from reaction to prediction, from survival to innovation, from suspicion to synergy. This partnership must therefore extend to every sphere of national life:

    • Between government and academia, to design policies rooted in evidence and measurable impact.

    • Between security agencies and communities, to transform policing from enforcement to partnership.

    • Between business and education, to turn research into enterprise and create jobs for our youth.

    • Between religious institutions and civic leaders, to rebuild moral capital and social discipline.

    • Between media professionals and educators, to promote truth, tolerance, and national cohesion.

    • Between traditional institutions and modern governance, to blend wisdom with law and heritage with innovation.

    No nation develops in isolation. The mind of the university must engage with the realities of the street; the hands that build must learn from the heads that think. It is in this handshake between knowledge and experience that national strength is born. Every sector has a stake; and a role. The teacher shapes conscience; the cleric nurtures morality; the entrepreneur drives productivity; the artist awakens national spirit; the journalist protects truth; the technologist creates solutions; the traditional institutions remain the custodians of our cultural heritage promoting peaceful coexistence and the Police, standing at the moral centre of it all, protect the peace that allows every other sector to thrive. If Nigeria must stand secure, then our strength must not lie in silos but in synergy, where every citizen, every scholar, every faith, every trade, and every tongue becomes part of one shared security network.

    This is the true meaning of the Town–Gown Partnership: a whole-of-society covenant where knowledge serves humanity, and humanity protects knowledge. It is not just a collaboration; it is a national rebirth. We must, therefore, build a Nigeria where innovations in the universities positively shape the operation of government, where government funds the innovation of the gown, where business applies the findings of research, where media amplifies only the truth and sinks falsehood and where the Police safeguard the environment that makes all these possible. Because the defence of a nation is not its army, it is its unity of purpose. The most advanced weapon any country can possess is the partnership of its people. And the surest foundation of peace is not the wall that divides us, but the bridge that connects us.

    THE MORAL FOUNDATION OF SECURITY

    It is pertinent to know that no security plan can succeed where the conscience of a nation is asleep. Our laws may punish crime, but only morality prevents it. The true battle for peace begins not in the streets, but in the soul of a people. When values collapse, violence follows. When conscience weakens, corruption takes root. When truth becomes negotiable, trust disappears. A society cannot legislate its way out of moral decay; it must educate and elevate its way out. That is why the classroom and the pulpit must never grow silent. They are our first police stations of the mind. They shape the way citizens think before the law ever restrains how they act. The teacher and the cleric are our earliest peacekeepers, forming conscience, building empathy, and nurturing the discipline that makes security sustainable. Every act of crime begins first as a thought. Every act of violence begins first as a belief that right and wrong no longer matter. So when we speak of the Town–Gown Partnership, we are also speaking of a moral partnership, between education and ethics, between learning and living right.

    Our institutions of learning must therefore teach more than skills; they must teach citizenship. They must graduate not only job seekers, but nation builders. And our religious institutions must preach not only salvation, but civility; not only faith, but fairness. Security without morality is policing without purpose. That is why the Nigeria Police Force, under my leadership, has continued to emphasize professionalism, human rights, and ethical conduct. Because when a Police officer stands for integrity, he becomes a teacher in uniform, a moral example of the justice he enforces. Let us, therefore, rebuild the moral foundation of our nation, one classroom, one family, one pulpit, one police station at a time. For it is only when conscience returns to the centre of our national life that peace will find a permanent address in Nigeria. But moral strength must now meet modern strategy. The threats we face today demand both conscience and competence.

    UNDERSTANDING THE MOMENT: HOW INSECURITY IS CHANGING

    Distinguished guests, Nigeria, like many nations, is facing a complex and evolving security environment. Today’s threats are faster, smarter, and harder to detect. We now battle crimes that move as swiftly as data, criminals who hide not only in forests, but behind firewalls. A single keystroke can inflict more damage than a bullet. A viral post can ignite violence faster than a match can light a flame. A lie repeated a thousand times can tear apart an entire community overnight. This is the new frontier of danger: fast, connected, and merciless. We face multiple layers of insecurity, insurgency and banditry in some regions, the growing menace of kidnapping for ransom across state lines, the plague of cultism and drug abuse among our youth, the rise of cybercrime, and the growing influence of misinformation online. The Nigeria Police Force, under my command, has embraced one truth: we cannot fight 21st-century crime with 20th-century tools. That is why we are undergoing the most profound transformation in our modern history; from a reactive, enforcement-driven institution to a proactive, intelligence-led, technology-driven, and community-focused Police Service. We are expanding our cybercrime units, modernizing our forensic labs, deploying drones and data analytics, and investing heavily in human capacity. Our goal is simple, to stop crimes before they happen, rather than chase them after they occur. But technology alone cannot build trust. Algorithms do not inspire communities. Real security is born out of relationships and this is where academia, the gown, becomes an indispensable ally.

    Read Also: ‘Why youth empowerment must drive Nigeria’s digital future’

    THE WAR OF FALSEHOODS: TRUST, TRUTH, AND NATIONAL SECURITY

    In this new age of connectivity, perhaps the most dangerous weapon in our society is not the gun, but the lie. Misinformation has become a silent bomb; it does not destroy buildings; it destroys trust. A single false post can cause chaos faster than a bullet can travel.

    Today, misinformation stands among the most potent threats to peace and stability in our society. With just one false narrative, an entire community can be thrown into turmoil. The Nigeria Police Force has been one of the worst hit. Every day, manipulated videos, distorted stories, and unfounded allegations spread across social media, painting the men and women who risk their lives for this nation as villains instead of protectors. These falsehoods don’t merely wound reputations; they erode public trust, discourage cooperation, and make the job of policing infinitely harder. When citizens begin to doubt those who secure them, the fabric of collective safety begins to tear apart. A society cannot fight crime with suspicion; it must fight with unity and shared truth. Some of these campaigns are not innocent mistakes. They are deliberate attempts by enemies of the state; masquerading as activists or influencers,  to discredit the security establishment and weaken national resolve. They thrive on confusion, feed on division, and seek to make citizens see their protectors as their persecutors. That is why we must confront misinformation as a national security threat; not with censorship, but with civic education, digital literacy, and transparent communication.

    The truth remains that the Police cannot succeed without the trust and support of the people. In every democracy, effective policing depends on partnership, because security is not enforced; it is co-created. Here in Nigeria, the leadership of the Nigeria Police Force has continued to do its utmost to build public confidence and earn the trust of the people through openness, accountability, and community engagement. Yet, our sincere efforts are constantly undermined by enemies of the state who hide under the cloak of activism, spreading misinformation and throwing spanners into the machinery of our work. Their actions do not strengthen democracy; they weaken it. They do not build trust; they destroy it. And by doing so, they make policing more difficult and fuel insecurity in our nation. Let me state categorically: we are not deterred. We remain steadfast in our mission to build bridges of trust, earn the confidence of the people, and foster genuine collaboration between the Police and the communities we serve. Because when trust is broken, fear grows, but when trust is built, peace follows.

    REIMAGINING SECURITY THROUGH KNOWLEDGE: THE KNOWLEDGE–COMMUNITY PHILOSOPHY

    For too long, the classroom and the community have worked in parallel lines; learning separately, serving separately. It is time to bridge that divide. The police safeguard the streets; the university safeguards the nation’s intellect. The police know what happens; the scholar knows why it happens. The solution to national security lies somewhere between the “what” and the “why.” Imagine criminology departments collaborating with Divisional Police Officers to design predictive crime models. Imagine psychology scholars working with our intelligence units to understand radicalization. Imagine engineering students developing surveillance solutions for the Force, and sociologists using data to guide our community dialogue programmes. That is the true essence of the Town–Gown partnership, not ceremonial collaboration, but shared innovation. Nigerian universities must become think-tanks for public safety, and the Nigeria Police Force must serve as a living laboratory for applied research. When knowledge and law cooperate, peace endures. The Town–Gown Partnership is, at its heart, knowledge in uniform and wisdom in motion.

    BUILDING THE PARTNERSHIP: TURNING RESEARCH INTO REALITY

    Esteemed participants, to make this partnership concrete, I propose five pillars:

    1. Data-Driven Policing: Convert police operational data into predictive models that identify crime hotspots before incidents occur. Let data, not speculation, guide deployment.

    2. Youth Behavioural Studies: Partner with universities to understand why young people drift toward cultism, extremism, and crime, and to design evidence-based interventions.

    3. Cybersecurity and Digital Ethics Education: Develop joint digital literacy and cyber defence programs. Let young people not only connect, but also defend.

    4. Community Conflict Management Frameworks: Build new models of community dialogue and restorative justice to strengthen trust between citizens and police.

    5. Public Trust Evaluation: Engage universities to measure public perception and the impact of police reforms; ensuring accountability and responsiveness.

    We invite student researchers, innovators, and social scientists to walk with us. When young minds become part of policing, they cease to be bystanders, they become builders of peace. Security is not a task; it is a culture. Where education fails, crime begins. Where morals collapse, violence thrives. Where communities stop caring, insecurity grows. That is why our national renewal must start from the family, the classroom, the faith centre, and the media space. Lagos offers a model of success,  where government, security, and academia collaborate closely. The partnership between the Lagos State Police Command, the State Government, and institutions like LASUED has enhanced community participation and rapid response. Let us institutionalize such efforts nationwide;  through Campus Security Partnership Desks where students, police, and administrators meet regularly to anticipate and address threats.

    Every crime statistic hides a story, a family that lost direction, a youth who lost purpose, or a community that lost compassion. Real security is not achieved by punishment alone but by restoring hope. Empathy must walk side by side with enforcement; and every police action must defend the dignity of human life.

    CONCLUSION: WHEN KNOWLEDGE STANDS GUARD

    Distinguished ladies and gentlemen,

    Nations are not secured by walls or weapons; they are secured by wisdom. They are sustained by people who think deeply, act bravely, and serve faithfully.

    If we succeed in forging this partnership, then history will record that when darkness threatened our land, it was not the sound of gunfire that answered, it was the sound of understanding. Let this moment, right here at LASUED, be remembered as the dawn of a new security renaissance — one born not of fear, but of faith; not of suspicion, but of shared purpose. I see a Nigeria where the police patrol with empathy, the youth dream with discipline, and our universities light the path with innovation. I see a nation that learns its way to peace, teaches its way to progress, and thinks its way to greatness.

    Because when knowledge stands guard, ignorance retreats. When communities unite, criminals scatter. And when truth takes the microphone, falsehood loses its audience. So today, I call on every scholar, every officer, every citizen — let us rise together. Let us build a nation where the pen and the uniform no longer stand apart, but side by side, defending one flag, one faith, one future.

    Egbetokun Ph.d., NPM, Inspector-General of Police delivered this keynote address at the third security summit of the Lagos State University of Education, Oto-Ijanikin themed: Strengthening the partnership between town and gown in the age of insecurity.

  • Narrow view

    Narrow view

    Contrary to the Federal Government’s claim that the observed drop in food prices across the country signalled progress towards food sovereignty and food security, the All Farmers Association of Nigeria (AFAN) argued that the decreased prices may be unsustainable. AFAN’s position is bad news for Nigerians struggling with a tough cost-of-living crisis.

     “We are beginning to witness a decline in food prices across several commodities — a reflection of ongoing market stabilisation efforts,” including increased local production, the Minister of Agriculture and Food Security, Abubakar Kyari, stated on November 6, at the opening of the 47th National Council on Agriculture and Food Security, in Kaduna. The forum assessed Nigeria’s agricultural progress.

    However, reacting to the minister’s presentation after the event, AFAN President Kabir Ibrahim explained that “seasonal or harvest period price” was an important factor in the prevailing low prices in commodities. He also listed zero tariff imports between July and December last year, and low purchasing power of most Nigerians as other factors.

    He added that the current low or reduced price regime for most farm products “may not be sustainable if the farmers are not supported to readily go back to the farm.”

    According to the association, the urgent support required includes the reduction of input costs such as fertilizers, agrochemicals, and labour. It noted that farmers were facing higher production expenses despite increased output.

    Notably, the National President of the National Apex of Cashew Farmers, Processors and Marketing Cooperative Limited, Yunusa Enemali, also wondered why the minister had attributed the drop in food prices to increased local production. He said the government had failed to address the challenges facing farmers.

    Read Also: Bolarinwa tasks Tinubu, Nigerians over Trump’s threat

    Importantly, Enemali further raised potent questions about the country’s ongoing cost-of-living crisis, arguing that the noted cut in food prices does not tell the whole story. 

    “If the food has fallen,” he asked, “is it affordable to the common man on the streets? Has the transport dropped? Has the fuel dropped? Is the infrastructure okay?”

    These posers effectively shift the focus from the superficial argument about reduced food prices to the real-life impact on ordinary citizens.

    The arguments from these two top players in the agricultural sector against the minister’s picture suggest that the government may be out of touch with the challenging realities facing farmers in the country to the detriment of agricultural growth.

    Indeed, this food price debate shows that the authorities need a holistic view of reality.

  • His Lordship has spoken

    His Lordship has spoken

    By hardball (PIX)

    A federal high court in Abuja lately highlighted an aspect of Nigerian law that people most concerned would prefer abides in permanent abeyance. The court sacked Abubakar Gummi, representing Gummi/Bukkuyum federal constituency of Zamfara State in the House of Representatives, for defecting from the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) to the All Progressives Congress (APC).

    Cross-party defections by political actors is the in-thing currently in Nigerian pollical culture. But Justice Obiora Egwuatu, late last week, held that Gummi’s defection was unconstitutional since there was no division in the PDP at the time he left the party in 2024. The judge restrained House Speaker Tajudeen Abbas from further recognising the Zamfara lawmaker as a member of the green chamber. Among other things, he also ordered the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to conduct fresh election to fill the vacant seat within 30 days.

    In a suit filed through their lawyer, Ibrahim Bawa, SAN, the PDP and its Zamfara chairman, Jamilu Jibomagayaki, had asked the court to determine whether Gummi’s defection from the PDP – that sponsored his election – to the APC was lawful, and whether the House speaker’s failure to declare his seat vacant violated Section 68(1)(g) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended). The referenced section states: “(1) A member of the Senate or of the House of Representatives shall vacate his seat in the house of which he is a member if – (g) being a person whose election to the house was sponsored by a political party, he becomes a member of another political party before the expiration of the period for which that house was elected; provided that his membership of the latter political party is not as a result of a division in the political party of which he was previously a member or of a merger of two or more political parties or factions by one of which he was previously sponsored.”

    Read Also: FEC approves $396m loans for northern IDPs, Sokoto health project

    Gummi, in his defence, argued that his defection was warranted by “lingering unresolved internal and external crises” within the PDP at both national and constituency levels. He said the situation made it impossible for him to effectively represent his constituents and ensure equitable distribution of democracy dividends.

    Justice Egwuatu, however, dismissed Gummi’s defence and criticised the growing trend of political defections, describing it as a betrayal of the electorate’s mandate. “In a situation where the electorate have made their choices between different political parties and their candidates based on the manifestos and marketability of such a political party, it is legally and morally wrong for a politician to abandon the party under whose platform he or she was elected into office and move to a rival party without relinquishing the mandate of his or her former party. If a person must decamp, don’t decamp with the mandate of the electorate. Don’t transfer the votes garnered on the platform of one party to another party,” he ruled inter alia.

    As His Lordship pleases…

  • Another garland awaits Zacch Adedeji as Fed Govt is set to exceed revenue target

    Another garland awaits Zacch Adedeji as Fed Govt is set to exceed revenue target

    By Rabiu Usman

    Two months to the end of this year 2025, it is getting clearer that once again, the Federal Government through the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) under Dr Zacch Adedeji, is poised to surpass the revenue target for the year.

    Dr Zacch Adedeji had set a N25.2 trillion revenue target for 2025, N3.6 trillion higher than the revenue generated in 2024. The target for 2024 was N19.4 trillion. This target was not only met, it was exceeded by N2.2 trillion as N21.6 trillion was generated.

    For 2025, under the leadership of Zacch Adedeji, the FIRS has already recorded a total of N22.59 trillion in tax collections from January to September, leaving just N2.64 trillion to meet the targeted N25.2 trillion.

    The N22.59 trillion nine months tax collection will amount to an average of N2.51 trillion per month. Going by this, it can be rightly expected that the FIRS will surpass this year’s revenue target of N25.2 trillion by more than N4 trillion.

    From the total collections from January to September 2025, oil tax revenue stood at N5.29 trillion, representing 98 percent of the target, while non-oil taxes amounted to N17.3 trillion, or 128 percent of the target, accounting for 76 percent of the total collection.

    Since Zacch Adedeji took over as the FIRS boss, FIRS has achieved significant revenue improvements in mobilisation.

    While setting the 2025 target of N25.2 trillion, he had declared that its realization would be anchored on the strategic pillars of capacity building and training, infrastructure and facility enhancement, as well as technological advancement.

    READ ALSO: Few notable things about Olumo rock

    Dr. Zacch Adedeji, who had described the 2024 performance as a landmark moment in Nigeria’s tax administration history, stressed the need for sustained momentum, strategic reforms, and institutional consolidation.

    Two months to the end the year 2025, it is crystal clear that the momentum that made the 2023 and 2024 revenue target to be surpassed has not only been sustained, it has increased.

    And as assured by Adedeji, the one being referred to as the Nigeria version of “Zaccheus The Tax Collector”, “the FIRS will continue to implement new tax laws fairly, enhance the digitalisation of tax processes, train and retrain its staff, and strengthen partnerships with stakeholders to meet and surpass government revenue expectations.”

    According to him, the implementation of the new tax laws, which provide for the transformation of the FIRS into the Nigeria Revenue Service (NRS) will take effect on January 1, 2026, thus empowering the agency to be involved in non-tax revenue collection from the Nigerian Upstream Petroleum Regulatory Commission (NUPRC).

    Adedeji noted that several strategic initiatives have modernised tax administration, including the National Single Window Project, designed to streamline trade and tax processes, and the e-invoicing system, which enhances transparency, accuracy, and digital integration in tax collection.

    He said; “FIRS has in 2025 continued its transformation into a modern, technology-driven, and service-oriented institution, achieving major legislative, operational, and technological milestones that position it for sustained growth and greater efficiency.”

    The FIRS has also not stopped praising the judiciary for what he called “its sound and consistent tax rulings that have helped shape the nation’s fiscal landscape.”

    Speaking at a capacity-building workshop for Justices of the Supreme Court, Court of Appeal, and Judges of the Federal High Court on new tax laws recently, the FIRS Chairman, said that the introduction of new tax laws, including amendments to the Finance Acts, the Petroleum Industry Act, and other subsidiary legislations, has significantly reshaped the tax ecosystem. He however demanded deeper collaboration between the judiciary and tax authorities.

    “The judiciary, through its interpretative powers, remains the ultimate arbiter in maintaining the delicate balance between the legitimate powers of tax authorities and the rights of taxpayers.

    “Tax disputes that are resolved promptly and based on clear judicial principles foster compliance and contribute to economic stability,” he said.

    With a record-breaking revenue growth of N47.39 trillion, representing 115 per cent of the target, non-oil revenue accounting for 76 per cent of total collections, the diversification and reform success in the country’s tax administration is becoming more and more obvious.

    And for the country’s Zaccheus The Tax Collector, it is yet another Garland, even as another ambitious target is being expected for 2026.

    • Usman, a public affairs commentator writes from Abuja

  • Anti-corruption tactics: A call for new approach

    Anti-corruption tactics: A call for new approach

    Sir: Nigeria’s fight against corruption and other financial crimes is essential, and agencies like the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) are central to that effort. Yet increasingly aggressive tactics (surprise arrests, publicised investigations, dawn raids, and detentions) are creating a climate of fear that may be undermining the very outcomes Nigeria needs: investments, productivity, and sustained growth.

    High-profile operations send a powerful signal, but they also ripple through firms in unintended ways. When senior executives face the possibility of unannounced arrests for non violent economic offences, leadership teams become overly cautious and apprehensive.

    Requiring the physical presence of chief executives for routine queries is especially counterproductive. When finance, legal, or compliance officers can answer questions, summoning the CEO serves little investigative purpose while inflicting maximum disruption. It diverts leadership from operations, stalls approvals, and signals that cooperation will be met with spectacle rather than professionalism. Allowing designated officers to respond, or using written interrogatories and virtual meetings, can resolve issues without fear tactics.

    Many sectors and transactions such as energy, telecommunications, finance, and infrastructure are technically complex.

    Routine investigators may not always distinguish legitimate structures or transactions from red flags at first glance. In such cases, agencies should seek expert help or request detailed explanations and supporting documents from firms before escalating. Early technical engagement saves time, reduces disruption, and improves outcomes for both investigators and firms.

    Publicised investigations and sensational headlines before facts are fully established can weaken, not strengthen, corporate governance. Directors may focus on reputational damage control rather than building robust compliance systems. Fear encourages secrecy and siloed decision making, eroding the internal transparency that underpins effective oversight.

    These dynamics carry real financial costs. Boards and lenders price risk, and when enforcement feels unpredictable or punitive, risk premiums rise. Companies face higher borrowing costs, tighter covenants, and reduced access to capital as financiers account for potential disruption from investigations or sudden removal of key decision makers. In an economy where credit is already expensive, this “fear premium” can stall expansions, slow hiring, and blunt productivity.

    Foreign investors look for clear rules, consistent processes, and proportionate treatment. The impression that firms may face spectacle, extended detentions, or unwarranted raids discourages market entry and reinvestment.

    Read Also: Team Nigeria opens camp  ahead of WESPAC tournament in Accra

    Capital flows to jurisdictions where robust enforcement coexists with predictable, fair outcomes.

    The broader economy pays the price. When investment is deferred, infrastructure lags, supply chains thin, and technology transfers slow. Contracts shrink for local suppliers, talent drifts to calmer markets, and entrepreneurship shifts from building to hedging.

    None of this diminishes the need for strong enforcement. Deterrence matters and credible prosecution is essential for market integrity and public welfare. But enforcement must avoid fear based tactics that cause collateral damage. International standards point the way: the United Nations Convention against Corruption stresses pairing enforcement with prevention through education and public awareness, integrity in the public sector, private sector compliance frameworks, and civil society participation.

    A better path is available. For less potent economic crimes and cooperative suspects, written summons and voluntary interviews could serve as the default response, reserving arrests and detention for cases involving credible flight risk, evidence tampering, obstruction, or similar concerns. In line with the UN Convention, education led prevention—regular guidance, sector trainings, and reminder notices that nudge firms toward best practices should be prioritised. Simple public scorecards (such as best  and worst performer lists) based on objective criteria could be considered to reward improvement and spotlight laggards without theatrics.

    These measures do not weaken enforcement; they strengthen it. By emphasising proportionality, due process, expertise, and incentives for compliance, Nigeria can deter misconduct without deterring investment, inviting more good capital to fuel economic growth and shared prosperity.

    •Samira Ladan Tsamiya Esq London, UK.

  • Shares valuation as tool for economic development

    Shares valuation as tool for economic development

     Sir: I have noted with dismay that despite the fact that shares and stocks valuation constitute one of the most dynamic areas of national growth and sustenance, and despite several opportunities in it, transaction channels and large market availability, Nigerians are not making the best use of these opportunities for economic development. This is unlike in the more developed countries of the world. Nigeria’s shares and stocks assets, if properly harnessed and utilized, have the potential to achieve that objective.

    This is the gap we need to close, and the initiative we should key into.  When we launch into this critical aspect, more capital would be accessed by companies with higher valuations, and this will ensure more investment in growth-oriented activities. Confidence would be enhanced in the financial markets, investors would buy and sell various financial instruments such as stocks, bonds, currencies, commodities, derivatives and raise capital. With more capital raised, more funds would be available for investment, and the more we invest in the economy, the more growth we record.

    Nigerian economy is unique in various ways, with challenges in all critical services. Shares and stocks valuation is one of the challenges. We only need to comprehend the significance of shares and stocks valuation, and stakeholders would make informed choices and protect their interests effectively.

    Read Also: itel holds maiden  Nigeria cycling challenge in Lagos

    That makes it mandatory for estate surveyors and valuers to effectively key into this initiative and spearhead the unlocking of potentials in shares and stocks valuation. Partnership with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) would suffice. SEC is strategic to ensuring standardization and optimal professionalism in carrying out this aspect of economic services with total compliance to best global practices in the overall interest of our nation. The partnership would enhance the promotion, advancement and deepening of the financial markets, a critical mission the organization has been driving since inception in 1979. The process will assist us in building human and institutional capacity for effective service delivery.

    To maximally benefit from the unveiling potentials and long-term prospects in this aspect of professional service, estate surveyors and valuers must intensify and sustain skills acquisition efforts. We should not relent in growing standards and professionalism through training, and re-training in order to be at par with international best practices and standards, especially in today’s technology driven world, where every profession keep innovating in order to remain relevant.

    It is my hope that we will get insight into the challenges in this economic development-enhancing endeavour, as well as the roadmap to turning the challenges to prospects and benefits.

    •Olanrewaju Olaitan,Lagos.

  • Kogi: Touting salary payment as achievement

    Kogi: Touting salary payment as achievement

    Sir: Kogi State Commissioner for Information, Kingsley Femi Fanwo in a recent post on his Facebook page touted the payment of salaries to civil servants in Kogi State as an “achievement” of the state administration. For a man who occupies the exalted position of image maker of a state government, such a post was not only a professional misstep but also an unfortunate blunder in public communication.

    Here is what Fanwo wrote: “They said the payment of salaries is not an achievement. I agree. No questions. But when it is not paid, it becomes a failure. Isn’t it?

    “Government resources have competing pressures. Education is there, healthcare is there, roads are there, agriculture is there, youth and women empowerment is there, security is there, housing and urban development too and many others across all the sectors.

    “The magic of the Kogi State government to still meet all of these needs and still pay salaries should be commended.

    Let’s be clear: payment of salaries is not an achievement. It is an obligation. A responsible government pays its workers as and when due, not as an act of benevolence, but as a matter of statutory and moral duty. To celebrate it as an “achievement” is to set a dangerously low bar for governance and to insult the intelligence of the working population whose sweat and labour sustain the state machinery. Workers earn their pay through their service. Salaries are rights guaranteed by law, not favours dispensed by magnanimous governors.

    Under international labour standards, specifically Article 23(3) of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948), it is clearly stated that “Everyone who works has the right to just and favourable remuneration ensuring for himself and his family an existence worthy of human dignity.” This provision makes salary payment a matter of right and justice, not benevolence.

    Read Also: NIS to introduce emergency passport for Nigerians abroad

    Similarly, the International Labour Organization (ILO) Convention No. 95 (Protection of Wages Convention, 1949) mandates employers, including governments, to pay wages regularly and in full. The obligation is binding on all member states, including Nigeria.

    At the national level, the Nigerian Labour Act (Cap L1, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004) explicitly provides under Section 15(1) that “Wages shall become due and payable at the end of each period for which the contract is expressed to subsist.” In simple terms, the law expects that every employer, whether private or public, pays workers promptly at the end of each month.

    Also,  Kogi State’s Public Service Rules reinforce this, mandating that government employees receive their lawful entitlements as and when due. Nowhere in these laws is salary payment described as a government favour or an “achievement.”

    Governor Usman Ododo’s administration has indeed initiated and continued several development-related projects across the state. These are in road rehabilitation, construction of model secondary schools, support for security architecture, and expansion of infrastructure across tertiary institutions. These are tangible, measurable, and impactful indicators of achievement. Those are the milestones that define success in governance. Not the routine act of paying salaries.

    Across Nigeria, many states, especially in the Northwest and Southwest consider prompt salary payment a routine responsibility, not a trophy to flaunt. States like Lagos, Oyo, and Rivers have long normalized the practice of paying civil servants promptly, even while executing massive infrastructural and social projects.

    Let’s be honest, failure to pay salaries promptly is not only a sign of administrative incompetence; it is a woeful failure that reeks of irresponsibility. It cripples productivity, fuels corruption, and breeds resentment. When governments pay salaries late, they are not saving money — they are losing legitimacy.

    Therefore, Governor Usman Ododo’s decision to pay salaries promptly deserves acknowledgment for responsibility, not celebration for achievement. The distinction matters, especially in a democracy where accountability and communication shape public perception. Each time a spokesperson misrepresents responsibility as achievement, the government loses moral capital. The governor’s performance should speak through visible projects, economic reforms, and governance integrity, not through exaggerated praise for meeting basic obligations.

    •Ozumi Abdul, abdulozumi83@gmail.com