Tag: politics

  • ‘Christians have role in politics’

    A Cleric, Rt. Rev. Dapo Asaju, has urged Christians to participate in politics, saying that it is not a dirty game.

    He described the recent victory of former Ekiti State GovernorAyodele Fayose at the poll as the wish of the electorate.

    Asaju, a retired professor and an Anglican Bishop, said:” Darkness will shine, if light refuses to shine. God needs your role in politics, which starts from the youths, who are present here today. You need to register; you need to vote and also wait for your vote to be counted before leaving the polling booths.”

    The Vice Chancellor of the College of Technology, Abeokuta spoke at the 2014 Youth Summit organised by the Christian Conscience Group at the Chapel of Christ the Light, Ikeja.

    Asaju spoke on the theme: ‘Playing second fiddle in your father’s house’. He said: “The Bible gave the provision for the system of government in practice. Christians should be active participants and not the gaping audience.”

    Rev. Asaju said being a clergyman does not forbid him to join the push for  good governance. He said that Christians should support political parties of their choice, adding that they have the numerical strength to effect change in Lagos State.

    The cleric addded: “It is high time Christians got to power because we have the population and that is why we are trusting in your generation to be the change Nigeria seeks. Christ has the best manifesto and you are not inferior to anyone as your dream of being a leader is achievable, only if you make something great of yourself”.

    He said Governor Babatunde Fashola has  laudable projects for the state.  But, he maintained that Christians should support the push for change and good governance. The priest also charge Christians to wake up from their slumber and defend great values germane to good governance..

    Pastor Ituah Ighodalo, the General Overseer of Trinity House, said: “This is the right time Christians should clamour for change, new direction and a new beginning. Christians should not see politics as a dirty game”.

    He said a good Christian governor will be endowed with love, fear of God and sympathy for the common man.

    He urged Christians to register and protect their votes, run for electoral offices and become more politically conscious.

    The Chairman of the group, Chief Enouch Ajiboso, said the group’s aim sole is to bring youths together and work towards changing their life. He advised them to shun unruly behaviour and embrace good mentors.

    He added: “We want the youths to get involved in politics and governance in a positive way and we also have hope in their generations because they are the leaders of tomorrow and they need to be mentored as such.”

  • PhD Scholarships in Politics and International Relations at Cardiff University, 2014

    Cardiff University is inviting application for five partial PhD scholarships in Politics and International Relations. This scholarship is open to UK/EU and Overseas nationals without further restrictions. These studentships consist of £3,996 to be provided in the first year of the PhD programme. The application deadline is 1st August 2014.

    Study Subject(s): Scholarships are awarded in the area of Politics and International Relations within the School of Modern Languages at Cardiff University.

    Course Level: Scholarships are available for pursuing PhD degree level at Cardiff University.

    Scholarship Provider: Cardiff University, UK

    Scholarship can be taken at: UK

    Accreditation: Cardiff University is an accredited university. Cardiff University is accredited by the Russell Group and EUA Universities UK.

    Eligibility: This scholarship is open to UK/EU and Overseas nationals without further restrictions.

    Scholarship Open for International Students: UK/EU and international students can apply for these PhD scholarships.

    Scholarship Description: School of Politics and International Relations at Cardiff University invites applications for five partial PhD Scholarships for Home, EU and International students.

    These scholarships will be awarded on a competitive basis. The scholarships will be awarded to students undertaking a PhD within the School of Modern Languages and will each provide £3,996 as a one-time disbursement in the first year of the PhD.

    Number of award(s): The School of Politics and International Relations at Cardiff University invites applications for five partial PhD Scholarships.

    Duration of award(s): These PhD scholarships will be paid as a one-time disbursement in the first year of the PhD.

    What does it cover? Each studentship consists of £3,996 to be provided in the first year of the PhD programme.

    Selection Criteria: These scholarships will be awarded on a competitive basis.

    Notification: Not Known

    How to Apply: If you wish to be considered, please send an email expressing your interest to: europ-pg-admissions-at-cardiff.ac.uk.

    Scholarship Application Deadline: The application deadline is 1st August 2014.

  • Photo: All political parties summit

    Photo: All political parties summit

  • MPPP promises new dawn in Kwara politics

    Kwara State Chairman of Mega Progressives People Party (MPPP), Sheikh Abd Akeem Opeloyeru has promised a new dawn in the politics of the State.

    He said this while addressing party supporters after the state exco meeting in Ilorin, the state capital over the weekend.

    Opeloyeru said days of politics as usual is over whilst reiterating that MPPP “believes in the tenet of democracy and with it grassroot strength spread across the State.

    MPPP party boss who was a founding member of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in the statea ssured that the party “stands as a formidable party and a party to watch out for in 2015.”

    He said MPPP was ready to wrestle power from the incumbent come 2015 and ensure that credible candidates that have the interest of the people in mind are elected into public office.

  • Politics in the work-place: Are you an owl or a fox?

    To be effective and to survive, managers require leadership competencies which include envisioning, mental energy and stamina, a sense of purpose, ability to continue learning, ability to handle organisational politics, understanding and managing teams, facilitative in approach, being intuitive, change management, communication, stress management, balancing ambition and integrity, etc.

    Countless hours of training, books upon books, academic and non-academic papers and vital units of business education curriculum have been devoted to one of the above competencies/skills or the other.

    However, little has been written about organisational politics, either because many find the subject distasteful or perhaps because it is deemed to be worthy of study.  Neither is it found in the syllabus of any management programme of MBA course that I have come across.  What a waste! It is possible that more people’s careers flounder on the rocks of organisational politics than for many other reasons. Yet it is an area of great interest to practising managers. An exceedingly high proportion of the extra-curricular questions (i.e. those asked in the bar at the end of the day) in most out-of-site training programmes centre on this thorny area.

    Whether we want to admit it or not, the stark reality is that there is heavy, sometimes dangerous politicks, is going on in our establishments and corporations. While it may not be surprising to find it in government institutions and corporations, the academia is not left out. Even the so-called blue chip companies are not left out, including the local subsidiaries of trans-national corporations. In our environment, the basis of the politicking is a little more complex and the instrument of practice can be scary. Organisation politics here is complicated by unbridled nepotism, ethnicity and corruption. It is not unusual for promotions, appointments and postings to be done on one or more of the above considerations rather than merit and competence. And the instrument ranges from the absurd to the macabre-juju, assault, arson and, even, assassination!

     

    So, how can politics be defined and, more importantly, how can it be survived?

    If company politics can be described as ‘the way we do things around here’, then surely it can also be described as ‘the way that we do things to people around here’. It is sad truism that whatever people gather to tackle a task, there will be tension, rivalries, jealousies, hidden agendas and plain old-fashion mischief. Not only do people want to achieve the task their own way, they also want the way that the task is approached to reflect glory in certain specific directions and to help the careers of specific individuals or groups.  It may not be pleasant, but, whether your place of work is a merchant bank or a monastery, it is unavoidable. Indeed, there is evidence to show that the more senior and better educated the participants, the more prevalent and unpleasant will be the politics. At Marks & Spencer’s Head Office in London in the 70s, a number of highly qualified, talented individuals played fast and furious political games.  The reasons? The awesome organisation in its retail stores did not extend to Head Office, where many senior professionals were somewhat under-employed. As the saying goes, ‘the devil makes work for idle hands’, and the spare hours were filled with all sorts of intrigue.

    The concept of political animals is a popular one, and the University of Birmingham has conducted intriguing studies on the nature of these beasts in organisations.  Researchers identified two axes behaviour:

     

    • That of being ‘well-read’ in what was going on politically within the organisation: having an interest in the different factions’ power camps and power plays. The degree to which one was well-read could be high or low

    • That of having an interest in self and the promotion of one’s own aims versus that of having a prime interest in the fortunes and welfare of the organisation.

    With these axes in mind, it then became possible to identify four discrete orientations and to label each with the name of the animal most representative.

     

    Orientation 1:  Here the individual was politically well-read and had a high interest in the fortunes of the organisation rather than self. This individual they labelled the Wise Owl.  Owls are both liked and respected; furthermore, they are seldom hunted and usually survive. There is one downside, however: they do not often get to the head of the forest.

     

    Orientation 2: In this box the individual was well-read and took an active interest in the politics; moreover, the individual promoted him- or herself actively within the organisation. Here we have the Crafty Fox.  The fox is not always popular, for it hunts and it can create mayhem, but usually it is a survivor.  Occasionally, it oversteps the mark and is hunted down, but even fox hunt in the area of southern England where I live are anything to go by, I’m glad to say!)

     

    Orientation 3: In the first of the lower boxes is found the person who is politically ill-read, but who on the other hand has a high degree of self-interest.

    The researchers contemptuously label this individual as the Donkey – both stubborn and stupid.  The donkey is used as a beast of burden, resents it and is seldom thanked.  It never reached the top.

     

    Orientation 4: The final box contains those who are badly read politically, who have no interest in improving their knowledge or skills and yet who continually put the organisation before self, Loyalty, blind loyalty, is the name of the game, and these people are labelled Sheep, unquestioning naive.  It is often happens that the sheep end up in the slaughterhouse.

    So, where is the best position to be politically? Having put this question to a wide variety of executives from different countries and cultures, the answer is invariably ‘just to the right of the Fox/Owl divide (i.e. a combination of both, but being slightly more of a Fox).  In other words, they were saying that you have to know the political forces at work and have to keep up to date with the trends and development here. In addition, you have to know how to play the game in order to appreciate the games was not worth the sacrifice or one’s own personal integrity and self-respect.  So, to survive, the effective leader must be ‘aware’ and must learn to apply this awareness in ethical ways that reinforce the leader’s credibility rather than detract from it. All the essential skills of questioning, listening and above all intuition must be used to the full. Having the antennae out of all times is not being manipulative and does not sacrifice integrity. It is simply being smart.

    Acknowledgement: we have relied heavily on John Maurik, Management Consultant and author, Discovering The Leader in You (McGraw-Hill, 1994) and The Portable Leader (McGraw-Hill, 1997).

     

     

    Olu Oyeniran is the Managing Partner/CEO, EkiniConsult & Associates, Job Search

    And Career Management Consultants and publishers of www.jobsearchskill.com

    Email: oluoye@jobsearchskill.com, jobsearchskill@yahoo. co.uk

     

  • A protest and its politics

    A protest and its politics

    Imagine if there were no relentless #BringBackOurGirls protests, the unfortunate 276 Chibok schoolgirls whose story has captivated the world would have long been forgotten – another statistic in an brutal insurgency which government informs us has claimed 12,000 Nigerian lives.

    Imagine if the hashtag activists and the local and foreign media had not stayed on this case, the Chibok girls would have disappeared from the radar of national discourse to be replaced by politicians jostling for 2015 ascendancy.

    Who, for instance, remembers that a few months ago 19 job-seeking youths perished after a badly-bungled Nigeria Immigration Service (NIS) recruitment exercise? One or two weeksof outrage and a country used to Boko Haram killing hundreds for fun, quickly returned to business as usual.

    In some other land someone would have taken responsibility for the scandalous exercise and done the decent thing by resigning. In April, South Korea’s Prime Minister, Chung Hong-won, quit over the ferry tragedy in which over 180 died. He offered his resignation over criticism of the government’s handling of the sinking of a passenger ferry.

    Announcing his departure, Chung said the “cries of the families of those missing still keep me up at night”. The right thing for me to do is to take responsibility and resign as a person who is in charge of the cabinet.”

    Both President Goodluck Jonathan and his Minister for Interior, Abba Moro, consider it a light thing that 19 Nigerians are killed by the acts of omission and commission of government officials. That is why no one has been called to account.

    All over the world whenever a politician or government is caught up in some damaging scandal or controversy, their desire is that the issue quickly disappears or that the media would lose interest. Sometimes they get their wish as something more newsworthy breaks and the media moves on.

    But it doesn’t always work that way. Occasionally the public is transfixed by an issue and once the press sinks in its teeth it doesn’t let go easily. When that happens, those on the receiving end quickly resort to blaming imaginary enemies for their errors of judgment.

    The Chibok schoolgirls saga is one such matter that is not going to disappear from the front pages irrespective of what the president, his party or the military think of the #BringBackOurGirls protests and those they imagine are driving it.

    Nothing will please the president and his party men more than if the protesters disappeared from Abuja parks where they have been keeping the plight of the girls alive in the world’s consciousness. Their persistence is so un-Nigerian given that we are a people blessed with conveniently short memory. We hardly fight for anything – especially if the process would cause us pain.

    That is why a succession of rulers who understood our psyche never took our “uprisings” over petrol price hikes and sundry matters seriously. They always took the cynical position that in a mere three days people would run out of steam. As hunger pangs begin to bite the ranks of the would-be “revolutionaries” will start to crack. In these instances mass poverty in the land became a tool in the hands of the rulers.

    Now that the hashtag activists have refused to stop making government uncomfortable with their protests, the tried and tested Abuja formula is to use thugs ostensibly exercising their own right to protest to muscle out the original demonstrators. That was essentially what played out last week when a bunch of clowns parroting the narrative of the government set upon #BringBackOurGirls protesters.

    After Oby Ezekwesili’s group decided to march on Aso Villa with the campaign to free the girls, President Jonathan headed off a potentially awkward confrontation by sending his Minister of State for Federal Capital Territory (FCT) and a couple of others to tell the protesters that they had better address their demands to Boko Haram.

    It was also not surprising to find Chief of Defence Staff, Air Marshall Alexander Badeh, addressing very supportive “protesters” last week. The very friendly bunch he spoke with bore banners singing praises of the military and denouncing its critics. It all lines up perfectly with the narrative emanating from Defence Headquarters which views every unflattering portrayal of its handling of the war in the North East as part of some dark conspiracy.

    To top it off, everyone from the president to very senior figures within the ruling People’s Democratic Party (PDP) have reverted to the old line that the insurgency was not only manufactured by the opposition, the undying global #BringBackOurGirls campaign was another sinister maneuver by the ever resourceful All Progressives Congress (APC).

    Information Minister, Labaran Maku and Senator Ita Ennang have suggested, incorrectly and mischievously, that the protests have been led largely by members of APC. They also claim that they only happen in states controlled by the opposition!

    The other day I noticed Mrs. Maryam Uwais, wife of the former Chief Justice of Nigeria, speaking for the campaigners. That clearly means she’s picked up an APC membership card unbeknownst to many! There are lots of decent Nigerians backing these protests and they should feel offended by this attempt by desperate Abuja politicians to dismiss their genuine concern for these innocent children who are in their second month of captivity.

    In any event, being a member of the APC does not strip a Nigerian of his constitutional right to protest. Since the ruling party insists on pushing this ludicrous line, I would suggest they start their own global #Boko HaramReturnOurGirls campaign. That will put APC in its place, give Jonathan a good night’s sleep and make Abubakar Shekau drive back to Chibok to deliver the girls posthaste!

    First Lady, Patience Jonathan, obviously ventilating what the thinking in the corridors of Aso Villa was, famously set the tone when in the early days of the protests she warned demonstrators to “keep it in Borno State.” Unfortunately for those who would like the protesters to disappear even when the Chibok girls have not returned, the dog has long bolted from the kernel.

    This thing can no longer be contained by the usual crude strong arm tactics or by demonising the opposition. The powerful human story of these girls still trapped in the grip of an unstable terrorist has become an international cause célèbre. The only thing that will end the protests is the safe return of the girls. Those who say we should direct our protests to Boko Haram just don’t get it.

    As terrorists the group has done its ugly bit by snatching the girls. It is the responsibility of the government to protect Nigerians and to bring the girls. The buck stops at their table and it is to them that our demands will continue to flow. The direction of the calls for action can only be reversed once the government says it has ceded its constitutional responsibility to the sect.

    License to torture

    It’s been a long time since I looked with such anticipation to getting my picture taken. In the age of the selfie you would think that a snap or two would be no big deal. But this was no ordinary photograph. I was rushing to a Federal Road Safety Commission (FRSC) office on Lagos Island to get my visage “captured” as part of the final phase of the long process of renewing my driver’s license.

    I had heard horror tales from many who had managed to snag the new license, but nothing prepared me for the sight that greeted me that wet morning. My heart sank as I entered a hall where a tense crowd of between 200 and 300 persons was anxiously waiting for proceedings to take off. Helpfully, the official directing affairs assured that some of us might be there till 8.00 pm!

    As the process chugged along slowly, I tried to make sense of the seemingly chaotic comings and goings – convinced there had to be method to what was unfolding before our collective eyes. Predictably, it didn’t take long for frustrations to boil over.

    The longwinded official was having a hard time controlling a bunch of obdurate Nigerians who wanted to be served immediately. But even the more amenable were getting irritable because they had been coming and going, and today did not look like it was going to end well.

    At some point, a bunch of us were asked to return later in the afternoon. I dashed across town only to return to be confronted with a crowd that had only marginally shrunk. By this time some were already cursing a country where nothing works – wondering why they had to spend days just to get a picture taken.

    When it was 4.00 pm a group of us were informed that it was in our best interest to return the following Monday. Shoulders drooping we trooped out dreading the prospect of another day going through the same process.

    There is something dreadfully wrong with the way the driver’s license is currently being processed. It is crying for urgent reform. Whatever it was designed to achieve, it is also resulting Nigerians being treated in way that is akin to torture. Valuable man hours are being wasted on the process and it doesn’t have to be so: except if we are being told that making the process cumbersome is an end in itself. FRSC help!

    Rebasing revisited

    I am one of those who took a positive view of the rebasing of our GDP – an exercise that saw Nigeria overtaking South Africa as the continent’s largest economy. That said I refuse to get carried away and join those who now think we are a rich country because a handful of individuals own private jets.
    Perspectives like this one by British Member of Parliament, John Redwood, might help. In a blog not too long ago, he said: “We have recently learned that following a recalculation of GDP for Nigeria, it emerged last year as Africa’s largest economy with a GDP of $509 billion. It overtook South Africa in terms of total output, but still remains a long way behind in per capita income given the much greater population in Nigeria.
    “What should give us pause for thought is how small this output still is for a country of 170 million people. It means Nigeria’s output is still lower than London’s, with just 8 million people. It should put our criticisms of the UK economy into context, and reminds us how much more there is to do to tackle poverty in other parts of the world.”

  • Boko Haram, politics and a dishonest world

    JUDGING from headline news about daily Boko Haram killings in Nigerian newspapers this week alone, one would wander why foreign nations like the US and Britain have not asked their citizens to flee Nigeria or avoid it like a plague altogether, instead according that dubious honour with alacrity to Thailand where a coup took place during the week. Yet both Nigeria and Thailand are vibrant democracies where elections are the identifying hall marks although the difference as shown this week is that while the Thai army has suspended the constitution, it has not included the part that concerns the key part of Thailand’s stability, which is the Thai monarchy. On the other hand, in Nigeria according to reports, the army chief of finance at a military training course for army accountants lamented that the army cannot defeat Boko Haram because it was underfunded and bureaucracy was hampering the release of even the meagre funds to an embattled army expected to end the Boko Haram horror swiftly, by first finding and bringing home safely our 200 Chibok girls. Obviously the difference is clear in the workings of the democracies of Thailand and Nigeria and that is food for thought today. We will however top the menu to be served with an icing on the cake in terms of the US involvement in Nigeria and its recent criticism that only the US is helping Nigeria on Boko Haram while the globally vocal France and Britain are yet to show up in Nigeria to contain Boko Haram as announced with fanfare since the unfortunate abduction of the Chibok girls last month. In all these situations we are going to show how good faith and honesty were lacking in the governance of the nations mentioned as well as their accomplices, not only in the practice of democracy but also in the conduct of diplomacy. We end up with some comments on Egypt’s presidential elections this week end, where populist democracy is being buried as the army chief returns in a key election, in a new democracy that puts priority on the security and stability of Egypt, rather than the sort that saw out former Egyptian dictator Housni Mubarak in Egypt in 2011. Which also was the kind that the army stamped out so, nastily albeit bloodlessly in Thailand this week. Starting with Nigeria, it must be said that in spite of the Boko Haram horror and the showing of CNN reporters in the hamlets of Chibok patrolling with vigilante groups at night, the president is yet to visit Chibok even though whole world has taken the plight of the Chibok girls to heart. The reason is quite clear. One does not need presidential spokesmen to clarify that this president is seeking re election and even though containing Boko Haram is in focus, it is not in contention with that democratic pursuit .So the politics of re election must go on willy nilly and in spite of Boko Haram and the Chibok girls. This surely explains why the president was reported to have told demonstrators in Abuja that they should direct their protests on the Chibok girls at terrorists and not his government as done in other places experiencing terrorism. In addition the president cannot be expected to lose key states where elections are expected soon to a rampaging opposition that is far ahead and proactive in proffering solutions to Nigeria’s numerous socio economic and political problems while being burdened with the issue of Boko Haram when, anyway, the government has renewed the State of Emergency which the governors of the three states of the North East never wanted. More importantly the Americans have brought in drones and anti terror experts stationed in neighbouring Chad and would soon take care of Boko Haram while the business, or is it politics, of governance and re election go on as usual and undisturbed. Which makes plain common sense although the huge security and stability implications are there for all to see. Thailand’s democracy however was a different kettle of fish before the army intervention this week. Too many demonstrations by pro and anti government forces represented by the red and yellow shirts and election by proxy by the Shinawatra family of the former Prime Minster wanted for corruption in Thailand, paralysed business and the Thai economy such that ordinary Thais are relieved by the intervention of the army. Of course the Thai politicians have themselves to blame, as from Thailand’s political history they knew that the army could always come in. They could even have been invited by the monarchy which like that of Britain is very much revered in Thailand. So, in brief, on Thailand let the politicians rue their excesses in terms uncontrolled, frequent and paralysing demonstrations for now and hope to strike a deal with the military soon, so as not to prolong military rule. As said earlier, it was reported widely this week that US Secretary of State John Kerry took a rare swipe at France and Britain over their promised help to help Nigeria fight Boko Haram and find the abducted Chibok girls. John Kerry spoke at an anniversary dinner in the US and noted that France criticised the US for not attacking Syria over the use chemical weapons by the Bashar Assad regime after Kerry had elaborately shown the civilised world that the American government had ample evidence to punish Assad. Obviously Kerry was trying to tell the French who know more about the Sahel where Boko Haram is operating to be more forthcoming in helping Nigeria to fight Boko Haram as promised instead of developing cold feet at the last minute. At least the US Secretary of State wants France to use the same zeal it used to put pressure on the US to attack Syria on chemical weapons earlier, on its promise to help Nigeria fight Boko Haram in its backyard in Africa . Which really in recent times, given the decisive French military interventions in Mali and Central African Republic, is what ECOWAS sub region or the treacherous Sahel and its creeping desert where Boko Haram and militant Islamists operate with impunity, have become for France in Africa. Definitely as a concerned Nigerian I do not think the US Secretary of State is asking too much of France this time around and would appreciate a quick and positive French rethink on the matter to save Nigeria from terrorism. Lastly the presidential election in Egypt provides another dubious face of democracy very much tied to security and political stability. The presidential elections have two candidates but one of them is there just to make up the numbers. The Egyptian army is mid -wifing the delivery of its erstwhile boss former Field Marshal Fatah El Sisi as the next elected president of Egypt. Not surprisingly, move is viewed with relief and satisfaction by most Egyptians after the tumult and violence of two street revolutions that overthrew former dictator Housni Mubarak who was deposed in 2011 and replaced by elected president Mohammed Morsi of the Muslim Brotherhood which has now been branded and outlawed in Egypt as a terrorist organisation and its members sentenced to death en masse in recent times. Today, the fate of both Mubarak and Morsi are extremely different while that of Egypt is being put firmly in the hands of Sisi by the ongoing presidential elections. Morsi is awaiting trial for treason and in prison and the penalty for that is the death penalty. Mubarak on the other hand is in military custody and was this week fined pittance and jailed three years for corruption and massive embezzlement while in power for almost three decades. It is clear that under Sisi, Egypt will slide back to a highly controlled democracy that puts human rights at arms length while guarding and protecting jealously its stability and security against its own version of Boko Haram which is the Islamic Brotherhood which it has driven underground again by banning. So Egypt has defined its own democracy on its own terms which was what then Field Marshal Sisi told a Pentagon official when he asked the Americans to see Egypt through Egyptian eyes. Now those eyes will be converted or metamorphose to another round of Pharaonic democracy when the rituals of democracy confer the presidency of Egypt on Sisi in this presidential election in the mould of past elections that created a long line of military dictators. Its pedigree goes back to the late Gamal Abdel Nasser, Anwar Sadat, and Housni Mubarak with the Muslim Brotherhood condemned to political perdition and its formerly elected president Mohammed Morsi awaiting the call of the executioner. Really under these circumstances it is very difficult to say long live Egyptian or Pharaonic democracy. Yet, this is the destiny of Egypt in the ensuing Sisi presidency after this election. Sadly to me this is vintage democratic fraud and farce at its best and one can only wonder what will happen next in Egypt, in the name of democracy.

  • Vacuous politics

    Vacuous politics

    It must be symptomatic of the fallen standard of education in Nigeria today that the quality of political discourse has dropped to an unbelievably pedestrian level. Public comments are devoid of neither rigour nor intelligence, while criticisms are stark and devoid of such nobility of purpose that serve the overall interest of a nation. The atmosphere is therefore suffused with knee-jerk remarks and unintelligible utterances made only for the sake of their noise and nuisance values. In the end, not the parties or the society is enriched.
    All the political parties have in some degrees not been up to par in their information management and dissemination strategies. However, the Peoples Democratic Party’s (PDP) comment in the wake of the bomb blast in Nyanya, Abuja, mid-month must be the lowest limits. As acrid smoke still billowed from what may probably be the worst terror attack on the nation, the PDP spokesman, Chief Olisa Metuh, released what will pass for the most unconscionable political statements in recent times off-handedly blaming the opposition All Progressives Congress (APC) for the attack.
    The PDP’s statement reads in part: “We stand by our earlier statements that these attacks on our people are politically motivated by unpatriotic persons, especially those in the All Progressives Congress (APC) who have been making utterances and comments, promoting violence and blood-letting as a means of achieving political control. Nigerians are also aware of the utterances by certain APC governors which have been aimed at undermining our security forces and emboldening insurgents against the people.
    “Those who have been promoting violence through their utterances can now see the monster they have created. They can now see the end product of their comments; a country flowing daily with the blood of the innocent. The question is how do they feel when they see the mangled and blood-soaked bodies of their victims? How do they feel when they hear the voices of the dying and injured? Of course they feel nothing. Their hearts have been hardened and they are embittered by the fact that they have been rejected by the people. They are bitter because the people have chosen to rally round the government they love and voted for; but must they choose the path of violence and blood-letting as a response to the wishes and aspirations of the people?”
    There must be a limit to party propaganda and political bombast. The charred and mangled bodies of nearly 100 innocent citizens cannot be the platform for scoring cheap political points or engaging in childish blame game. Have we descended to the level of playing politics with death and destruction; with our collective national calamities? Metuh made his vacuous statement even as the nation wept and compatriots were still in the vast motor garage sorting pieces of flesh from personal effects. The ruling party would make wild accusations against fellow countrymen while condolence messages were streaming in to Nigeria from across the world.
    Metuh had made such weighty allegations based merely on specious, circumstantial grounds with nary a strand of evidence. Politicking while the nation is in deep sorrow may well be an attempt to cover up PDP’s failure in the past three years to curb this incipient terror that has brought the country to her knees. But this cancerous insurgency may well have its roots in the PDP as was noted by the late former National Security Adviser, General Owoye Azazi.
    While we admonish all parties to endeavour to raise the level of public political engagement in the interest of the nation, the ruling PDP has a higher, bounden duty to show better example.

  • Politics is about development, not trading words, Jonathan insists

    Politics is about development, not trading words, Jonathan insists

    President Goodluck Jonathan Thursday again advised politicians in the country to focus their attention on development rather than engaging in insults and abuses.

    Jonathan had recently made similar remarks when Anambra State Governor, Peter Obi and other delegates from the state paid a courtesy call on him at the State House, Abuja.

    The President gave the new advise Thursday while speaking at the commissioning ceremony of the 3- lane 48 kilometers long Katsina Ring road in Katsina State.

    According to him, politics is about infrastructural development and creating an enabling environment for businesses to thrive and not about shouting on the pages of newspapers.

    Jonathan, who is in Katsina on a two-day state visit, hailed the foresight and infrastructural drive of the Ibrahim Shema- led administration in the state.

    He said: “Shema is a great supporter of the administration. He is also a great member of the party. This project is being commissioned at a time most states and even the Federal Government are lacking funds to carry out big projects.”

    “I commend you for your efforts. Politics is all about development. It’s not about insulting ourselves and shouting in newspapers. Politics is about providing infrastructure for the people and creating the enabling environment for business to thrive,” he said.

    He thanked the people of the state for the love they have extended to him since he became President.

    Speaking earlier, Governor Ibrahim Shema commended the President’s efforts in developing power, railway and water, stressing that his administration has done so much to transform the state.

    His administration, he said, since inception constructed 49 roads across the state and dualised 7 local government roads, while many jobs were also created during implementation of the projects.

    According to him, his administration has spent N74 billion on road construction since inception.

    The Commissioner for Works in the state, Abdulaziz Isa Kaita noted that the 3- lane 48 kilometers ring road was started in 2009 and completed in 2013 by the state government without borrowing any money.

    The road project, he said, contained a drainage system, independent water system and solar powered lighting.

    The President’s plane landed at the Umaru Yara’adua Airport by 10:30am and was received by the host governor, the Minister of Mines and Steel, Musa Sada, Information, Labaran Maku, State for Works, Ambassador Bashir Yuguda, Agriculture, Dr Akinwunmi Adesina as well as former Minister of State for finance, Dr Yerima Ngama

    Former governors, Ibrahim Ahmed Shekarau (Kano), Attahiru Dalhatu Bafarawa (Sokoto) and Abdulkadir Kure (Niger) were also at the airport to receive the President.

    .

     

  • ‘Women must not take back seat in politics’

    ‘Women must not take back seat in politics’

    Amina Abdulazeez made history when she was elected the first woman to occupy a seat in the Students’ Representative Assembly of the Usman Danfodiyo University, Sokoto (UDUS), Students’ Union Government (SUG). The final year student of Political Science, who is also the Vice President of the union, speaks with HALIMAH AKANBI (200-Level Law) on the legacy she wishes to bequeath.

    Can you tell us your background?

    I was born in Birnin Kebbi, where I had my primary and secondary education. I hold a diploma in Public Administration. I am the first lady to be elected a member of the Students’ Representative Assembly in Usman Danfodiyo University. I am also the Vice President of the Students’ Union.

    What prompted your interest in politics?

    Naturally, I have passion for activism. So by implication, this makes me to join campus politics. In fact, I was called upon by my colleagues to participate in students’ unionism because of my pedigree. Specifically, I started politics when I was in the polytechnic; I contested for Social Director. Although, I lost the election, but since then I have never looked back. Honestly, I realised that for people to be agents of change, somebody has to take up the gauntlet first and carry other people along.

    How does your course of study help your interest in politics?

    Not really. But I can say that being a student of political science has helped me to better understand the dynamics of campus politics. It has also helped to identify challenges facing students and the huge expectations from everybody to deliver. Political Scientists are seen as doctor of all political ailments and see issues from the right perspective.

    Given your experience so far, would you advise women to participate in politics?

    Yes. I want them to take active role in campus politics. The campus is not meant for male students alone. Ladies should not join politics to fill up the quota; they are stakeholders. They must be part of the people determining where the pendulum of service should swing. They must not take the back seat when it comes to political participation. I was inspired to contest for a seat in the Students’ Representative Assembly because I discovered that no lady had been there before and presently, as the Vice President, I am working with the present legislators to sponsor a bill that would reserve at least a slot for female from each faculty.