Category: Discourse

  • President Tinubu and June 12

    President Tinubu and June 12

    • By Tunde Rahman

    Around this period in 1993, precisely on June 12, 1993, the day of that historic election, this writer operated in two different but mutually reinforcing capacities. While I was the Political Correspondent of the old Daily Times, covering the then-unfolding electoral process in Abuja, I was also an officer in the Nigerian Election Monitoring Group monitoring the poll in the federal capital. It was an important day in the nation’s life, as it was in my journalism career. The late Professor Omo Omoruyi, an intellectual giant and the brains behind General Ibrahim Babangida and his transition programme, who designed most of the electoral ideas introduced by that regime, including Option A4, had put the election monitoring group together.

    As the Political Correspondent of the Daily Times, I had an uneasy sense of foreboding when the then National Electoral Commission, which had been announcing the results of the election on a display board mounted at the commission’s headquarters then at Area 10, Abuja, suddenly stopped adding new results after results from 14 states had been announced. I promptly filed a story on this strange and disturbing development. The next day, the late Dr. Femi Sonaike, Editor of the Daily Times at the time, ran a front-page editorial demanding the continuation of the publication of the results. I was beside myself in ecstasy at the NEC HQ, celebrating the editorial and Dr. Sonaike’s bravery and boldness. For a government-owned newspaper, the editorial was an unforgivable affront to the military. As it turned out, that was the last edition Dr. Sonaike edited as Daily Times Editor. He was instantly removed from office.

    Then began a sad spiral of events, culminating in an announcement formally annulling that free and fair election. A dark pall descended on the nation. The country erupted in turmoil, with almost daily protests against the election’s annulment. The rest did not simply become history, as they say, but a profound history with compelling lessons.

    This piece is not an odyssey of my journalism career. It’s about President Bola Tinubu and the undocumented contributions to June 12, particularly after that annulment. Tinubu played a frontline role in the conception and later agitation of the National Democratic Coalition (NADECO), which stridently fought for the de-annulment of June 12.

    At the time of the election, he was a Senator of the Federal Republic. In defiance of the military, he and others reconvened the Senate that had gone on recess, during which they demanded the de-annulment of the poll or immediate termination of military rule.

    For his agitation, the military hounded him. His residence at Balarabe Musa Crescent in Victoria Island, Lagos was petrol-bombed by agents of the junta who thought he had been burnt alive. However, he escaped abroad and continued the agitation, providing direction and funding for NADECO Chieftians abroad. All of that had been widely publicised and commended.

    Many may also recall that iconic and viral picture, which circulated online, where Asiwaju Tinubu was seen behind the late Bashorun MKO Abiola as Abiola went to confer with the late dictator, General Sani Abacha, on the June 12 matter. The significance of that event signposted Asiwaju’s relationship with MKO as a trusted ally and his essential role in the then-unfolding struggle. Asiwaju Tinubu, it was learned, warned the late MKO to tread cautiously and be wary of Abacha or the military over June 12. As he often says, the military uniform is called camouflage, and camouflage, according to him, is a synonym for deception.

    Read Also: 2027: Northeast APC declares support for Tinubu/Shettima ticket

    It is thus unsurprising that much of his contributions, particularly after June 12, remained indelible years after the death of Abiola, owner of the stolen mandate. The profundity of June 12 is evident in the fact that its ghost has refused to go away years after the restoration of democracy in 1999. President Olusegun Obasanjo, who inherited power on a silver platter and his Peoples Democratic Party, carried on as though oblivious of the historical import of June 12 and the ominous pall that its years of neglect had cast on the nation’s democratic system. Although the late President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua inaugurated the Justice Muhammed Uwais Electoral panel to reform the nation’s electoral process after admitting his election in 2007 was flawed, he battled ill-health for the better part of his presidency to think of June 12. President Goodluck Jonathan also remained seemingly unfazed about that annulled poll. For 16 years after the democratic renewal, the PDP government carried on with the utter neglect of June 12 and its symbolic place in our democracy.

    However, President Buhari took bold steps to resolve the June 12 conundrum and put Abiola in his rightful place even in death. Recognising him as the winner of June 12 and as President, Buhari bestowed on MKO posthumously, the highest national honour of GCFR reserved for presidents. He also declared June 12 a national public holiday. Buhari gave Abiola’s running mate in the election, Ambassador Babagana Kingibe, the second-highest honour of GCON. Buhari’s gesture won him admiration and commendations.

    Many didn’t know that Asiwaju Tinubu had made the recommendation to President Buhari.

    Addressing the National Assembly last Thursday, President Tinubu again commended Buhari for this critical decision: “Let me pay tribute to former President Muhammadu Buhari for reaching back into history to rectify a national misdeed by making June 12 Democracy Day and by officially acknowledging Chief Moshood Kashimawo Olawale Abiola and his running mate, Babagana Kingibe, as the victors and thus duly elected President and Vice President respectively of Nigeria after the June 12, 1993, elections.”

    President Tinubu completed the restitution for Abiola and other heroes of democracy that Thursday. He conferred posthumous national honours on Kudirat Abiola, MKO’s wife, and other heroes. Agents of the military junta killed Kudirat on the streets of Lagos in the wake of the June 12 struggle.

    It is relevant to state that certain things are instructive about President Tinubu and June 12. Tinubu became President in 2023, 30 years after June 12. Is this simply a coincidence or divinely ordained?

    The late MKO Abiola christened his campaign manifesto “Hope 1993: Farewell to Poverty.” President Tinubu called his own Renewed Hope Agenda for a Better Nigeria.

    Now, has the ghost of June 12 been finally laid to rest? Is MKO’s vision for Nigeria alive in Tinubu’s presidency? Vice President Kashim Mustapha Shettima thinks so.

    Speaking during the public lecture commemorating the 26th year of unbroken Democracy, VP Shettima said decades after the June 12 debacle, providence returned the baton of Abiola’s struggle for a better Nigeria to “one of his most trusted lieutenants—President Tinubu.”

    He affirmed that, based on the final account of Abiola’s life, the military could not take away or extinguish hope. “It is this faith in the promise of Abiola’s vision that has renewed the hope of this nation,” he said.

    The work is not entirely done. Although the recent resolution of the National Assembly adopting June 12 of every year for the Presidential Address is a step in the right direction, as it will help to institutionalise June 12 and immortalise Abiola, I think MKO deserves full recompense for his contributions and for paying the supreme price for Nigeria’s democracy. The government should pay the debts if actually it owes Abiola some money, as his family claims.

    In the meantime, President Tinubu’s pronouncements last Thursday at the hallowed chamber of the National Assembly stand as homage to resilience and a bold reminder of what might have been.

    •Rahman is Senior Assistant to the President on Media and Special Duties.

  • Tinubu’s 2027 landscape: Reform, resistance and the road ahead

    Tinubu’s 2027 landscape: Reform, resistance and the road ahead

    • By Kayode Oladele

    The bipolar opposition coalition forming against President Bola Tinubu appears to be an uneasy alliance of strange bedfellows – Atiku, Obi, El-Rufai, and others with vastly different ideas without  clear ideologies and political trajectories. Their shared goal of unseating the President may not be enough to overcome their internal contradictions which is also threatened by the law of the negation of the  negotiation.

    Without a unified, unambiguous alternative policy platform or coherent leadership structure, the opposition  coalition can at best,  be perceived as marriage of convenience made in hell rather than a platform for providing a more credible and more reliable alternative for Nigerians in the forthcoming 2027 general elections.

    Political science teaches us that such opposition  coalitions can succeed only when built on shared principles, not just mutual resentment against the seating President. Whether this opposition coalition front can present a viable challenge that can mussel life out of the  All Progressives Congress (APC ) government will depend on its ability to build trust, articulate a clear national agenda, and appeal beyond narrow political bases. Unfortunately, it is difficult to see any of these fundamental elements in the present opposition agitation and gang-up coalition against President Bola Tinubu and the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) Party.

    Conversely, Tinubu’s  political machinery is not just built on rhetoric but on decades of deliberate institution-building, loyal patronage networks and a knack for striking alliances for mutual benefit. Unlike his rivals, who often rely on reactionary politics or populist waves, the President placidly plays the long distance  game with the words of desiderata: one carefully calibrated move at a time.

    Whether he is navigating the internal politics of the APC, disarming dissents within his base, or neutralizing potential opposition threats, Tinubu has demonstrated a mastery of Nigerian politics that few can match. And unless the opposition coalition  can offer more than sporadic outrage or opportunistic alliances, he will continue to dictate the tempo of Nigeria’s political future heading into 2027 general elections.

    Read Also: Tinubu orders security chiefs to restore peace in Benue

    Within the opposition coalition , it is clear that many joiners are focused mainly on their personal ambitions and long-term goals powered by the desire for grabbing raw power rather than offering real panacea  to the challenges they pretentiously claim to be facing the country under the current administration. This indicates that many opposition coalition members prioritize their own empowerment and ambitious over national interests.

    Their decisions to oppose the President has no beneficial or positive impact on the general public nor has it addressed  important national issues. Examining the profiles of the frontline figures within the opposition coalition will provide valuable insights into their history, characters and the bumpy roads that lie ahead of their contorted orchestra that sounds like a broken  record.

    The lead vocalist, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar is often described as a hardy perennial contender whose political journey has traversed nearly all of Nigeria’s major political platforms. To date, he has contested the presidency six times. His first attempt was in 1993 when he sought the presidential ticket of the Social Democratic Party (SDP) but lost to the late Moshood Abiola, whose eventual election was annulled by the military regime of Gen. Ibrahim Babangida.

    In 2007, Atiku contested under the Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN) but was unsuccessful. In 2011, he returned to the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), only to lose the presidential ticket to then-President Goodluck Jonathan. He later joined the All Progressives Congress (APC) in 2014 but lost the party’s ticket to the former President  Muhammadu Buhari. He eventually became the PDP’s presidential candidate in 2019 and 2023, losing both elections, most recently to President Bola Tinubu.

    With eyes now on 2027, Atiku is once again maneuvering through the political terrain, scavenging on some passing throbs occasioned by the government’s bold reform policies in a bid to court public sympathy and support. Critics argue that he has become emblematic of political persistence without renewal. He has exhausted all his trump cards and incapable of spinning surprises in order to gain any electoral advantage over the President.

    Peter Obi, the Labour Party (LP) Presidential  candidate in 2023, emerged as a third-force figure, galvanizing urban youth and disaffected voters through the “Obidient” movement. However, some critics argue that the movement leaned heavily on ethnic and religious sentiments, lacking a cohesive national strategy. Others view it as a necessary disruption to Nigeria’s entrenched two-party dominance. The 2023 elections showcased both the energy and limitations of the movement, raising questions about whether Obi’s appeal can translate into a broader coalition with national viability ahead of the 2027 elections.

    Former Kaduna State Governor Nasir El-Rufai has recently reemerged as a vocal critic of the Tinubu administration after being sidelined from ministerial appointments due to his failure to scale through the rigorous Senate conformation. He is now reportedly aligning with the opposition coalition to wrestle power with the President in 2027.

    The opposition coalition team also includes a pocked of some other aggrieved figures within the APC  fold itself  who claims exclusion from the Party. While some of their complaints are framed as calls for inclusivity, political pundits suggest that they may be rooted more in personal political survival than in genuine concern for balance or equity.

    Be that as it may, these  elements are coming together to form a moribund alliance and bipolar opposition  coalition against the President. However, Nigerians are bored by their rhetoric and lack of policy alternatives even though,  what they fail to realize is that, at the end of the day, the PDP is thinning out while the APC is swelling up as it continues to witness mass defections into its fold at a geometrical rate. Ultimately, the aggregate of the elements decamping from the PDP to the APC and those leaving the PDP to form another third-force opposition coalition will turn the PDP into a mere carcass, which will eventually weaken the opposition against the President.

    Despite these opposition threats, President Tinubu’s administration is pushing ahead with his progressive reforms as encapsulated in the Renewed Hope Agenda. These reforms are not without pain, but they represent essential steps in correcting decades of fiscal irresponsibility and lack of political direction. 

    As the country braces for the road to 2027, Nigerians will ultimately judge their leaders not just by rhetoric or past affiliations or the opposition coalition’s politically motivated feeble  narratives and lack of direction , but by who, like the President, offers the most credible pathway to economic stability, national unity, security and good governance. For now, Tinubu’s reform agenda has sparked a shift in the political conversation from failed promises to good governance and sterling performance.

    Oladele, a lawyer, is a member of the Federal Character Commission.

  • The intellectual sins of June 12: A reckoning with Nigeria’s democratic conscience

    The intellectual sins of June 12: A reckoning with Nigeria’s democratic conscience

    • By Prof. Ojo Emmanuel Ademola

    Every June 12, Nigeria observes a significant date that embodies both the aspirations for democracy and the painful betrayal of that dream. This day commemorates the 1993 presidential election, celebrated as the most free and fair in the country’s history but ultimately annulled by the military regime led by General Ibrahim Babangida. While the focus has often been on the political and military figures involved, there has been less emphasis on the intellectual shortcomings that contributed to this democratic failure. These shortcomings—the “intellectual sins” of June 12—include silence, complicity, and ideological failures that continue to impact Nigeria’s pursuit of democracy.

    The election that could have changed Everything

    Every June 12, Nigeria observes a significant date that embodies both the aspirations for democracy and the painful betrayal of that dream. This day commemorates the 1993 presidential election, celebrated as the most free and fair in the country’s history but ultimately annulled by the military regime led by General Ibrahim Babangida. While the focus has often been on the political and military figures involved, there has been less emphasis on the intellectual shortcomings that contributed to this democratic failure. These shortcomings—the “intellectual sins” of June 12—include silence, complicity, and ideological failures that continue to impact Nigeria’s pursuit of democracy.On June 12, 1993, Nigerians came together to vote for Chief Moshood Kashimawo Olawale (MKO) Abiola, a well-known southern Muslim celebrated for his wealth, philanthropy, and political acumen. His electoral victory was more than just a tally of votes; it became a powerful symbol of national unity and a collective longing for civilian governance following years of military rule.

    The military’s annulment of the election results, based on vague security concerns and claims of irregularities, was profoundly disappointing. This decision was not merely a political manoeuvre; it represented a significant betrayal of the democratic values that the election was meant to uphold.

    The silence of the intellectual class

    One of the most troubling aspects of the June 12 crisis was the widespread silence—or, even worse, the rationalizations—by many in Nigeria’s intellectual elite. University professors, public commentators, and thought leaders, who should have served as the nation’s moral compass, largely failed to speak out against the annulment. Some even justified it, wrapping their arguments in legal jargon or appealing to national stability.

    The silence in this situation was not neutral; it was an act of complicity. During times of national crisis, when the intelligentsia chooses to remain silent, this absence is not merely a lack of comment—it is an endorsement of the status quo. Nigeria’s intellectual class’s failure to provide a strong defence of democracy in 1993 highlighted a more profound issue: a lack of genuine commitment to democratic governance.

    Ethnic Chauvinism and the failure of national integration:

    The annulment highlighted the fragility of Nigeria’s national identity. Although Abiola had widespread appeal across the country, the decision to invalidate his victory was perceived mainly as influenced by northern political elites who were uneasy about a southern Muslim becoming president. This perception, whether accurate or not, strengthened the belief that Nigeria’s democracy is held captive by ethnic and regional interests.

    Once again, the intellectual class fell short. Instead of confronting the ethnicization of politics, many scholars and commentators either overlooked it or contributed to it. The chance to use June 12 as a catalyst for national integration and civic nationalism was missed.

    The Legal and Constitutional Vacuum:

    The events of June 12 highlighted Nigeria’s fragile legal and constitutional framework. The annulment of the election exposed the country’s institutions as inadequate in preventing executive overreach and safeguarding the electoral process. At that time, there was a lack of an independent judiciary capable of contesting military actions, an ineffective legislature to oversee government activities, and a civil society that was not sufficiently strong to mobilize in response.

    The Institutional weakness in Nigeria was not a coincidence; it stemmed from years of intellectual neglect. The country’s legal scholars, constitutional designers, and policy thinkers did not create a system robust enough to resist authoritarian tendencies. Consequently, the annulment of electoral processes directly resulted from this inadequacy.

    Read Also: Tinubu has fulfilled Abiola’s vision for a democratic Nigeria — Shettima

    The myth of transition without transformation:

    The military’s commitment to transitioning Nigeria to civilian rule was fraught with inconsistencies. The annulment of the June 12 elections exposed the illusion that democratic governance could be realised without a fundamental change in the country’s political culture. The transition program itself was characterized by a top-down approach, a lack of transparency, and a focus on maintaining the interests of the elite.

    Many intellectuals were drawn into the myth surrounding a purportedly democratic transition process. By actively participating in advisory roles, they inadvertently lent credibility to a system that lacked true democratic principles. Their failure to critically examine the underlying foundations of this transition program represents a significant intellectual oversight.

    The Repetition of History:

    The aftermath of June 12 has had lasting repercussions for Nigeria, as the country seems trapped in a cycle of repeating past mistakes. Key issues such as electoral malpractice, the dominance of elites over democratic institutions, and the suppression of dissent are still prevalent in the political landscape. Unfortunately, society has not fully grasped or embraced the vital lessons from June 12, indicating a failure to learn from history.

    The recurring failures

    In Nigeria’s democracy highlight a deeper intellectual shortcoming, as there is a reluctance to engage in critical self-reflection and necessary institutional reform. It is simpler for leaders to honour June 12 through ceremonies and speeches rather than address the uncomfortable realities that emerge from this historical moment.

    A Path to Redemption:

    Nigeria needs to initiate a new democratic renaissance to address the intellectual shortcomings highlighted on June 12. This revival should focus on enhancing civic education, implementing institutional reforms, and reaffirming a strong commitment to democratic values.

    1.         Enhancing civic education within society is essential to ensuring the vitality of democracy. This involves prioritizing the teaching of democratic principles, critical thinking, and active citizenship in schools, universities, and media outlets. By doing so, citizens will become more aware of their rights and responsibilities, thus fostering a more engaged and informed populace.

    2.         Strengthen Institutions: A functioning democracy requires that the judiciary, electoral commission, and legislature operate without political interference. Achieving this necessitates legal reforms and a significant cultural shift in how power is exercised and contested within society.

    3.         Empower a New Generation of Public Intellectuals: Nigeria requires independent thinkers who prioritize democratic values over ethnic or political affiliations. These intellectuals should courageously challenge authority and advocate for democratic principles, unafraid of potential repercussions.

    4.         Confront the Past Honestly: The June 12 crisis serves as an important historical event that should be incorporated into school curricula and discussed in public forums. It carries significant moral lessons that are essential for understanding the past. By acknowledging and confronting this history, Nigeria can work towards establishing a more just and democratic future.

    Conclusion: Democracy as a moral imperative

    June 12 serves as a powerful reminder of Nigeria’s complex democratic journey, highlighting both its potential and challenges. Rather than merely marking the date with hollow statements, engaging in a genuine reflection on the past is essential. The mistakes of that time—characterized by silence, complicity, and ideological failures—should not be repeated. As we honour this day, we must recommit ourselves to the ideals embodied by Abiola’s victory, including justice, unity, and the empowerment of the people.

    Democracy transcends being merely a system of governance; it is fundamentally a moral obligation. Every citizen, particularly those influential in shaping public opinion, has the responsibility to uphold and defend democratic principles with bravery, clarity, and firm conviction.

  • A tribute to Uncle Sam at 90

    A tribute to Uncle Sam at 90

    • By Azu Ishiekwene

    I   encountered the relic of his presence long before I met Sam Amuka, known as Uncle Sam. Inside a room in the far corner of the old Kudeti PUNCH building, predominantly constructed of plywood and steel frames, there was a wooden armchair that had been a fixture in Uncle Sam’s office when he served as managing editor.

    When I joined PUNCH as a staff writer eight years after his departure in 1981, this piece of furniture was in my first office, sitting like a totem in a shrine, while stories about Uncle Sam floated in whispers.

    The stories could not be told freely in PUNCH at the time because of the bitter dispute between Uncle Sam and his friend and Publisher, Olu Aboderin, which would later end in an out-of-court settlement.

    So, if one were looking for stories about Uncle Sam’s early professional life, particularly his works, the Daily Times would have been a good place to find them.

    In the 1990s, however, the Times started having its own problems, leading to frequent changes at the top, and a dramatic sale that imperilled not only access to the records of the newspaper’s leading lights like Uncle Sam, but even the history of the newspaper which, in its heyday, was Nigeria’s most prosperous, authoritative and vibrant brand.

    From ‘Offbeat Sam’ to ‘Sad Sam’

    Uncle Sam made his name at the Daily Times, but his journalism career did not start there. According to Ben Lawrence, in an article entitled “An artiste and a builder,” published in Voices from Within, a collection of articles edited by Lanre Idowu to mark Uncle Sam’s 70th birthday, he made his first call at the Sunday Express, where John Pepper Clark was features editor.

    J.P. Clark nurtured him, but it was at the Times that his talent blossomed. He started with “Offbeat Sam,” which, as the name suggested, was an unconventional, straight-from-the-heart weekly column that stripped many social and political issues of their cloak of hypocrisy.

    Like many elites in the 90s who criticised gossip magazines as street rags but never missed reading them behind closed doors, “Offbeat Sam” made politicians and government officials uncomfortable. But it was a foretaste of what was to come.

    When Uncle Sam moved from the Sunday Express to become editor of Spear magazine (he later edited the Sunday Times), a Daily Times publication set up to rival Drum of South Africa, he started the “Sad Sam” column. His entry expanded a vibrant and robust field of punditry that included the likes of Hadj Alade Odunewu, Peter Enahoro (Peter Pan), Clarkson Majomi, Gbolabo Ogunsanwo, Haroun Adamu, and Uche Chukwumerije, amongst others.

    Writing for a living

    “Sad Sam” was not interested in the news. He exploited the foibles and follies of politicians and those in authority to entertain, provoke emotions, or instigate deeper thinking about who we are.

    An article by Gbemiga Ogunleye, “The columnist’s power,” quoting Sad Sam in the Sunday PUNCH of August 12, 1973, said, “I (Sad Sam) write for the same reason that a houseboy cleans the house or a secretary-typist takes shorthand and types or a taxi driver rides the street, touting for fares…or an executive in business or government goes to the office or a professional burglar steals. For a living, that’s all. It’s none of my business to correct the ills or save this country!”

    I’m a bit like Sad Sam these days, chastened by the years and weary of making any fuss about changing the world by writing. However, one area in which I could never be like Uncle Sam is his management style.

    Read Also: une 12: Nigeria has made tremendous progress under Tinubu, says Aiyedatiwa

    Be ‘a little mad’

    In an industry where he once admitted in a sticker on the wall of the PUNCH newsroom, “You don’t have to be mad to work here, but a little madness helps,” how did he manage a steely coolness in his small body frame amidst the turmoil of the newsroom, never mind the many tempests of a life forged in the vicissitudes of the streets of Oguanja in Sapele?

    Was his stoicism partly shaped in his formative years, including his time as a left-winger for the Government College, Ughelli football team and his education at the Nigerian College of Arts, Science and Technology, Enugu, where he studied architecture?

    As Odunewu wrote, the intensity of the newsroom creates more of the likes of Lord Beaverbrook, the publisher of the Daily Express or MKO Abiola of the Concord – or even Sam Nda-Isaiah of LEADERSHIP – a breathless and restless stock in whose corner I find myself, than the likes of Uncle Sam who would rather go to the office with a peace offering than drag the office to their presence by the scruff of the neck.

    An eye for talent

    Eric Teniola, who worked with Uncle Sam in PUNCH between 1977 and 1981, as Oyo State Editor, Constituent Assembly Editor and Lagos City Editor, told me that one of Uncle Sam’s greatest gifts is his capacity to always look on the bright side, the opposite of the essence of a Sad Sam.

    “He knew how to spot a talent and to bring out the best in the people who worked with him,” Teniola said. “From Muyiwa Adetiba to Toye Akiode and Frank Aigbogun, he identified some of the most remarkable talents in the newsroom and created the environment that inspired them to work. He was always informal, unpretentious and spontaneous, looking for a reporter to give a big break or a miserable bloke to give a free lunch.”

    Ademola Osinubi, former MD/Editor-in-Chief of PUNCH, who started as a reporter in 1976, and later became the chief reporter under Uncle Sam, said, “With Uncle Sam, you couldn’t be sure your script would pass the test until it’s been published. He was an editor’s editor.”

    Gene vs. lifestyle

    As for his longevity, that is a different story. It’s probably part hereditary. Uncle Sam’s mother died at 109. Apart from his older brother, Oritsedere, who passed in 2002, the other three from the same mother are still alive, and the youngest is a woman, Amanaghan, 76. Uncle Sam’s daughter, Omasan Dudu, told me he is a good swimmer and, until recently, maintained a personal yoga coach.

    “He still goes to the office every Monday and takes his exercises seriously,” she said. “I remember he fought against the attempt to convert the open space in his community in Lagos, Anthony Village, where he exercised. But most of all, his longevity is down to his generosity of spirit and God’s grace. That’s how he has managed multiple ulcer surgeries and other big challenges in life. It’s grace.”

    In my obsession to live a long, healthy life, only God knows how many things I have given up. I can’t remember when I last used a sweetener or milk, even gluten-free ones, for my tea or pap. Last year, when I visited him, Uncle Sam had his tea with plenty of honey and topped his tea with several spoonsful of sachet Cowbell milk. Packets of Kemp’s crackers biscuits littered the cane table.

    Daddy DJ!

    To create the perfect ambience for his refreshment, he turned on music stored on a flash drive. “You don’t know I’m called Daddy DJ?” he joked in response to my puzzled look. That was new to me from a man I consider Nigeria’s answer to Jimmy Breslin.

    In a tribute to Breslin after his death, The Guardian wrote that he was the champion of the trials and troubles of the ordinary people in New York. “He filled his columns with gangsters and thieves, whom he knew first-hand from drinking in the same bars. He told stories that smacked of blarney behind their anger.”

    That could have been Sad Sam, a man punctual as the clock, passionate about press freedom and sustained by righteous rage.

    Live and let live

    Three years ago, he had a fracture. He had undergone a back surgery and was on his way to an appointment for an acupuncture procedure. Instead of walking over a plank in front of the place, he tried to jump over the gutter and fractured his leg. I asked the editor of Vanguard, Eze Anaba, how the Vanguard publisher, who was then 87 years old, had survived the fall.

    “He believes that life has a NAFDAC number,” Anaba said. “Nothing can take you out if your number has not expired.”

    I asked Osinubi how he would describe this man he has known for 49 years. “He lives life on his terms,” he said. “Live and let live.”

    Here’s to another 20, Uncle Sam!

    •Ishiekwene is Editor-in-Chief of LEADERSHIP and author of the book, Writing for Media and Monetising It.

  • The many lives of June 12

    The many lives of June 12

    • By Olatunji Dare

    To military president, Ibrahim Babangida, who was compelled by circumstances beyond his control to stage the presidential election of June 12, 1993, ostensibly the final act of his transition programme that had been eight years in the making, the poll was so shot through with bribery, coercion, intimidation and manipulation that it could not be countenanced as a test of the people’s will.

    He was forced to make a ragged, tearful retreat from office and from power by the nationwide protests.

    To Ernest Shonekan, head of the misbegotten Interim National Government that was charged with supervising the poll, it should be regarded as having passed into “the dustbin of history.”  In the end, it was Shonekan himself who was swept into that receptacle.

    To Clement Akpamgbo, officially Attorney-General and Secretary for Justice (ha) but in fact the regime’s forensic cardsharper, the election was a crime, and anyone who invoked it stood to be charged with treason.

    I know of one young man who felt sorely tormented that Akpamgbo, being chair of the Body of Benchers, was going to be the presiding personage at his Call to the Bar, and that he was supposed to regard him as a model.

    General Sani Abacha, who ended Shonekan’s pretence of being a Head of Government after 93 turbulent days, called the election a “watershed” and then set about to muddy and pollute the waters, only to expire in an orgy of concupiscence.

    In his Inaugural Address, President Olusegun made not the slightest allusion to June 12.  In his tenure spanning eight years, he could not bring himself to mention MKO Abiola’s name in public – Abiola, the winner of the annulled poll.  But every anniversary of June 12 helped keep that day and its epochal outcome splendidly in focus.

    Obasanjo would designate May 29, the day he took office as an elected civilian president, as Nigeria’s Democracy Day.  It was as if June 12 never happened. True believers in June 12 were unmoved. The day refused to go away.  Indeed, the harder they tried to erase it, the more tenaciously it clung to our consciousness.

    It was probably this tenacity that led Gani Fawehinmi, the redoubtable attorney and crusader for democracy and human rights, whom nobody ever accused of humbug, to declare that June 12 was a “spiritual force” that one dared to suppress at one’s peril.

    And then, a president from the North produced by a coalition of progressives from the Southwest and the North, yielded to pressures to accord June 12 its rightful place in Nigeria’s history.  Thus ended May 29’s sham pretence of being the symbol of the democratic will of Nigerians.

    And in double-quick time, June 12 was proclaimed Nigeria’s Democracy Day and declared a public holiday. With his release from a secret pact he had been forced to make with the Babangida regime and its powerful confederates, Humphrey Nwosu, chair of the national electoral body that conducted the election, published the official results that confirmed what had been known 48 hours after the poll.

    Abiola won decisively on every front and across Nigeria. He was no longer the “presumed winner” of the poll.  He was the uncontroverted winner and an authentic martyr of democracy, who refused to bargain away the people’s mandate for release from prison and privations of the shabbiest kind, this man of commanding presence who had lived in splendour and empowered hundreds of his compatriots to do the same, a person of storied kindness and compassion and legendary philanthropy.

    Sooner or later, a sturdy lie that was sown and watered and nurtured begins to wither from attrition, unable to withstand the relentless battering of countervailing facts.

    So it has been with the June 12 election and the elaborate scaffolding of falsehoods and obfuscations built around it.

    Read Also: Democracy Day: Soludo to speak on national rebirth at June 12 ‘Platform’

    Its calculating protagonist is nothing if not alert to the arc of history.  Sensing that his version of the events of that tumultuous period was becoming increasingly tenuous and that he was about to be unmasked as a reprobate unworthy to be called an officer and a gentleman, he changed tack abruptly.

    Several years ago, without any mental discomfort, Babangida told an interviewer that the June 12 election he annulled was the fairest and freest Nigeria had ever known and that it was completely devoid of violence.  So free and fair, he might have added, that it had to be annulled to protect a public that was not equipped to process it!

    And at every opportunity, he affirmed the true election outcome, maintaining however that it had to be annulled, even as he washed it clean of a battery of malpractices he had recited as justification. It was a monumental volte face, executed without regret or contrition.

    He reserved his peroration for the launch of his memoir, A Journey in Service, on February 20, 2025. The volume and the occasion, I contend, were designed more to monetise June 12 than to enrich history and public discourse. Even before a full accounting is done, the book has already gone down as the greatest money spinner ever produced between two covers. And how he milked it!

    Only certified gushers in the oil field can generate so much wealth at such velocity, but there, one must reckon with the muck and the dangers of life on the rig and the tax man.

    Babangida’s memoir spouted cash faster than the speed of sound. A handful of grateful contractors and beneficiaries plonked down N16 billion in a matter of minutes.

    The Naira is no longer what it used to be, but N16 billion is a great deal of money in any economy. It is bigger than the annual budget of all but a handful of states in Nigeria.

    All the reasons Babangida had solemnly advanced for the annulment – the “security reports,” the “tremendous negative use of money,” resort to tribal and religious incitement, he finally admitted, were manufactured through and through.

    “We now know better,” he said.

    What did he know, and when did he know it?

    If Babangida knew that all along and still went ahead to annul the election, then he has the blood of hundreds who were killed during the June protests on his head and the pains and privations of the thousands who lost limbs and livelihood on his conscience.

    The annulment, then, was not a historic mistake. It was, and remains, a historic crime.

    If he came to know what he now admits only much later, then he stands guilty of wilful and sustained deception that plunged a nation on which he had foisted himself into a convulsion from which it is yet to recover.

    • Dare contributed this piece from Caledonia, Michigan.
  • June 12 and its abiding spirit

    June 12 and its abiding spirit

    • By: Opeyemi Bamidele

    June 12, 1993 was truly a watershed in our post-independence history as a federation of diverse people. It was a day that no fewer than 14.29 million voters trooped to their polling units nationwide to elect a new civilian president and put paid to the regime of tyranny that eclipsed our fatherland. Before us were two presidential candidates – Chief MKO Abiola of the Social Democratic Party (SDP) and Alhaji Bashir Tofa of the National Republican Convention (NRC).

    United by our excruciating thirst for a democratic Nigeria, at least 58.36% of the accredited voters cast their ballots in favour of Chief MKO Abiola, a business magnate and a man of the people, whose influence transversed the length and breadth of Africa. The voters, perhaps by a collective resolve, put their divergence behind them to overwhelmingly elect the presidential candidate of the SDP. It was a decision without a dot of religion, tongues and tribes. More precisely, it was a decision taken consciously in defence of people’s aspiration, freedom and future.

    At least 3,000 election observers, national and international, were accredited to monitor the 1993 presidential poll. The figure also included 135 foreign observers that keenly monitored the process nearly from all developed democracies in Asia, Europe and North America, among others, Unlike the 1979 election that was largely skewed in favour of the establishment candidate and the 1983 process that was laced with fundamental flaws that later triggered violence, observers gave the 1993 process a clean bill of health. In their report, they reached a consensus that the election “was well-conducted, free, fair and therefore credible,”

    What else did a leader or a regime require to uphold people’s most critical decisions, especially at a time of national emergency when people took off their togas of ethnicity and religion to elect a leader of their choice? But the Federal Military Government under General Ibrahim Badamosi Babangida refused to toe the path of honour and respect the will of the electorate. Rather, in collusion with the military hierarchy of the time, IBB annulled the June 12,1993 presidential poll without justification; installed the Interim National Government that lacked legitimacy and appointed General Sani Abacha, now late, as the guardian of that contraption. 

    This flaw, either by commission or by omission, subsequently plunged our fatherland into a six-year vicious reign of brute despotism, the kind of which Nigeria never witnessed since the end of colonial rule on October 1, 1960. It was also a reign of brutality and incarceration, extermination and subjugation, injustice and invasion, oppression and repression that evidently set back our development trajectory and earned us pariah status among nations.

    Rather than surrender to the whims of the late tyrant and his associates, June 12 bred bravery and courage, sacrifice and unity, aggression and rebellion in the hearts of masses and marketers, students and labour unions, intellectuals and professionals, political class and leaders of ethnic nationalities across the Niger. Indeed, it was a fierce battle of all against tyranny and not the state, against the despots and not the people, against the cruelty of regressive forces that sought to bring us back into subjugation.      

    These grim realities culminated in the birth of the National Democratic Coalition (NADECO), an amalgam of democratic adherents that transcended the primordial considerations that dominated our politics before that time or that criss-crossed all ethnic nationalities that constitute the Federal Republic of Nigeria. The forces never left the battle for the South-west because Chief MKO Abiola hailed from the region. For any consideration, they never saw it as the battle of the South alone; neither did they approach the battlefront with the mindset of the North against the South or the South against the North.

    For all democrats alike, it was essentially a battle for the soul of Nigeria. It was a battle for the future of Nigeria and her teeming people. It was a rescue mission that united all democrats against tyrants, masses against the despots as well as civil society against the mindless jackals that prowled our fatherland. And the battle was fought fiercely and won collectively, though with sore bruises that pro-June 12 advocates had to bear and the conscionable cost that they sacrificially paid for the liberation of our fatherland.

    In the battlefront were Pa Anthony Enahoro, Pa Adekunle Ajasin, Chief Bola Ige, Chief Abraham Adesanya, Air Commodore Dan Suleiman, Alhaji Balarabe Musa, Amb. Walter Carrington, Com. Frank Kokori, Dr. Fredrick Fasehun, Rear Admiral Ndubudi Kanu, Chief Ayo Adebanjo, Chief Gani Fawehinmi, Chief Ganiyu Dawodu, Dr. Beko Ransome-Kuti, Dr. Olikoye Ransome-Kuti,  Sir Olaniwun Ajayi, Sir Alex Ibru, Com. Chima Ubani, among others. All these titans of the struggle for democracy either died while the battle still raged or at some points after the battle was won. Nevertheless, they were all heroes of the June 12 struggle. And they will ever be remembered for standing firm against the rage of the military junta.

    The struggle also paraded the fearless warriors without firearms that are still living till date. The list, though inexhaustible, eminently comprises Senator Bola Ahmed Tinubu, now the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, Prof. Wole Soyinka, Col. Dangiwa Umar, Gen. Alani Akinrinade, Chief Ayo Opadokun, Oba Olu Falae, Chief John Odigie-Oyegun, Prof. Bolaji Akinyemi, Chief Cornelius Adebayo, Hon. Olawale Oshun, Chief Olisa Agbakoba, Chief Femi Falana, Dr. Amos Akingba and many more. Till this moment, they all occupy a prime place in the heart of our collective struggle that brought about transition to civil rule on the 29th May 1999.

    Read ALso: June 12: Tinubu to confer National Honours on select legislators

    The cost of the struggle was too hard to bear. The blood of the innocent was spilled on the streets of our major cities. The leaders of the struggle were murdered. In this category was Pa Alfred Rewane, who was murdered in his Ikeja home; Alhaja Kudirat Abiola, who was hacked down on the street of Lagos and Bagauda Kaltho who was torn into pieces in the heart of Kaduna. Even the murder of Rear Admiral Babatunde Elegbede, Dr. Sola Omatsola, Toyin Onagoruwa, Alhaja Suliat Adedeji and Mrs. Bisoye Tejuosho, among others, is still a source of sordid reflection that refuses to completely pale into the pit of our memory.

    In his own case, Sir Alex Ibru survived the gunshot of the despots. But he was never the same again until God finally called him home on the 11th November 2011. Perhaps by providence, Pa Abraham Adesanya and Air Commodore Dan Suleiman were shot at a close range, but came out unhurt. Scores of the June 12 advocates ended up in underground detention. The list includes Chief Olu Falae, now the traditional ruler Ilu-Abo in Akure North Local Government, Senator Olabiyi Durojaiye and Chief Lam Adesina, who was paraded on the street of Ibadan as a prisoner of war.

    The media was not exempted from the victims of the June 12 struggle. The fearless in this industry fought convincingly with their pens. The ink of their pens still bears witness to the gore of that slain that smeared our cities, the agony of incarceration that eclipsed the hearts of the victims and the undesirability of political asylum that became an option they never hoped for. Obviously, June 12 is one historic event that Dare Babarinsa, Nosa Igiebor, Chris Anyanwu, Soji Omotunde, Kunle Ajibade, Babafemi Ojudu, Dapo Olorunyomi, Niran Malaolu, Chris Anyanwu, George Mbah, Ben Charles Obi and Bayo Onanuga, among others, will ever relish to commit their ink to scribble down their own battles against the regime of tyranny. In varying measures, they all had their own share of the bitter bile that the regime of despots served them, whether in detention or in exile, whether in brutality or in harassment, whether as fugitives or in the trench of guerilla journalism.     

    As an attorney that just kicked off my legal practice, I was a victim of the vicious military junta. I still remember most vividly how I was enlisted in the legal team that fought for the restoration of the June 12 mandate. I also remember how Chief G.O.K. Ajayi, now of blessed memory,  led the team of eminent legal luminaries to reverse the annulment of the June 12 election. I remember how I argued for the release of 11 students of the University of Abuja before a Federal High Court in the FCT. I remember how the agents of the vicious regimes invaded my law office in Abuja because of my resolve for the release of the 11 students. I remember how my chamber assistant contacted my wife to inform me about the invasion of my law office. I remember how my wife, then a registered pharmacist with Garki General Hospital, organised an ambulance to rescue me from where I was hiding. All these scenarios marked the beginning of my journey into exile. But why did the agents of the junta invade my Abuja law office? They were, according to my chamber assistant, looking for arms and weapons they presumed I stockpiled in my law office and private residence.

    History is now our living witness that bears abundant testimonies to what Nigeria and Nigerians went through under the reign of despots. In June 1998, however, the wrath of God descended up the vault of the tyrant. And that regime, again by providence, came to an abrupt end. At home or in exile, nearly all June 12 advocates could glaringly behold a ray of light at the end of the tunnel. Just at this point, the last death knell loudly rang from the cave of power in Abuja, announcing the demise of Chief MKO Abiola. What a conspiracy! What a tragedy!! What a disappointment!!! It was the end of an era that sealed the theft of people’s mandate. Chief MKO Abiola became the last victim of the struggle when we had already beheld the light.

    The narrative is entirely different today. Our civil space is more participatory than ever before. Our politics is open to virtually all Nigerians without discrimination. Our courts are now sacred sanctuaries where the oppressed can freely seek redress. Unlike that era, we can freely make our choices without intimidation or exercise our rights without trepidation. Whether by law or by rights, we now enjoy all these benefits because the heroes and heroines paid supreme sacrifices for the liberty our children are now exercising in the digital space, the rights they are always willing to enforce in the court of law and the privileges they most times take for granted since the return to civil rule.  

    Sadly enough, the significance of this day rarely resonates with our present generations, especially those that were born shortly before June 12, 1993 and those that came after. Our upcoming leaders too are not in sync with the essence of the struggle that brought our fatherland to this new era of political liberty. These are dangerous signposts to our collective heritage. And as a consequence, the next generation may entirely lose the essence of what June 12 represents in the history of this federation if we do not brace for the task before us. The onus, first of all, rests upon us as a government or as a federation to sustain the spirit that drove the June 12 struggle and bequeath it to the future generations.

    The struggle was driven absolutely by the unity of purpose. It was sustained by the spirit of self-sacrifice at a cost no actor could ever quantify. It was won by a sheer commitment to the cause that unites us rather than the fault line that divides us. These are the core  drivers that then enable the spirit of the June struggle. As a federation, we must sustain and uphold the values that drove the struggle in the task of building a federation that works for all. This is the only way we can build a resilient democracy together. This is the only way we achieve a viable economy together. This is the only way we can ensure a functional democracy that purely serves the overriding public interests..

    The quest for a more democratic Nigeria is not just for the government in power. The opposition also has a frontline role to play  in the task of building a functional democracy. The onus now rests upon the opposition to offer credible alternatives that can reposition our economy and stabilise the political system. This is not the era to campaign for a shadow government, an idea that does not demonstrate the spirit of the June 12 struggle or that will further endanger the unity of our fatherland. It is the era that works for the unity of our fatherland and fights all divisive tendencies that threaten our collective prosperity.    

    • Bamidele is Senate Leader 
  • Uba Sani: Upholding the ideals of June 12

    Uba Sani: Upholding the ideals of June 12

    By Henry Ugbolue

    The June 12, 1993 presidential election remains one of the most poignant chapters in Nigeria’s democratic history. It was not merely an election — it was a referendum on justice, unity, and the people’s right to determine their future. Nigerians, across ethnic and religious divides, defied cynicism and cast their votes overwhelmingly for Chief Moshood Kashimawo Olawale (M.K.O.) Abiola of the Social Democratic Party (SDP). Abiola’s campaign, “Hope ’93,” was a national movement for equity, prosperity, and dignity — a moment where the Nigerian spirit found its voice.

    Yet, that collective voice was silenced when the military regime of General Ibrahim Babangida annulled the election. This act of authoritarian suppression ignited a storm of resistance across the nation, birthing a generation of democracy advocates who risked everything to defend the people’s mandate. Among those brave patriots was a young Uba Sani from Kaduna — a name now indelibly etched into both the story of Nigeria’s democratic evolution and its current renaissance in purposeful governance.

    Uba Sani’s role in the June 12 pro-democracy movement is both profound and sometimes underappreciated. As a passionate activist aligned with the Campaign for Democracy (CD) and the Joint Action Committee of Nigeria (JACON), he was instrumental in challenging the perception that the struggle to reclaim Abiola’s mandate was a sectional affair. Operating from northern Nigeria — a region often seen as monolithic in its political leanings —  Uba Sani defied stereotypes and built bridges between northern activists and their southern counterparts.

    His activism was more than symbolic. It involved real risks — arrests, harassment, detention — all for daring to demand that Nigeria honour its commitment to democracy. Alongside allies such as Shehu Sani (who was imprisoned for his activism), and northern leaders like the late Mallam Balarabe Musa and Col. Dangiwa Umar, Uba Sani carried the torch of June 12 with clarity, conviction, and courage.

    June 12 shaped Uba Sani. It was a political and moral crucible in which he learned to view governance not as a tool for dominance, but as a platform for service. Today, as Governor of Kaduna State, his administration embodies the principles for which Abiola stood: inclusivity, equity, justice, and economic liberation.

    Read Also: Democracy Day: Igbo group hails Nigeria’s impressive departure from military dictatorship

    When Senator Uba Sani assumed office as Governor of Kaduna State on May 29, 2023, the weight of history seemed to converge on him. The state was grappling with multiple afflictions — sectarian tensions, entrenched poverty, infrastructural decay, insecurity, and mass exclusion from financial services. In just two years, Governor Uba Sani has spearheaded what many now describe as a “Kaduna Renaissance.”

    This renaissance is not defined by headlines, slogans, or political grandstanding. Rather, it is a deeply strategic, people-centered transformation that draws from his activist roots and his unflinching commitment to democratic ideals.

    One of the most revolutionary aspects of Governor Uba Sani’s leadership is his refusal to politicise governance. This is a man who believes governance is sacred — a trust bestowed not just by voters, but by the weight of history. As he has repeatedly explained, “From Day One, I made it clear that we must relegate politics and focus on governance.” This rare ethos has yielded remarkable results: peace across political divides, mass defections from the opposition based not on coercion, but confidence in leadership, and a unified political landscape once deeply fragmented.

    Shaped by several years of civil rights activism, especially the June 12 struggle, Uba Sani views security as not just merely about arms and patrols. He insists that security is about addressing root causes: poverty, illiteracy, and alienation. In his words, “We are reversing the ugly trend of hopelessness and lack of economic prosperity.”

    From this perspective, his administration developed a dual-pronged approach: kinetic operations against criminal elements, paired with the non-kinetic extensive community-led peacebuilding to reclaim Kaduna’s social fabric from the brink of collapse. The effects have been tangible. Violence-ravaged zones like Birnin Gwari have returned to economic productivity, with commerce reviving in previously shuttered markets.

    With improved security came bold infrastructural development especially in hitherto underserved and unreached rural communities. Uba Sani views roads, bridges, and transport as instruments of justice — ways to bring opportunity to the most neglected corners of society. This effort aims to enhance urban mobility and connect rural areas to economic hubs.

    This commitment to connectivity echoes Abiola’s vision of inclusivity — of a Nigeria where no region is left behind, and where development is not a privilege, but a right.

    Governor Sani’s education reforms mirror the egalitarianism that defined the June 12 movement. He has drastically reduced tuition fees, invested in learning infrastructure, and prioritized teacher training. “Kaduna was number 12 in WAEC rankings. Now we are number 7 — and rising,” he said. His target is excellence, but his method is equity.

    In healthcare, the transformation is just as dramatic. Under his leadership, 250 primary health centers have been upgraded to level two — the highest by any state in Nigeria. The conversion of Kafanchan General Hospital to a Federal Medical Centre is both a functional upgrade and a testament to federal confidence in Kaduna’s health sector.

    Uba Sani’s most radical reforms may lie in his economic justice agenda. He speaks passionately about the exclusion of over 85% of Northwestern Nigerians from financial systems as of 2023. “We must look at ourselves in the mirror and apologize to the people of Northern Nigeria,” he declared — a moment of rare political introspection.

    But Uba Sani is not content with apologies. His administration has rolled out aggressive financial inclusion programmes targeting rural women, youth, and MSMEs. The Kaduna Enterprise Development Agency (KADEDA) now supports entrepreneurs with grants, training, and low-interest loans. In just two years, these efforts have created jobs, unlocked potential, and begun to correct long-standing economic imbalances.

    Transparency is a cornerstone of the Uba Sani Renaissance. Procurement has been digitized, budgeting processes opened, and Kaduna has become a magnet for foreign direct investment in agro-processing, logistics, and infrastructure.

    This reflects the moral foundations instilled in him during the pro-democracy struggles of the 1990s. Like M.K.O. Abiola, Uba Sani believes that poverty is not inevitable — it is a policy choice, one that can be reversed with courage, integrity, and people-first policies.

    His philosophy of leadership: quiet, intentional, and resolute, is perhaps best summarized in his refusal to be distracted by the politics of 2027. “Leadership is about lifting others,” he maintains. And through every kilometer of road, every revitalized school, every empowered entrepreneur, he is doing just that.

    Two years into his tenure, Uba Sani has proven that the sacrifices of June 12 were not in vain. His journey from street protester to state governor is a moral arc that bends toward justice, much like that envisioned by Abiola himself. He has taken the ideals of that struggle — unity, dignity, equity — and translated them into living, breathing governance.

    Kaduna State is now a reference point for purposeful leadership in Nigeria. It is a laboratory for what is possible when political ideology meets social vision, and when democratic values are lived, not merely preached.

    In many ways, the story of Uba Sani is the continuing story of June 12. It is the saga of a country that, though battered by cynicism, still dares to dream. It is the chronicle of a man who, shaped in the fires of struggle, now shapes the future of his people.

    Interestingly, Governor Uba Sani sees in President Bola Ahmed Tinubu a kindred spirit, not just in the struggle for the actualization of the June 12 mandate of Chief Moshood Abiola but in renewed hope in what is possible in today’s Nigeria. Governor Uba Sani believes that like M.K.O Abiola, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s leadership is speedily healing Nigeria and truly renewing the hopes of the people. Uba Sani stands as both a bridge to our past and a blueprint for our future. The spirit of June 12 lives on, not just in memory, but in motion, in the renewed streets of Kaduna, in the hope of its youth, and in the work of a Governor who knows that leadership is service, and service is destiny.

    •Henry Ugbolue, is a Media and Communication Professional

  • A portrait of Nigeria’s health sector in two years

    A portrait of Nigeria’s health sector in two years

    • By Ebitimi Osaretin

    When President Bola Ahmed Tinubu assumed office in 2023, Nigeria’s health sector stood at a difficult crossroads. Stretched thin by decades of underfunding, weakened infrastructure, emigration of health workers, and low trust from the public, the task seemed daunting.

    Yet, within just two years, the winds of reform have begun to blow through the corridors of hospitals, clinics, laboratories, and primary healthcare centers across the nation.

    Under the banner of the Renewed Hope Agenda, the Tinubu administration has initiated a bold journey to reposition Nigeria’s healthcare system, restoring confidence, improving outcomes, and investing deeply in both people and institutions.

    Despite the laudable efforts, it is a journey still unfolding, but one that has already begun to transform lives and rewrite stories.

    The first sign of renewed commitment came in the form of the Nigeria Health Sector Renewal Investment Initiative (NSHRII) Sector Wide Approach (SWAp) Compact, signed in 2023 with governors, development partners, and private sector actors.

    This was followed by the Health Sector Strategic Blueprint blueprint, a document that would later become a guiding torch for reforms. At the heart of these reforms lies a fourfold mission: to strengthen governance and accountability across the health system; improve the quality and equity of care for all Nigerians; unlock the value chain of health products through local production; and boost national health security by enhancing preparedness and response mechanisms.

    A sector-wide approach now anchors collaboration between federal, state, and local governments—one that includes quarterly review meetings, joint communiqués, and transparent performance tracking.

    The revitalisation of primary healthcare, the first and most crucial point of access for millions, has gained unprecedented momentum.

    By the first quarter of 2025 alone, over 37 million Nigerians had accessed services from revamped PHC centres. Model facilities in Rivers, Edo, and Plateau now serve as shining examples of what is possible when leadership meets investment.

    Beyond infrastructure, the administration has focused on maternal and child health through the Maternal and Neonatal Mortality Reduction Innovation Initiative (MAMII). In just a year, 6 million pregnant women received essential micronutrient supplements, and more than 4,000 free caesarean sections were successfully carried out across empaneled health facilities.

    To further equip the frontlines, over 60,000 midwifery kits were distributed nationwide, an initiative led by the First Lady, Senator Oluremi Tinubu, to empower nurses and reduce maternal deaths.

    Nigeria’s health workforce is being reimagined with bold steps to halt brain drain and strengthen training. Training capacity has increased by 32%, with over 61,000 frontline health workers and 3,874 health managers trained since 2023. Enrollment in nursing programs grew from 28,000 to 115,000, while 120,000 new workers are expected to be trained by 2027.

    The launch of the National Health Fellows Programme, which deployed 774 young health leaders, one from each local government, represents a long-term investment in leadership and innovation across the system. This effort was complemented by asynchronous learning sessions, boasting a 74% module completion rate and near-perfect engagement in live sessions.

    In recognition of these efforts, President Tinubu was named the African Union Champion for Human Resources for Health and Community Health Delivery.

    For decades, Nigeria’s health insurance coverage stagnated at around 9%, leaving the majority vulnerable to health-related financial shocks. That tide has now turned. Over 4 million Nigerians were newly enrolled within one year, including vulnerable groups covered under the Basic Health Care Provision Fund (BHCPF). The 2025 budget allocated N25 billion under the Catastrophic Health Insurance Fund, which now covers costly treatments such as cancer care and dialysis. The reform of the National Health Insurance Authority (NHIA) is unlocking private sector engagement, mandating individual coverage, and delivering access to high-impact services such as caesarean sections, VVF surgeries, and treatment at 106 CEmONC facilities across the country.

    Read Also: Health sector challenges: Experts see light at end of tunnel

    In what can only be described as a watershed moment, Nigeria’s health sector is receiving record domestic funding. Over N86.8 billion has been disbursed under BHCPF from 2023–2024 alone. An additional $200 million was approved by the President to bridge funding gaps after the exit of key international donors. The Project HOPE initiative is set to inject over $1 billion into PHC infrastructure and services, while $3.4 billion in pooled funding is mobilised through the Health Sector Renewal Investment Initiative.

    Significantly, the administration has improved access to medicines by supporting pooled procurement and signing executive orders that waive import duties and VAT on essential raw materials and medical devices.The launch of the Presidential Initiative to Unlock the Healthcare Value Chain (PVAC) is building an enabling environment for local manufacturing.

    From ultrasound machines to rapid diagnostic kits, Nigeria is forging new partnerships with global health brands to begin in-country production. More than 70 bankable projects worth over $5 billion are now underway, supported by additional financing from development banks and the private sector. Tertiary hospitals across all six geopolitical zones are receiving historic upgrades. From advanced diagnostic centers in Ilorin and Enugu to cardiac and pathology facilities in Sokoto and Ibadan, the scope of transformation now touches 503 projects across 61 federal hospitals. The long-neglected battle against cancer is receiving renewed energy through dedicated infrastructure investments and targeted equipment procurement.

    Routine immunisation has recorded major successes. Two million children under age two receive Penta-3 vaccines quarterly. Twenty-five million children have been vaccinated against measles. Twenty-two million received Yellow Fever vaccines, and 14 million adolescent girls are now protected by the HPV vaccine. In addition, 105,000 children received the new malaria vaccine.

    In the face of the worst diphtheria outbreak in decades, the administration mounted a rapid and effective response. The same resolve led to the historic introduction of the Mpox vaccine, making Nigeria the first African country to do so.

    Public trust in the health system is rising steadily. In just two years, approval ratings have jumped, with 47% of Nigerians affirming a positive direction, and 54% expressing confidence in government health emergency responses—a notable leap from 2023 levels. Citizens are not only benefiting but being heard.

    The government has prioritised citizen feedback and adapted accordingly, proving that governance is not just about delivering services but building trust. With strong foundations now laid, the next phase is focused on deepening impact and sustaining momentum.

    The expansion of the Vulnerable Groups Fund and Catastrophic Health Fund is underway. Completion of cancer treatment centres and rollout of advanced equipment are in progress. The administration is scaling up malaria control interventions and local net production and delivering on the target of 17,000 revitalised PHCs. The Social Action Fund (SAF) is being operationalised to power community-led health solutions. The journey is still unfolding, but Nigeria is rising.

    With unity across federal, state, and community lines, the vision of a resilient, equitable, and people-centered health system is no longer a distant dream. It is becoming the new reality. And in the words of the President, “No Nigerian should die because they are poor.” Indeed, under the Renewed Hope Agenda, the health of the nation is finally becoming the wealth of the people.

    Hence, from scaling up the MAMII initiative in 172 LGAs to completing cancer infrastructure and operationalizing the SAF, the Tinubu administration is not slowing down. Plans are underway to scale malaria interventions, boost local production, and deepen citizen engagement.

    This is not just a transformation—it is a reawakening. The health of Nigeria is finally being placed where it belongs: at the heart of national development.

    President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has not only delivered a scorecard—he has charted a new course for the soul of the nation. And while challenges remain, the foundation has been laid. With sustained commitment, Nigeria is poised to become a continental leader in health resilience and equity.

    The journey has only just begun.

    • Osaretin is a health expert and writer.
  • Benue insecurity: A note of caution to ill-informed Alia critics

    Benue insecurity: A note of caution to ill-informed Alia critics

    • By Donald Kumun

    Benue State, often dubbed the “Food Basket of the Nation,” currently groans under the suffocating weight of relentless insecurity occasioned on her by the killer herdsmen, terrorists, bandits, advanced, and well serviced criminals. The unprovoked attacks on the poor, defenceless, downtrodden, and marginalized members of the state, have become a daily nightmare, leaving a trail of sorrow, displacement, and deaths.

     This dire situation has rightfully become a source of profound concern for the Benue State Governor, Rev. Fr. Dr. Hyacinth Iormem Alia, and indeed all well meaning members of the society both within and beyond the State. Every segment of society, from the revered traditional institution, to the diligent local government chairmen, and most acutely, the visionary Governor, His Excellency, Fr. Alia, are deeply concerned about what has befallen our homeland.

    Yet, amidst this palpable crisis, a disturbing trend has emerged: a chorus of ill-informed criticism from the opposition, seemingly designed to undermine the concerted efforts of the Governor’s administration rather than contribute to in bringing about a lasting solution.

    The depth of this concern was vividly brought to the fore during Governor Alia’s appearance on Channels Television on Friday, June 6, 2025, on POLITICS TODAY. In a candid and poignant interview hosting by the erudite Seun Okinbaloye, the Governor laid bare the menace of insecurity, revealing to the world the harrowing siege on Benue State by terrorists and criminal killer herdsmen.

    His words painted a grim picture of communities ravaged, livelihoods destroyed, and innocent lives tragically cut short leaving the state in a situation where it will barely play its traditional role of feeding the nation. He articulated the profound frustration and despair that have gripped the populace, emphasizing the urgent need for a united front against these existential threats.

    Moreover, Governor Alia equally x-rayed the layers of interventions made by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu and the security architecture as well as the major decisions taken by the military and police hierarchy to roll back the menace. The Governor’s address was not merely a lament; it was a call to action and a clear identification of some of the elements and situations that have fuelled the problem, either directly or through their divisive rhetoric. He pointedly alluded to the activities of undesirable elements whose actions, wittingly or unwittingly, exacerbate the already fragile security situation.

    The Governor’s allusion to such individuals is not a personal vendetta but a necessary spotlight on those who, rather than offer constructive engagement, have decided to trade in misinformation, disinformation, and attempts to destabilize the state for selfish political gains. Their public utterances and clandestine machinations, serve to muddy the waters, spread panic, and distract from the critical task of restoring peace and order.

    It is disheartening, to say the least, to witness the unpatriotic stance adopted by certain critics of the Governor’s administration, including a number of members of the National Assembly representing Benue State. And even those who constituted the immediate past administration in the State. While constructive criticism is an essential pillar of any thriving democracy, what is currently being peddled by these individuals often crosses the line into outright sabotage. Their pronouncements, more often than not, lack a fundamental understanding of the complex security challenges facing the state and the multifaceted strategies being deployed by the government.

    Read Also: Akume not silent on Benue killings, SGF’s aide counters Alia’s claim

     Contextualisation is often at full play. Instead of rallying support for security initiatives, collaborating with state authorities, or lobbying for federal assistance, these critics appear more interested in scoring cheap political points and undermining the Governor’s credibility. This has to stop forthwith.

    Their narrative, a frequently dismisses the gravity of the situation, downplays the efforts of the security agencies, or worse, seeks to attribute the insecurity to the current administration, conveniently forgetting the deep-rooted historical context of these conflicts. This kind of ill-informed and politically motivated criticism is not only unhelpful but downright dangerous. It emboldens the perpetrators of violence by creating an impression of disunity and weakness within the state’s leadership. It vainly tries to erode public confidence in the government’s ability to protect its citizens and can inadvertently discourage potential investors and development partners.

    Let this message be unequivocally clear to the critics of the Alia administration, including those within the National Assembly: your efforts to frustrate the legitimate and well-intentioned efforts of the constituted authority will not go unaddressed. Benue State is facing an existential threat, and this is not the time for partisan bickering or political grandstanding. The consequences of such divisive actions and tactics are far-reaching and detrimental to the very people you claim to represent. When you sow discord, you reap instability. When you peddle falsehoods, you breed distrust. And when you prioritize political gain over the lives and safety of your constituents, you betray the sacred trust reposed in you.

    History will judge those who stood by and offered nothing but cynicism while their state burned. It will also harshly judge those who actively worked to impede progress and frustrate the efforts of those genuinely committed to finding solutions.

    The current administration, under the astute leadership of Governor Alia, is working tirelessly, engaging with security agencies at all levels, fostering community-based peace initiatives, and seeking both kinetic and non-kinetic approaches to quell the violence. This requires cooperation, not condemnation; unity, not division.

    Whether they like it or not, know it or not, or believe it or not, this current phase of insecurity is a dark chapter in the history of Benue State, but like all dark chapters, it is destined to pass. The resilience of the Benue people is legendary, their spirit unyielding. The commitment of Governor Alia and his administration to restoring peace and normalcy is unwavering. They are not merely reacting to events; they are actively formulating and implementing strategies to secure the state, protect its citizens, and ensure that justice is served.

    To the beleaguered masses of Benue State, those who have borne the brunt of these barbaric attacks, be assured: better days are indeed ahead. The government is acutely aware of your suffering during this moment of grief, your losses, and your yearning for peace.

     The sleepless nights of the Governor, the traditional rulers (Tor-Tiv and the Och’Idoma), all heads of the  security apparatuses in the State, and the Federal Government of Nigeria, under the close watchful eyes of the President, Bola Ahmed Tinubu, as well as the local government chairmen, are dedicated to finding lasting solutions for peace to be restored in Benue State. The sacrifices being made by security personnel on the front lines are not in vain. This administration, undoubtedly, remains committed to creating an environment where every Benue indigene can live without fear, pursue their livelihoods without apprehension, and contribute to the growth and development of the state.

    While the Governor works round the clock to seek help, mobilize security agencies, and foster inter-governmental collaboration, some elements of the opposition — driven by blind ambition, outdated vendettas, and sheer ignorance — have chosen to weaponize this humanitarian crisis for cheap political capital.

    The path to lasting peace will be arduous, fraught with challenges, and will require the collective effort of every well-meaning individual. It demands that political differences be set aside in favor of a common purpose: the security and prosperity of Benue State. It is a time for all hands to be on the deck, for empathy and understanding, and for unwavering support for those in leadership positions who are striving to navigate these turbulent waters, than pull Benue State down to collapse, under Governor Alia, amidst his conspicuous achievements, within two years in office. What do you have to bring on board? Don’t do it with levity.

    The sun will surely rise again over Benue, and when it does, it will illuminate a State reclaimed from the clutches of insecurity, a testament to the resilience of its people and the resolute leadership that refused to bow to adversity, or be deterred by ill-informed criticism.

    • Kumun is the Principal Special Assistant to the Benue State Governor on Print Media, and writes from Makurdi the capital of Benue.
  • Literature as human experience

    Literature as human experience

    By Chijioke Uwasomba

    The question may be asked: what has literature got to do with the whole lot of issues that have been raised so far. This question is important if we take into consideration the views of some writers and critics who insist that literature does not have any utilitarian value. The poet-soldier, Christopher Okigbo, who died fighting on the side of Biafra against Federal forces, in an interview he was of the opinion that “…the writer in Africa does not have any function. That is, personally, I have no function as a writer, I think I merely express myself, and the public use these things for anything they like.” Similarly, Ogungbesan stated that “…it is a betrayal of art for the writer to put his writing at the service of a cause, even if it is such a laudable and uncontroversial cause as the education of the people.”

    These positions differ from our conception of literature. Literature is concerned with humankind and human life in its entirety. This includes everything that impinges on human life; it covers every aspect of experience and aspirations, politics inclusive. And interestingly enough, it does not deal with a closed sphere of human experience as mentioned by Amuzu: “…it admits of all human activities and experiences dealing with the whole life.” And according to Strauch’s statement “…the literary work manifests man’s understanding of the meanings of human experience…”

    Ngugi wa Thiong’o, the writer whose works are the subject of our discussion, has demonstrated in his creative and critical works that the writer is a product of society, and has a responsibility towards it, wherein he unequivocally says in his prison memoir, Detained, that literature is not “…something belonging to a surreal world, or a metaphysical ethereal plane, something that has nothing to do with man’s more mundane, prosaic realm of attempting to clothe, shelter and feed himself.”

    In contemporary Africa, we can construct some axioms that “… writers and their works are implicated in the larger struggles which define political life in wider society”; hence the subjection of Africa to colonialist brigandage and imperialist capitalism in various guises has made it supremely important for the enlisting of literature and art in the task of liberation from imperialism and of redressing social inequalities within individual national boundaries; literature and art have a primary commitment to freedom and can only thrive in a free state, and that “… in a situation bedeviled with unfreedom, the primary responsibility of art is to enlist in the service of freedom.”

    Walter Rodney’s How Europe Underdeveloped Africa (1972) and Amilcar Cabral’s National Liberation and Struggle (1980) reveal the political, economic and social circumstances that formed the sensibilities of most African writers. Thus, they illuminate the various types of approaches and mentalities or ideologies that inform African revolutionary writings. In addition, these works help the reader to determine if a writer’s portrayal of African society fully reflects its social relations, political arrangements, and economic factors. These critical writings also help in the debate on the definition of African literature, because they bring forth the historical connections that make it possible for us to analyze African literature dealing with the pre-colonial, colonial and neo-colonial phases of African history.

    In class societies like Africa, culture, art and literature take on class character where literature is fully implicated as evince of a consciousness that seems to conserve society on behalf of privileged interests or in contrast, exude a revolutionary consciousness congruent with the objective interests of the oppressed class engaged in class struggle to change the status quo. It is in the context of the latter interpretation that we place Ngugi’s works as not only discourses on cultural and political decolonization, but also as works that are in quest of a new socio-economic and political order.

    Petals of Blood

    Petals of Blood, Ngugi’s fourth novel, is seen by many critics as the most ambitious and important of his works. According to Palmer “…of all African novels…Petals of Blood probably presents the most comprehensive analysis to date of the evils perpetrated in independent African society by Black imperialists and capitalists” (1979:228). Also, Ngara (1982:81) and Anyidoho (1986:67) among others see Petals of Blood as not only breaking new grounds for the African novel in literary creation, but also as representing the height of Ngugi’s achievement. This is because Petals is seen as having subsumed the themes and concerns of all of Ngugi’s other works, including those written after it, into one volume. During the launch of the book, Ngugi hinted that

    … imperialism…can never develop a country or a people. This was what I was trying to show in Petals of Blood: that imperialism can never develop us, Kenyans. In doing so, I was only trying to be faithful to what Kenyan workers and peasants have always realized as shown by their historical struggles since.

    In both theme and ideological perspective, Petals begins where A Grain of Wheat stops. It deals, in the main, with neo-colonialism in all its manifestations: oppression, exploitation, social abuse and injustice, and thus

    … it probes the history of the heroic struggles of the people of Kenya, from pre-colonial times to the present day, within a comprehensive cultural perspective which embraces the political, religious, economic and social life of Kenya.”

    In A Grain of Wheat, the struggle between the bourgeoisie and the peasants is still in its embryonic stages and therefore is not expressed in explicit ideological terms, whereas Petals takes us to a later period in the history of Kenya and the development of Ngugi’s socialist vision.

    The novel begins in the present with four main characters – Wanja, Abdulla, Munira and Karega – in jail on suspicion of being implicated in the murder of three African directors of the Theng’eta Brewery – Mzigo, Chui and Kimeria. This revelation comes to the fore through Munira in the cell while writing notes to satisfy the demands of the probing police inspector. Thus, from the present the story moves twelve years back to when Munira came to Ilmorog as a teacher in the village, and periodically it returns to the present and shows Munira in the cell, and on one or two occasions goes further into the experiences of Munira in Siriana where he was a student in the 1940s and during the Mau Mau uprising of the 1950s. The scene of most of the events of the novel is the community of Ilmorog which grew from a traditional African village into a modern industrial complex. Through the historical presentation given to us by Ngugi, we are able to have glimpses of the glory of Ilmorog’s past as a truly peasant community untouched by Western values that moved gradually from “a nomadic one to an agrarian civilization.”

    There was prosperity, contentment and a sense of belonging before the penetration of imperialism with its distorting influence, and the intrusion of imperialist values which

    brought Ilmorog into its decline, hence the author informs the reader that

    …Ilmorog…had not always been a small cluster of mud huts lived in only by old men and women and children with occasional visits from wandering herds men. It had its days of glory: thriving villages with a huge population of sturdy peasants who had tamed nature’s forests and, breaking the soil between their fingers, had brought forth every type of crop to nourish the sons and daughters of men.… In those days there were no vultures in the sky waiting for the carcasses of dead workers and no insect-flies feeding on the fat and blood of un-suspecting toilers (120).

    For the first time in the novel, we discover that drought has started ravaging Ilmorog with consequential damage to the otherwise thriving community. The criminal neglect by the political authorities, in particular, Nderi the member representing Ilmorog in the Parliament, worsens matters. Nderi, like other political officials, is only interested in acquiring wealth at the expense of his constituency. Eventually, Karega, the bright, idealistic young teacher in the community puts forward the proposal that the people should march to the capital where their MP stays to confront him with their problems. Like the revolutionary-minded masses in Ousmane’s Gods Bits of Wood, they march to the city in search of their representative. This march and its accompanying achievement mark a turning point in the lives of the exploited segment of Kenyan society in general.

    Arising from the visit to the city and the plane crash in Ilmorog, the attention of the government is attracted to Ilmorog, as the people’s doubts are fully justified. The capitalists and their agents-Chui, Mzigo and Nderi-move in their development projects: roads, banks, factories, distilleries and housing estates. These developments quickly destroy the fabric of traditional Ilmorog. The destruction of the mysterious spirit Mwathi by a giant bulldozer is the concrete symbol of the annihilation of a once proud society by the ravaging forces of modernization, and notwithstanding, the deceived peasants lose their lands and all their possessions to the local profiteers and their international principals.

    Ilmorog is transformed into a proto-capitalist society with all the attendant problems of prostitution, social inequalities, misery, uncertainty, and inadequate housing. The new Ilmorog is now divided along class lines. There is the residential area “of the farm managers, country council officials, the managers of Barclays, and African Economic Banks, and other servants of state and money power” (p.280). This area is called Cape Town, while New Jerusalem is reserved for the downtrodden in the society. At this stage in the development of Ilmorog, Karega who had left Illmorog following his dismissal from the teaching service five-years before reappears. To his chagrin, Wanja whom he was in love with has become one of the “powerful” people in the society. He informs Wanja, Munira and Abdulla of his activities during the last five years, doing one menial job or the other. Karega’s return to Illmorog helps in arousing the consciousness of the people (especially, workers in the Theng’eta Brewery where he does his last job). The novel ends with a strong hope of a proletarian revolution, as there is the realization on the part of the Kenyan workers and peasants of the possibilities of overthrowing international capitalism and its neo-colonial agents.

    In this novel, there is a clear demonstration that imperialism can never develop Kenya in particular and Africa in general. According to Ngugi: “In writing this book I was only trying to be faithful to what Kenyan workers and peasants have always realized as shown by their historical struggles since 1895.”

    The spokespersons for Ngugi’s socialist solution are Karega, the lawyer, Abdulla and Munira. Ngugi through Karega shows concretely that socialism was a natural way of life in traditional African society and calls on the African society to go back to its former way of life. Ngugi is deeply conscious that imperialist capital is the real enemy in Africa today. To change the status quo, Karega becomes a trade union agitator who mobilizes the workers and the peasants to rid the society of exploitation. Karega’s union activities have politicized the workers and they are ready to haul defiance at their greedy employers as can be seen in the last part of the novel, “the last duty” indicating that the struggle continues – La Luta Continua. Ngugi hopes that out of Petals of Blood, Kenyans (Africans) might gather “petals of revolutionary love” (94).

    In Petals, Ngugi uses his art to challenge the status quo. The Chuis, the Kimerias and the Nzigos who are agents of imperialism control the important spheres of life in Ilmorog. This can be seen in their directorship of Theng’eta Breweries and Enterprises Ltd. It is important to remember that this enterprise belonged to Wanja and Abdulla but the government through its agents handed it over to a multinational corporation. The economic deprivation and ruthless dispossession of the peasants finds its most effective symbol in the degradation of Wanja, the barmaid, who rises from prostitution to economic independence and womanhood but is forced back to the humiliating status of a prostitute who sells her body because nothing is obtained free, and the slogan becomes “eat or be eaten”. Ngugi’s combative spirit against neo-colonial agents and their masters continues in Devil on the Cross, a novel he wrote in detention in Kimathi Maximum Security prison in Kenya. Like Petals of Blood, the story takes place mainly in Ilmorog and partly in Nairobi. It is no wonder, then, that the major trope in Devil on the Cross could be neocolonial dependency, with the Devil on the Cross as the structuring symbol. This is best illustrated in Wariinga’s nightmare in which the white colonialist Devil is crucified by the masses (apparently, a reference to political independence) only to be resuscitated by the local comprador.

    Devil on the Cross shows the class struggle between the poor and the rich, the exploited and the exploiters. The novel begins with the story of Wariinga, a lady who had suffered a series of misfortunes, maltreatment and deprivation at the hands of some irresponsible men in the society. She was used, abused and abandoned by the rich old man of Ngorika whose child she was carrying. She had attempted suicide on the railway track but was saved by the timely intervention of Munti. After having her baby, she was able to complete her secretarial studies and found herself a job in Champion Construction Company. She later lost this job because she did not welcome boss Kihara’s attentions. Her undergraduate friend, John Kinwana, jilted her after accusing her of being Kihara‘s mistress; and she was thrown out of her one-room apartment for her inability to pay the rent which the landlord had increased, and the landlord secured the services of three thugs who threw her things out.

    On the matatu bus, we see Muturi, Wariinga and Wa Mukiraai with the invitation cards for the feast to choose the seven cleverest thieves and robbers in Ilmorog. Mukiraai is in favour of the competition, and he is of the opinion that the feast is not organized by Satan but by the organization of modern theft and robbery in Ilmorog to commemorate a visit by foreign guests from an association of the thieves and robbers of the Western world, particularly from America, England, Germany, France, Italy, Sweden and Japan. The creation of a Devil’s feast where national robbers and thieves with their foreign allies gather in order to reveal their tactics, strategies and motives provides Ngugi with the space for enacting or deconstructing, through the grotesque and the obscene, the banality of power, in a neo-colonial African society.

    During the feast we are confronted with the boastful thieves and robbers in the cave as the co-operation of the Kenyan bourgeoisie is seen as fruitful by the international representatives; the leader of the foreign delegation from the international organization of thieves and robbers headquartered in New York thanks the local thieves and robbers for the good work they have done performing, yet thieves who steal out of hunger are not allowed to compete. An example is Ndaaya Wa Kahuria in order to stop these noisy competitors who are watchdogs of imperialism that Wangari decides to invite the police, while Muturi who believes in the ability of the workers to arrest the thieves goes ahead to mobilize them. But the police who ought to arrest the thieves turn round to arrest Wangari, who should have been treated as an informant.

    The ability of the workers, students and other members of the exploited class to mobilize themselves is very encouraging. The clarion call and song of the masses in their revolutionary movement to overthrow capitalism and the rule of its agents are resonating:

    Come one and all, And behold the wonderful sight of us chasing away Devil And all his disciples:

    Come one and all (Devil on the Cross, 201).

    The resistance put up by the people, their massive struggle against the forces of law, shows that the masses can determine their fate.

    The realization of Wariinga’s life ambition to train as an automobile engineer goes a long way to show how the underprivileged in the society have worked hard to improve their condition, in spite of the brutal attempts by the powers that be to reduce them to nothingness. After Wariinga had worked strenuously to become an engineer, the forces of “economic strangulation” strike. Boss Kihara, in partnership with a group of foreigners from the USA, Germany and Japan , buys the garage and the surrounding piece of land for the construction of a tourist hotel. The shooting and killing of the devil’s accomplices, including the rich old man of Ngorika (whose son, Gatuiria, Wariinga has fallen in love with) show the determination of the masses to liberate themselves.

    Read Also: Nigeria secures over $2.2bn funding commitments for health sector reforms – Tinubu

    Devil on the Cross exposes the plight of the masses and the workers in the present-day political set-up in Africa in consonance with the belief of Ngugi that African writers should address themselves “to the crisis or conflict between the emergent African bourgeoisie and the African masses” (34). According to Edward Shills, ideologies arise in conditions of crisis and in sectors of society where the prevailing situation has become unacceptable. Ngugi’s commitment to Kenyan masses stems from loss of confidence in elite’s ability to build successful society as Devil deeply entrenched against people. Rich men release Devil, stifle opposition, silence dissenting voice. This situation pushes suffering people like Wariinga to seek redress. Wariinga mentally identifies with workers, gets gun from Muturi, and kills rich old man of Ngorika.

    Ngugi has through this novel shown that the sophisticated structures that have sprung up in the cities of Kenya – Ilmorog, Mombasa , Nairobi , Nakuru, Kisumu – do not have their corresponding enhancement in the standard of living of the general population. Rather, what we observe is the emergence of a new class structure the nouveau riche, an infinitesimal corrupt minority, having allied itself with the ex-colonialists to form a formidable barrier to the people’s share of the national resources. The battle is therefore between these “grabbers,” who strive to consolidate their hold and the deprived, who also strives to thwart them.

    The novel shows the class to which each character belongs; Muturi, Wariinga, Wangari, and Gaturiria represent the peasants and workers, while Gitutu Wa Gataaguru, Kihaahu and Muirevi represent the bourgeoisie. Hence, there is an intense struggle between the victims of exploitation and the exploiter class.

    Ngugi uses Matatu and cave as symbols. Matatu represents underprivileged world with limited freedom of speech. Matatu symbolizes lower class seeking freedom. Characters like Wangari, Maturi, Gatuiria, and Wariinga embody this struggle. Cave symbolizes devil’s domain controlled by profit-seeking men and leisurely women. Ngugi’s vision in this novel, like his other works, advocates for a collectively owned and controlled socialized economy. But the realization of this dream is dependant on unity, a factor Ngugi explains as “… until democratic-minded Kenyans, workers, peasants, students, progressive intellectuals and others unite…things will get worse, no matter who sits on the throne of power.

    Finally, some readers view Wariinga’s shooting of Ghitahy as savagery, but Ngugi sees it as a means to freedom. Violence is unacceptable if used to protect oppression. The action is ideologically relevant for overthrowing an unjust social order. Wangari’s failed action in inviting police still aids people in their struggle for a new society. It teaches peasants and workers that the law does not save them from capitalist exploitation, but rather sustains the status quo.

    In these two novels, progress and liberation in cultural and economic spheres are discussed by Masela (1979), Chesaina (1976) and Jeyifo (1985). Ngugi criticizes African ruling elite in Petals of Blood and praises people’s struggles against oppression by local colonialists. Devil on the Cross further explores this theme, exposing societal ills and emphasizing collective survival of exploited in Africa attacking the neo-colonial class structure causing poverty and insecurity in many modern African states.

    As political novels, the two works are unambiguous in their support of the views of the proletariat and in their condemnation of bourgeois philosophy and practice, as manifested in international capitalism, and therefore reject neo-colonialism as a viable way of life for Africans. The novels affirm that the coming together of the peasants and the workers in a united and collective manner against their exploiters will liberate them from the present state of bondage and life of misery and poverty.