IN the recent interview he gave to The Interview magazine, former Abia State governor, Orji Uzor Kalu, paints a portrait of the Yoruba that is alien to the Southwest-based ethnic group. He says they are united in their politics and project common interests by easily burying the hatchet. He gives the example of former governors Ahmed Bola Tinubu and Babatunde Raji Fashola who he claims glossed over their differences during the latter’s second term because of the mature way they played their politics. Such unity of purpose is distinctly Yoruba, Mr Kalu effuses, and stands in contradistinction to Igbo politics, which he excoriates in rather unflattering terms. According to Mr Kalu: “Let me tell you, there were more problems between (Bola) Tinubu and (Babatunde) Fashola than there were between me and Theodore Orji. But it is the discipline of the Yoruba that kept them at bay…The Igbo have no discipline in terms of politics. They are very good traders; they’re good in anything they do, but they don’t understand politics.”
Predictably, the portraits have created a firestorm, with the Igbo divided in two over Mr Kalu’s stereotyping, and the Yoruba viewing his theory with indifference and quiet amusement. To a section of the Igbo, Mr Kalu was the one who introduced the “traders’ mentality” to politics; but to another section, Mr Kalu’s description of Igbo political behaviour is infallible. On such controversial matters, it seems, there can be no consensus. Nor is one needed. Igbo politics and political behaviour, not to talk of political recruitment, have morphed over the years like the rest of Nigeria. Politics has become less ideological and more commercialised. In view of the convoluted and recurring shifts in alliances and affiliations, politics has changed in ways the First and Second Republic generations could not have imagined.
Mr Kalu’s dreamy portraiture of Yoruba and Igbo politics is a reflection of his inability to keep abreast of the changing dynamics of Nigerian politics, despite the experience garnered from successfully completing two consecutive terms as governor. Nothing demonstrates this lack of exactitude than his terrible misreading of Yoruba politics and worldview. He says had Mr Fashola been Igbo he would have, during his second term, abandoned Asiwaju Tinubu. He obviously holds the impression that the two Yoruba politicians stuck together between 2011 and 2015 regardless of their highly publicised differences. Mr Kalu seems unperturbed that his impression could in fact be exaggerated or altogether misplaced, indeed almost as if he failed to consider the posturing and body language of Yoruba governors and ministers since the All Progressives Congress (APC) won the last elections. And for the former Abia governor to extrapolate Yoruba political behaviour from the Southwest’s Fourth Republic politics alone is really astounding.
History, in fact, shows that the Yoruba are more fractious than the stereotype Mr Kalu concocts. The fractiousness of Yoruba politics all but brought the First Republic to grief. Even the Second Republic, which seemed under Obafemi Awolowo to present a unified and hierarchical politics, was already fraying at the edges before the 1983 polls. What with the internal schisms between the party leadership and the late Bola Ige. Indeed, Chief Awolowo confided in a few friends and associates how exasperated he had become over what he described as the naive and unbridled ambition of some of his protégés, and the covert manner they were undercutting him. As proof of his exasperation, Chief Awolowo indicated he would do nothing about the betrayal he was experiencing because the public would stigmatise him as an inflexible person and leader.
Scouring history further, Mr Kalu will find little to justify his sweeping, if not somewhat romantic, assertions about Yoruba political unity. That unity is a mere facade. If today a Mr Ayodele Fayose extends an olive branch across party lines to Asiwaju Tinubu, it is simply because the political undercurrents, or what is called the undertow, are more powerful than the surface currents of disharmony and conflict. Stereotypes are often unhelpful, considering their facile assumptions and the analytic red herrings they strew across ethnic and political paths. Whether analysts or Mr Kalu takes a deeper, closer look or not at politics among the nation’s big ethnic groups, the fact is that the unpredictability of alliances and affiliations makes stereotypes incompetent barometers of political behaviour. And that includes the Fulani who, stereotypes again suggest, play far more cohesive, mysterious, clandestine and ultimately more effective politics than any other ethnic group. President Buhari, not to say the ethnic and ideological coalition that brought him to office, stands in perfect refutation of that bloated surmise. Mr Kalu seems to base his conclusions on anecdotes. No ethnic group unites around a candidate that does not fire their imagination, whether by the sheer force and charisma of his person or by his inspiring espousal of great ideology. So, no matter how desperately anyone preaches ethnic unity around a person or cause, the Igbo cannot buck that global trend, whether they are skilful traders or not.
Tag: Kalu
-

Kalu oversimplifies Yoruba, Igbo politics
-

EFCC re-arraigns Kalu for allegedly diverting N3.2b Abia funds
Former Abia State Governor Orji Uzor Kalu yesterday lost his bid to avoid being re-arraigned in Lagos for an alleged N3.2 billion fraud.
He had petitioned Chief Judge of the Federal High Court Justice Ibrahim Auta, opposing a bid to transfer his case from the Federal High Court, Abuja, to the Lagos Division.
But the chief judge refused the prayers, paving the way for his re-arraignment before Justice Mohammed Idris sitting in Ikoyi.
The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) re-arraigned Kalu with Udeh Udeogu and Slok Nigeria Limited on 34 counts of money laundering.
They were first arraigned on September 27 before Justice Anwuri Chikere of the court’s Abuja division.
On learning that the case had been transferred to Lagos, Kalu, through his lawyer Prof Awah Kalu (SAN), filed an ex-parte motion seeking leave of court to apply for an order of mandamus to compel the chief judge to reverse the transfer.
He also prayed that the order should operate as “a stay of all actions, matters or issues ancillary to or relating to or pertaining to or connected with the case, pending the hearing and determination of the suit.”
EFCC, Attorney General of the Federation Abubakar Malami (SAN) and Justice Auta are respondents.
In a supporting affidavit deposed to by a lawyer, Ikechukwu Njoku, Kalu said the case, filed after he left office in 2007, suffered delays due to interlocutory appeals.
The former governor said he temporarily relocated to Abuja to face trial, therefore it would be in the interest of justice to let the case remain in Abuja.
The suit, filed after the transfer of the corruption case to Lagos, is still pending in Abuja.
Kalu and his co-accused allegedly diverted about N3.2 billion from Abia State’s treasury while he was governor.
He was said to have allegedly diverted the funds in tranches of N200 million, N50 million, N200 million, N300.8 million, N545 million, N429 million, N288.4 million, N190 million, N157 million, N152.8 million, N100 million, N84 million and N50 milliob between August 13, 2003 and January 12, 2005.
The offence is said to be contrary to Section 17 (c) of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act 2003 and punishable under Section 16 of the same Act.
The EFCC accused Slok Nigeria Limited of conniving with Emeka Abone, said to be at large, to help Kalu retain the allegedly stolen funds in its accounts.
The prosecution said Slok “knew or at least suspected the said Orji Uzor Kalu to have engaged in a criminal conduct.”
Udeogu was accused of helping Kalu to pay part of the allegedly stolen funds into Slok’s account with the defunct FinBank Plc.
They were alleged to have utilised Manny Bank (now Fidelity Bank Plc), Spring Bank Plc, defunct Standard Trust Bank and FinBank, now First City Monument Bank (FCMB) to divert the funds.
In counts one to 10, the accused were alleged to have retained about N2.5 billion in different accounts, which funds were said to belong to the Abia State government.
Kalu was alleged to have, between August 13, 2003, and August 10, 2005, used his company, Slok, to retain N2.5 billion in his account domicilled with the Apapa branch of First Inland Bank.
EFCC said the money formed part of funds illegally derived from the state’s treasury and were converted into several bank drafts before they were paid into Slok’s account.
In counts 22 to 33, Kalu, Udeogu, Slok and Abone allegedly collaborated to conceal the genuine origin of N2.1billion, which formed parts of funds illegally derived from the treasury between August 13, 2003 and August 10, 2005.
The defendants pleaded not guilty.
Kalu’s lawyer Chief Mike Ozekhome (SAN) urged Justice Idris to allow him continue on the bail earlier granted him.
“We are seeking the court’s discretion for the first defendant to continue on the bail granted to him on April 20, 2008 by Justice Adamu Bello.
“Since this matter has started, he has not jumped bail. He is an employer of labour; therefore, he will not undermine this court,” the SAN said.
Udeogu’s lawyer Mr. Solo Akuma (SAN) also urged Justice Idris to allow his client to continue on the bail granted him.
“The second accused person is a retired permanent secretary and his wife is a judge of the Federal High Court,” Akuma added.
Prosecution counsel Mr Adebisi Adeniyi did not oppose the applications.
Justice Idris granted as prayed and adjourned until December 12 and 23 for trial.
-

Kalu to EFCC: you want to convict me at all cost
Former Abia State Governor Orji Uzo Kalu has challenged the planned transfer of the corruption suit against him by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).
He also accused the anti-graft agency of plotting to convict him at all cost.
Kalu, in an October 15 letter through his counsel, Amobi Nzelu, addressed to the acting Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Mr. Ibrahim Magu, said the commission without his knowledge or his counsel requested for the transfer of the case to Lagos.
He said: “There is no justification legally, morally or otherwise for the said transfer if not to secure conviction at all cost and put him into avoidable expenses of moving his defence team to Lagos whenever the case comes up.
“It is also worthy to note that before the said transfer, politicians in Abia State and its environs had predicted at various fora that this matter will be transferred to Lagos where conviction will be secured at all cost.”
The case had resumed before the Justice Anuli Chikere of the Abuja division of the Federal High Court where plea had been taken at the last adjourned date and definite hearing fixed for December 6, 7 and 8.
The letter reads: “Our clients alongside others were arraigned before a Federal High Court, Abuja in 2007. Following rulings which did not go down well with our client, he appealed alongside others up to the Supreme Court via Court of Appeal. The matter was remitted back to the Federal High Court in 2016 by the Supreme Court for trial. The matter was assigned by the Hon. Chief Judge of the Federal High Court to Hon. Justice Anuli Chikere. At the last adjourned date, plea was taken and matter adjourned to the 6, 7 and 8 of December 2016 of definite hearing.
“Both parties departed the court with a view to come back and commence trial on the agreed dates. Surprisingly and behind the back of our client and his defence team, your Commission applied to the Hon. Chief Judge of the Federal High Court for the case to be transferred to Lagos Judicial Division of the Federal High Court.
“It is evidently clear that your Commission went into deep slumber and suddenly woke up to shop for forum convenience. What must have justified this sudden transfer is not far-fetched. Your commission went for a shopping bonanza and arrived at the residence of ‘forum convenience’, hence this request for the transfer to Lagos.”
-
Kalu’s daughter finally picks wedding date
The household of former Abia State governor, Orji Uzor Kalu, is buzzing with preparations for the wedding of their beloved daughter, Neya Kalu. After a long wait, the delectable billionaire daughter is set to tie the nuptial knot with her wedding billed for Wednesday, December 26 2016.Close sources to the family of the diminutive ex-governor said Kalu’s country home will host the ceremony.
Neya and her beau got engaged in August, at a posh restaurant in London. It will be recalled that her first marriage to popular socialite, Chima Anyaso, crumbled like a pack of cards, leading to allegations and counter allegations between the two parties. It was widely believed that Neya’s bid to recover from the shock of the failed union led her to pursue a master’s degree programme at the University of Buckingham. Incidentally, it was there that she met her groom-to-be, Lawrence Iyere, who happens to be a very successful businessman.
Feelers indicate that the groom’s family is leaving no stone unturned as they join the Kalu family to plan a high-octane wedding that promises to be the talk of Abia State and beyond well into the new year.
-

Kalu to tribunal: declare me winner of Abia North senatorial rerun
Former Abia State governor and the Progressive Peoples Alliance (PPA) candidate in the Abia North senatorial rerun, Dr Orji Uzor Kalu, has prayed the Election Petitions Tribunal sitting in Umuahia, the state capital, to decaled him winner of the rerun.
Kalu based his prayer on the fact that he won the election in all the five local government areas in the senatorial district, including his Bende Local Government Area, where he polled majority of the votes.
Under cross-examination by the first respondent’s lawyer, Chief Wole Olanipekun (SAN), as well as Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) counsel, Dr Livy Uzoukwu (SAN), the former governor, who started his seven-hour testimony on Tuesday, said his prayer was for the tribunal to re-compute the result of the rerun and declare him winner.
Kalu said he was confident that if the results were devoid of fraud, allegedly committed by his opponent and his political party, he would win the rerun.
The former governor also prayed the tribunal that it should expunge the votes wrongfully allotted to Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) candidate, Senator Mao Ohuabunwa, since he never earned such votes.
He told the tribunal that the PDP was not joined in the petition because the electoral law did not provide that the party must be joined.
Kalu said he was also aware that his agents did not sign the result sheets, where there were alleged electoral malpractices, adding that there were wards and polling units where the results were cancelled while INEC officials smuggled them into the final results.
The former governor said there was no need for further proof of alleged multiple thumb-printing, ballot box snatching and violations of the electoral law.
He said: “This is because the people who helped to rig the election were arrested and are undergoing trial in courts.”
Addressing reporters outside the court room, Kalu said over 500 hoodlums were arrested during the rerun for alleged electoral fraud and criminal acts.
The former governor said they were facing trial in courts of record.
The petitioner added that he wanted to be in Senate because of his love for Abia North residents and not for personal or selfish reasons.
According to him, his clean record as a former governor qualifies him to represent his people at the Senate.
Kalu hoped the tribunal would ensure justice in the matter, even as he expressed satisfaction with the proceedings.
The former governor urged his supporters not to despair.
He tendered 460 documents, including the result sheets for Ohafia, Arochukwu, Umunneochi and Bende local government areas.
Other documents he tendered included the certified true copies of the charge sheets for those who allegedly committed electoral offences; three newspaper reports on the election; voters’ register for Arochukwu, Bende, Umunneochi and Ohafia local government areas and receipts of payments for the certified true copy of the voters’ register to buttress his claims.
-

Fed Govt files amended charge against Kalu
The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) yesterday, at the Federal High Court, Abuja, filed a 32-count amended charge against former governor of Abia State Orji Kalu, for alleged money laundering.
EFCC in 2007 preferred 96 counts, including money laundering, against the ex-governor, his company, Slok Nigeria Limited, and Jones Udeogo.
Kalu and his co-defendants were accused of diverting the state’s fund while he was governor between 1999 and 2007.
The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that their re-arraignments were stalled following a pending appeal involving the third defendant, Slok Nigeria Limited, at the Supreme Court.
Counsel to the third accused, Chief Solomon Akuma (SAN), told the court of the subsisting appeal at the apex court. He, therefore, urged the court to adjourn the proceedings to allow parties sort out the appeal.
But prosecuting counsel, Mr. Oluwaleke Atolagbe opposed the application. He said Section 306 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA) 2015, prohibited stay of proceedings in a criminal matter at the trial court on account of a pending appeal.
Atolagbe argued that the appeal in question was similar to the two previous appeals involving Kalu and Udoego, which the Supreme Court had decided on March 18.
According to him, the apex court dismissed the accused persons’ objections to the charge preferred against them.
Justice Chikere Anwuli granted the application and subsequently adjourned the suit till June 30.
-

Governors’ extravagant living causing workers’ salary arrears, says Kalu
Former Governor of Abia State, Dr. Orji Uzo Kalu, yesterday attributed the inability of serving state governors to pay workers’ salaries promptly to what he called their propensity to squander public funds on personal luxury.
He spoke with State House correspondents after leading a delegation of investors in the power sector to a meeting with Vice President Yemi Osinbajo at the Presidential Villa, Abuja.
He said some of governors claim as much as N35 million as travelling allowance on one trip.
Unless state governors stop withdrawal of funds as security vote, they will continue to face difficulties to get enough money to fund critical projects in the state, Kalu said
But he said some governors are doing well in developing their states.
On the recent demand for more funds by the governors to meet up with their statutory obligations, Kalu said the demand was unnecessary as states already have sufficient funds to function optimally.
He said: “I think most of these governors are doing very well and some of them also are living in the euphoria of the office. You can see most of them who are very active. I don’t need to count them for you.
“These governors have enough funds to work for their people because if you check, the money drawn as security vote is excessive. They should stop that.
“Unless they stop drawing security vote, they will not have enough funds to work with and most of them are living in absolute luxury. So it is impossible to continue living in this manner.
“Most of the governors are even living in Abuja now. They don’t live in their states. Honestly, if you look at the books very well, for a trip they make, they will take a travelling allowance of N35 million.
“What are you going to do with that. So, how are we going to progress. Not all the governors. I have gone through Rivers, I see that Rivers is hitting the ground. I have gone through Adamawa, and I see Adamawa is hitting the ground.
“I have gone through a few more states, they are hitting the ground. They are working. I don’t speak with sentiments. I don’t speak for anybody. You can see those who are working and those who are not working. Let them sit down and do the job they are elected for.’’
-

British PM should apologise, says Kalu
Former Abia State Governor Orji Uzor Kalu yesterday described the statement credited to British Prime Minister David Cameron, in which he referred to Nigeria as a “fantastically corrupt” country as unguarded.
He said Cameron should apologise for the “unfortunate” statement.
“My attention and that of the Nigerian public have been drawn to the recent statement made by the British Prime Minister, Mr. David Cameron in which he characterized Nigeria as a “fantastically corrupt country” during his briefing to Her Majesty, Queen Elizabeth just before the anti-corruption summit which was attended by President Muhammadu Buhari in London.
“The statements of the British Prime Minister are most unfortunate and unguarded, given the relationship between the Nigeria and Britain, two countries that share very long and deep heritage; and especially as the British PM did not state the basis on which he made such assertion which has now become public. It is also a gross disrespect and a most uncharitable disposition to the Nigerian people who work hard to earn their living and who have made very positive impacts on the lives of British people and their economy. Also, such statements coming from the convener of the summit himself, just before the commencement, suggest that either he doesn’t take the summit serious, or he is deceptive in terms of his commitment to the Nigerian government in the fight against corruption.
“In the light of this, the British Prime Minister should render an immediate and unreserved apology to the Nigerian people and to President Buhari for those embarrassing comments. As a responsible government and former colonists of Nigeria, my advice is that Britain should handle this matter with the required level of responsibility and prudence so as to avoid a possible breakdown of diplomatic relations between the two countries,” Kalu added.
-

Kalu, others to be arraigned May 16
Justice Anwuri Chikere of the Federal High Court, Abuja, has fixed May 16 to arraign ex-Abia State Governor Orji Kalu.
Appearing with Kalu is the ex-Director of Finance in the State House, Udeh Jones Udeogu, and Slok Nigeria Limited, owned by the former governor.
The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) brought a 112 amended charge against them.
EFCC accused Kalu and the others of diverting the state’s funds estimated at about N5.6 billion while they were in office between 1999 and 2007.
The three are to be re-arraigned on the amended charge about seven years after they appeared on a similar charge before Justice Adamu Bello (now retired from the Federal High Court).
Kalu, Slok and Udeogu were first arraigned on July 27, 2007 on a 96-count charge. The EFCC, on February 11, 2008, amended the charge to112 counts.
The defendants challenged the competence of the charge and lost. They also lost at the Supreme Court which, on March 18, dismissed their appeal and ordered them to submit themselves for trial.
Kalu and Udeogu were in court yesterday when the case was called for mention. Dressed in white native attire, Kalu mounted the dock, accompanied by Udeogu.
Prosecution lawyer Oluwaleke Atolagbe handed a copy of the Supreme Court judgment to Justice Chikere and sought time for the prosecution to put its house in order.
Kalu’s lawyer Awa Kalu (SAN) and Solomon Akuma (SAN), who represented Udeogu and Slok, did not oppose the prosecution’s request for adjournment, following which the judge adjourned till May 16 to take defendants’ plea.
A five-man panel at the Supreme Court, while dismissing the appeals by Kalu and Udeogu on March 18, upheld the judgment of the Court of Appeal, Abuja, which also dismissed an earlier appeal by the defendants.
-

MASSOB to Kalu: don’t be deceived by expelled members
Leader of the Movement for the Actualisation of the Sovereign State of Biafra (MASSOB) Chief Solomon Chukwu has warned former Abia State Governor, Orji Uzor Kalu against using Biafra to woo support for his political ambition.
Chukwu who faulted Kalu’s promise to address the problems which gave rise to the agitations, if elected senator, was pessimistic that the former governor would make any impact in the struggle to liberate the people of the old Eastern region.
Chukwu, who spoke through MASSOB’s National Director of Information, Sunny Okereafor, said the former governor does not need to be elected a Senator before he can lend his voice to the problems. He accused him of playing politics with the issue.
His words: “As a former governor and international businessman, Dr. Orji Uzor Kalu does not need to be elected as a senator before lending his voice to the problems which are at the root of the pro-Biafra agitations.
“It is wrong for him to say if he wins election, he will address these problems. That is a political statement. Does Dr. Kalu need to be a Senator before he can appreciate that the people of the former Eastern region have become third class citizens and endangered species in Nigeria? Does he need to be a Senator to know that certain political positions in Nigeria are no go areas for Ndigbo?
“Does he need to be a Senator before condemning the killing of defenseless protesters? Does Dr. Kalu need to get to the Senate before he can speak against the detention of pro-Biafra protesters? What proper dialogue and common ground is he promising when President Muhammadu Buahri has continued to show hatred for Ndigbo? “Rather than playing politics with the issue, it is high time people like Dr. Kalu, and other Igbo leaders speak up to say enough is enough.”
Chukwu warned Kalu not to allow himself be deceived by those he described as “expelled MASSOB members” who may approach him for patronage, stressing that MASSOB is not a political organisation.