Category: Yomi Odunuga

  • Official delusions and painful realities

    Official delusions and painful realities

    The ostrich would rather bury its head in the sand than confront an ugly reality. Right? I really don’t get what the nation stands to gain from the riotous umbrage that greeted the latest report on massive corruption in Nigeria, which was recently submitted to the United States Congress by the Secretary of State, Sen. John Kerry. Outraged by what the government considers to be an exaggerated and warped verdict on the true state of moral decadence and official graft in the country, President Goodluck Jonathan was flustered that the report, tagged “Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2012”, failed to acknowledge the yeoman’s efforts being made by his administration to corner the monster, inflict it with the gravest injury and finally cow it into submission. How come the compilers of the report, which was mostly made up of information supplied by foreign government officials, non-governmental and international organisations, ignored the sanity that has been injected into the processes of awarding contracts for fertilizer supply and the removal of the many corruptive cogs in the power sector? Jonathan asked.

    In all honesty, it would have been a refreshing breath of fresh air if the country’s main opposition parties had not feasted on the damning report, to enjoy some form of bragging right in the political space. And it would have also been irresponsible of the ruling Peoples Democratic Party to remain silent in the face of the battering by an opposition which, in the words of the PDP, is as guilty as any other person in the mad race to empty the public treasury. But that is as far as illogic can be applied in tackling a deadly malaise that continues to impoverish the generality of the people. To this writer, it would have been more ennobling if the PDP had come out with facts and figures that would puncture a huge hole in the US report instead of its attempt to justify official federal sleaze and entrenched moral turpitude by pointing fingers at states being controlled by the opposition. How does this argument change the perception out there that the Nigerian nation is swarming with callous briefcase thieves?

    Besides, something tells me that the Jonathan government is merely being theatrical in its self- abnegating stance against the US report on the abysmal state of human rights abuses and corrosive corruption in Nigeria. No. It couldn’t have been that dumb not to see it coming after the US Government expressed serious reservations about what it termed a “setback for the fight against corruption” when Mr. Diepriye Alamieyeseigha was summarily granted state pardon after serving terms for financial misconduct as governor of Bayelsa State. In that diplomatic face-off, the US minced no words in telling us the likely aftershocks of the curious presidential pardon while the Department of State’s spokesperson, Victoria Nuland, warned about a setback in the “ability to play the strong role we’ve played in supporting rule of law and legal institution-building in Nigeria.”

    The government, it must be said, reserves the right to put any foreign government that unduly interferes in its private affairs to the task.

    In the same vein, we cannot expect foreign donors to continue releasing funds into a stagnating system that is eternally weak at confronting the corruption monster. It is, therefore, not enough to spit fire or get petulantly abrasive over what the report described as “massive, widespread, and pervasive corruption (which) affected all levels of government and the security forces.” Nothing can be achieved if we allow the rage, the dirty politicking and the shameless blame game to blur our vision. If only our leaders can have some measure of reflection or introspection, they will find the evident fact that the government needs to take a second look at the full report and ask some salient questions regarding the timelines and issues raised.

    For example, is it true that the government has failed in its duty to effectively implement criminal penalties for official graft as stipulated in the Nigerian law? Is the report right in stating that our public officials “frequently engaged in corrupt practices with impunity and is there a “widespread perception (that) judges were easily bribed and litigants could not rely on the courts to render impartial judgements? Are our judicial officers so corrupt that they now take “bribes to expedite cases or obtain favourable rulings? Was the report dead on point in its chronicling of the shameful timelines of corrupt practices in the fuel subsidy saga? The Nigerian leadership should pause and ponder.

    How far have we gone in unravelling the real culprits in the $620,000 “sting” operation involving Mr. Farouk Lawan and oil magnate, Femi Otedola? Could it be true that the Lawan committee on the fuel subsidy scam unravelled the “misappropriation of nearly half the subsidy funds, with poor or non-existent oversight by government agencies” between 2009 and 2011? Did the government lose an estimated N1.067 trillion ($6.8bn) to “endemic corruption and entrenched inefficiency” in the oil sector? Are some government officials currently facing trial for stealing 32.8 billion naira ($210 million) Police Pension Fund? Did the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission file criminal charges against former Governor of Bayelsa State, Timipre Sylva, for laundering close to five billion naira ($32 million) of funds belonging to the state?

    Was the report wrong in any matter particular that an anti-graft agency do have a glut of corruption cases  against the former Minister of Works and Housing, Hassan Lawal, for 24 counts of fraudulently awarding contracts, money laundering, and embezzlement of 75 billion naira ($480 million); arrest of Mr. Dimeji Bankole, former Speaker of the House of Representatives, and Deputy Speaker Usman Nafada for the alleged misappropriation of one billion naira ($6.4 million) and 40 billion naira ($256 million) respectively; arrest of former Ogun State Governor, Otunba Gbenga Daniel; former Oyo State Governor, Chief Adebayo Alao-Akala; former Nasarawa State Governor, Alhaji Aliyu Akwe Doma; and former Gombe State Governor, Muhammed Danjuma Goje? Did James Onanefe Ibori not walk out as a free man from our court until his eventual conviction in the Southwark Crown Court in London to charges of money laundering and other financial crimes totalling 12.4 billion naira ($79 million) he had committed during his eight years in office as Governor of Delta State?

    How easy is it to access information from government even with the existence of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)? How many public officials get convicted for false declaration of assets by the toothless bulldog called the Code of Conduct Bureau? And has the President acceded to the request by the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project and other groups that he should disclose his assets from 2007 to 2012? Did he give a damn about what his refusal portends for the negative perception out there that we are a bunch of leeches who feed fat on the common wealth?

    To us, the picture painted above may not be that bad. After all, petty thieves still get maximum sentence at our courts. But, to others, our larceny is unequalled. Today, those who should be behind bars after surrendering their loot to the State are the ones making and implementing the laws for us. I dare say some of them are even interpreting the laws. It was so bad that a former Chairman of the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC), Justice Mustapha Akanbi, recently lamented at a forum in Ilorin that: “Many well-meaning and responsible Nigerians have been crying foul at the turn of events and the apparent cover-up of purveyors of corruption in recent times and the lethargic manner corruption cases are being handled. More often than not, mediocre, incompetent and corrupt officials, rather than resourceful, efficient and competent hands, find their way into positions of power and authority, which they use and manipulate to their own advantage and not to the benefit of society or the public good.

    “The result is that the nation begins to drift and slide dangerously down the slippery road of economic ruination. In the process, there is the general desecration of societal and normative values, low level performance in both socio-economic and technological developments and, ultimately, a putrefying decadence, the stench of which often puts off or prevents other nations with a record of transparency and probity from wanting to interact or do business with a corrupt nation.”

    If we find it difficult to swallow the bitter pill of putrefying corruption being thrown at us by the US government, can we, at least, sift the truth from Akanbi’s Lamentations? Or is Akanbi merely gloating because he missed the opportunity to desecrate the throne of justice and become ‘madly’ rich? Could he also have overblown the issue of corruption in our country out of proportion like Jonathan suggested of the US’ damning report? Let”s pause and ponder over these things!

  • PDP has a  survival battle to fight as  2015 gets  nearer —Tukur

    PDP has a survival battle to fight as 2015 gets nearer —Tukur

    In an interview with newsmen, the embattled Chairman of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Alhaji Bamanga Tukur, spoke on how he has been managing crises in the party, his son’s alleged gubernatorial ambition in Adamawa State, the Boko Haram menace and other issues. Deputy Editor, Nation’s Capital, YOMI ODUNUGA, was there. Excerpts:

    HOW would you react to media reports on the alleged plan to remove you from office by some forces within the PDP, most especially the governors from the party?

    You just said media reports. That is the point. You know that as democracy deepens in Nigeria, so will people begin to understand that sensationalism is not an act of journalism, but an act of marketing. We all know that once the media touch a story, the facts are almost always turned upside down. That is why sustained sensationalism is not helping our young democracy to grow. That is why I believe that we should all be against gossip journalism for it stands on the way of strengthening democratic institutions in Nigeria. I believe that rather than destroying our young democracy, the media have the duty to help nurture it. We shall all agree that this democratic journey cannot happen without a critical media, but criticism should, first and foremost, be based on pursuit of the truth so that citizens should be fed with the facts and truths to enable them make the right judgments and hold their leaders rightly responsible. But gossip journalism, journalism devoid of facts, is journalism that tends to set us backward rather than move us forward. Our media should as a matter of urgency understand that when Party members disagree, it does not mean that the party is about disintegrating or is on fire. In the PDP, we have been disagreeing to agree; and that is the very beauty of democracy. But this is not unique to PDP alone, it is a universal reality. Political parties all over the world are constantly disagreeing to agree because everybody is allowed to air their views. That is why PDP has the NWC, the NEC, and the Board of Trustees as instrument of airing views and resolving problems and building consensus.

    There is no better democratic way to run a large party like ours. But that is not to say that every member of the party would agree with you on every decision you made. And if that happens, then, one should not conclude that the world would come to an end. If one or two governors, for example, do not like my face, because of certain decisions we took as a party, that does not mean the world is coming to an end, especially when it is possible that another set of decisions we took which they like could compensate for the earlier decisions that made them to not like my face. That is politics. And the same goes for a few members of the party who would want Bamanga Tukur’s head to be broken because they did not like our recently concluded reconciliation exercise. Does that have to mean the end of the world? I don’t think so. That is why it surprises me to read most of the things members of the press go about writing without evaluating their facts. How can I as the National Chairman of PDP who became chairman because I wanted democracy blossom in our party not be cherishing principles of democracy? How can I bring internal democracy into our party if that is not done democratically? I know that change is difficult to come by, but I also know that the only lasting change is the change arrived at by consensus.

    The party runs more effectively because we all put heads together to make decisions. That was what happened when I got elected as the chairman. That was what happened when we resolved to address the problem that causes breakdown of confidence among our members across the states. It was the same process that guided us when we concluded that the agenda of reconciliation based on Triple R (Reconciliation, Reformation and Rebuilding) should be our main driver in reinventing PDP. That is why I have come to PDP to fight and bring back justice, equity, and progress. So, to answer your question, I am not aware of any plan to remove me as the chairman of this great party. I read about the plot to remove me when I was in London and now that I am back, the party is passing a vote of confidence on me. You can now see the dimension of events. The PDP for me is a family, and it would continue to be so as long as I remain the chairman. I will do so taking responsibility for every action the party has taken, most especially on how to return the confidence of members. I will do so without succumbing to distractions and blackmails.

    Are you in essence saying that you are in good accord with all the governors who many believe are nursing grudges against your leadership?

    Look, the governors are the main pillars of the party and no one should wish that away. That is why we work to relate well with them. The chairman of the Nigerian Governors’ Forum, Chibuike Amaechi, and I talk always on the phone and exchange visits. Amaechi is a gentleman, who I know has the party at heart. He is a leader who I enjoy relating with. The same is true with the chairman of the PDP Governors’ Forum, Godswill Akpabio, who has insatiable love for the party. The ongoing sensational reports about my relationship with the Governors, is unfortunate because it is the creation of the media. Akpabio and Amaechi, as party leaders like big brothers in a family, are priceless to the party, especially as good sources of inspiration. And what makes us good leaders is not our ability to avoid problems since problems must always come but our ability to face problems squarely and patiently as well as creatively whenever they come so that at the end of the day we resolve them and learn from them. That is what PDP is good at, we always focus on what sets our party stronger and puts us ahead of the opposition groups.

    Are you saying all is well in PDP for now?

    While I won’t paint a rosy picture of the situation of things in PDP, surely I will paint a picture of a party that knows how to manage its internal conflicts and problems. As a big family, we are bound to encounter problems from time to time. As I said earlier, as a big family, we believe in sitting down to rub minds and see how best to take the party to a greater height. This we must do now that we have a war of survival to fight as 2015 gets nearer. At the end of the day, we always come out stronger and more tactful than before.

    Some members of the party said that you made a slip on the issue of Adamawa PDP when the National Working Committee of the party sacked its executive. Could that be true?

    The truth is that Bamanga Tukur was never and is never the creator of the crisis in Adamawa PDP. The problem had been there before I came in as the party chairman. Party members in Adamawa had complained so bitterly that they wanted an election to replace the old exco which had completed its tenure. They wrote several petitions to the National Secretariat, to the Independent National Election Commission and to the Presidency. INEC intervened. The late President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua also intervened when he directed that fresh election be conducted. INEC did the same and the records are there. The PDP under the leadership of Chief Okwezilieze Nwodo set up committees, which met with stakeholders in Adamawa and they made recommendations. That was what we met on the ground when we came in. In fact, we continued to receive delegations upon delegations from Adamawa urging us to democratise the leadership process in the state. The NWC met and took a decision, which we felt was in line with democratic pursuit in the party. We agreed that since we are in a democracy, not in a dictatorship, we should conduct our affairs also democratically. In doing that, we did not target any individual or group when we asked PDP in Adamawa to conduct its affairs democratically. I want to make it clear here that Bamanga Tukur has no ulterior agenda in Adamawa PDP. That the fact that it happened under my chairmanship shouldn’t make me the creator of the long standing problem when all we did as NWC was to bring democracy. In fact, if there is anything, the main agenda is to see more members embrace the party as their own by creating a level playing field for everyone to operate in.

    That it is being opposed by those who don’t want democracy should not force us to succumb to their wishes. We will continue to do what it takes to ensure that we promote and protect party democracy in PDP. The good news is that we are now in the process of reconciling all aggrieved members in the state and other states of the federation as democracy demands. It is our responsibility to do that without succumbing to intimidations and blackmails. We should do so if we want our party to return to the ideals of its founding fathers. That is why I crave for the continued support and understanding of our party members so that we fast-track our journey to party greatness, rather than to allow ourselves to be tied down by issues we should have resolved with the snap of the fingers.

    So what are you going to do now to pull all the aggrieved parties together to get the party going?

    We have been talking to ourselves at different levels. If you have been observant, you would have been noticing some changes. I have been saying times without number that my insistence on democracy is in the long best interest of the party. And that is what I have been pursuing since I became chairman. I have since then been pursuing an agenda of Reconciliation, Reformation and Rebuilding of the party at all levels in Nigeria. I knew it was not going to be an easy task but no doubt I am optimistic we should get there.

    What is your take on the plan by the government to grant amnesty to the Boko Haram sect?

    We are being faced with insurgency from within, which we tagged as Boko Haram. But, for me, I see it as an attack from outside. Therefore, it is not really the duty of only one section or one community. If we see something that attacks our government, attacks our churches, attacks our mosques, attacks our markets, attacks our motor parks, attacks our emirs and chiefs, attacks the United Nations, attacks the police and the military, I think we all better start thinking. I hope it is all of us, starting with the political parties, to come together; the religious bodies, ulamas, everybody should have what we call ‘hands on deck’ to ensure that we confront that evil and win it. I call on everybody to confront that evil and win it. I am concerned because today you know our party is the party that carries the government and everything that affects the life of the people definitely should concern the party and everybody’s concern. Boko Haram is a bad omen and they are bad. They are not Boko Haram, they are evil, that is what I can say. They are evil, even bringing up a connotation that isolates them.

    How can you justify bombing the mosques, bombing the churches, bombing the market, bombing the motor parks, bombing people along the street, bombing police stations and bombing barracks, bombing banks and all that? What I can say is let good confront the evil.

    You have been accused of being an interested party in the Adamawa PDP crisis because of the alleged interest of your son, Awwal, in contesting as governor in 2015. How true is this?

    You are talking about my son. He was in politics before I became the chairman. He was in the House of Representatives before I became the chairman. I leave my son to be what he wants to be. I cheer him up if he is looking for leadership, why not? My job as chairman of the party is not to promote any individual or stop any individual from expressing his desires. I have already told my party members and my God that I want to lead this party based on equity, justice and fair play. And I said, no imposition, including everybody. Let the members of the party decide whom they want as their leader in every level; that is where I stand. Whoever they want should be their leader. I am not interested in he is my son or she is my daughter. If you are my son or my daughter, so what? Those who are governors, are they not sons of some individuals? If they are daughters, are they from the tree? They are sons and daughters of some people. If he says he wants to be governor, I will clap for him.

    You have been going around talking about reconciliation. Is the removal of Rivers State PDP executive part of the reconciliation?

    PDP does not remove anybody. We don’t remove a winning team. It is a court matter and I have nothing to do with it. If people feel cheated, they go to court and if the court decides, I have nothing to do with it. What they decide, we take over from there.

    Since you came into office, it appears the party is enmeshed in more crises, why is it so?

    All these are part of human endeavours. You know wherever you have human beings, they are bound to make their views known. You can have different interests and so, you can expect that. My job as the chairman is to reconcile these as much as possible based on level playing field, based on equity, based on justice. It is a challenge, I am ready to face that challenge, whenever it happens, we face it.

  • MEND: An inspiration from Hitler?

    MEND: An inspiration from Hitler?

    If the militants in the ‘new’ Movement for the Emancipation of the Niger Delta (MEND) are bereft of ideas regarding how to help President Goodluck Jonathan out of the stagnating ‘leadership’ mess, they should not add to the burdens on his frail shoulders. And if these persons are sworn to pursuing a suicidal mission, they should, at least, spare Christianity the bloody tar brush with which they are inclined to make an imprint. It is, first, a simple matter of courtesy to the faith and, above all, respect for God. Whatever their grouse against the State, nothing could be more sacrilegious than for a bunch of terrorists to ignorantly position themselves as God’s battle axes. That, I dare say, is my reading of the statements credited to a certain Jomo Gbomo, of a plan to attack mosques, Islamic institutions, hajj camps and clerics on behalf of Christians.

    By the way, I am a Christian and I shudder at the suggestion that some dunderheads have chosen to fight on my behalf or on behalf of the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN). It is petty and cheap. It is an old trick where the evil ones that live among us try to mix religion with politics. It just can’t work.

    It is quite difficult to know those cavorting before this coward from the pit of hell. But it is quite easy to decipher where the country is headed should Gbomo’s threat become a reality. This character speaks spiritedly about the “assassinations of clerics that propagate doctrines of hate” as if he is any better. Except he writes under the influence of some psychotic substances, there is no way anyone with half a brain can justify the Independence Day bombings of 2010 where more than a dozen innocent souls were killed and scores suffered various degrees of injuries. If that was not a terrorist act, then what is? During the Independence Day bombings, did the Jomo Gbomo MEND, which thumped its chest for a successful job, separate Christians from Muslims before detonating the bombs? And what kind of baleful hatred would propel a man to embark on such a cowardly violent act?

    Just like the Boko Haram sect, there is something about MEND that sucks. They are birds of a feather out on a mission to set the country on fire. The Jomo Gbomo MEND constitutes a clear and present danger to our collective existence regardless of the delusion in high places that MEND ceased to exist after some ex-agitators came out of the creeks to embrace amnesty. If that was the case, then October 1, 2010 wouldn’t have happened; the crude theft in the Niger Delta would have significantly reduced and the killing of 12 policemen would not have taken place. The MEND that Jonathan and those he granted amnesty operated may have been dissolved but there exists a deadlier one that pretends to know not Jonathan or the ‘Generals’ who now run things from the comfort of their homes in Abuja. It is the MEND on the bend – a MEND whose threat to cause mayhem should not be taken lightly.

    How can this MEND assuage our pains and anguish by piling up more body bags of innocent souls through the evil called ‘Operation Barbarrosa?” How can it base a negotiated ceasefire on a questionable intervention by the convicted mastermind of the October 1, 2010 bombings, Henry Okah? Who is this Gbomo and what does he stand for?

    Now, this jolt of history for those who may not know what Operation Barbarrosa portends. Adolf Hitler’s 22 June 1941 invasion of the Soviet Union during the Second World War was code-named Operation Barbarossa. It was the largest invasion in the history of warfare. Contrary to its planner’s intentions, it marked the beginning of the pivotal phase in deciding the victors of the war. It failed and caused a high rate of fatalities for Hitler’s war machine – 95% of all German Army casualties that occurred from 1941 to 1944. So, anyone can see the illogic of MEND’s Hitlerian ‘inspiration’.

    If the truth must be told, Gbomo and his ilk thrive because of the crying laxity in our security and justice system. Perhaps if those who perpetrated criminal acts of terrorism against the state had, in the past, been apprehended and made to face the full weight of the law, we would not be at this stage where we now offer amnesty to the destroyers of our humanity. When you take up arms against the State, maim, kill, rape, kidnap, ruin its main source of revenue and get rewarded with amnesty and a secured future in the name of peace, what you get is the kind of unmitigated arrogance and lethal injury that have been inflicted on this nation by people who should ordinarily be serving terms in prisons.

    Unfortunately, and at the risk of sounding like the bird with the broken beak, the only person who has to sit up and rein in these terrorists is Jonathan himself. He must, by now, accept that he committed a grave error when he tried to extricate MEND of complicity in the Independence Day bombings. We now know that at the heart of that carnage was a MEND that would rather compound its kinsmen’s misery rather than helping Mr. President out of a difficult situation. And it is all due to the impotence in governance. The question is: How did we sink this low?

    We are swimming in this slimy puddle today because we, collectively, left the initiative to the criminals. We conceded the bragging rights to them and now we marvel when people like Jomo Gbomo and every other sick warlord taunt the State!! After countless threats of apprehending them and bringing them before the justice stool, not a single arrest has been made. Killings after killings, the government did nothing other than throwing its hands up in submission and seeking divine intervention when we had expected it to deploy all the resources at its disposal to halt the state of anomie. It appears the government is content with its half-hearted approach to confronting raw terror. And that’s a shame.

    Jonathan needs to wake up, smell the coffee and take decisive action. In his speech just hours after the Boston twin bombings that killed three and injured scores of innocent bystanders, President Barrack Obama defines terrorism thus: “Any time bombs are used to target innocent civilians; it is an act of terrorism.” Obama’s sole promise to the grieving populace is simple: the culprits will be apprehended and made to face the full wrath of the law! Does this refrain sound familiar? Yes, it does. The only difference is that, in the United States of America, a President’s word is a bond. Here, the words are as empty as they come. As I write this, the security forces are on the verge of unravelling all the knots surrounding the Boston bombings and suspects are already on the radar. Surely, justice will catch up with those responsible as promised by Obama. The law is waiting to crush them. Here, we humbly wait on them to embrace amnesty while justice cries blue murder! How sad.

    Be that as it may, we need to sound a note of warning to Gbomo and his group that it is not too late to put an end to their sickening terror plot. Already, the Nigerian State is saturated with humongous madness that the authorities are battling to contend with. It is the responsibility of the authorities to go after this MEND on the bend and stop it from inflicting another bout of terror on the nation. I doubt if the country can survive the consequences of such a threat. The time for long speeches is over. This is the time to walk the talk and halt the drift into anarchy! Will Jonathan stand up to be counted?

  • Now, Ministry of Amnesty Affairs truly beckons

    Now, Ministry of Amnesty Affairs truly beckons

    It could just be the perfect answer we have groped for in this season of bloody anomie. Maybe we never realised how close we were to the solution because we have been blinded by the regularity of the sheer savagery that welcomes us into every new dawn in Nigeria. When a nation’s story is repeatedly told in parenthesis of pain, it is quite easy to lump the absurd with the normal. From the look of things, it should be clear to the dunderheads in government that they have been scurrying for answers by asking the wrong questions. While they were busy gallivanting about town, claiming to be mopping up intelligence that would assist the government in getting to the root of a country’s self-inflicted woes, little did they know that the one-in-all cure was right under their noses. It still beats me silly how these juggernauts, whose responsibility it is to think for the government, didn’t realise early that we would soon be back to the doorstep of that magical word—Amnesty——after all the bloodletting, violence and mindless killings. How come they did not know that we would end up talking peace on a canvas dripping with the blood of innocent souls?

    We may not have an accurate data of lives that have been lost as the killings persist even as I write this; what we do know for a fact is that the number runs into thousands. Many came to that tragic end in worship places; countless others were bombed to death in orgies of unmitigated violence; some were lined up and executed; hundreds were slaughtered in their homes, on the streets and even at workplaces. There were abductions with sad ending. Families were wiped out. In the sickening madness, there has been an astronomical increase in the number of widows, widowers and orphans. We do understand that, for these years, the monsters behind these killings have remained faceless, known only to those who, vows after vows, promised to bring them to justice. At a point, it was so bad that the harbinger of death was always prowling the neighbourhoods, daring those paid to keep him in check to fire the first shot. Well, they never did. And the monster acquired a larger-than-life image. And, for long, we have groped in the dark, seeking wisdom on how best to appease the one with bloodied hands.

    Maybe that was what the government did when it dangled the amnesty carrot before the Niger Delta militants some years back. To appease the ‘generals’ and comrades-in-arms in the creeks, the government bent over backwards and struck a multi-billion-dollar deal with the militants and their foot soldiers. Now do not ask me who qualifies to be called a militant because the definition, I have been made to understand, is not static. We were told that that wise move to grant amnesty to these persons, who took up arms against the state, has led to an increase in the volume of crude oil exploration from a little over 700,000bpd to over 2.6 million bpd. Henceforth, militants are now to be known and addressed as ex-agitators, having undergone training on non-violence. They disarmed voluntarily, trained on the best principles of non-violence, were placed on monthly stipends for a period and are being sponsored on vocational training both at home and abroad. It was a perfect script fit for the box office. Most ‘generals’ now live a life of affluence, rubbing shoulders with the high and mighty in the corridors of power. Many, who could barely append their signature on any piece of paper pre-amnesty, now hang out at the lobbies of the best hotels in Abuja, selling oil-lifting contract papers. They ride the costliest cars, wear designers’ perfumes, host the biggest shindigs in town and get the best police protection money can buy!

    It was, we were told, a win-win situation for all! The oil majors now have access to the rigs; government now rakes in billions of dollars from crude sales; militants have been ‘reformed’, ‘former ‘generals’ are now briefcase contractors with one of them given the mandate to take charge of the security of Nigeria’s maritime boundary and the Niger Delta, we are to understand, is being restored back to its once tranquil ambience. That was the perfect picture that has been painted about this oily deal in spite of the occasional rumblings in the creeks by yet-to-be-settled aggrieved militants! For these lucky ones, the blood on their hands has been cleansed by the sanctity of amnesty! Seems everyone is content with the graveyard peace, right? Don’t worry, just be happy!

    Question is: How does granting amnesty justify the government’sconsistent incompetence and outright lethargy in tackling headlong, the insecurity that has been foisted on the nation by different shades of ‘insurgents’ in the guise of freedom fighters? Perhaps, if this government has shown the capacity to handle the situation, there wouldn’t have been any need by the Sultan of Sokoto, the highly revered AlhajiMuhammedAbubakar (III) , that members of the Boko Haram sect should be granted “total amnesty” by the President Goodluck Jonathan administration for peace to reign in the country. It is even becoming clearer by the day that the Jonathan administration, sans the initial gragra of refusing to negotiate with ghosts, has no option than to extend the amnesty carrots to these ‘ghosts’ in absentia going by the frenetic pace with which it has surreptitiously embraced the Sultan’s fatherly advice.

    When the idea was placed on the cards by the Sultan some four weeks back,  some socio-cultural and religious groups, notably the OhanaezeNdigbo, the Afenifere and the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN) joined issue with the Sultan, querying the propriety of granting a ‘deadly and faceless’ sect amnesty. They threatened to ‘frustrate’ any move that could lead to a situation where the faceless persons would sit at the round table and parley with Jonathan in Aso Rock. Other anti-amnesty groups have since joined the fray, faulting what they perceived would be tantamount to an injustice to victims of the murderous sect.

    Well, they may be right. It is just that this issue is beyond them. Politics is at the heart of this latest move and no one should expect anything less than shady deals. The noisemaking is good but I doubt if it will change anything. For the avoidance of doubt, these noisemakers are not in power, neither are they in government. In the final analysis, the buck stops on Jonathan’s table. In any case, he is damned to take one decision or the other because this madness, which portends clear and present danger to our collective survival as a nation, simply cannot be allowed to continue.

    If the government cannot stop the reign of terror, it can, at least, eat the humble pie and begin some form of rapprochement. Some have argued that such a move implies that the government would be approaching the negotiation table from the position of weakness. But that, to my mind, is balderdash. Did the government negotiate with the Niger Delta militants from the position of strength when it granted them full amnesty with retirement benefits some years back? Were some of the ‘generals’ not faceless until they were flown to Abuja on presidential jet and were officially unveiled to the Nigerian public? Has anyone called for their trial at The Hague for the criminality that they perpetrated whilst in the creeks? Did we raise eyebrows when villains were transformed into instant heroes overnight? Have these persons not become top government business racketeers in and around Abuja today? In any case, has amnesty completely eradicated killings in the Niger Delta?  So, why should such palliative gesture be denied a group that has rendered government impotent in the last three years?

    My advice: It should be clear to those with discerning eyes that amnesty has become another viable business venture that would be exploited by all shades of criminals conversant with the high octane impotence in governance. Since the government cannot continue to offer platitudes at the killings of commoners and the high and mighty, it may as well take a bold step to create a Ministry of Amnesty Affairs, which should be well-funded to settle those holding it by the balls. If that is the only way to stop the daily spilling of innocent blood, then let’s kick the ball rolling. Very soon, ethnic groupings like the Oodua Peoples Congress (OPC) and the Movement for the Actualisation of the Sovereign State of Biafra (MASSOB) would also demand for amnesty, reasonable stipends and foreign training in exchange for their dane guns, AK47s, charms and sheer noisemaking. The oil bunkerers, armed robbers, kidnappers, internet scammers, subsidy thieves, pension fund looters, failed husbands and wives, paedophiles, hired killers and all manner of criminals in the system would have no option but to seek amnesty in exchange for their peace. Let’s face it, if politicians loot the treasury, impoverish the people, spit on their poverty and end up getting ‘justice’ with a slap on the wrist through plea bargaining, why won’t barefaced criminals ask for a slice of the cake for peace to reign since governance has become one hell of a joke? Will there ever be an end to this shameless dance on the graves of lost souls whose spirits crave justice? So much for justice! Wither governance?

    Note: This piece, which was first published on this page on March 9, 2013, has been slightly adjusted following the move by the government to consider some form of amnesty to members of the Boko Haram sect, the furore being generated over the shape and form of the amnesty committee and the fresh violence that has gripped the Niger Delta with the killings of 13 policeman last week. God bless Nigeria.

  • Between the PDP and its Judases

    Between the PDP and its Judases

    Last week, I asked a question which, in my view, sums up the painful realities of the Nigerian story: how does hope triumph in a milieu where deception holds aloft the trophy of our quotidian living? For as long as I can remember, we have always been, unabashedly so enmeshed in a mad race to dribble the truth, even to our collective peril. It’s a tough one to swallow, but there is hardly any Nigerian today who does not address issues solely from the direction through which his bread is buttered. And so, it is not uncommon to read about how some of yesterday’s men suddenly transformed into today’s apologists for all that is bad with the system. Let’s face it, you do not invite a man to ‘come and chop’ and then tolerate his indiscretion of pissing in the pot of soup. Seriously, I cannot understand why some people cry blue murder just because those who used to be on this side of the divide, breathing down the government’s neck now see things differently, having joined them on that side. In actual fact, this delusive grandeur of deceptive reasoning tends to continue ad infinitum because we all seem to be in the same boat—victims of the lure of the stomach rather than common sense. But, this is a topic for another day.

     Today, the focus is on a deceit of a different kind—the endless chicanery at the Wadata House headquarters of the self-professed Africa’s biggest political gathering, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP). That the PDP is yet again treading a self-implosion laden path, just two years before a general election is hardly surprising. Those who call it a gathering of the crudest set of Peoples-Deceiving-People must have perfectly dissected its physiognomy. Was it Soyinka that once described them as a “nest of killers”? No one should expect less than something close to a fratricidal war in a family of deadly pugilists who will stop at nothing to hold on to power. Those who expect things to be different under the President Goodluck Jonathan administration really must have lost the compass in navigating the history of this behemoth. For, right from inception, the PDP has proved to be its own arch enemy. It has a queer way of raking up needless dust and making a hell of noise out of it.

     In its 13 years of existence, the party has always been in search of peace while it holds on tenaciously to those things that are the direct antithesis to a peaceful communion. At the heart of its problems is its fixation on a fallacy that it is running a party of like minds with adherence to rules and regulations as contained in its constitution. Nothing could be farther from the truth. Perhaps, if the founding fathers of the party had stood their ground and stopped former President Olusegun Obasanjo from annexing the PDP as part of his personal fiefdom in Aso Rock, this behemoth would have saved itself from being under the control of one man. We may not know if the story would have been different had the late President Umaru Yar’Adua completed his tenure. But we do know when and how the so-called supremacy of the party was subjugated under the whim of one man. It started when Obasanjo got tired of Chief Barnabas Gemade as chairman of the party, cut short his tenure and imposed Chief Audu Ogbeh at a closely monitored pseudo convention. It was not long before Ogbeh received the same shock treatment after Obasanjo’s symbolic rapprochement at the former’s house where he reportedly ate pounded yam and vegetable soup. Hours later, Ogbeh was kicked in the groin and Chief Ahmadu Ali, singlehandedly picked by Obasanjo, stepped in.

     Since then, the PDP has been waddling in deceitful twists and turns. Its constitution was dramatically changed to accommodate Obasanjo’s dream of becoming a life Board of Trustees chair. Chief Vincent Ogbulafor was eased out of office in a controversial manner by Jonathan loyalists for his insistence on maintaining the zoning arrangement of the party, which would have seen a Northerner emerge as President in the 2011 elections. He was shoved off the chair few days after the party’s National Executive Committee, which was chaired by Jonathan, passed a vote of confidence on his leadership. Even Ogbulafor’s successor and Jonathan’s chosen, Dr. Okwesilieze Nwodo, could not survive the web of deceit woven around the presumed cohesion in the party and he had to step aside.

     Fast-forward to 2012 and there came in a breath of fresh air in the person of Alhaji Bamanga Tukur, an octogenarian with vast experience in business and politics. Everyone had thought he would be the stabilizing factor, the kind of father figure that would truly bring the dissenting voices in the family to the round table. But alas, if news filtering in from Wadata House is anything to go by, Tukur may as well be marking time on that swinging hot chair. It is simply unbelievable that the ruling party can’t wean itself off its old wily ways.

     Like others before him, Tukur is under intense fire. Although the party’s National Publicity Secretary, Chief Olisa Metuh, has been doing all he can possibly do to downplay the brewing crisis by blaming it on mischief makers (thank God it is not the devil this time), history has taught us not to buy that dummy. He speaks of cohesion and unity among the rank and file of the party while the Akwa Ibom State Governor and chair of the PDP Governors’ Forum speaks of ‘Judases’ that must be sent packing before lasting peace can be achieved. He said majority of the party members are on the same page with the party apparatchiks, yet Tukur and the BoT Chairman, Chief Tony Anenih, have embarked on separate junkets across the nation on a reconciliatory mission. Is it not strange that these octogenarians are busy reconciling close ‘friends’ when they should be in the comfort of their homes resting? If things are as calm as cucumber, why did Akpabio make references to Judases that would be crushed by the party’s moving train? Why the nine-month delay in holding the party’s NEC, an event that should be a quarterly affair in accordance with the constitution? Why are the governors queuing behind their Adamawa counterpart in the crisis that Tukur has been identified as an interested party? Why is its deposed National Secretary, Olagunsoye Oyinlola, crying blue murder and threatening to fight Tukur to the bitter end? And why is Tukur always dropping Jonathan’s name each time he tries to explain his action or inaction? Why the backbiting, dirty intrigues and hurried fence-mending? Why?

    Truth is: Although the PDP reserves the right to pride itself as the only national party in the land; but clearly, it has not managed its affairs better than the opposition parties. It is abysmally poor on internal democracy because it operates at the whim of one man—the voice from Aso Rock. It was the norm under Obasanjo and the pattern continues under Jonathan. That, in my humble view, is not party supremacy. It is the basest form of political gobbledygook. If the party must look itself to the mirror, it must start by accepting that it has thrived on deceit and has not lived up to the minimum standard it sets for itself. There is no betrayal that could be bigger than this. And that’s what Judases do. The problem is: it is hard to identify the saints among this crowd of Judases. But if Metuh believes that there is no cause for alarm and that the Tukur-led executive “will be in charge of party administration until our term ends”, I can only wish him good luck as the hunt for the Judases under the umbrella of deception continues!

  • Random ruminations

    Random ruminations

    Perhaps, like me, you have often wondered whether there would ever be an end to the farcical drama that serially

    unfolds in Nigeria, almost on daily basis. For the incurable optimists among us, it is a question of time before change occurs. Yet, that time is fast ticking towards an imminent implosion, which many perceptive citizens would rather not talk about. They will rather keep tugging at the attenuating strings of hope as if such hope has an elastic capacity to soak up the widening depth of anomie across the Nigerian landscape. How does hope triumph in a community where deception holds aloft the trophy of our quotidian living? No doubt, things are getting tougher by the day and unusual innovations in official corruption along with other challenges such as the Boko Haram menace continue to weigh heavily on expectations of productive governance. Nonetheless, extreme attention is being focussed on frivolities by those who ought to take the bull by the horns. It’s really incredible how Nigerians trudge on in this climate of ceaseless gloom and plastic laughter.

    Probably determined to take our minds off the drudgery of whining over the tragic realities of our collective existence in this country of a thousand surprises, the Governor of Bayelsa State, Seriake Dickson, introduced a freshly-minted swagger to our sorry story. For a state that has been in the news for all the wrong reasons right from the days it fell under the firm grip of the now pardoned ‘Governor General’ Diepriye Alamieyeseigha, it beggars belief that Dickson ( who was packaged as one on a arduous journey of re-claiming the lost glory of an oil-producing community that is in dire need of true heroes) could be the one cuddling inanity as if it was getting out of fashion. And I doubt if this man that was fished out of the House of Representatives is not sold to extending Bayelsa’s locust years from his leadership style.

    In retrospect, it is clear that one had erred by concluding so prematurely, that Dickson had reached the nadir of political chicanery with the ‘eye-service’ elevation of Dame Patience Jonathan to the position of a Permanent Secretary in the state’s civil service. But with His Excellency’s decision to adopt his Abuja-based godfather’s strategy of setting up committees after committees and panels after panels with benumbing intimacy, it was not unexpected that Bayelsa would, sooner rather than later, become another practical example of how government can be run through committees. However, it never crossed the minds of many that Dickson has the sole ambition of beating his mentor to his game. And that was exactly what he did with his decision to set up a committee that would tackle the menace of rumour mongering, which the state believes serves as a big impediment to the reclamation dream of Jonathan’s chosen.

    To justify the move, the Chief Press Secretary to the Bayelsa State Governor, Daniel Iworiso-Markson, quipped: “The high-powered committee will address the ugly trend of rumour-mongering in the state. A situation whereby the person and office of the governor are always at the receiving end of rumour-mongering is quite disturbing to the government. The committee will be tasked with the responsibility of fishing out persons who made it a habit to peddle rumours and spread false and misleading information to the public.”

    If you ask me, I will say Dickson deserves a National Award (preferably GCON) for thinking out of the box. Why is Bayelsa so blest with geniuses who always wear their thinking caps on their buttocks? Okay, I know the community harbours some of the nation’s best fishermen in spite of the curse of oil. What I did not know is that the state is also brimming with men who can, with a single cast of the net, fish out rumour mongers wherever they may be hiding in the oil-rich region. What an egregious malady? Now, some questions. What were the criteria used in fishing out the members of this rumour-mongering fishing committee and what are their modus operandi? Would they be hanging out at the beer joints and red spots tapping on the conversations of the citizens? Would they partake in this rumour-mongering hunt by dropping some snippets that would ignite the passion of the peddlers of fake news about the person and office of the governor?

    In this rambling moment, I just wonder if the Bayelsa State Government has not carried this rude joke too far. What does its entire Ministry of Information really do? What exactly were the tissues of lies or rumours being peddled about the governor anyway? That the elevation of the First Lady to the post of Permanent Secretary was not a show of appreciation for the dogged fight put up by the Jonathans in kicking Timipre Sylva out of the seat? That he has not spent most part of his short tenure hounding perceived loyalists of his predecessor in addition to his commitment to wiping off any footprints that could remind him of Sylva’s governorship in the state? Why should rumour-mongering so discomfit the chief executive of a state that he would appropriate state resources to fund a moribund committee which is clearly certified to chase shadows? Hmnnchonchuhunhon…I laugh in Chinese language.

    Yet, Dickson was not the only one that has turned governance into one huge bungling game. The wicked grin on Knucklehead’s face has refused to disappear, having painstakingly digested what some notable Nigerians have had to say about the demise of the iconic writer, Prof. Chinua Achebe. You can’t help but wonder where all those eulogies were flowing from! If only they had taken time to read through Achebe’s lines in all his books, they would have buried their heads in shame. Do they know how Africa’s finest writer started his exilic journey? Do they have the capacity to decode his messages, the innermost grief he felt for the missed opportunities and the consistent squandering of God’s abundant blessings? And do they really think Achebe would choose their platitudes over and above a life that is truly dedicated to the service of humanity? How far have they gone in redressing the problems Achebe listed as plaguing Nigeria and hindering its progress? And when the man died, all they had to offer were words which fly in the face of logic! Shame.

    If you believe that the words they spluttered about Achebe came from the depth of their hearts, then you must have believed President Goodluck Ebele Jonathan when he hinted that the latest plan to hike the price of Premium Motor Spirit would be done in consultation with the people. Suddenly, the people now matter to them. How strange? By now, the average Nigerian understands that this latest gimmick, about the people and I, is merely dressing a bitter pill with sugary coatings. Having gone through a nation’s maximum revolt against his coercive action in January, 2012 when he unilaterally did the unthinkable by attempting to force a price regime on the populace, Jonathan ought to know that he would need more than the twisted logic of “wasting resources meant for a greater number of Nigerians to subsidize the affluent middle class” to scale the hurdle this time. How does he expect to convince the people on the need to remove fuel subsidy when he has not told them what he plans to do about the massive corruption in that sector, which has made the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation insolvent, in addition to the huge liability it has become?

    Really, there is no point whining like a broken record, rambling on about the plan to create 480,000 jobs; build infrastructures; strengthen security; improve agriculture, power and medical facilities when all we see daily is a systemic decimation of our collective patrimony and a seeming lack of the political will to rein in the culprits. Now, some may say this is sheer rumour-mongering that denigrates the person and office of the “Oga at the top.” Needless to say that I lay no claim to originating this presumed fable. Those interested in fishing out the peddlers of this wicked rumour of inaction and cluelessness against the government at the centre should visit the spots where ordinary citizens converge after work hours to soak their sorrows and laugh off the ramblings in high places. Shhhhh… I just hope I have not given more than enough hint to Dickson’s committee on rumour-mongering as it settles down to work. I wish them good luck in their new venture.

    Do have a blessed Easter celebrations devoid of empty patter!

  • Shall we tell President?

    Today, I’m shooting straight from the hip. There should never be any apologies for consistently drumming the right words into the unresponsive ears of those ruling us. Why should I when our land has been turned into a canvas of blood under their ignoble watch? We had thought the raging madness was subsiding, going by the frenetic pace of political mediations playing out. But we were damn wrong. Those baying for the blood of the innocent have not had their fill; they are still on the rampage. And to demonstrate their desire to set the country on fire, they struck again at the popular New Road Motor Park, Sabon Gari, Kano State, sending scores of lives to early graves. Over 60 others who escaped the suicide bombers’ terror attack are said to be hanging between life and death in various hospitals. These were ordinary Nigerians who struggle daily to get some crumbs for survival. Their crime? They were just unlucky to be at the right place at the wrong time. They were the latest victims of the senseless killings pervading the land. Sad enough, there is no comprehensible official figure regarding the number of citizens that have been wiped off by these agents of terror in the last three years.

    Like many others that happened before it, the Kano motor park attack left more than a sour taste in the mouth. Here we speak not of the pall of gloom that enveloped the country as charred remains of the victims were piled in body bags. We do not refer to the scary images that confronted us as the plume of flames darkened the heavens. No, this is not just about the anguished lamentations of those caught in the explosion. It is something deeper than that. There are questions we need to ask. What kind of force pushes a man to the precipice such that he offers himself as a willing tool of mass destruction, a human bomb? What is the motive for the attacks and where is this violent anger coming from? What grievous sin has humanity committed against these alien forces that cannot be brought before the table for peaceful discussion and resolution? How do the mass murder and killings of innocent lives redress the presumed injustice?

    Of course, there were stories of lucky escape and divine intervention—the survivor who recounted how he packed his intestines with his cloth; the one who lost a nose and confessed that death could come knocking any time soon; and the one who had a brief conversation with the suicide bomber before he ended it all in total damnation. Gone with the bomb explosions of that dark Monday was someone’s father, mother, uncle, brother, sister or aunt. Gone eternally too, is many families’ dream of actualising hopes for a good life in a sad country. There was that heart-rending account of a family of six that was consumed in the blaze of terror, crushed beyond recognition, burnt to ashes. Breadwinners can no longer fend for loved ones. Children can only hold on to memories of good times they once shared with their parents. Wives have become widows; husbands have transformed into widowers, children into orphans. Dreams forever deferred. Laughter stopped abruptly and endless wailing has left many with bloodshot eyes. Today, we mourn the dead, conscious of the reality of our own vulnerability in the next harvest of bombs and bullets as the official lethargy in tackling the menace fluctuates between the outright mundane and sheer folly. That is what official dithering is inflicting on our collective psyche daily.

    No, I am not saying the government is sitting on its hands, rubbing raw pepper on our festering wounds. In fact, going by Aso Rock’s timely response to the Kano harvest of death, it is obvious that it has re-energised its condolence letter drafting unit. Howling like the bird with the broken beak and with a dint of self-adulation to boot, the government hollered: “President Goodluck Ebele Jonathan has condemned in strong terms, today’s bomb blasts in Kano. The President said the barbaric incident will not deter the Federal Government from its strong-willed determination to overcome those who do not mean well for this nation. He said the Federal Government will not be stampeded, for any reason whatsoever, into abandoning its unrelenting war against terrorists in the country.

    “President Jonathan reassured Nigerians and foreigners in the country that the Nigerian Government will continue to do all that is required to ensure the safety of lives and property, including continued collaboration with local and international partners and stakeholders to check the menace of terrorism. President Jonathan commiserated with the victims of the Kano explosions, their families and friends, and assured the Kano State government of the Federal Government’s continued support.”

    As expected, it did not take long before many important personalities in the polity joined the platitude crafting train. From David Bonaventure Mark to all manner of party thugs, it was the same old story of regrets and empty fulminations. Hey, doesn’t this ring a familiar bell? How many more reassurances should we expect from the “Oga at the top” before we begin to experience the concrete manifestation of this “strong-willed determination to rein in terror”? And who the hell is stampeding Jonathan into taking a long overdue action?

    Don’t get it twisted. We do know that the government’s official town criers have never been found wanting in the outpouring of sophisticated imbecility to cover up cluelessness. We know it is the responsibility of some persons to continue to defend the indefensible by whatever means possible. We also know that, on this matter, it is quite difficult to accept defeat and throw in the towel when, in spite of the bloodletting and violence, one’s bread is being buttered on that other side, daily. But, for posterity sake, can someone tell the President that Nigerians are getting tired of the empty nattering of a determination to battle a monster that has continued to grow bigger by the day, inflicting the most grievous pain and glibly pissing on our wounded hearts?

    Who among the belching gang of praise singers in the corridors of power would summon the courage to tell the President the home truth—that he has failed woefully in protecting lives and property, a responsibility which the Constitution placed squarely on his desk? Since one of his moneybag friends has told us that ‘Oga at the top’ was divinely instructed by God to pardon his former boss, the great Alams, shall we then tell the President that the subjects he swore to protect with the last ounce of the blood flowing in his veins are, impatiently so, waiting for him to tell us when the gods would show him a clearer picture on what to do with a menace that continues to send shivers down our spines?

    How long shall he wait for Godot before he comes to the ultimate reality that cluelessness cannot be a virtue in this lingering atmosphere of parlous gloom? Could the overfed court jesters please tell the President the ungarnished truth, just this time?

  • It’s truly complicated, isn’t it?

    In Nigeria, nothing is as simple as it appears. Our fascination for weaving a web of complications around what others would

    consider to be non-issues is legendary. We just love moving through this tricky maze that leads to nowhere. And, in that ungainly fashion, we have consigned to history quite a truckload of things that are sure to haunt us later in life. I foresee a situation where those half-buried corpses whose legs are hanging out will, one day, demand proper interment. When that eventually happens, there will be no hiding place for any of us. We just have this queer disdain for treading the straight and narrow path. We hug the mundane while the reality of our folly stares us in the face. Is it that we have become utterly and unabashedly sold to those whimsical deceptions to the extent that we have completely missed the opportunity to apply the brakes? I mean, must we cuddle banality with reckless abandon?

    I am shocked at how fast we turn every matter of national importance into some huge joke. Why should everything and anything that requires outright condemnation or serious punishment to serve as deterrent end up on the popular ‘soft landing’ table? Just the other day, and to our national shame, a top official of the Nigerian Security and Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC) who is also head of the agency’s Lagos office, Mr. Obaseye Shem, carried sheer incompetence to its zenith with his bewildering display of ignorance on a live programme on Channels Television. This dude, who has a gift of rambling through simple questions, could not even give us his agency’s correct web site address. It was as if he was battling with a tough geometric question. And when he eventually dribbled his way round the answer, he ended up confusing the viewers and the interviewers with his “www.nscdc that’s all” riposte. Oops! And what on earth was he doing in that hot seat if all he could tell us was a mind-scotching response that his “Ogas” in Abuja are in possession of the keys that could unlock the almighty web site of a public institution that has become notorious for its money-for-a-job racketeering! How and when has making public an organisation’s web address become rocket science such that a senior personnel would be rambling on a daytime live television programme?

    Yet, Shem’s outrageous outing is just a tip of the iceberg. Those schooled in the art of complicating simple matter would tell you it remains the best way of hiding behind a sore finger. By the time you throw more confusing dimensions into the system, chances are that the issue will naturally wear out like many others begging for attention. It is a diversionary governance tactic that has worked magic in our peculiar socio-political terrain. An example would suffice here. When the former aide to President Olusegun Obasanjo, Mrs. Oby Ezekwesili, accused the Goodluck Jonathan government of frittering a large chunk of an estimated $67bn (N10.8trn) left in the nation’s foreign accounts by Obasanjo as at May 2007, many Nigerians had expected any government that is truly built on probity and accountability to take serious exception to such statement. They wouldn’t have minded if the government had taken up Oby’s challenge for a public debate on the matter so that the truth, and nothing but the whole truth about what was left, what had been spent and saved, could be unraveled.

    But today, and almost three months after Ezekwesili threw the bombshell, mum has been the word from the appropriate quarters in government. After unleashing the predictable yet uncoordinated ranting of its attack dogs on the former World Bank Chief, it appears no one in this circuit of confused persons is interested in the debate which the National Assembly has gladly offered to explore. Instead, they have resorted to the old, wily trick of dusting up some old files, allegedly linking Ezekwesili or her aide to an investigation being conducted by the Independent Corrupt Practices and other related offences Commission (ICPC) on her stewardship as Minister of Education. Now, the question is: how does that distract from the fact that this government is yet to come clean on the allegations that billions of dollars were being frittered away without any physical evidence of governance? If this latest move is not aimed at obfuscating the simple question asked by Ezekwesili on accountability, then what is? Or did the government just wake up to the sudden realisation that a certain ICPC was investigating a case related to presumed fraudulent practices against a close aide of the former minister?

    For Knucklehead, this trick just doesn’t jell. In actual fact, this cheap blackmail which was copied from the Olusegun Obasanjo’s book of political chicanery is staid. You either take up the challenge thrown by Ezekwesili or eat the humble pie since throwing in the towel has never been the option in this clime. Now, if Ezekwesili or any of her aides were found to have dipped their hands in the public till, it is meet and proper that they be punished in accordance to the law. After all, a former governor of Bayelsa State and a former Police chief were made to dance to the clanging anti-corruption rhythm under Obasanjo. What should be condemned is when these agencies allow themselves to be used as attack dogs or tools employed in complicating seemingly straight forward issues. In the real sense, these things are not as complicated as we always manipulate them to look like. Or are they?

    There are a host of other issues that fall under this category, which time and space would not permit Knucklehead to discuss. However, it is really surprising that a government adept at complicating the simplest of logic could not understand the hue and cry over its latest sacrilegious move to put a stamp of legitimacy on ‘authority stealing’ as exemplified in the presidential pardon granted the former governor of Bayelsa State, Diepriye Alamieyeseigha, and seven others, including a former Chief of General Staff, Lt.-Gen. Oladipo Diya, a former Minister of Communications, Maj.-Gen. Tajudeen Olanrewaju, a former Minister of Works, the late Gen. Abdulkareem Adisa, a former Managing Director of the defunct Bank of the North, Alhaji Shettima Bulama and Dr. Chiichii Ashwe.

    Feigning ignorance of the public’s derision, the President’s Adviser on Public Affairs, Dr. Doyin Okupe, quipped: “Why all this noise about Alamieyeseigha and the pardon? Is it because it is him? Is it because he is a Niger Deltan? Is it because of his closeness to Jonathan? Even in our laws, though I am not a lawyer, there are certain offences that you commit and after ten years, you receive presidential pardon. There is a Yoruba saying that says: “you asked a thief to run, he runs. You asked him to drop what he has stolen, he did. What else do you want from him?”

    Fact is: Okupe, his boss and the other jesters at that Council of State meeting simply don’t get it? First, let me put it on record that all those who attended that meeting, including the governors and irrespective of their party affiliations, have betrayed the huge trust reposed in them. We are not that dumb not to understand why Diya, Adisa and some other persons were pardoned. By the way, it is simplistic to say that some persons are kicking against a presidential pardon for the great ”Alams” and self-styled ‘Governor-General of the Ijaw Nation’ on the basis of where he comes from. No. Even Okupe knows that it has nothing to do with what he has ‘stolen” or ‘dropped’ after his trial and conviction. It is something much deeper than that. It hangs in the realm of morality, common sense and the perception out there regarding the noise we make about giving corruption a deadly pin fall.

    Now, is that too much to ask of government? Is it too much to demand that they stick to the rules wherein the poor and the rich get equal right and justice?  Why should the government allow some VIP thieves to walk away from justice with a slap on the wrists while petty thieves rot or die in jail without as much as enjoying the luxury of a well-rounded meal per day? What is so complicated in this matter that Okupe simply can’t understand that this presidential handshake of a pardon has gone far beyond the elbow? Anyway, to simplify it for him: maybe we should dispatch a letter to the British government asking them to free one Chief James Onanefe Ibori so that he too can be granted a presidential pardon by GEJ. Or is Ibori not a Niger Deltan? Or has he not dropped some of what he allegedly stole? Fortunately, an arrangement for the transfer of Nigerians in British jails is getting concluded by both governments. Soon, Ibori could be here. In any case, we can always complement Okupe’s warped knowledge and application of the Yoruba proverb with an English saying, what’s sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander. Maybe we should just scrap the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission and the ICPC so that we can close the chapter on this toothless fight! Or is that also too complicated to comprehend by the jokers in power?

  • Now, Ministry of Amnesty Affairs beckons

    It could just be the perfect answer we have groped for in our seasons of bloody anomie. Maybe we never realised how close we were to the solution because we have been blinded by the regularity of the sheer savagery that welcomes us into another day. From the look of things, it should be clear to the dunderheads in government that they have been scurrying for answers by asking the wrong questions. While they were busy gallivanting about town, claiming to be mopping up intelligence that would assist the government in getting to the root of a country’s self-inflicted woes, little did they know that the one-in-all cure was right under their noses. It still beats me silly how these juggernauts, whose responsibility it is to think for the government, didn’t realise early that we would soon be back to the doorstep of that magical word—Amnesty——after all the bloodletting, violence and mindless killings. How come they did not know that we would end up talking peace on a canvas dripping with the blood of innocent souls?

    We may not have an accurate data of lives that have been lost to the nation’s killing fields in the last four years; what we do know for a fact is that the number runs into thousands. Many came to that tragic end in worship places; countless others were bombed to death in orgies of unmitigated violence; some were lined up and executed; hundreds were slaughtered in their homes, on the streets and even at workplaces. There were abductions with sad ending. Families were wiped out. In the sickening madness, there has been an astronomical increase in the number of widows, widowers and orphans. We do understand that, for these years, the monsters behind these killings have remained faceless, known only to those who, vows after vows, promised to bring them to justice. At a point, it was so bad that the harbinger of death was always prowling the neighbourhoods, daring those paid to keep him in check to fire the first shot. They never did. And the monster acquired a larger-than-life image. And, for long, we have groped in the dark, seeking wisdom on how best to appease the one with bloodied hands.

    Maybe that was what the government did when it dangled the amnesty carrot before the Niger Delta militants some years back. To appease the ‘generals’ and comrades-in-arms in the creeks, the government bent over backwards and struck a multi-billion-dollar deal with the militants and their foot soldiers. Now do not ask me who qualifies to be called a militant because the definition, I have been made to understand, is not static. We were told that that wise move to grant amnesty to these persons, who took up arms against the state, has led to an increase in the volume of crude oil exploration from a little over 700,000bpd to over 2.6 million bpd. Henceforth, militants are now to be known and addressed as ex-agitators, having undergone training on non-violence. They disarmed voluntarily, trained on the best principles of non-violence, were placed on monthly stipends for a period and are being sponsored on vocational training both at home and abroad. It was a perfect script fit for the box office. Most ‘generals’ now live a life of affluence, rubbing shoulders with the high and mighty in the corridors of power. Many, who could barely append their signature on any piece of paper pre-amnesty, now hang out at the lobbies of the best hotels in Abuja, selling oil-lifting contract papers. They ride the costliest cars, wear designers’ perfumes and host the biggest shindigs in town!

    It was a win-win situation for all! The oil majors now have access to the rigs; government now rakes in billions of dollars from crude sales; militants have been ‘reformed’, ‘former ‘generals’ are now briefcase contractors with one of them given the mandate to take charge of the security of Nigeria’s maritime boundary and the Niger Delta, we are to understand, is being restored back to its once tranquil ambience. That was the perfect picture that has been painted about this oily deal in spite of the occasional rumblings in the creeks by yet-to-be-settled aggrieved militants! For these lucky ones, the blood on their hands has been cleansed by the sanctity of amnesty! Seems everyone is content with the graveyard peace.

    Since the government has consistently displayed its incompetence and outright lethargy in tackling headlong, the insecurity that has been foisted on the nation by different shades of ‘insurgents’ in the guise of freedom fighters, it is not surprising that the amnesty cry has now moved a notch higher with the recent call by the Sultan of Sokoto, the highly revered Alhaji Muhammed Abubakar (III) , that members of the Boko Haram sect should be granted “total amnesty” by the President Goodluck Jonathan administration for peace to reign in the country.

    Of course, the Sultan did not make the call without reason. He traced the security challenges to a regime of injustice meted out to the people, adding that, with amnesty, members of the sect could lay down their arms and embrace peace. Noting that the government is not under any compulsion to heed his fatherly advice, the Sultan quipped: “Ours is to advise and we will continue advising the government. If they do what they are supposed to do, that would be fine.”

    I am aware that some groups, notably the Ohanaeze Ndigbo, the Afenifere and the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN) have joined issue with the Sultan, querying the propriety of granting a ‘deadly and faceless’ sect amnesty. They have threatened to ‘frustrate’ any move that could lead to a situation where the faceless persons would sit at the round table and parley with Jonathan in Aso Rock. But they miss the point because they are not in power, neither are they in government. In the final analysis, the buck stops on Jonathan’s table. In any case, he is damned to take one decision or the other because this madness, which portends clear and present danger to our collective survival as a nation, simply cannot be allowed to continue.

    Like the Sultan noted, there is no compulsion attached to the request. If the government cannot stop the reign of terror, it can, at least, eat the humble pie and begin some process of rapprochement. Some have argued that such a move implies that the government would be approaching the negotiation table from the position of weakness. But that, to my mind, is balderdash. Did the government negotiate with the Niger Delta militants from the position of strength when it granted them full amnesty with retirement benefits some years back? Were some of the ‘generals’ not faceless until they were flown to Abuja on presidential jet and unveiled to the Nigerian public? Has anyone called for their trial at The Hague for the criminality that they perpetrated whilst in the creeks? Did we raise eyebrows when villains were transformed into instant heroes overnight? Have these persons not become top government business racketeers in and around Abuja today? So, why should such palliative gesture be denied a group that has rendered government impotent in the last three years?

    My advice: It should be clear to those with discerning eyes that amnesty has become another viable business venture that would be exploited by all shades of criminals conversant with the high octane impotence in governance. Since the government cannot continue to offer platitudes at the killings of commoners and the high and mighty, it may as well take a bold step to create a Ministry of Amnesty Affairs, which should be well-funded to settle those holding it by the balls. If that is the only way to stop the daily spilling of innocent blood, then let’s kick the ball rolling. Very soon, ethnic groupings like the Oodua Peoples Congress (OPC) and the Movement for the Actualisation of the Sovereign State of Biafra (MASSOB) would also demand for amnesty, reasonable stipends and foreign training in exchange for their dane guns, AK47s, charms and sheer noisemaking. The oil bunkerers, armed robbers, kidnappers, internet scammers, subsidy thieves, pension fund looters, failed husbands and wives, paedophiles, hired killers and all manner of criminals in the system would have no option but to seek amnesty in exchange for their peace. Let’s face it, if politicians loot the treasury, impoverish the people, spit on their poverty and end up getting ‘justice’ with a slap on the wrist through plea bargaining, why won’t barefaced criminals ask for a slice of the cake for peace to reign since governance has become one hell of a joke? Will there ever be an end to this shameless dance on the graves of lost souls whose spirits crave justice? So much for justice! Wither governance?

  • Memo to the ‘resurrected’ First Lady(2)

    Memo to the ‘resurrected’ First Lady(2)

    And what in the world do they mean by tagging you a murderer of truth? They said you looked at them straight in the face and danced through your lies to the embrace of your husband. They wondered why it took you close to four months to come out with the half-truth, knowing that you never told anyone what you were actually treated for. In that split moment of self-glorification, the truth that had been hidden for months hit us like thunderbolt. By the time you finished the sermon on how you were brought back from the dead, you left us searching for the appropriate words to describe your conduct. Some called you a despicable liar. But I believe that was too harsh. I’d rather put it mildly by saying you were simply being economical with the truth. That’s a nicer way of saying it. It is a special privilege that Nigerian citizens accord top citizens; we are a grateful nation and we dare not accuse the highly-placed of lying from both sides of the mouth. For three harrowing months, you twisted logic and foisted the most incongruous illogic on us. I’ll explain, Ma.

    But first, your words when you mounted the pulpit on that innocent Sunday: “I actually died; I passed out for more than a week. My intestine and tummy were opened. I am not Lazarus but my experience was similar to his own. My doctors said all hope was lost.

    “A black doctor in London who is with us in this service was flown in when the situation became critical. It was God himself in His infinite mercy that said I would return to Nigeria. God woke me up after seven days. I know that some people somehow leaked the information that I was dead. They are people that I trust and rely on; to them, I was dead and I would never return to the country alive. Some of them even sold my things off.

    “I won’t say everything here. It is the Lord’s doing that I returned alive. When God says yes, nobody can say no. People are always afraid of operation (surgery) but in my own case, while my travail lasted, I was begging for it (surgery) after the third operation because I was going to the theatre every day. It was God who saw me through. I did eight or nine operations within one month. It was not an easy one.”

    Now, my observations: Take, for example, the belated comparison of your ordeal to that of Lazarus in the Bible. From Nigeria to the Bible; indeed, you and your ways have come a long way Ma. People said if it was indeed true that you ‘died” for seven days before God’s healing balm touched you through your doctors, then you missed the chance to praise Him by, first, baying for the blood of imaginary enemies on your arrival in Nigeria. They said you went off the cuff by blowing the trumpet of no surgery in Germany when you actually went under doctors’ scalpels more than eight times! They also noted that your confession was lacking in key details and they are asking salient questions—If it was not “that hospital”, which hospital did you stay for the six weeks? If it was not cosmetic surgeryor tummy tuck, what were you treated for? Was it food poisoning as being alleged or could it be common cold and catarrh or even toothache? You see, the ways of VIPS like you never cease to confound us.

    Madam, you missed the point if you think that those asking these questions do not wish you well. On the contrary, they are your true friends—the ones that would never think of selling off your things because you were on a sick bed. They are not even qualified to become business fronts to the high and mighty. All they want from you is to set good examples. They want to see a virtuous woman that would not take God’s mercy for granted. They said your ‘resurrection’ will only have meaning if you begin to truly touch lives positively. For your information, there are too many vulnerable children out there who have no access to basic healthcare; many Nigerians cannot afford treatment for common ailments like malaria and flu; countless others rely on self-medication; and many more have died due to poor healthcare facilities.

    Yet, in this country, billions of dollars are frittered on medical tourism by those who are expected to make the system work. White elephants are erected to satisfy the taste of those in power. These, to my mind, are the physical evidence of wasted billions. Has it ever crossed your mind Ma that that black medical doctor that was flown from the United Kingdom to save your life, and who was probably flown into the country with taxpayers’ money just that he could attend your extravagant thanksgiving ceremony, could have been working in any of our medical facilities if they have not been turned into glorified consulting clinics! It grew so bad that those who loot the public till now travel abroad to give their teeth a clean wash! State governors and their lackeys now retain the services of medical personnel in far-flung countries while the hospitals at home rot away. There is no doubting the fact that your famed ‘resurrection’ must have left more than a modest dent on the nation’s leaky treasury. We, the people, thank God for your life. And in doing that, we hope that we would not have to die before having the chance to exhale….like you just did even if yours was heavily garnished with tissues of lies!

    For the records Ma, I hope you understand that my piece is not an affront. Some people don’t like telling the truth, others don’t like hearing it. The truth hurts for a little while, but lies hurt forever. That you were given a second chance by the Ceeator demands something deeper and ennobling. A little bit of introspection should make it clearer. If only you can take a pulse and reflect on these things, you will understand that your decision to side-kick imaginary enemies devalues the essence of the office. However, in all this, the choice is yours for one lie often begets another. Good enough, truth is eternally triumphant. Make your choice, Ma!