Tag: Ribadu

  • Ribadu steps down for Dankwambo for Gombe North

    The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) senatorial candidate for Gombe North, Mohammed Usman Ribadu, has withdrawn from the race.

    This makes it more likely for Governor Ibrahim Dankwambo to contest the election.

    Dankwambo lost out in the PDP presidential primary.

    Ribadu, who is Commissioner for Special Duties, said Dankwambo is more qualified to represent Gombe North at the Senate.

    But the governor said he will make consultations before accepting Ribadu’s ‘gift’.

    He said: “I want to make consultations because I spent eight years as governor and I want to rest to enjoy the remaining years I have in life,” he said.

    Dankwambo also described the victory of Atiku Abubakar at the PDP presidential primaries as a victory for the Northeast.

     

  • How to resolve farmers/herders crisis, by Tinubu, Ribadu, Sani

    All Progressives Congress (APC) stalwart Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu yesterday listed the search for water as one of the major causes of the clashes between farmers and herders.

    Tinubu noted that water, or more accurately the lack of it, is at the heart of consistent conflicts between farmers and herders in parts of the country.

    He suggested both short and long term solutions to the lingering crisis that has left many dead and others displaced.

    Also yesterday, a former Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Mallam Nuhu Ribadu, said that because the nomadic Fulani have not been integrated into the country, they had been moving in search of land where they will be regarded and treated as other Nigerians.

    Ribadu underscored the fact that it was wrong to ascribe the clashes to President Muhammadu Buhari.

    He said that it was obvious that the native Fulani were angry with President Buhari for allegedly turning his back on them and not giving them audience like he does to other groups.

    Tinubu and Ribadu spoke at a two-day national summit on conflict resolution organised by The Nation and Television Continental  (TVC) as part of their contribution to finding a lasting solution to the bloody farmers/herders clashes.

    Speaking through a Federal Executive Commissioner (South West) in the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC), Mr. Sunday Dare, Tinubu said the  government must sustain wise policy and action to keep peace and prevent violent recurrences.

    According to him, the government must also maintain reasonable and effective military and law enforcement presence in the affected areas.

    The security operatives, he said, should work with leaders of the herders and the farmers in the communities as well as traditional and religious leaders.

    On the long term solution, Tinubu said that Nigeria needed to take the lead for Africa in international fora dealing with climate change as well as develop what he called “water catchment and conservation systems”.

    Tinubu said: “My contribution will not be filled with statistics, graphs and figures. It will have more of a conceptual or strategic bent.

    “I take this route because the challenges we discuss are complex and encompass more than meets the eye.

    ”In order to adequately address these challenges, we must sufficiently define what they are.

    ”Sensational media headlines and much of public opinion have concluded that the conflict between herders and farmers is inherently a religious or ethnic scrum.

    ”This conclusion is understandable. The most visible thing seen are two groups predominately of different religions and ethnicities contending against each other.

    ”However, wisdom counsels against hasty conclusions. Sometimes that which is unseen is more important than that which is visible.

    ”For instance, gravity and the magnetic field affect everything we do but we cannot see these fundamental forces of the physical universe. Yet, anyone who walks to the edge of tall building, but refuses to keep gravity in mind may quickly find that he has sacrificed himself to his own ignorance.

    ”Perhaps this conflict is not birthed of the religious identities of its antagonists as zealots on both sides of this equation would have us believe.

    “Such a description might fit their notions of religious intolerance and bigotry but it is likely too simplistic to be correct.

    “Instead, we should ponder whether this conflict is but the manifestation of deeper forces at work. This conflict, for the most part, is not born of religious or ethnic differences.

    ”Many things contribute to this situation. However, if you forced me to identity one factor, I would do so in one word. And that word is:  Water. Or, more accurately, the lack of it.

    ”Our physical bodies are predominately water as are the bodies of the flora and fauna we depend on for our existence.

    Water-based ecosystem

    “Our ecosystem is a water-based one. A civilisation’s success is keenly determined by its relationship with and management of water.

    ”Too much water – like in the tsunamis, hurricanes and floods seen across the globe – often kills man.

    ”Conversely, insufficient water turns man into a killer of himself.

    ”Throughout recorded history, civilisations have risen and fallen with changed rain patterns, with droughts and floods.

    ”What does that mean in the Nigerian context?

    “Perhaps through a combination of the natural climate cycle and man-made climate change, weather extremes are more frequent.

    ”When it rains, it floods. When dry season comes, little water is to be found. Land becomes swiftly parched as if water never ministered to it.

    ”In the North once marginally arable land has turned too barren to sustain life. Cattle herders, mostly unaware of this phenomenon called climate change, still sense something is wrong.

    “Places they once took their cattle are now nothing but blasts of hot air and inedible dust.

    ”Of necessity as they see it, they drive their herds onward, further south toward water and greenery.

    “But also toward farmers and their farmlands. Each year, the desert eats up thousands upon thousands of acres of land.  This pushes herders and even some farmers southward.

    ”The result is that an increasing number of people and livestock seek to extract from a dwindling amount of fertile land enough water and feed to sustain themselves.

    ”This is a recipe for increased competition and conflict. Violence is almost inevitable in this situation of diminishing vital resources.”

    Not unique to Nigeria

    In the view of the former Lagos State governor, ”this scenario is not unique to Nigeria”. “Other  West African nations suffer it”.

    ”In some of these nations, both farmers and herders are of the same religion but that affiliation does not thwart conflict,” Tinubu said, adding:

    ”An acutely thirsty man remembers neither Bible nor Quran very well until his thirst is quenched.

    “Dire need often pushes a man to behave as if bereft of compassion for a person in equally dire circumstance.

    ”No doubt the problem has exacerbated during the past decade. We must assume climate change plays a role.

    ”Those of us who herald globalization and tout its promised rewards, better take a step back and lower the volume of their cheerleading just a bit.

    ”For climate change is but a portion of the malign underside of globalisation.

    “Africa now bears the greatest ecological brunt of a globalisation that has not even rendered to Africa its just economic rewards.

    ”First, Africa is shorted by the unequal exchange of its natural resources for more expensive finished goods.

    ”Compounding the injury, our weather patterns have been made to pay the price for the relative opulence of the West.

    ”This is not to absolve Nigeria and Africa of its share of the blame. We do not tend our environment sufficiently. We are guilty of wasteful, sometimes harmful, misuses of our land.

    “However, the damage done by others to the global ecosystem dwarfs our missteps.

    ”Thus, while we rightly see the situation as an immediate crisis that must be decisively and swiftly resolved so as to save lives, we must also see it as an alarm, requiring us to devise even more long-term changes that protect our people from environmental degradation.”

    Tinubu noted that though the violence has thankfully subsided, the government must sustain wise policy and action to keep peace and prevent violent recurrences.

    He advocated “a comprehensive remedial/rehabilitation strategy for victims of the violent crisis.”

    The government, he stressed, must help herders gradually shift from their traditional nomadic existence to a more static lifestyle.

    Tinubu said: “We have to face the reality that modernity is making the nomadic way counterproductive and inefficient.

    ”Unoccupied, isolated land can quickly be turned into grazing areas in the affected states.

    “In the long run, this will enable herders to better maintain their livestock and thus their own livelihoods.

    Forum for farmers/herders

    ”Government should establish a permanent panel as a forum for farmers and herders to discuss their concerns and identify ways to mitigate contention.  This will also help educate the general public.”

    The APC leader, who preferred long term solution to the crisis of herders/farmers clashes, said: “Nigeria needs to take the lead for Africa in international fora dealing with climate change.

    “Water catchment and conservation systems must be developed. This includes the prudent use of dams and irrigation sub-systems maintainable at the local level.

    ”More water efficient farming techniques must be employed. Projects to protect the land for additional desertification must take adequate priority.”

    He noted, however, that “these recommendations are suggestive and not at all comprehensive.”

    ”However, I think they convey the idea that dealing with the immediate crisis is essential. But we also must position ourselves to deal with these larger forces, which are at the deepest root of this challenge.

    “If we cannot get to this root, our short-term efforts may be successful but over time they will be of decreasing utility.

    “This is a problem that is mostly not of your doing but one that you must solve for the future of this nation and its people.

    ”If you allow your greatness as a nation to show, you shall succeed in securing the benefits of a good life and suitable environment for people and generations to come.  That is the Nigeria I see and believe in.”

    Ribadu on nomadic Fulani

    To Ribadu, Nigeria’s major challenge is that most of the nomadic Fulani do not have a place to call their own and are, therefore, constantly on the move in search of land for their animals.

    Ribadu said that apart from the nomadic education programme put in place by the government a few years ago, there has not been any concrete effort to integrate the nomadic Fulani into the scheme of things.

    He said “As a developing country, we will continue to have challenges and problems. But it is important for us to address the problems confronting us. Whatever we are going through, other countries have gone through it. Why don’t we look at what we must do.

    “Nomadic tribes are not new. They exist all over the world. Most of the native tribes of America are nomads. In India alone, we have about 350 nomadic tribes. Even in sub Saharan Africa, there are nomadic tribes. If you go to the southern part of Africa, you go to Kenya, Tanzania and other places you have nomadic tribes up to Namibia.

    “There had always been a problem and they were able to do something about it. But the question is, why have we not been able to address it? In Namibia, we had a big problem too of nomadic and pastoralists.

    “Nomads are normally landless people who have animals to take care of and, in doing that, there is likely going to be a problem. There is also the issue of continuous migration and the attendant problem on ecology and this has continued to put pressure on the system. That is why in Nigeria today, there has been a problem and we have failed to address the fundamental issue.

    “We forget that people who are landless will continue to be a problem and part of the problem we are facing today is these people fighting to say we are part of this country. They want a place of their own where they will be taken care of, but there is resistance. That is why you see what is going on in Zamfara, Birnin Gwari and most of the places.

    “The Fulani in the town who claim to be part of them, or even their traditional rulers who claim to be their leaders, don’t understand what they are going through. They are people who are completely out of everything.

    “You can hardly see any nomadic Fulani man that is part of state assembly or the National Assembly and they form about 15 to 20 million of the population and they are marginalised. They are not in any way benefiting from what is happening in the country today.”

    According to Ribadu, “there has been only one attempt to address the problem and that was the nomadic education programme”.

    “ Many of those who participated in the nomadic education programme are PhD holders today and those are working are helping their communities. Other than that, I have not seen any effort geared towards solving their problem.

    “The crisis of the nomadic Fulani are even more at home with non Fulani communities. Today, because of the problem of internal migration, they will rather go to the southern part of Nigeria and stay there and live in comfort because of the insecurity in northern Nigeria.”

    Buhari not part of it

    Defending President Buhari against allegations of supporting his Fulani brothers, he said “People have continued to misunderstand what is going on. President Buhari has nothing to do with what is going on. In fact, the Fulani are even angry with him because they think he has abandoned them. They think he is listening to the others and that he gives audience to the people from Benue, Plateau and never gave them audience.”

    The Senator representing Kaduna Central, Shehu Sani, said the political elite must decide the type of country they wanted to preside over.

    Sani insisted that the political elite should make concerted efforts to address the security challenges facing the nation.

    Sani said: “We must look for how best we can solve these problems that has become cancerous in our society today. It is to the knowledge of every person that in the last twenty years there has been Forum and fora that provided opportunity for people to dissect the problem and proved solutions. Naturally, we are not a country that is short of solutions.

    “The problem is that a problem exists in our country and the solution exists in our group. So, the disconnect between problems and solutions kept us running round the circle of violence, bloodshed and hostilities that has become part of our daily lives.

    “If we are serious as a country determined to address these problems, it is something that we could have achieved. But it has always been talk, talk and talk with no solution in sight. The political establishment in this country must decide for themselves which kind of country they want to be saddled with.

    “Most of those people that are killed are the people living in the rural areas. Most often, those in the position of leadership and power have not been touched by these crises. That explains why it is what it is today. There have been blames on the security agencies.”

    “Each time we have violence, there are talks that they need to address the situation. But how can that be possible when people in position of power, like governors, control billions of Naira as security votes which they spend on political thugs and not on security agencies.

    “Security votes are used to oil political machinery and support violent criminals in the society or aimed at capturing power or preserving power. We spend so much time in politics. If a fraction of the the time and resources we spend on politics is spent on peace and security in this country, we could have gone very far, but that is not the case.”

  • APC primaries : Ribadu, Modi reject Adamawa gov primary

    Two of the Adamawa three governorship aspirants of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Mahmood Ahmed (Modi) and Nuhu Ribadu, have declared the process was flawed.

    They said it was so flawed that no result from it would be acceptable to them.

    In separate briefings yesterday, the aspirants insisted the primary did not take place anywhere in the state.

    They expressed they were perplexed some of the results were already being bandied.

    Modi, who spoke at his ward in Yola town as the results of the primary were being collated at the APC state headquarters in Jimeta, asserted the entire process was fraudulent.

    He said its result could not stand even in a Banana Republic.

    Proclaiming he would reject the result of the primary even if he was declared winner, Modi said: “We are shocked they now say they are collating result when no election was held.

    “I condemn the exercise in its entirety. It isn’t just that it lacks credibility, the election didn’t happen.”

    Ribadu, at his campaign office in Jimeta, contended no election took place anywhere in Adamawa State.

    He said it was therefore impossible to declare any result.

    “Thousands of our supporters trooped to voting centres across the state but there was no election.

    “No officials to attend to them and no election materials,” Ribadu stated.

    He said he and his team were shocked to hear of collation of result, stating”The whole thing is incredible. How can you conduct a direct primary election in the night? It’s just not possible.”

    “The NWC should step in and save our party from this embarrassing situation.

    “We demand immediate cancellation of the process.  The electoral committee should be disbanded,” the former chairman of Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) stated.

    The electoral committee was yet to react to allegations as at the time of filling the report.

    Modi,Ribadu and Governor Muhammed Jibrilla (Bindow) were the aspirants.

     

  • Ribadu, Pate warn against indirect primary

    …says APC may lose Adamawa, Bauchi

     

     

    Former Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Mallam Nuhu Ribadu has warned against that the party may not have candidates for the general elections in Adamawa State if it goes ahead to conduct its primary election through the indirect mode as against the direct mode preferred by majority of the aspirants.

    Similarly, former Minister of state for Health, Dr. Mohammed Ali Pate warned against the use of indirect primary in Bauchi state saying his party may not win the state if unpopular candidate is forced on the people through indirect primary.

    Read Also:I sacrificed my Presidential ambition for Buhari – Ribadu

    While Ribadu said that any aspirant who was afraid to face members of the party in a direct primary was not prepared to face the people of the state in a general election, Pate believe that direct primary should be used during the primary election so as to test the popularity of all the aspirants.

    Both Ribadu and Dr. Pate spoke after going through the mandatory screening for all aspirants contesting various offices on the platform of the party by the National Working Committee of the party.

    Ribadu said the processes that threw up the leadership of the party in Adamawa State is presently being challenged in court, pointing out that if the court invalidate the process, whatever might have been done by the leadership will be null and void.

    He insisted that majority of the aspirants contesting various positions in the state preferred the direct primary mode, saying it was the best process because it gives ownership of the process to the people and eliminate corruption.

    He wondered why anybody should be afraid of facing the people through the direct primary option, stressing that anybody who is afraid to face members of the party was not prepared to face the people of the state during the general election.

    Ribadu said “The governor is an aspirant and there are other aspirants who are also contesting. The rest of the aspirants said they want direct primary. It is not just governorship, but the Senatorial and House of Representatives.

    “Majority of those who are contesting or who want to contest wants direct primary. Adamawa State is one 9f the states going through difficult court cases and I don’t think that the party will allow itself to go ahead and do indirect primary when there is a pending court case that is challenging the legality of the state executive.

    “In an event that the court declares the state executive illegal, then the whole thing that was done by that executive will be a nullity and the party will end up in trouble and will not have candidates to go into the general election.

    “The issue of direct primary is to determine by the National Working Committee and will come up with a position. We are waiting, believing that they will look into the case of Adamawa and see that it will be in the best interest of the party for us to have direct primary.

    “Direct primary is giving the people the opportunity to directly get involve in the process of selecting those who are going to carry their flag in the general election.

    “Why should somebody be afraid of direct primary. If you are afraid to face the people, then you are not prepared to face the general election. You are afraid to face members of your party and now you are waiting to go into the general election. I think it is ridiculous.

    “Direct primary is justice and fairness, it is giving the party back to the people so that they can determine and decide those who are going to be their own candidates. I think it is in the best interest of this party that we adopt the direct primary because it will stop corruption.

    “You will stop people who corner things and always specialize in doing things, always manipulating, compromising, taking advantage of positions, taking public money and using it for their personal interest to the disadvantage of others. Direct primary is a solution to the problems that we are facing.

    “It is fine to base the decision on mode of primary on the decision of the state EXCO and the stakeholders as well as the aspirants. Don’t forget that the most important person in this process is the aspirants. Those who have paid money, so much money to contest are the most important people in this process and the party has recognized that.

    “I don’t think that it is right to say that it should be EXCO that should determine that. We know what the EXCO is in our own system and who put them there. But they are not the ones who are going to contest because they are not the aspirants.

    “When the aspirants say this is what they want, they should get that because the6 are they are the stakeholders. Let the stakeholder, the governor and the EXCO sit down and decide. If you don’t agree. We are doing direct primary and there is no agreement in many states including Adamawa.”

    On his part, Pate who is among the governorship aspirants campaigning for direct primary said his group has made its case known to the national leadership of the party that without direct primary winning Bauchi state might be difficult.

    He said: “We have made our case, if the party wants to win Bauchi state; it should put forward a credible, popular candidate. At this point, we know that the mass of people in Bauchi state are worried that an imposition will not bud well in the general elections and so we place our faith on the leadership of the party to do the right thing and allow fair process to play out otherwise we cannot guarantee APC winning Bauchi state.

    “There is a structured process that we have been made to participate for the various offices we are seeking on the platform of the party. I have done mine and for Bauchi state, we have an agenda which is to bring development which has so far eluded our people.

    “So even though we have an incumbent governor, we know his term comes to an end in 2019 and we are sure to takeover even as we also believe in the party to do the right thing and ensure that members and aspirants get the justice they deserve if the party wants to succeed in Bauchi.”

  • I sacrificed my Presidential ambition for Buhari – Ribadu

    Former Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Mallam Nuhu Ribadu has said the he sacrificed his Presidential ambition to allow President Muhammadu Buhari go for a second term in office because of the good work he is doing for the country.

    Speaking in an interview with newsmen, Ribadu also threw his weight behind the President allowing the Acting Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, Ibrahim Magu to continue to head the agency despite opposition from the National Assembly, saying fighting corruption is the most difficult job to do.

    Asked whether he was sacrificing his presidential ambition because of President Buhari, Ribadu who is contesting the governorship primary of the APC in Adamawa State, said “You can say part of it. Of course, that is a good reason. When you agree with a leadership, it is okay that you step aside and allow good thing to happen and I am comfortable with that.

    “That is okay. It is fine if what you have in your heart is honest service. Any chance is an opportunity for you to do what you can to help your own people, you cannot shy away from that. I have no issue with that.

    “Today, President Buhari is our President and I agree with him totally and I am comfortable with the leadership he is giving this country. If there is anything under, I can also make my own contribution, I am very much prepared to do so.”

    Speaking on the non confirmation of the appointment of the EFCC Chairman, Ribadu said “This is sad part of our country. To even get things done properly and correctly becomes almost impossible. I don’t see any reason why they will not confirm him and allow him to do the work properly. I totally agree with the federal government in allowing him to do this work.

    “Whatever you can say about Ibrahim Magu, you cannot take away the fact that he is a honest person and a very courageous person. These are some of the requirements you need in an anti corruption agency. He is doing extremely well.

    “I know him and I know how the place works. I know this difficult in doing this work for our country. I am in total agreement with the decision of the federal government to allow him to continue. It is a matter of courage because fighting corruption is the most difficult job to do.

    “It will require all the sacrifice, all the patience and everything that everybody can give for us to make an impact. We are going the right direction. It is tough one, a difficult one, but Nigerians should please go along with it and support it. If we don’t, the chances are that we will not be able to do anything in this country.”

    On whether the EFCC was right in investigating accounts of state government and state governors, he said “I told you earlier that fighting corruption is not easy. It is not likely that you will please everyone. You will have to go after people who are in control of government.

    “I won’t go to the village and go after somebody for the fun of it. It has to be people who are in charge and on control and often, they are people in opposition or against.
    “When you are fighting corruption, there are targets and the target is often people who are in charge of our own wealth and if they mismanage it, the agency has a duty to go after them. But I don’t think that you can do it outside the law.

    “There are rules and regulations that govern and determine the way you conduct yourself, as long as you follow it, as long as you are within the permission of the law, I think we must understand that it has to be done. Look across the world, the issue of fighting corruption is the same thing all over. People are saying the same thing they are saying in Nigeria.

    “We are not different from the rest of the world. Fighting corruption is the most difficult thing. It is the most difficult job you can do, especially if you are going to do it with all honesty and with good intentions. There is no way that you will not be condemned.”

    On the allegation that Corrupt persons were joining the APC for protection, he said “I don’t think that is the case, but that is the beauty of democracy. People are entitled to be where they want to be. Constitutionally, no one has the right to stop you fr9m belonging to any political party. It is the fundamental right of individuals to belong where they want to and no one has the right to.

    “You have no right to stop the, because they are entitled to. I am not saying that I totally agree with what is going on. It is not my choice that today, I am from Nigeria, from Adamawa and from Yola. I found myself here and I have no right to say that simply because I disagree with somebody from Yola, I don’t want to play a role or participate in making Adamawa a great place.

    “I have no right to exclude anybody. Nobody has the right to stop another person from belonging to any Organisation of Association. Even if you disagree, you can’t do much about it. If somebody is corrupt, let the law take its course. I don’t think that can be a reason for you to stop a person from belong to a political party.

    “I think these are things that you have to get clear. It is in our constitution that you are free to belong to a political party, you are free to contest unless the constitution says you cannot. Those issues are constitutional, and fundamental and Nigerians will just have to understand that.”

    On why he wants to be Governor, Ribadu said “I just want to serve. In Adamawa State, just like many other states in Nigeria deserve better leadership. We can do better. We are faced with challenges and difficulties and people will just have to come forward and stand up.

    “When you are faced with challenges and problems, people will have to stand up and confront it. I believe that anybody with something to offer must come forward and I believe I have something to offer. I believe that I can work honestly and change the way things are, I can run a government that is honest, just, fair and all inclusive.

    “I will address the problem of insecurity. I will certainly change the lives of our people. That is the reason why I still want to try and see if Nigerians will give us chance.”

  • Lawal, Ribadu, others insist on direct primaries

    Stakeholders, governorship aspirants and statutory delegates of the All Progressives Congress (APC) in Adamawa State, led by former Secretary to the Government of the Federation (SGF), Babachir Lawal, have said any attempt to foist the indirect primary option on the party may cost it the 2019 governorship election.

    The stakeholders, including Dr. Mahmud Halilu, believed to be Mrs. Aisha Buhari’s brother, and former Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) Nuhu Ribadu, told a news conference in Abuja that only primaries conducted through the direct option will be accepted.

    Lawal, who spoke on behalf of the stakeholders, said as a former SSG, there was no way a stakeholders’ meeting can be held in his absence. He added that the meeting where the indirect primary  was endorsed was secretly called and held inside the Government House.

    He reminded party leaders of a pending appeal against the conduct of the congresses that brought the current leaders to office, saying any primary conducted by such a group will be null and void.

    Lawal said: “Further to our April 27 news conference on elective congresses, we are constrained to once again express our rejection of the indirect primaries being concocted by the Adamawa State government and its cohorts.

    “Recall that the APC National Executive Committee (NEC) adopted the direct primaries for the nomination of candidates for the 2019 elections. We praise our National Chairman Adams Oshiomole, and NEC members for the landmark decision.

    “For a long time now, especially in the days building up to the political activities, key stakeholders have been increasingly marginalised and party activities and processes carried out in secrecy to exclude legitimate interests. This policy of exclusion came to a head with the purported September 3 meeting of the State Executive Committee, where indirect primaries was allegedly adopted as mode of electing party flag bearers.

    “That meeting was convened secretly; we the undersigned aspirants, statutory delegates and critical stakeholders, were not invited. It was therefore a meeting of like minds; persons who were prepared to perpetuate illegality to satisfy the whims of an individual who has lost out in popularity and integrity.

    “We dissociate ourselves from the purported resolution which was done in bad faith and is bound to affect the image and chances of our party in the elections.

    “Majority of the APC family in Adamawa received the news of the adoption of direct primaries by NEC with pleasure and enthusiasm. Our members are pleased that they will help the party nominate credible, acceptable and marketable candidates to fly its flag. We, therefore, cannot allow unpopular persons who are afraid of voters to change the rule of the game.”

    Those who attended the briefing include Lawal; Senator Ahmed Mo’Allayid; Senator Halilu Girei; Senator Bello Tukur; Marcus Gundiri; Nuhu Ribadu; Sadiq Muhammed (Walin Ganye); Dr. Mahmoud Halilu, among others.

  • Anti-corruption: Nigerians must join hands with FG to succeed, says Ribadu 

    For the anti-corruption battle to succeed, the Federal Government and the people of Nigeria must be on the same page, with same purpose, Mallam Nuhu Ribadu has said.

    The pioneer Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) explained that the consensus means working together to mobilise citizens, consolidate good practices and point out mistakes along the line.

    He spoke in Abuja at the public presentation of the first-year report of the Corruption Anonymous (CORA) project by the African Centre for Media and Information Literacy (AFRICMIL).

    He said:  ”There is probably no better way to help Nigeria to find its feet than helping to entrench the fight against corruption  through a coherent  and  systematic  campaign  that has the support of Nigerians.

    “There is no gainsaying the fact that for us to succeed in the fight against the corruption scourge, there must be uniformity of purpose. What this means is that the government and the people—through the media and civil society organisations, would have to find a common ground. This consensus does not mean civil society serving as trumpets for the government, but it means working together to mobilise citizens, consolidate good practices and point out mistakes along the line.

    “The importance of the government/people synergy in the fight against corruption is best measured by the trust people have in the integrity of the system. The manifestation of that trust, in turn, is when people go beyond expressing verbal support for the work to volunteering tips and information.

    “Giving information about crimes to law enforcement agents is a constitutional role of the citizen. In fact, to do otherwise is not only unpatriotic, but a punishable offence. However,  Nigerians are often reluctant to play this role for a number of reasons. It is not because they are not patriotic. Anytime people see public officers who are serious about their task or a government that is committed, you see a surge of interest on the part of the public to contribute their quota to make the system work.”

    Ribadu also called for adequate protection for whistleblowers because of the importance to aiding security agencies.

    “Whistleblowing is a very important catalyst that can help law enforcement agents and it is, therefore, not out of place for the government to provide incentives for whistle-blowers with vital information.

    “The whistleblower  policy is new and evolving. There are issues and grey areas that need to be addressed to arrive at a more robust document. The back-end of the public interface platform needs serious tightening to make it fool-proof and ensure that it is not compromised. Those who volunteer information need to be sure of their security and confidentiality.

  • Ribadu: unholy alliance working to scuttle anti-graft war

    Ribadu: unholy alliance working to scuttle anti-graft war

    The Federal Government should remain steadfast in its commitment to the anti corruption war because “there is an unholy alliance of corrupt people in and out of government” trying to derail it, former Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) Chairman Nuhu Ribadu said yesterday

    In his view, the anti-corruption war is working, but Nigerians must resist those in high places who want to scuttle it.

    Ribadu said EFCC Acting Chairman Ibrahim Magu and his team were doing a great job and needed the support of well-meaning Nigerians.

    He said some Nigerians may not like Magu’s face or his strategy, it should never be a reason for rejection of fundamental truths and his good job.

    Ribadu, who spoke at the fifth anniversary of Connected Development (CODE), a non-governmental organisation in Abuja, said those who had been stumbling blocks to the war against corruption clearly did not understand or feel the biting impact of corruption.

    He said: “There is no doubt that the current anti-corruption regime in the country is working. We have seen the feat attained in recent past and the ongoing effort to stall it.

    ”We, as Nigerians, must also stand to be counted on the intractable issue which poses a bigger challenge, the corruption malaise. Importantly, at a time like this, when a clear line is re-emerging, demarcating agents of progress and those bent on stopping them, as citizens, we have a duty not to be on the fence but make a clear choice between these contending forces.

    “Nigerians must take a stand between those who are working diligently to get back our stolen money and those who are poised to scuttle such efforts.

    “We are witnessing essentially a classical case of state capture in which individuals, including those in high public office, use their position to undermine the state and its policies because of their personal interest.

    “Unfortunately, some people who are supposed to be part of efforts at restitution are colluding with those who have stolen our commonwealth to frustrate the work of those who are genuinely committed in reversing the ugly trend.

    “And as this unholy alliance of corrupt people in and out of government takes root, it is us, the ordinary Nigerians, that are the victims.”

    “Those who have been a stumbling block to the war against corruption clearly do not understand or feel the biting impact of corruption.

    “If they do, they would not put up the kind of resistance we are currently witnessing in the efforts to make a success of the anti-corruption war.”

    To Ribadu, Magu and his team has been performing well and they ought to be supported.

    “At the implementation level, I am of the opinion that Ibrahim Magu and his team are doing a great job and they need the support of all well-meaning Nigerians.

    “ I know how tough this work is, and I can appreciate the challenges they are contending with. We must support and encourage them. Not because we like or dislike them but because they are offering a selfless national service, and they are doing it very well,” he said.

    Ribadu said it was wrong to personalize the attack against Magu and the EFCC.

    “Yes, you may not like someone’s face or even disagree with his strategy but that should never be a reason for you to reject fundamental truths and the good things that such a person is doing,” he said, adding:

    “It is also no excuse for you to personalise your duty or responsibility or undermine efforts that are beneficial to us as a country.

    “I have chosen to take a stand on this because I have passed through this myself and I see similar signs of those dark moments of 2007 hovering all over us.

    “It is always a dangerous cocktail when some corrupt elements in power decide to side with private interests outside government, using the rule of law as a ruse, to muscle sincere efforts to tackle corruption.”

    The ex-EFCC chairman said the nation was yet to finish paying for the mistakes of 2007 and the years after.

    He said Nigerians should not allow history to repeat itself.

    He said: “We haven’t yet finished paying for the mistakes of 2007 and the years after. We should not allow history to repeat itself in this regard.

    “Personally, I believe this administration is doing a wonderful and patriotic duty by putting the fight against corruption on the front burner. Corruption is a serious ailment afflicting this nation and by facing it headlong, the Buhari administration is doing us a whole lot of service.”

    Ribadu urged the youthful members of CODE to join the anti-corruption crusade.

  • Ribadu, Customs boss tipped to replace Magu

    Ribadu, Customs boss tipped to replace Magu

    AS the plot thickens to stop the Acting Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Mr Ibrahim Magu, from becoming the substantive chair of the Commission, three names have popped up as his possible replacements. They are a former boss of the anti-graft agency, Mallam Nuhu Ribadu; the Comptroller-General of the Nigeria Customs Service, Col. Hamid Ali (rtd) and a retired Assistant Inspector-General of Police, Amodu Ali, who is famous for investigating the $180million Halliburton bribery scandal.

    Investigation by our correspondent revealed that the decision to prop up their names was part of the grand plot by the powerful forces opposed to Magu to stop his re-nomination by President Muhammadu Buhari. More names might also be propped up in the next few days. But the Transparency International- Nigeria and some civil society groups yesterday protested non-confirmation of Magu by the Senate.

    The TI and others described the security report upon which the Senate based its decision as “curious.” A top source said: “These forces do not want Magu re-nominated by the President when the Senate returns from Christmas break. “This is why they have recommended some people (at least three for now) who have impeccable integrity like Magu as the next substantive chairman of EFCC.

    “These are the Comptroller- General of the Nigeria Customs Service, Col. Hamid Ali (rtd), a former Chairman of EFCC, Mallam Nuhu Ribadu, and a retired Assistant Inspector-General of Police, Amodu Ali who investigated the $180million Halliburton bribery scandal. “But President Buhari is just listening to arguments for and against Magu. The ball is in the court of the President.” There were however fears last night that these forces might go to court if Buhari re-nominates Magu.

    They are trying to hang on to the report of the Department of State Security Service (DSS) to seek some ambiguous reliefs in court.” It was also learnt that pro- Magu sympathisers are also pressing buttons to have the ears of the President to stick to the Acting EFCC chairman. Another source added: “Representations have been made in the last 24 hours to those close to the President to insist on Magu. “Those sympathetic to Magu actually approached an influential governor to intercede and let the President get a second opinion on the DSS report.

    “This situation is dicey as I talk to you because both sides are embroiled in intense politics of survival. “Those against Magu were busy yesterday celebrating that they have boxed the Acting EFCC chairman to a corner.” Apart from Transparency International, other civil society groups who protested against non-confirmation of Magu by the Senate yesterday include Civil Society Legislative Advocacy Centre (CISLAC) and Zero-corruption Coalition (ZCC) They made their position known in a statement by the Executive Director of CISLAC, Auwal Ibrahim Musa (Rafsanjani).

    The statement said: “The Civil Society Legislative Advocacy Centre (CISLAC), Transparency International-Nigeria (TI) and Zero-corruption Coalition (ZCC) express concern at the circumstances surrounding the nonconfirmation by the Nigerian Senate of Ibrahim Magu as the Chairman of Economic and Financial Crime Commission (EFCC), upon his appointment by the President.

    “We find it worrisome that the confirmation of the head of such a strategic anti-corruption agency is taking such a long time, having been first appointed in November 2015, and worse still at a time when the nation is reinvigorating the fight against corruption. “CISLAC, TI- Nigeria and ZCC wonder if there is more to the unfolding events than meets the eye. “We are further alarmed at the circumstances preceding the last session in which the Upper Chamber failed to confirm the appointee.

    “The fact that the session was preceded by a rowdy sitting and the Senators resorted to a closeddoor session further highlights the lack of transparency in the confirmation process. “We find the Senate’s reliance on a security report from the Department of State Services (DSS) as a reason for the rejection of the President’s appointee very curious.

    “While we acknowledge that the Senators have the power of confirmation as well as the right of recourse to relevant institutions for vetting, this must be applied strictly for public good and in very transparent and accountable manner. “CISLAC, TI and ZCC therefore call on the Senate to make public the security report it depended upon to reject the confirmation. “Merely reading it out in a closed session and applying it to arrive at such far reaching decisions fall short of the expectations of the electorate that they represent in the exercise of their powers.

    “We call on the DSS to publicly confirm that they are the source of the report in question and authenticate the content for the Nigerian Public to know. “Considering that the DSS is also an agency in the executive arm, it should indicate if the report was also shared with the President who appoints the EFCC chairman. This is to ensure that it is discharging its functions as expected by law and procedure.

    “We call on the Presidency to publicly state its position on the unfolding issues so that Nigerians can have a clear picture and draw their own conclusions as public support is crucial to a successful fight against corruption. “The position of the EFCC chair is a very sensitive one and its occupant must be held to the highest levels of integrity and credibility.

    “A situation where individuals and groups hide under clandestine and unverified documents and reports to take decisions that could undermine the integrity of individuals and institutions at the forefront of the anti-corruption efforts will be a disservice to the nation and must not be allowed to stand.

    “We notify the Senate that their inability to come clean on these would only fuel the perception that their failure to confirm the appointment of the EFCC chairman who has acted for one year is linked to their personal and selfish desire to protect themselves and scuttle the fight against corruption of which several of their members have been beneficiaries. “We urge all well-meaning Nigerians and the media to kick against all manners of unjust decision or resolution by the Nigerian Senate to sabotage the on-going anti-corruption fight in the country.”

  • Anti-corruption war, a thankless job, says Ribadu

    Anti-corruption war, a thankless job, says Ribadu

    •Pays tribute to Obasanjo

    A former Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Mallam Nuhu Ribadu has described anti-corruption war as a thankless job and a humanitarian service.
    He asked those leading the war not to despair, especially the staff of anti-corruption agencies.
    He, however, commended the Supreme Court for assisting the commission in its fight against corruption.
    He also described ex-President Olusegun Obasanjo as steadfast, patriotic and genuine in institutionalizing probity.
    Ribadu made the submissions in his remarks at the Pre-Inauguration Lecture of the Olusegun Obasanjo Good Governance and Development Research Centre, National Open University of Nigeria (NOUN) in Abuja.
    He said: “As I said many years ago, when you fight corruption, it fights back and it fights dirty. I can tell you that it is still relentlessly fighting back.
    “Corruption will also continue to fight those of us who stood on its way till our death.
    “However, those of you out in the battlefield today should not despair. The work is a humanitarian service for which you will have eternal reward. I can assure you that fraud is fraud, lies are lies. It will meet its terminal point; we shall triumph at the end!”
    He said it was a good decision that NOUN has decided to honour Obasanjo with such a centre.
    Ribadu said: “As someone who has made a career out of the fight against corruption, December 9 is a very important day.
    “It provides consolation for some us who have taken to the dangerous and often thankless career of the anti-corruption aspect of law enforcement.
    “The second reason is that we are celebrating an initiative of the National Open University of Nigeria (NOUN), namely the opening of a Centre for Good Governance and Development Research, a thoughtful concept in our search for a greater nation.”
    Ribadu commended Obasanjo for his commitment to probity and institutional reforms including the establishment of EFCC and ICPC.
    He said: “The third, and very important to me, and indeed for institutional memory of our country, is naming the centre after my boss, former President Olusegun Obasanjo.
    “As someone who has worked with Chief Obasanjo closely for many years, I can attest that he is someone who is very steadfast, patriotic and genuine in all things he does. He has also contributed in no small measure in bringing wide-ranging public sector reforms from which we are still benefitting.
    “Apart from institutionalizing probity in government business through such agencies as NEITI and BPP, Obasanjo it was who set up the two anticorruption agencies that are today serving us very well: the ICPC and EFCC. It is therefore very heart warming to see such a good man being honoured in an enduring way like this.”
    He also praised the Supreme Court for assisting the EFCC and other anti-corruption agencies with landmark judgments.
    Ribadu added: “It is important also, in taking stocks of the fight against corruption in Nigeria, to acknowledge the efforts of various stakeholders without whom we may not achieve the modest successes recorded so far.
    “Agreed that the chief executives are the drivers of the process and it is from their body language that the rest of the country flows, however, the two other arms of government; the Judiciary and the Legislature are essential for any progress in this regard.
    “There are also non-state actors such as the media and civil society groups who often set the agenda and give the needed backing at critical junctures.
    “All the agencies promoting transparency and fighting corruption came into being because the Legislature passed the necessary bills into law. We also had (and believe still have) not a few lawmakers of integrity and patriotism who stood by us even in the midst of stern opposition.
    “This is the same thing with the Judiciary. We have had very iconic, astute and honest judges who work with the fear of God and patriotism. Our superior courts have on more occasions than one showed commitment to the fight against corruption.
    “The Supreme Court of Nigeria, in particular, has been a shining example in this regard. I cannot remember, in all my years of service, when the Supreme Court went against anti-corruption efforts.
    “We have had amazing judgments that often became golden references in support of the war against corruption. For example, all efforts to whittle the powers of the EFCC and ICPC have been vehemently rejected by the Supreme Court.
    “I see this tradition of the Apex Court being upheld by the current set of justices in the Supreme Court. Only recently, the court gave an impressive judgment in the case of one of the governors that has been lingering for about 10 years, and chastised the appellants for the frivolities.
    “This posture in favour of the war against corruption by the Supreme Court is something that deserves special mention, and commendation.”