Category: Comments

  • Technology and international collaboration

    Technology and international collaboration

    • Will Stevens

    Secretary of State Anthony Blinken was in Abuja and Lagos and the message he brought from President Biden is that the United States wants to work together with the nations of the African continent in equal partnership. That we need to join together to combat the challenges that face the entire world. That no nation can do it alone. 

    As Secretary Blinken said it so eloquently: Africa shaped our past, it’s shaping our present, and it will define our future. 

    And, I might add, no nation is having a bigger impact on the evolving digital transformation than Nigeria. 

    As Africa’s largest economy, largest democracy and number one destination for venture capital – Nigeria is driving innovation and creative solutions to the challenges that vex Nigerians, Africans and people across the world. 

    These innovative creators are reinforcing my deeply held belief that African solutions and African voices are critical and central to resolving the problems of the 21st century and beyond. 

    The world is changing at an unprecedented pace, fueled by the relentless innovation from an increasingly interconnected world. In the past decade, global internet traffic has grown by 700 per cent, and mobile phone users have surpassed 6.6 billion.

    This increased connectivity creates boundless potential for cross-border collaboration – creating a global village where ideas can spark across oceans, and innovations can blossom through collective efforts.

    Imagine a world where researchers from across continents collaborate on groundbreaking medical discoveries, where engineers work together to tackle climate change, and where entrepreneurs share ideas and resources to build a more sustainable future. 

    This is a present that we are already beginning to experience and a future that I am certain will mean a better world for our children and our children’s children. 

    Together, we are using the latest technological innovations to address some of the world’s most pressing challenges in the areas of climate change, education, healthcare, agriculture, and other vital areas of development and economic growth.

    However, building these bridges requires more than just technological prowess. We must overcome challenges like cultural and linguistic barriers, unequal access to resources, and cybersecurity concerns. These challenges are not insurmountable.

    By embracing inclusivity, bringing capital to markets that need infrastructure investment, and developing robust cybersecurity measures, we can pave the way for fruitful international partnerships. 

    Together, I see that some of these challenges are already being addressed.

    U.S. venture capital firms have invested heavily in African tech startups with over 60 and 40 percent of venture capital funding in Nigeria and Africa respectively coming from the United States.

    Up to 60 per cent of African startups are incorporated in the United States – this figure is 80 per cent when considering Nigeria alone.

    In 2021, African startups raised $4.8 billion. This translates to an average of over $1 million every two hours!

    Despite the global downturn in VC funding, the United States still accounted for about 40 per cent of the $3.4 billion raised by African startups last year.

    Four months ago, President Biden issued a landmark Executive Order on Safe, Secure and Trustworthy Development and Use of AI that emphasised collaboration with countries all over the world to develop and use artificial intelligence in a responsible manner.

    Before that, in 2022, the Biden-Harris Administration developed the Digital Transformation with Africa (DTA) initiative that aims to build partnerships with African countries to expand digital access, increase U.S.-Africa commercial relations, support increased digital literacy, and strengthen digital enabling environments across the continent.

    This initiative emphasises “with” – Digital Transformation “with” Africa, not “for” Africa; as we believe that Africa on its own brings tremendous value to the global table.

    Nigeria remains Africa’s largest economy and is the United States’ second-largest trading partner in Africa with two-way trade exceeding $10.6 billion in 2022. 

    The United States is proud to be one of the largest foreign investors in Nigeria with FDI totalling $5.6 billion in 2022.

    There are over 80 U.S. companies operating in Nigeria, in manufacturing, fast-moving consumer goods, pharmaceuticals, technology, etc.

    Read Also: Mo Abudu appointed to International Emmys board

    These companies collectively pay billions of naira in taxes, create thousands of direct and indirect jobs, and directly support various socioeconomic programs that improve the lives of Nigerians. 

    We are committed to supporting Nigeria and Africa on its journey to prosperity as we believe that a strong and prosperous Africa is good for the United States and good for the world!

    To close, I implore every one of us to remember that collaboration is not a zero-sum game; it is a win-win proposition. 

    By working together, sharing knowledge, and pooling resources, we can overcome any obstacle and achieve the seemingly impossible.

    Let us, therefore, leverage this opportunity to forge lasting partnerships, break down barriers, and use technology not just to connect, but to create a future where innovation flourishes for the betterment of our interconnected world. 

    Let us continue to build bridges, not walls.

  • Adoke, EFCC and the limits of media trial

    Adoke, EFCC and the limits of media trial

    • By Ahmed Dalhatu Ahmed

    On March 28, Justice Abubakar Kutigi of the FCT High Court made far-reaching pronouncements in his ruling on the charges filed by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) against Mohammed Bello Adoke, former Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF) and Minister of Justice, and six other defendants in the long-running OPL 245 saga. The judge accepted the no-case submissions made by Adoke and the other defendants because, in his words, the EFCC did not establish a prima facie case for a full trial. He lambasted the EFCC for filing frivolous charges and wasting the court’s time for four years.

    This is not the more familiar issue of lack of diligent prosecution. This time, it is an abject lack of evidence to substantiate the 40-count charge. In-house, EFCC lawyers reportedly admitted long ago that the case was so bad and was going nowhere, although Offem Uket, the commission’s lead prosecutor, could not have conceded this in court. Of course, with many people not paying attention to the details of the case, the spin doctors went to town saying the trial was bungled, while insinuating, without evidence, that the prosecutors might have collected bribes from the defendants.

    Remember, this was a case filed in 2020 by Bala Sanga, who abandoned it in 2022 after seeing that it was weak with Uket later brought in ostensibly to salvage the situation.

    I have taken the time to read the full text of the judgment and I would advise EFCC’s lawyers to stop wasting the time of our courts. The truth of the matter is that the OPL 245 case was bad.

    Little wonder Justice Kutigi declared that the charges were poorly drafted. And this is not about the regular grammatical errors but poor articulation of arguments. More specifically, the judge would also note that the EFCC failed to lead evidence linking Adoke and his co-defendants to the alleged crimes. For instance, the EFCC had accused Adoke of “knowingly disobeying the direction of law with intent to cause injury to the public” but did not provide the facts. “During the trial, none of the witnesses for the prosecution gave evidence or alluded to the nature of the direction of law that was disobeyed,” the judge stated in his ruling.

    The EFCC had also accused Adoke of granting tax waivers to Shell and Eni. Even here, it is an open secret that tax waivers are granted by the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) subject to presidential approval and not the AGF. Justice Kutigi noted that the EFCC did not produce any evidence to back its claim against Adoke, not even a testimony by an FIRS official.

    “Absolutely no evidence whatsoever was led as to the tax [Shell and Agip] were due to pay under the OPL 245 agreement or indeed any other tax and also how they instigated 1st Defendant (Adoke) in a manner geared towards committing the alleged offence,” the judge said. Simply put: The EFCC did not produce even the minimum evidence required to prove its case.

    The EFCC also accused Adoke of collecting a bribe of N300 million from Aliyu Abubakar, a property magnate who was also arraigned, and this was supposed to be the smoking gun. The EFCC did not even attempt to prove this charge. Of this the judge said: “I have carefully gone through the evidence led by the prosecution witnesses and nobody alluded to any offer or gratification of N300 million by 2nd defendant (Abubakar) to 1st defendant (Adoke) and/or that they were privy to 1st defendant accepting any form of gratification from 2nd Defendant as a motive for showing favour in the exercise of his official functions. In addition to the failure to establish if a gratification was offered and accepted, no purpose for which the alleged gratification was given was defined or slated.”

    Justice Kutigi pointed out a very amazing fact: “None of the prosecution witnesses even spoke to this count at all and this is fatal. There is really nothing on which the court can even rely on to proceed to determine whether a prima facie case was raised ab initio.”

    How can you charge a defendant to court for allegedly receiving a bribe and not even one of your witnesses said anything about it? What is the court supposed to do? Should it help you create evidence and witnesses?

    You would be forgiven for thinking the entire OPL 245 case was about Adoke. Of the 40 counts, only four mentioned his name, but he was made the poster boy. Indeed, 29 of the 40 counts were against Rasky Gbinigie, the company secretary of Malabu Oil and Gas Ltd, who was accused of removing Mohammed Abacha’s name as a director of the company and thus denied him the benefits that accrued from the sale of OPL 245 by Malabu to Shell and Eni/Agip in 2011. Instructively, Abacha was EFCC’s No 1 prosecution witness.

    Read Also: ‘EFCC not investigating Betta Edu for N30 billion’

    Adoke had always maintained that he did no wrong, and that the administration of former president, Muhammadu Buhari merely sought to help the Abacha family get a share from the proceeds of OPL 245. Adoke said there was a plot to criminalise him so that Nigeria could use that as evidence to win its OPL 245 cases in Europe.

    He has been vilified for nine years and till date, has not been found guilty of any wrongdoing. Nigeria lost all OPL 245-related cases everywhere. All the courts said there was no evidence of corruption. The lesson here is the huge difference between a court trial and media trial. For while the EFCC may have done excellently well in media trials, now it has to sharpen its skills when it comes to the court of law, where hearsays and speculations are no substitutes for evidence.

    • Ahmed, public affairs commentator, can be reach via dalhatu1985@gmail.com.
  • Electricity subsidy removal, a peculiar mess

    Electricity subsidy removal, a peculiar mess

    SIR: Every government all over the world subsidizes certain things for the citizenry. From America to Europe, it is either agricultural products or housing and to all other basic things of life. Therefore, this administration must not make the mistake of thinking every subsidy is an aberration. It is certainly not. There is nothing abnormal in the government still subsidising electricity since it has removed the subsidy on petroleum products.

    Just a while ago, Yemi Cardoso, the Central Bank of Nigeria governor claimed publicly that he had to get a consulting firm, Delloittee and Co, to help the bank verify the backlog claims on forex demands pending before the bank. Probably, this is what the minister of power ought to have done if there are seemingly, fraud related issues concerning the electricity subsidy rather than its total removal. It is not only ill-timed; it is insensitive too considering that the service is nearly non-existent.

    Almost everyone generates their own electricity in their own way. The success of alternate energy businesses in Nigeria lately, especially solar, is a confirmation of this.

    The most vital component of overcoming our energy challenges has never been given the needed attention it surely deserves. What is required is what lawyers will call a fiduciary relationship –coming out to Nigerians clean, transparently, with all the challenges in the generation, transmission, and distribution sector. What is needed is a total forensic audit of capacities and challenges, and of course, the attendant solution.

    The recent decision of granting the states the right to generate, transmit, and distribute its own energy is commendable but may still take some good time to achieve. Successive past administrations at the federal level all share in the blame for the present position of our energy supply in the country. The worst was the administration that unbundled the energy sector and sold off its assets to companies that had no experience whatsoever in power generation, transmission, and distribution. They were only interested in the choice assets of the companies they bought. This is why they have not added any value to the companies in terms of service delivery except declaring a profitable balance sheet predicated on fraudulent billings.

    Since 1999, the ‘song’ has been “government has no business doing business,” and immediately a government business doing well is sold off to a private investor, the business dies afterwards. So it has been with almost all the federal government business ventures sold off to private investors. We deserve to know the exact figure of megawatts generated by our generation companies, how much exactly we need, what exactly are the challenges in the transmission sector, as we all know the challenges bedevilling the distribution sector.

    Read Also: Many Nigerians still enjoying electricity subsidy, TMSG hits critics

    The distribution sector is the most exploitative in the chain by asking consumers to buy transformers and cables etc. With current efforts at stabilising the naira after floating it paying off, and the expected downstream deregulation of the petroleum products sector, that has necessitated the prediction of a downward review by mid-year of goods and services, this removal of electricity subsidy will truncate all these expectations. The consumers on the power distribution line of Band A, the supposed targets of the removal, are mostly goods and services companies, so it is only logical that an increase in production costs will be recouped from the retail costs of goods and services. This is a simple principle of economics.

    Therefore the already battered common citizens will be the ultimate targets of the removal. And suffice to ask what exactly does the government wants to subsidize for the citizens? There is no existent subsidy on agriculture products, none now on petroleum products any longer, none on housing, none on transportation, and so on.

    The ministry of power has to rethink this decision. They should do more of constant monitoring and evaluation of the energy value chain, especially with generation and distribution in order to provide the needed services to consumers and then after a while of sector stability, it can begin to toy with the idea of electricity subsidy removal. In which case the service delivery would have improved and the citizens can appreciate the improvements.

    Nigerians want to see the minister more on the electricity provision facilities visiting for inspection, doing on the spot assessments, and speaking to Nigerians on the efforts being made to increase our megawatts from its present figure to its required figures.

    • Fola Aiyegbusi, “hefzibar2006@yahoo.com”
  • On the need to support the small scale farmers

    On the need to support the small scale farmers

    SIR: A motley of small scale farmers that are strewn around different corners of our country are responsible almost entirely for feeding and sustaining the food supply chain; therefore contributing to the nutritional, social and economic needs of the country. They are preponderantly from the rural backwater notoriously known for being bare of basic necessities and amenities. And, where such exist they are almost in a state of irretrievable state of dysfunction.

    The huge contribution of the agricultural sector to the nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is propelled by the activities of small scale farmers. Their roles are especially important for rural development, employment and poverty reduction.

    Daily they hunch over their hoes tilling the land in wet and dry seasons. They operate on scattered small lands which are either bought, family owned, inherited or rented. Quintessentially, they are subsistent in nature and capacity determines the quantity to be sold in the market in meeting numerous quotidian needs. The family is the primary source of labour with support from hired labour in some instance and labour exchanges from other farmers. The use of rudimentary tools is the norm with improved farming practices, advisory services, market information etc. practically absent. Basically, they count on their hands-on experience and efficiency in the utilization of available resources.

    It has been motion without movement despite many attempts to ostensibly prop up this category of farmers. Barring any attempt at reimagining our approaches to the agricultural sector, the burden of our food needs will continue to rest on the thin shoulders of the small scale farmers in the face of the bulging population and the attendant spike in nutritional requirement.

    Against this background, there is a strong necessity for proactive steps in adequately priming the small scale farmers by pulling out every stop in making their contribution count significantly while helping them take advantage of the emerging opportunities.

    The small holder farmers are vulnerable to a myriad of stifling factors such as price volatility and the activities of middlemen that deny them the full benefits of their investment; others include effect of climate change, limited access to inputs, credit market, lack of access to market, deficient or non-existing infrastructure etc. Social ills like conflicts, kidnappings and banditry are establishing crushing foothold in rural communities with debilitating effects. All of these factors and several others have conspired in pushing the small scale farmers deeper into the abyss of poverty.

    Myriad of experiences have proven that access to market and information possesses the capacity to help circumvent not a few challenges and empowering the small scale farmers financially and therefore promoting pro-poor economic growth.

    There’s necessity to enhance small scale farmers productivity through massive technology and financial support. The financial inclusion is the x-factor needed to transition Nigeria farmers from subsistence to a growth phase. This will be actualized by providing farmers with funding so they can invest in needed technology that will expand operation and enable them compete with agro-entrepreneur across the world.

    Read Also: Aiyedatiwa distributes palliatives to farmers

    Regardless of the weakness ascribed to the NIRSAL- Anchor Borrowers’ Programme resulting into mixed results, the motivation behind its creation remains brilliant and it is highly desirable to re-work the programme in light of the many lessons learnt for proper positioning in supporting the small scale farmers. More so, genuine advocacy in pushing the interests of the small scale farmers to the front burner of public discourse and holding policy makers and government accountable needs to be supported alongside, encouraging private initiatives.

    On the whole, our surest path is to continue to put in place policies to support agricultural development, strengthen institutional capacities, provide appropriate infrastructure, facilitate technology access and create business friendly environment for the small scale farmers.

    We need to place the small scale farmers on the path of recognition for their incredible contribution and valorising them means reaching out to them just as we do when we require their electoral mandates. And, improving agricultural productivity will require lot of doings in scaling up the small-scale farmer which should start now.

    • Abachi Ungbo, abachi007@yahoo.com
  • Price war in Nigeria’s airline industry

    Price war in Nigeria’s airline industry

    SIR: The commencement of Air Peace flights to London was met with enthusiasm by Nigerians, who welcomed the prospect of more affordable travel options. Nigerians have long borne the brunt of exorbitant airfares on international routes, particularly the Lagos-London connection. The arrival of Air Peace, offering more competitive pricing, was a welcome relief. However, this development also triggered a reaction from foreign carriers, fearing the loss of Nigerian passengers to their Nigerian competitor. A price war has erupted on the lucrative Lagos-London route, with foreign airlines slashing fares in a seemingly coordinated effort to push out domestic carrier, Air Peace. This development raises critical questions about global economics, political influence, and the future of Nigerian air travel.

    It’s essential to contextualise this price war within the broader framework of global economics and politics. The desperation of foreign carriers to maintain their stronghold reflects the competitive nature of the airline industry, where market share translates into power and influence. As Kwame Nkrumah aptly stated, understanding our enemies is crucial for African nations striving for economic independence and self-sufficiency. Nigerians play a pivotal role in driving the country’s economy forward. As consumers, their choices can shape market trends and influence the strategies of airlines operating within the region. In fact, this applies to other sectors of the economy. There’s a silver lining for Nigerian travellers in the short term, as these fare reductions could translate to immediate savings. Notwithstanding, this may be a temporary benefit. Price wars rarely result in long-term gains for consumers. The financial strain on airlines could lead to service cuts, fleet deterioration, and ultimately, higher fares once the competition is subdued.

    Read Also: Keyamo commends Air Peace as airline launches Lagos-London flight

    So, what’s the way forward for Air Peace? The airline needs to leverage its unique position as a truly Nigerian brand. This could involve innovative marketing campaigns that resonate with the local market and capitalise on Air Peace’s understanding of Nigerian travellers. It already started well by successfully integrating elements of Nigerian culture and identity into its services, setting itself apart from foreign competitors. The introduction of a distinctive dress code for its attendants, proudly African in style and the inclusion of local cuisines on board add a touch of authenticity and pride to the flying experience.

    Patriotic citizens also have a role to play. Supporting Nigerian-owned companies is not just an economic decision but also an act of patriotism. By patronising indigenous businesses like Air Peace, Nigerians contribute to the growth and prosperity of their own country. Encouraging the thriving of indigenous businesses such as Air Peace is essential for Nigeria’s economic resilience and autonomy. In a global economy often influenced by Western economic interests, the government must adopt a decisive stance in protecting and promoting local industries and entrepreneurs.

    • Matthew Alugbin PhD, Edo State University, Uzairue.
  • Rise and fall of MAGA USA 

    Rise and fall of MAGA USA 

    • By Tiko Okoye

    The rise of former US President Donald Trump in politics and to the White House in 2016 eerily mirrors the rise of Adolf Hitler in German politics. Hitler’s ‘Fuhrer principle’ (Fuhrerprinzip), espousing that absolute authority flows from the pinnacle down to unquestioningly guide all facets of life in Germany, is very much the same as Trump’s MAGA ideology which espouses that the ‘Orange Jesus’ – as he’s blasphemously being called by his ‘adherents’ – can say or do no wrong!

    The manner in which Trump has made zombies of about 30 percent of Americans with his grandiose MAGAfication sloganeering is lifted from the pages of Mein Kampf – Hitler’s autobiographical manifesto that describes the process for hypnotising the German population with his Nazification political ideology.

    Under President Joe Biden, the US economy has never been more buoyant, with the lowest unemployment rate in more than 50 years and an across-the-board drop in crime rates. The NATO Alliance that was on the brink of rupturing when Trump was POTUS has been re-energised under Biden, even registering a quantum leap in the number of new members. If performance was the sole yardstick for winning the election, Biden would hardly need to break sweat to coast past the finishing line.

    But in the rather queer case of the USA, the popular one-man-one-vote doesn’t determine who wins a presidential election. The enormous influence of a handful of battleground aka swing aka purple states to decide the winner under America’s Electoral College System means that Trump can still emerge victorious!

    Faced with a decision to choose between giving up his toxic bid to return to the White House and perilously placing America between a rock and a hard place, Trump seems to have chosen the latter. The Republican Party aka Grand Old Party (GOP) Trump now controls lock, stock and barrel is brand new and not old; neither is it grand nor is its philosophy about conservatism (pro-life and status of Jerusalem are just two of a myriad of Conservative values) nor even about the republic. It’s now a party of Trump, by Trump and for the sole personal interests of Trump.

    Trump hasn’t only imperiously declared that the only election result he would accept is the one he wins else there would be a blood bath, he has also unequivocally stated that – as a ‘one-day dictator’ – he would give the sandpaper treatment to individuals and institutions he believes betrayed him by making short work of his claims of a stolen election. These would include the judiciary, media, Democrats, Congressmen, FBI and even the military – and the signs are plenteous that he means serious business!

    As the head of the executive arm that enforces the decisions of the judicial and legislative arms, a re-elected Trump will largely ignore court decisions and laws passed without his assent, and only act on those he considers agreeable. He will also only appoint cabinet members, top aides and military commanders who vow fealty to him and not to the US Constitution.

    In the years leading up to WWII, lone voices in the wilderness like that of Winston Churchill were calling on European leaders to decipher the handwriting on the wall and stop appeasing Hitler, but the majority felt Hitler was just sounding off and wasn’t really the ogre he’s being made out to be. History is set to repeat itself in America with same calamitous consequences, as many typical Trump foot soldiers outrageously imagine that they know him more than his long-term associates who served in his administration. 

    The laundry list of Trump’s erstwhile associates and cabinet members who have publicly announced that they won’t endorse their former boss because a second term would be catastrophic for the USA includes: his Vice, a chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, two White House Chiefs of Staff, an Attorney-General, two Secretaries of Defence, two National Security Advisers, two Homeland Secretaries, two former national chairpersons of the Republican Party, three Communications Directors and a wide assortment of attorneys, ambassadors, etc.

    But the most egregious turn Trump has taken in his bid to win re-election at all cost is to play the religious card. He has recently taken to baiting his rabid MAGA fanatics with the morsel of Christian nationalism. Unfortunately many Nigerian Trumpians – who either have their conscience seared with a hot iron or are bereft of a sense of history – don’t realise that the phrase is simply a buzz word for White rule/domination.

    On the other hand, MAGA fanatics and African-Americans on opposite sides of the divide understand fully well that there was a time when prayers were compulsorily being said in schools and workplaces in the predominantly-Christian, Bible belt of the South, yet – just as was to be re-enacted in Apartheid South Africa by White Boers – slave ownership and inhuman treatment of Blacks as a matter of official government policy were justified by references to the Biblical story of Ham and other scriptural verses.   

    Then there was Vidkun Quisling, who nominally co-headed the puppet government of Norway during Nazi occupation. His collaborationist government participated in Germany’s war efforts and funnelled Jews from Norway to concentration camps in occupied Poland. It was Quisling who, at a meeting with Hitler in Berlin in December 1939, strongly urged a German occupation of his country – and the Fuhrer obliged him by invading Norway in April the following year. He was eventually executed by firing squad after being sentenced to death for high treason less than six months after the war ended.  

    Read Also: Ndume condemns electricity tariff hike

    While Hitler obliged Quisling in view of contiguity, Vladimir Putin, a one-time head of the FSB (former KGB), knows only too well that America – sans Canada – is too far-flung for a military misadventure, and that based on whatever dirt he has on Trump that makes him act like a quisling, the MAGA tribal chief can be counted on to offer the entire country to him on a platter without having to break sweat!

    If Trump becomes POTUS, the USA will eventually occupy the No.3 position on the global power grid, ceding No.1 position to Russia with China coming a close second. The NATO Alliance will collapse and Putin would invade and occupy neighbouring NATO member-countries, particularly those that used to be part and parcel of the defunct Soviet Union, without any pushback from Trump.

    I foresee major revolts ultimately ultimately springing up in many states, with Trump back in office. These would be heavily repressed by non-state military actors recruited from the roughest elements of American society in the mode of Hitler’s ‘Brownshirts’ and Benito Mussolini’s ‘Blackshirts,’ with considerable assistance from Putin. The one consolation is that American citizens and their institutions are wiser and more resilient, as evidenced by Trump’s failed 2020/2021 coup de grace.

    There arose long before Trump a certain Senator Joseph McCarthy (GOP-Wisconsin). Like Trump, McCarthy was the most visible public face at a time in America due to his much-touted nationalist fervour to ‘make America great.’ And very much like Trump, McCarthy knew how to oratorically incite a mob with demagogic, reckless and unsubstantiated accusations, put-downs on the character or patriotism of political opponents and put-ons to trick or cheat people.

    McCarthy was the very powerful chairman of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations (SPSI), who claimed that spies and communist subversives lurked in the Hollywood film industry, universities, the State Department, the Voice of America (VOA), the major television networks, the US Army and even the President Harry Truman administration!

    But not a single spy was caught by the time the curtains came down on the SPSI public hearings, and some of his claims about personal and professional achievements were discovered to be sexed up or falsified. Many of the same individuals and organisations hailing him as a 18-carat America hero subsequently turned against him. McCarthy died two years later aged only 48.  

    The equivalence of a political earthquake created by the result a by-election that was recently conducted in the deep red, Bible belt, MAGA state of Alabama has buoyed up hopes that Trump would suffer an electoral shellacking in November. A Democratic candidate, Marilyn Lands, who made women’s reproductive rights her sole theme, trashed her GOP opponent by a massive 25 points in a special election, flipping the state house seat in a reliably Republican constituency that Trump won by double digits in 2016 and 2020. For those who say “So, what?” let me explain that the Alabama political clap is akin to snow falling in Sokoto during the dry season!

    I’m inspired to predict that Trump will suffer a public humiliation similar to Quisling’s and McCarthy’s before/by the middle of 2026. If re-elected, he would be toppled and tried for high treason just like Quisling. Trump would become the first former US President to die by lethal injection or in an electric chair in a maximum security prison. Perhaps, just as quisling became a byword for ‘traitor,’ and McCarthyism became a noun that described ‘a reprehensible political witch-hunt,’ trumpism may also become a synonym for ‘gaslighting’ and ‘Art of the Steal.’ Who knows?

  • Of a Colloquium and the Reintegration of NdiIgbo

    Of a Colloquium and the Reintegration of NdiIgbo

    • By Ijeomah Arodiogbu

    Since it’s formation as a political party, the All Progressives Congress (APC) as a political vehicle has sought to change the dynamics of Nigeria’s politics. Since it’s inception, it has been the only party that has sought to give an intellectual bent to its processes as a party and in its interactions with the people.

    When the party came into power in 2015, it much maintained the same tempo and this was witnessed by in a number of issues of national interest whether it was on restructuring or national security, the APC in keeping to its tradition has formed a nexus with the academia in search of answers to such critical questions.

    Similarly I have toed such a line since I became the National Vice Chairman of the SouthEast Zone in 2022. Coming from the academic background  i believe just much as Jeffrey Stacey too that a number of policy issues or problems already have viable solutions which have already been identified by academics. It is by such nexus that the party may be instrumental in

    bringing about change as well as progress in the country, particularly in the areas of fighting corruption, promoting good governance, and improving the economy.

    For me, one of the ways in which the SouthEast APC has sought to achieve its goals  of making meaningful impact on the party, its membership and the general public is to regularly s jaw-jaw with academicians in order to appreciate present trends. Such encounters are sometimes informal, though they then help shape one’s thoughts on policy directions others are formal, such as summits, conferences, retreats and colloquiums, these foras serve excellently as meeting points where should where policy maker, government official and stakeholders meets with the academia to discuss important issues facing the nation and chart a way forward on such issues.

    Read Also: Sanwo-Olu distributes rice to Lagos councils, LCDAs

    Thus I welcomed the idea of the 1st SouthEast Colloquium which was held in Nnewi on the 22nd of March, 2024. The colloquium a brainchild of the SouthEast Zonal Organizing Secretary, Chief Dozie Ikedife had the theme as “Demarginalization of the SouthEast and integration into national politics” a knotty issue which has continually plagued the thinking caps of a number of academicians not only in the SouthEast but also all over the Federation.

    Exploring this topic under a number of historical considerations, particularly before and after the civil war with regard to the economic and political status occupied by the Eastern region when compared to the Northern and Western regions. Are we indeed marginalized as a people? Is the marginalization influenced by external forces or is it internal or again a mix of both?

    So when the resource person in Professor Charles Esimone, present Vice Chancellor of the Nnamdi Azikiwe University puts the blame on the 1999 constitution and the lack of an appropriate census I can partially agree but then are these the only causative factors?

    Those who share Esimone’s thoughts forget that we cannot exonerate ourselves too as one writer put it, “ we have exonerated our own leadership local by the abiding illusion that Abuja is the witch.”

    So while we continue to blame Abuja for the perceived marginalization we continue to parade voyeurs who themselves feed fat on the marginalization to the detriment of our people. Using such phobia, such politicians have sought to shut out our people from the centre only to join the same centre after misleading millions!

    Such politics of self exclusion has also been the bane of our politics and has left us holding the short end of the stick from where we then complain of being marginalized whereas we have failed to take up our place in the national tripod of our politics.

    Truth remains that we cannot take our place in the Nigerian scheme of things if we exclude ourselves it is akin to shooting ourselves in the foot or tying one leg whilst competing in a two legged race.

    NdiIgbo must therefore seek to integrate our politics into the national grid, we must build bridges with other ethnic nationalities, building mutual trust and confidence between each other. This way alone is the surest route to ending such tales of marginalization.

    One thing I have learnt from previous elections is that no zone alone can make one president of this nation, this should be etched in our minds as we look forward towards ensuring that we put an end to this talk of marginalization, we must begin with ourselves before we begin to address the external forces, only then can we truly bring the talk of marginalization to its conclusive state.

    ●Dr Ijeomah Arodiogbu is the National Vice Chairman APC SouthEast

  • 72 witty cheers, Mr. President

    72 witty cheers, Mr. President

    President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s 72 years on mother earth have provided invaluable insights into the true meaning of vision, foresight, focus, tenacity and grace. In politics, these virtues are often reflected in the use of language. Today, in the context of the President’s birthday on 29 March, 2024, this column examines his template of presidential rhetoric. This is important, given the tendency for commentators to claim that the President has not been reputed to be gifted in oratory, irrespective of his remarkably witty and profound use of language.

    President Tinubu is a man of immense grassroots appeal who holds the common people in high esteem, touches base with them constantly and bends to their will on critical matters. In a widely reported 2 October, 2018 speech to journalists, in Lagos, he himself explains, as follows, why he bows to the wishes of his followers:  “It’s only if you have followers that you’re a leader in democracy. If I look back and I don’t find them again; if I don’t respond to them, if I fail to accede to their request, I would have failed the leadership test. … For you to become an influential person, you have to respond to the yearnings of the people. This is politics; democracy, one man, one vote.”

    In consonance with this common touch, he speaks the language of the people. For example, at the 29 March 2018 Bola Tinubu Colloquium in Lagos, in his reaction to the criticism that the All Progressives Congress (APC) government of President Muhammadu Buhari was harping on the failure of the preceding People’s Democratic Party (PDP) government of President Goodluck Jonathan rather than embarking on its own meaningful governance, Asiwaju Bola Tinubu said: “Ah! They say don’t talk about it. Enhn? What should we talk about? … And if we’re not talking about it, then what is the lesson to all Nigerians? Forget those batches. They won’t come back. No nation without its challenges. Even America is facing challenges. … We didn’t say we will not be challenged. But we have to report to millions of Nigerians who voted for us that this is what we found. And we’re not going to take it off the ground no matter how twisting the mind of PDP and their supporters may be. We’ll keep talking about it: ‘You looted. You wasted our resources …’ Yoruba says, ‘Àì tètè m’ólè, olè ń sá lọ.’”

     In this excerpt, he uses common speech fragments (i.e., “Ah!”, “Enhn?”) to infuse his speech with a dose of cynicism, and he uses street lingo (i.e., “They won’t come back.”).  “They won’t come back” is a Lagos street idiom which is a literal English translation of the Yoruba expression “Wọn ò níí wá mọ́.” The idiomatic equivalent of this expression in English is “Good riddance to bad rubbish”. He also varies the content of the standard Yoruba proverb “Àì tètè m’ólè, olè ń m’ólóko.” (‘Not catching the thief fast enough makes the thief to catch the farmer.’). This proverb is the equivalent of the English proverb, “Thief cries ‘Catch thief.’” To create folk humour, he rendered the proverb in parodied form as, “Àì tètè m’ólè, olè ń sá lọ.” (‘Not catching the thief fast enough makes the thief to run away.’)

    President Tinubu also undertook the rhetorical variation of the standard Yoruba proverb “Ọmọ ẹni kò sè’dí bẹ̀bẹ̀rẹ̀ ká f’ìlẹ̀kẹ̀ sí t’ọmọ ẹlòmíràn.” (‘When your own child is sufficiently endowed, you don’t adorn the buttocks of somebody else’s with beads.’) On 28 March, 2024, the President appealed to Nigerian religious leaders as follows: “Pray for our country. … You don’t condemn your own nation. I’m a Yoruba man, and our fathers would say, no matter how slippery the bottom of your child, leave the bead there; leave the bead there. This is your country. Don’t condemn it in sermons. Don’t abuse the nation. … Don’t curse Nigeria. It’s a beautiful land; land of prosperity.” The proverb’s witty variation, complemented with repetition and lexical variation, is a solemn admonition to religious leaders to remain patriotic, whatever they may think the limitations of the country may be. 

    Asiwaju Bola Tinubu also spoke the language of the people at the earlier-mentioned 29 March, 2018 Bola Tinubu Colloquium in Lagos in his allusion to former President Olusegun Obasanjo’s penchant for writing condemnatory open letters against his successors in office. Specifically, Asiwaju stated: “I remember my grandmother used to send me to a letter writer in the post office of those days and near the magistrate court. So, somebody who is writing letters these days, a letter of politics. As if they’ve never been [in government] before. Bad belle letters.” Here, he uses the pidgin expression, “Bad belle letters” (i.e., ‘Mischievous letters’), along with innuendo (or the indirect reference to former President Obasanjo) in order to show intense disapproval.

    In his famous Èmilókàn speech delivered on 3 June, 2022, in Abeokuta, Ogun State, as an aspirant in the presidential primaries of the APC, Asiwaju Bola Tinubu further identified with the common people in the remarkable way he formed one of his words. Reviewing the past Vice-Presidential candidates President Muhammadu Buhari had chosen prior to 2015, Asiwaju Tinubu, mentioned Dr. Chuba Okadigbo, and described him as, “Okadigbo – flamboyant, faaji-loving Catholic”. The endearing compound word “faaji-loving” is attention-grabbing with respect to its unique composition. The first word “fàájì” is a Yoruba word and means ‘fun’, while the second one “loving” is an English word. The compound word “faaji-loving” is therefore an instance of strategic, creative code-mixing or language alternation, and is more striking than the fully-English synonym “fun-loving”.

    In the Èmilókàn declaration – a speech in which he seemed to be fighting with his back against the wall – Asiwaju Tinubu did what in Yoruba Language is referred to in the expression “Ó fọ́’gbá yánga.” (Literally, ‘He smashed the calabash of inanities’, or idiomatically, ‘He went for broke.’) He was, in a sense, “speaking softly, but carrying a big stick”. A historical article in the National Geographic on the 26th President of the United States stated as follows: “On September 2, 1901, United States Vice President Theodore Roosevelt outlined his ideal foreign policy in a speech at the Minnesota State Fair in Falcon Heights, Minnesota: ‘Speak softly, and carry a big stick.’ Two weeks later, Roosevelt became president and ‘Big Stick diplomacy’ defined his leadership.” A quizlet on this concept elucidates it this way: “Big stick ideology, big stick diplomacy, or big stick policy refers to U.S. President Theodore Roosevelt’s foreign policy: ‘speak softly, and carry a big stick.’ A proverb advising the tactic of caution and non-aggression, backed up by the ability to do violence if required.”

    As a whole, the Èmilókàn speech seemed to have been a salvo fired to presage a fierce internecine political battle in which no prisoners would be taken. Graciously, key stakeholders read the Èmilókàn code accurately, and within 24 hours of the delivery of the Èmilókàn treatise, the tide changed in Asiwaju’s favour. 11 APC Northern Governors declared their support for the party’s presidential candidate to come from the South. The code had served its purpose. In political communication, there are times when silence is golden; there are times for “speaking softly and carrying a big stick”; and there are times in which the appropriate thing is to growl. President Tinubu has shown an amazing grasp of these facts.

    In the Èmilókàn speech, Asiwaju presented himself as an at least triply ‘sinned against’ political benefactor. The key message of the speech is: “I wiped off the tears of President Muhammadu Buhari, I saved the neck of Prince Dapo Abiodun, and I gave national visibility to Professor Yemi Osinbajo, but they seem to have been biting the fingers that fed them or at least conniving at the efforts to do me in.” The speech was therefore in essence an appeal to the sense of moral rectitude in which one good turn deserved another.

    Read Also: Nigeria has what it takes to end insecurity – Kwankwaso

    Of all of his witty expressions of his displeasure at what was perceived as treachery or lack of reciprocity by those whose backs he had had, the most strikingly brutal put down was in referring to the Executive Governor of Ogun State, Prince Dapo Abiodun, as Eléyí (‘This one’). In this reference, he seemed to have denuded the Governor of all of his resplendent trappings of office, and he coupled it with referring to him only by his first name, “Dapo”. Even with respect to body language (or non-verbal language), Asiwaju did not turn to look in the direction of the Governor, but only gestured backward, demeaningly and dismissively, at the Governor who was sitting right behind him. Regarding some of the other people he believed had not treated him right, he wittily deployed repetition, rhythm, metaphor and proverbs to make his point.

    Remarkably, the Èmilókàn speech threw up its own set of proverbs. Some of Asiwaju’s critics claimed that, in the speech, he had displayed an “entitlement mentality” and an uncharitable recount of the political favours he had done others. In his defence, some of his supporters cited the following strikingly mitigating or euphemistic Yoruba proverb: “Nítorí àìgbọràn là ṣe dá àtẹnumọ́; nítorí àìmore là ṣe dá ìrègún.” (‘Stubbornness is the reason for incessant repetition; and ingratitude is the reason for recounting favours dispensed.’) 

    Asiwaju Bola Tinubu also demonstrated amazing wit by literalising a metaphorical expression in an observation made by a journalist on 11 April, 2022. Earlier that day, the incumbent Vice-President, Professor Yemi Osinbajo, had declared his interest to join the APC presidential election primaries, which Tinubu had himself joined since 10 January, 2022. The journalist drew Asiwaju’s attention to the development as follows: “Your son has just declared, sir.” Asiwaju’s response was, “I have no son grown enough to declare.” Here, the allusion to Professor Yemi Osinbajo metaphorically as Tinubu’s ‘political son’ by the journalist attracted Asiwaju’s indirect Osinbajo-repudiating, sarcastic literalisation of the word ‘son’ as Tinubu’s biological offspring.

     More than anything else, 3 words that would patently mark the Tinubu Presidency are “Subsidy is gone.” The simple sentence they form is curtly and peremptory, and has been instantaneously far-reaching in effect. Words may be used to entertain or change the course of history. President Bola Ahmed Tinubu may not make a captivating compere, or an engaging standup comedian. He may not win the trophy for rhapsodising oratory. He seems to live rather by the English proverb, “Talk is cheap.” So, in place of rapturous oratory, which incites momentary emotions with expressions which may be largely forgotten shortly after delivery, he deploys calm wit marked by the choice of simple, memorable words which have profound, remarkably more long-lasting impact. He doesn’t mesmerise with his words, he jolts with his actions. Happy birthday, Mr. President!

  • Afenifere and the progressive camp (1)

    Afenifere and the progressive camp (1)

    When sometime in 2008, the late Yinka Odumakin invited me to his 23, Sylvia Crescent, Anthony Village-office in Lagos, little did I know that a big surprise was waiting for me. A fine gentleman with a consistent commitment to the progressive bent, Odumakin had offered to pay me a visit but since it was unYoruba for leaders and elders to initiate the kind of visit he was envisaging, I opted for the opposite. And there I was, face-to-face, with the inimitable Odumakin and the irresistible Jimi Agbaje, aka JK. One thing led to another and I eventually became the pioneer Administrative Secretary of the Afenifere Renewal Group (ARG), under the national chairmanship of Olawale Oshun.

    Notable members of the prestigious Group included Ayo Afolabi, former Governor Kayode Fayemi of Ekiti State, Babafemi Ojudu, Bisi Adegbuyi, Oye Oyewumi, Lai Oyeduntan, Olutola Mobolurin, Ademola Oyinlola, Tokunbo Ajasin, Jumoke Anifowose, Biodun Oyebanji, Zacch Adedeji and Agbaje. Among others were Kunle Famoriyo, Ropo Sekoni, Charles Akinola, Adedamola Dada and the now-deceased former Deputy Governor Funmilayo Olayinka of Ekiti State (1960 – 2013), Dipo Famakinwa (1967 – 2017), Bayonile Ademodi (1952 – 2020) and, of course, Odumakin (1966 – 2021).

    On March 26, 2024, Oshun clocked 74 years on the Planet Earth and a group of intellectuals in the Southwest under the leadership of Professor Lai Olurode converged on his Ijebu-Imushin country house in Ogun State to honour this man of many parts with a Roundtable Discussion on the Governance Crisis in Nigeria. 

    Oshun has done well and he deserves to be celebrated. He has paid his dues but then, only an ungrateful heart will also say that God has not been good to this delightful ideologue of the All Progressives Congress (APC) bent. So, he has no reason to complain! Author, journalist and farmer, he’s a former Chief Whip of the Federal House of Representatives and prominent member of the defunct National Democratic Coalition (NADECO). He was also a close ally of the late MKO Abiola, the winner of the June 12, 1993 presidential election. As a matter of fact, Oshun was reportedly one of the few, prominent faces at the historic Epetedo Declaration on June 11, 1994. ARG under Oshun’s leadership produced the Development Agenda for Western Nigeria (DAWN) Strategy Roadmap which led to the formal inauguration of DAWN Commission by the Southwest governors in July 2013.

    It is important to note that ARG was formed “with the stated intent of reuniting the feuding factions” in Afenifere and as “a necessary body to preserve the ethnic identity of the Yorubas.” If one may therefore ask, how smooth has the journey of hope which the Group brought to the Yoruba race with its formation been and how many of its founding philosophical objectives have been realized? Looking around today, the mainstream Afenifere has become more of a wrong noise than communal togetherness. While one faction, led by Reuben Fasoranti, is obviously looking in the direction of ‘E lo f’okan bale’, the other, headed by Ayo Adebanjo, is excruciatingly Obidient-compliant. Since the guardians of society are either dead or deep in slumber, Yoruba people have become deeply divided and that’s to our collective hurt!

    Beyond its sequined glint, Yorubaland had expected Afenifere to serve as a very powerful research institution like the Chatham House in London. Though ARG has done one or two things along this line, it is unfortunate that what we now have is more of interest-leaders and self-servers who have developed an unsatisfying urge for political slots for their children and concubines thereby leaving the children of the poor with no future! And they have succeeded in doing that! And nobody, except the Stone of Israel, can put an end to it!

    In the days of Obafemi Awolowo, Adekunle Ajasin and Abraham Adesanya, the fear of Afenifere was the beginning of wisdom for any governor who wanted to access relevance in the zone, even beyond. How come that has faded away so soon? Where did the rain start beating the Yorubas and who are the giants and strongholds who want Yorubaland to not remain even stagnant but speedily moving backward? Has the Yoruba race arrived at the desired shore and what’s the opium keeping the actors in deep sleep? Is the Yoruba progressive corporate world the way it should be? What efforts has Afenifere made to reverse the pains of the grinding penury in the midst of stupendous plenty that has now sadly become the lot of Western Nigeria? In the sincerity of his heart, would Awolowo have abandoned his people to their fate without proffering urgent, comprehensive and soul-saving solutions at a time like this

    Read Also: Afenifere chieftain backs Tinubu’s govt

    Agbonmagbe, now Wema Bank (1945)! Western Nigeria Development Corporation, WNDC (1949)! The Nigerian Plastic Company Limited (1954)! Western House (1958)! Western Nigerian Government Broadcasting Corporation, WNTV (1959)! Liberty Stadium (1960)! University of Ife (1961)! Cooperative Bank (1961)! Cocoa House (1964)! Lapal House (1978)! And many others! Whereas some leaders have been in charge of the destiny of Yorubaland for more than two decades with next-to-nothing to show for it, what Awolowo and his colleagues did with a shorter reign is what the children of Oduduwa have got as their inheritance till date. It is therefore unfortunate that successive leaders have only been feeding fat on the labour of these heroes past!

    Also, time was when the media space was controlled by the Southwest. Now, the zone is almost nowhere to be found on the media map. In the Banking sector, not much is happening! In the political space, the North has not lost its grip; and, in Agriculture, it has lost touch. But for Amotekun, the security situation in the Southwest would have been worse! So, what’s happening?

    If we want to talk about Afenifere, we have to go back to the treaty that ended the Kiriji War and the formation of the West African Students Union (WASU). The foundation of Egbe Omo Oduduwa by Awolowo was a spinoff of WASU and it put together a level of work which led to the manifesto of the Action Group, ‘Life more abundant’; and it made a difference because we’re not just talking about ‘Free Education’ which was the centerpiece but also the formation of the development financing institutions such as the WNDC, Western Nigeria Finance Corporation and Western Nigeria Housing Corporation, established in 1958. Yoruba leaders at the time followed the paths already embarked upon by the Brazilians. Of course, that’s why Brazil is not looking for foreign investments. Brazil established the Brazilian Bank for Sustainable Development (BNDES) in 1952 and it’s now about the most powerful financing agent for development in the world. Every year, Brazil recapitalizes BNDES with about 1% of her foreign earnings. That’s why the Bank, according to the Financial Times of London, can give loans with up to 50 years tenor. Impliedly, a capitalized WNDC or Cooperative Bank would have made Olokola Deep Seaport in Ondo State the best outside of Freetown.

    Again, that a Yorubaman is Nigeria’s president does not mean the race should go to bed and start snoring! Already, the noise in town is that too many appointments are in the hands of the Yorubas and that it is because the president is of the Southwest extraction. So, let Afenifere visit Awolowo’s grave with a view to atoning for its sins before it’s too late. There and then, it should tie up with institutions like the Pension Fund to embark on serious capital projects that can give loans of up to 30 years tenor. But, wait a minute: what have been the roles of the Ministries of Regional Integration in the six states that make up the Southwest? If they have an agenda for DAWN, why can’t they go back to it?

    • To be continued.
  • France: Friend or foe of Africa?

    France: Friend or foe of Africa?

    • By Olabode Lucas

    Recently, I came across a video recording by the newly elected president of Senegal, Bassirou Diomaye Faye, which I presumed was recorded before the presidential election in his country which he won decisively. In the video recording, the 44-year old Faye condemned in an impeccable English language, France’s interference in the affairs of its former colonies in Africa. He urged France in an unmistakable term, to loosen its oppressive grip on Africa as he alluded to years of human trafficking, exploitation, colonialism and neo-colonialism by France that had brought nothing but misery to Africa. Faye urged France to emulate Germany that does not have any colony to exploit and yet it is the economic powerhouse in Europe and the third largest economy in the world. He further urged France to stop its inference in political development in Africa through imposition of unpopular leaders, who are nothing but lackeys of France.

    With this explosive exposition of French atrocities in Africa, coupled with the recent open and unapologetic rejection of France in Mali, Guinea, and Niger by the patriotic new young military rulers of these countries, the days of reckoning have come for France in Africa especially in its former colonies. France is no longer at ease in Africa as its heinous policy in Africa is now unravelling.

    In the sixties, the imperious President De Gaulle of France gave paper independence to French colonies in Africa and corralled them into an unholy French community. In doing so, he imposed puppets as new rulers of these so-called independent countries. Some of these puppet leaders were, Leopold Senghor of Senegal, Houphouet Boigny of Ivory Coast, Ahmadu Ahidjo of Cameroons, Maurice Yameogo of the then Upper Volta, now Burkina Faso, Ahmani Diori of Niger, Hubert Maga of the then Dahomey now Benin, Tombalbaye of Chad, imbecilic Jean Bokassa of Central African Republic and other pliable leaders. These leaders could see nothing wrong with France and they were installed as leaders to take care of French interests instead of the interests of their countries. They were simply French people in black skin who wholly imbibed French culture.

    The terms of independence given to these leaders by France were punitive. All the foreign exchange earnings of these countries were domiciled in Paris, where they were linked to French Franc. They could only withdraw their legitimate earnings only with permission of the French government. It is also known that all French former colonies in Africa are paying back to France colonial tax for money France claimed to have used for the infrastructural development of the colonies, as if people in these colonies did not pay any tax when they were under the oppressive tutelage of France. At present, this colonial tax amounts to $500 billion. In order to ensure compliance with terms of independence, the French kept paratroopers in these former colonies at independence for the purpose of ousting any recalcitrant leader. This was the lot of Sylvanus Olympio of Togo who rebelled against these heinous terms of independence immediately after his country’s independence. France, eventually after some years was able to impose Eyadema as president of Togo, and who throughout his oppressive 38-year reign, was a lackey of France.

    The two leaders who defied De Gaulle and refused to join the suffocating French community with its punishing terms for independence were Sekou Toure of Guinea and to some extent Modibo Keita of Mali. For his audacity, De Gaulle unleashed all French colonial venom on Sekou Toure. Overnight at independence, he withdrew from Guinea, all French technicians and administrators leaving the newly independent country high and dry. De Gaulle wanted to cripple Guinea but for the prompt intervention of Osagyefo Dr. Kwame Nkrumah of Ghana, who provided necessary assistance to Guinea. For this heroic role of Nkrumah, he became a marked man for destruction by De Gaulle and his co-oppressors in the Western world.

    Apart from the atrocities committed in its former colonies, France has never meant well for Africa, It is on record that despite all the entreaties, France under President De Gaulle tested atom bomb in the Sahara Desert in the sixties. These tests caused a lot of serious health problems in many countries in Africa including Nigeria, where the new independent government under the conservative and cautious Tafawa Balewa cut diplomatic relation with France. De Gaulle could not stand this, as he was irked at the temerity of Nigeria in giving diplomatic snub to France. De Gaulle had his revenge during the Nigeria civil war when he tacitly gave support to the ill-fated Biafra and encouraged Ivory Coast to recognize the secessionist Biafra. It is also on record that France did all within its power to frustrate the formation of ECOWAS because it thought that such a union would lessen its influence in its former colonies in West Africa.

    Read Also: Shettima inaugurates technical committee for iDICE

    Far afield, France is responsible for the present poverty and economic dislocation in the hapless Haiti through the punitive reparation it imposed on Haiti at independence. After the people of Haiti revolted to have their independence, France callously made Haiti to pay it 90 million gold francs which presently is equivalent to $21 billion. Up till now, no French government has come to the aid of Haiti by paying back the money extorted from that country.

    It is an irony that France that has been turning black people into serfs in their continent, collapsed like pack of cards under the onslaught of Germany, just nine months after the commencement of the Second World War that lasted for good six years. France was humiliated and forced to sign an armistice agreement on June 22, 1940. Also, the same France that is flexing its muscle in its former colonies in Africa was booted out in disgrace from its colonies in Indo-China, after it was decisively defeated in the battle of Dien Bien Phu in 1954.

    French policy in Africa is collapsing and it is gratifying to note that young Africans in the former French colonies in Africa are throwing away the suffocating toga of French neo-colonialism. By July this year, eight former French colonies in Africa would stop using CFA but will have their own independent currency called Eco, which would be tied to Euro instead of French Franc. This is a welcomed development. It is a pity that the youthful French president, Emmanuel Macron fails to see the handwriting on the wall and instead of initiating new French African policy based on collaboration between equal partners, he is still pursuing the imperious policy of the De Gaulle era which is archaic and subjugating. This policy is now roundly rejected by leaders in French former colonies in Africa.

    In his reaction to the new development, Macron arrogantly asserted that Niger and other Sahel countries would collapse without French support. The policy of France in its former colonies is a mockery of the French motto of Liberty, Equality and Fraternity. It has not extended this to its former colonies in Africa where many people now regard France more as a foe.

    •Prof Lucas writes from Old Bodija, Ibadan.