Category: Opinion

  • Two Years of President Tinubu: Two stories behind the positive numbers

    Two Years of President Tinubu: Two stories behind the positive numbers

    • By Tunde Rahman

    Economists and commentators have written and said much about the positive trajectory and indicators signposting Nigeria’s economic growth. These indicators indicate that the reforms embarked upon by President Bola Tinubu since assuming office two years ago have begun to engender successful outcomes. The reforms are paving the way for economic recovery. The facts are self-evident and they speak for themselves too.

    According to a World Bank report, the GDP grew 3.4% in 2024, the highest in a decade. Inflation is tumbling and is currently at 23.7%. The government is meeting its debt obligations. After the Central Bank of Nigeria cleared the forex backlog amounting to $10 billion, the debt-service-to-revenue ratio fell from around 100% to below 60%. Foreign reserves, which instill confidence in investors to come in and exit with their profits as they wish, now stand at $38 billion.

    Just as remarkable is how national revenues have increased exponentially, resulting in unprecedented increases in allocation to sub-nationals. Such growth has been a significant shot in the arm, giving them the much-needed fiscal impetus to fund projects and cater to the welfare of their people. The increased revenue also helps partly finance key infrastructure projects such as the Lagos-Calabar Coastal Road and the Sokoto-Badagry Superhighway. Last week, President Tinubu inaugurated the completed Phase 1, Section 1 (30km by six lanes) of the 750km Lagos-Calabar Coastal Highway.

    These strides have been phenomenal. But there is more work for the government to do. The administration also has a few challenges to tackle. The macroeconomic gains highlight the need to impact microeconomics. The positive economic statistics must impact the living standards of the most significant number of our people. They must affect their living standards, especially the cost of essential goods and services. The government needs to reduce unemployment significantly, just as it needs to make the country much safer.

    However, as I have often argued, President Tinubu’s achievements in two years are not mere happenstance. They did not come by wishful thinking. They result from a bold vision outlined in his Renewed Hope Agenda, uncommon courage, and unrelenting hard work.

    This piece explores just two stories that speak to the courage, audacity and determination of President Tinubu to do things differently. The first happened a day before President Tinubu’s trip to Rome, Italy, on May 17, 2025, for the inauguration of Pope Leo XIV. Invited by the new Pope, the President’s decision to attend the event, accompanied by Catholic bishops, was remarkable in the context of the President’s religion and that of his vice-president. In the build-up to the 2023 election, the opposition claimed the two leaders would turn the country into an Islamic state. That did not happen. Instead, they are running an administration that is blind to religion. Christians, Muslims, and adherents of other religious leanings get their dues.

    Read Also: Fire guts hotel with over 480 Nigerian pilgrims in Mecca

    I was at the residence to see the President around 2 pm just after he had performed the diplomatic ceremony of receiving letters of credence from some ambassadors. From that period, he was in his home office, working on files and receiving governors, top government functionaries and other guests who had visited till around 11 pm. Those who visited included Imo State Governor Hope Uzodimma, Secretary to the Government of the Federation Senator George Akume, Attorney-General and Minister of Justice Lateef Fagbemi(SAN), Minister of Solid Minerals Development Mr. Dele Alake, Minister of Marine and Blue Economy and former Osun State governor, Alhaji Adegboyega Oyetola, as well as top businessmen including Alhaji Samad Rabiu of BUA Group. In that long period, the only other thing that went into that office was his lunch. It’s not an isolated pattern. The fact deducible from all this is a bewildering work ethic. President Tinubu works unusually long hours. He devotes virtually all his time to the Nigerian project. So, his success is a product of hard work.

    His uncommon courage and audacity are well known. His policy options, particularly removing the unsustainable subsidies on fuel and forex, were things leaders before him found appropriate and desirable if the country must move forward but lacked the courage to implement. Fuel subsidies were corruption-laden, while the multifarious foreign exchange windows incentivised arbitrage. For instance, between January and June 2023, fuel subsidies alone gulped N3 trillion, and the bulk went into the pockets of the oil cabal.

    An important subtext of this story could be glimpsed from Mr. President’s response when I asked him about the influx of governors, lawmakers, and top chieftains of other parties into the All Progressives Congress. He replied: “Yes, they are coming because they have seen the success of our policies. The economy has virtually rebounded, and the country has turned the corner. Do you think they would defect to our party if I’m not doing well, and the policies have turned awry?”

    President Tinubu hardly allows any opportunity to bask in well-earned moments of glory to elude him. He often says, “I have a bragging right here. It is my turn to brag over this.”

    The President is, however, not unmindful of the fact that the macroeconomic gains achieved by his administration thus far have not fully impacted the streets and pockets of our people. He has also spoken of this. At the inauguration of Phase 1 of the Lagos-Calabar Coastal Road referenced earlier, President Tinubu appealed to Nigerians to be patient with him.

    “I know your expectations are still very high at this stage, and our people are still going through difficult times. I take this opportunity to appeal to all Nigerians that hope is here, and it is realisable,” he said, adding: “You would be proud of the benefits; there is light at the end of the tunnel. Inflation is coming down; we have eliminated the corruption in the exchange rate; the corruption in fuel subsidy is now limited to the barest minimum. It is all for you, the people; we are reducing the cost of manufacturing and encouraging manufacturing locally. We give all incentives for everyone to abide by the principle. May God bless our country; may God bless Lagos State and keep our fighting soldiers safe,” he said.

    -Rahman is a Senior Special Assistant to the President on Media & Special Duties.

  • The AFRICOM Commander

    The AFRICOM Commander

    The name of the man in the picture is General Michael E. Langely.

    He is an American.

    He is a General in the U.S. Marine Corps.

    He is the Commander of AFRICOM (@USAfricaCommand).

    He is an enemy of all Pan Africanists & African nationalists.

    He is an enemy of all people of color and all true progressives.

    He is a tool of the western imperialists that seek to continue to subjugate and enslave Africa, milk us dry, supress our people and undermine, discredit, eliminate and destroy every progressive leader and force that rises on our continent.

    He has called for the removal and elimination of Capt. Ibrahim Traore, the Head of State of Burkina Faso, accusing him of stealing the gold belonging to his people.

    He has criticised numerous other African leaders and sought to rubbish their efforts.

    He is only comfortable with African leaders that work for the CIA or that tremble and bow before the west.

    When the history of Africa is written the malodrous name of this mendacious Yankee will be clothed with scorn and opprobium.

    READ ALSO: Ileya, four other popular festivals in Nigeria

    He will be remembered as one of the most shameless and notorious house negros that ever lived, and his name will be synonymous with that of the pitiful and grovelling Norwegian World War II Minister of Defence and Nazi collaborator Vidkun Quisling, the self-hating and self-denigrating Aunty Jemimah leader of the British Conservative Party Kemi Badenoch and the servile black American lickspittle and fictional character known as Uncle Tom.

    As obnoxious as his earlier interventions on Africa have been, the man just keeps spewing rubbish.

    His latest outing took place on May 27th during a television interview on Kenya’s Citizen TV.

    With all the arrogance he could muster he said, “I have talked to a number of Ministers of Defence and Presidents and told them we were assessing. If we are that important to you, you need to communicate that and we will see.”

    After getting his nose-bloodied by millions of Africans for attempting to interfere in the internal affairs of a number of African countries and making the most outrageous and asinine claims about their leaders, this creature now comes up with this.

    Such unadulterated arrogance and pristine insolence coming from the conflicted and confused commander of a western imperialist army turns the stomach!

    Can someone tell me who the hell he thinks he is, who invited him to Africa in the first place and who and what he is assessing?

    He must really think that all Africans are fools and that we do not know his real mission and purpose. What a nerve! Did we invite you here in the first place? Has your nefarious and sinister prescence in any way bettered our lives?

    In the case of Nigeria, despite all our appeals and attempts at collaboration, you and your superiors in Washington have refused to help us in our war against insurgency and terrorism for the last 15 years!

    Instead, you have sought to castrate, weaken, shame and silence us. You have left us to fight Boko Haram, Al Qaeda and ISWAP, three of the most deadly terrorist organisations in the world, all alone.

    You have refused to give us the intel that we need. You have refused to sell us the arms and equipment that we asked for.

    You have refused to either give us access to your satellite intel or share it with us.

    You have done NOTHING for us in Africa except make empty promises, give us lessons about how to run our nation and live our lives and disparage and undermine our leaders.

    Worse of all, you have sought to introduce regime change and destabilise many African governments through the clandestine and nefarious activities of your CIA and its sister agencies.

    You have covertly encouraged and empowered the terrorists because their activities suit your purpose and the only way you can justify your unconciable neo-colonialist disposition and imperialist prescence is by arming them and telling us that you are here to help us to fight them and to protect your so-called strategic national interests.

    This is a classic case of what is known as a Hegelian dialectic. You create the problem, you wait for the reaction and then you offer the solution. This is how the Western hegemons have always behaved.

    The Englisman David Icke rightly describes your behaviour as the “PROBLEM/REACTION/SOLUTION formula” which succesive western governments have used to control and ultimately destroy many nations in the Middle East, Africa and indeed the global south.

    The truth is that YOU are the source of ALL our problems. We need you like we need poison! We need you like we need ebola! We need you like we need P. Diddy’s “freak offs”!

    We need you like we need AIDS, COVID and cancer all rolled into one! We need you like we need a garbage dump. We need you like we need rats and cockroaches.

    Let me be clear. The tide has turned. Africa has come of age! Africa is no longer your football that you can kick up and down the field for pleasure.

    Africa is no longer your little slave girl who you rape, plunder and pillage at will.

    We can and will solve her own problems, fight our own battles, choose our own leaders and forge our own destiny.

    My advice to you is to carry your invading force, get the hell out of our continent and NEVER come back!

    We remember what you did to Patrice Lumumba, Thomas Sankara, Silvano Olympio, Kwame Nkrumah, Muammar Ghadaffi, Gamal Nasser, Laurant Gbagbo, Murtala Mohammed, Jerry Rawlings, Ahmed Ben Bella, Robert Mugabe, Nelson Mandela and so many other great and powerful men and visionary leaders of our great and beautiful continent.

    We remember how you undermined ECOMOG and brought it to its knees.

    We remember how you destroyed North Africa and the Sahel, how you shattered East Africa and established Al Shabab and how you destabilised southern Africa and supported the Boers.

    You and those that sent you to our shores are cruel, cold-hearted and insincere and you have nothing to offer but death, misery and destruction.

    In the name of God leave and allow us to become that which God has ordained us to be.

    • (Chief Femi Fani-Kayode is the Sadaukin Shinkafi, the Wakilin Doka Potiskum, a lawyer, a former Minister of Culture and Tourism of Nigeria and a former Minister of Aviation of Nigeria)

  • Between President Bola Tinubu and Napoleon Bonaparte

    Between President Bola Tinubu and Napoleon Bonaparte

    By Gboyega Amoboye

    President Bola Tinubu is a man of history.  In politics, he is as skillful as Charles Talleyrand, the French Foreign Minister at the Congress of Vienna in 1815 and as smart as Metternich, the  Austrian  Foreign Minister  at the same Congress. Though France  was vanquished, Talleyrand was able to play the victorious  European countries that defeated Napoleon against each other to the advantage of France. Where Napoleon Bonaparte has failed, Tinubu has succeeded. Any wonder he is always a step ahead of his challengers including Baba Olusegun Aremu Obasanjo, the over bearing Ebora Owu. He outsmarted Obasanjo in the battle for the  control of Lagos State in 2003.

    To Baba Obasanjo’s suprise Tinubu became the first Yoruba he could not stop from becoming President. He had stopped  the great Chief Obafemi Awolowo in 1979 and said Abiola was not the expected Messiah after the annulment of the June 12 1993 Presidential election. Obasanjo tried in vain the “Orubebe formula” to get the election of President Tinubu annulled in 2023.

    As destiny  would have it President Tinubu has become the undisputed champion in the running battle between him and Obasanjo. It may be inadvertently, the President proves that a new Sheriff is in town.  He reverted to the old National Anthem rested by then Obasanjo before leaving office as Head of State in 1979.

    Baba is fond of renaming  National Monuments as if the masquerade is to blame and not the face behind it.  For instance, he changed the logo of the Nigerian Airways from a flying Elephant to Eagle. In the first Republic, Nigeria operated a less expensive Parliamentary System. But was replaced with the Presidential System of today. Perhaps with a new Sheriff  it may be goodbye to Egypt soon.

    A skilful politician per excellence, President Bola Tinubu is likely conversant with “Owe Akala, Oju a t’urari” meaning the proverb of Akala, destiny may bring us together again. Many of us might have read the popular Alawiye by J.F Odunjo in our primary  school days.

    Akala is a bird. When caught in a hunter’s snare, it pleaded with the hunter to spare its life because destiny might bring them together again. Indeed the future came too soon when it was only Akala that could save the life of the hunter.

    READ ALSO: Ileya, four other popular festivals in Nigeria

    Where political shylocks  would demand a pound of flesh, President Tinubu  remembers  ‘owe Akala’.

    Statesman, is a word often abused. The press in particular is guilty of labelling anybody a statesman even if devoid of credibility. Statesmanship should be associated with nobility. President Bola Tinubu demonstrated  nobility by ordering the reopening temporarily, the PDP secretariat along with others, shut down by the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Chief Nyesom for non payment of tenement rates. While as expected some opponents of PDP might be rejoicing over it’s travail, the President demonstrated Statesmanship. All his political career, the President has never been found wanting in humanity.

    He was as good as becoming the President of the Senate in 1992 but conceded it to the North and settled for Senate Leadership even though President Babangida was from the north.

    In the course of the race for the APC Presidential Primaries  in 2023, even when it became obvious that President Muhammadu Buhari was against his candidacy, Bola Tinubu remained unperturbed. He focused on the ball when it should have been pay back time having helped Buhari to power in 2015.

    However if Buhari had forgotten the past, many other political associates never did. Party stalwarts including Governors defied Buhari to stand with Tinubu. This is where he   succeeded, where Napoleon failed. Napoleon once cartooned as the butcher of Europe, never spared his victims. But he never read Alawiye so he was not conversant with Owe Akala. It was therefore  an opportunity for eight European countries to unite against him at the Battle of Waterloo in June 1815 where France was defeated and Napoleon sent out of  history, where Tinubu is finding allies even in his ‘grateful enemies’.

    In Israel, we were shown the house of the ‘bonus lastrus, good thief’ as the thief on the right hand side of Jesus at crucifixion is called. So there are equally good enemies.

    The gale of defections to the APC from other political parties is a demonstration of appreciation and trust reposed in the President. This does not mean it would lead to one party system.The Peoples Democratic Party is too strong to die just yet, but would remain a god with a foot of clay.

    While his predecessors from Ibrahim Babangida held on to funds raked in from fuel subsidy withdrawals, Tinubu shares the money monthly among States and local governments to enable them develop their people and alleviate poverty.  Unfortunately many state governments are yet to cope with the expectations of the President for an even development of the country.

    Obviously defectors to APC might have realised that more time is required to build a nation where other political opponents are clamouring for a change of government after two years out of four in the first instance. While some critics may be eager to quote development in Singapore under President Lee Kuan Yew they have failed to note that it took him 31 years to build a country of just 5.7m people.

    As one congratulates Mr. President on the halfway journey, it is two years down, two up and the future belongs to the Almighty. God’s speed Your Excellency.

  • Africa’s Time is Now: Building global prosperity through entrepreneurship

    Africa’s Time is Now: Building global prosperity through entrepreneurship

    By Dr. Doris Uzoka-Anite, CFA

    “The world’s next billion-dollar enterprises are already taking root on African soil. Come. See. Build with us.”

    Across boardrooms, innovation hubs, and policy circles, one truth has become increasingly undeniable: entrepreneurship is the engine of modern prosperity. From Silicon Valley to Shenzhen, Bangalore to Lagos, it is entrepreneurial ingenuity that drives economic transformation, unlocks human potential, and redefines the future of nations.

    Yet, while the global innovation map is familiar, a new frontier is rapidly emerging — Africa. And at its heart, Nigeria is leading the charge.

    At the Legatum Centre for Development and Entrepreneurship at MIT, I recently had the privilege of addressing global investors, policymakers, and innovators on this very topic: Innovation in Global Markets – Prosperity Through Entrepreneurship. I left more convinced than ever that Africa’s moment is not a distant aspiration; it is here, it is now, and it is powered by an entrepreneurial spirit as vast as our potential.

    Our demographic advantage — over 220 million Nigerians, with 60% under the age of 25 — represents not just a number, but a seismic opportunity. Young, dynamic, digitally fluent Nigerians are already reshaping sectors from Fintech to Agritech. Success stories such as Flutterwave, now valued at over $3 billion, and Paystack, acquired by Stripe for $200 million, are proof that African innovation is globally viable, scalable, and investable.

    In 2022 alone, Nigerian startups raised more venture capital than the rest of West Africa combined. These are not isolated triumphs; they are signals; signals that Nigeria is open for business; signals that African entrepreneurs are not waiting for handouts — they are building, scaling, and thriving.

    But entrepreneurship does not happen in a vacuum. Innovation requires ecosystems — supportive environments where policy, regulation, capital, education, and infrastructure converge to enable ideas to flourish. As Mariana Mazzucato reminds us, innovation is not just about ideas; it is about ecosystems.

    Yet, as we build these ecosystems, we must confront hard truths. Despite the excitement around African entrepreneurship, there remains a significant misfit between available capital and the sectors that truly reflect our real economy. Too much of the funding today flows narrowly into high-growth tech ventures aimed at unicorn valuations. Too little reaches agriculture, processing, fashion, trade — the industries where the majority of Africans live, work, and create.

    This misallocation is not just an economic oversight — it is a structural risk. As I noted at the Legatum Centre, we cannot eat artificial intelligence. Even the architects of AI must eat. If our investment models continue to overlook the foundational sectors that sustain life — food systems, manufacturing, community-based enterprises — we will build economies detached from the needs of real people.

    We must also rethink how we judge entrepreneurial potential. Too often, the current models favour those who fit narrow expectations — those who pitch with flashy energy, polished accents, or perfect certainty. But real entrepreneurship, especially in emerging markets, is messy. It is probabilistic, not deterministic. Some of the best entrepreneurs are soft-spoken, operate in local languages, and are solving deeply local problems.

    Read Also: Nigeria ranks 5th in 2024 global generosity index

    If we restrict opportunity to only those who conform to imported templates, we will miss out on the vast ingenuity present across Africa — in our markets, our farms, our informal sectors. We must deliberately develop new pipelines of entrepreneurs, expand how we recognise potential, and create funding models that are as diverse as the markets we seek to serve.

    Celebrating success is important, but so too is normalising failure. In mature ecosystems, entrepreneurs who fail are not banished; they are funded again, having learned valuable lessons. In our societies, we must build a culture that embraces iteration, resilience, and second chances.

    Nigeria is acting. Through initiatives like the Nigeria Startup Act, our Digital Economy Policy (2020–2030), strategic funding instruments such as the Bank of Industry and Development Bank of Nigeria, and our leadership within the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA), we are creating an environment where broader types of entrepreneurship can thrive.

    But we cannot do it alone. We need global capital that is patient, intentional, and impact-driven. We need investors who understand that true inclusive prosperity comes not only from scaling a handful of tech giants, but from empowering millions of SMEs across diverse sectors.

    This demands alternative financing mechanisms — ones that prioritise stability, resilience, and widespread job creation over short-term returns. It requires fund managers willing to invest in food systems, manufacturing, retail, healthcare, and education — the lifeblood sectors of society. It calls for a new generation of investors who are as committed to building as they are to profiting.

    Africa’s entrepreneurial journey will not be without challenges. But it is challenges that have historically given rise to the greatest innovations. If we create the right ecosystems — and recalibrate our investment priorities — African entrepreneurs will respond, not just with local solutions, but with global leadership.

    To the global investor community, my invitation remains simple: Come. See. Build with us.

    The world’s next billion-dollar enterprises, groundbreaking technologies, and prosperity-driving ecosystems are already taking root on African soil. Together, we can shape a future defined not by exclusion, but by inclusion; not by extraction, but by empowerment.

    Africa’s time is now. Let us build it together.

    Dr. Doris Uzoka-Anite is Nigeria’s Minister of State for Finance.

  • Pope Francis: The reformist who divided opinion

    Pope Francis: The reformist who divided opinion

    By Aysu Bicer and Esra Tekin

    When Jorge Mario Bergoglio became Pope Francis in March 2013, his election was considered unexpected.

    At 76, he was older than many anticipated, and as a Jesuit from Argentina, he was a relative outsider to the Vatican establishment.

    But his selection was historic — he became the first pope from Latin America and the first member of the Jesuit order to lead the Catholic Church.

    Over a decade into his papacy, Francis remained a figure of both admiration and controversy.

    He died at age 88 after suffering a prolonged illness, the Vatican announced on Monday.

    He suffered a “prolonged asthma-like respiratory crisis” associated with thrombocytopenia, according to a previous Vatican statement.

    Francis sought to reform the Vatican’s bureaucracy, tackle corruption, and address some of the church’s most pressing challenges.

    While he had been hailed for his humility and commitment to social justice, his leadership also drew sharp resistance from conservatives within the church and beyond.

    A life shaped by faith, struggle

    Born in Buenos Aires on Dec. 17, 1936, to Italian immigrant parents, Jorge Mario Bergoglio was drawn to religious life from an early age.

    Read Also: North, coalition formation and presumptions

    He studied in Argentina and later in Germany before being ordained as a Jesuit priest in 1969.

    Unlike many Vatican figures, he had little international exposure early in his career, spending most of his time in Argentina, where he gained a reputation as a humble, austere leader deeply committed to social justice.

    His early years were marked by personal hardship.

    As a young man, he suffered a severe lung infection and lost a part of his right lung. Despite this, he remained physically active and later became Archbishop of Buenos Aires in 1998.

    As a cardinal, Bergoglio was known for his simple lifestyle, often taking public transport instead of using a chauffeur.

    His sermons frequently addressed inequality and the struggles of the poor, subtly criticizing governments that failed to protect the most vulnerable. He was seen as a voice for social inclusion, which later became a defining theme of his papacy.

    First Pope born outside Europe in more than a millennium

    Francis, the Catholic Church’s 266th pope, was the first non-European pope since Gregory Ill, who was born in modern-day Syria and elected in 731.

    He chose the name Francis in honor of St. Francis of Assisi, a 13th-century monk known for his charity and kindness to animals.

    He studied philosophy and earned a master’s degree in Chemistry from the University of Buenos Aires. He taught literature, psychology, philosophy, and theology before becoming the Archbishop of Buenos Aires, the Argentine capital.

    In his youth, he enjoyed dancing tango with his girlfriend before discovering his religious vocation.

    As a student, he worked as a bouncer in a Buenos Aires bar and had a stint as a janitor.

    He was also known for washing the feet of AIDS patients during his time as archbishop — echoing Jesus, in the Bible, washing the feet of his disciples.

    A papacy of reform

    From the beginning, Pope Francis set a different tone. He chose not to live in the Apostolic Palace, opting instead for a modest guesthouse in the Vatican.

    He rejected many of the formalities of the papacy, signaling a shift toward a more accessible, down-to-earth leadership style.

    His early popularity was bolstered by his focus on key reforms. He took swift action to tackle financial corruption within the Vatican, particularly in the scandal-ridden Vatican Bank.

    He also restructured the Curia — the church’s administrative body — reducing its bureaucracy and making it more transparent.

    Child sex abuse scandals

    One of his most significant challenges had been addressing the church’s child sex abuse scandals.

    He removed bishops accused of covering up abuse and created a Vatican commission to address the issue. However, critics argue that his actions had not gone far enough, pointing to the slow pace of justice for victims.

    Francis also consistently spoke out on global issues beyond the church.

    He criticized free-market capitalism, calling it a system that often “kills” the poor.

    He urged governments to take stronger action on climate change and was an advocate for migrants, going so far as to compare European migrant detention centers to concentration camps. These statements sparked a backlash from conservative politicians and business leaders.

    Despite being seen as a progressive, Pope Francis remained firm on key Catholic teachings. He upheld traditional positions on abortion, same-sex marriage, and the role of women in the church, showing that he was not a liberal in the way some expected.

    His willingness to replace high-ranking conservative cardinals with more progressive voices fueled further resistance. Some Vatican insiders accused him of marginalizing traditionalists in favor of his own reformist agenda.

    Long before his papacy, Bergoglio’s role during Argentina’s military dictatorship (1976-1983) was a subject of debate.

    As head of the country’s Jesuits during this period, he was accused by some of failing to protect two kidnapped priests. Another allegation suggested he did not follow up on a request to help find the missing baby of a woman who was kidnapped and later killed.

    The Vatican strongly denied any wrongdoing on his part.

    Nobel Peace Prize-winning human rights activist Adolfo Perez Esquivel, who was jailed and tortured during the dictatorship, defended Pope Francis, saying there was no evidence he collaborated with the regime.

    Since becoming pope, Francis had taken steps to acknowledge the church’s role in Argentina’s past. He initiated the beatification process for priests murdered by the regime and ordered the Vatican to open its archives to victims and their families.

    For sure, Pope Francis remains one of the most influential figures in global Catholicism.

    His push for reform had won him both admiration and fierce opposition. His social and economic views continue to divide opinion, and his leadership style has reshaped the Vatican in ways that will have lasting effects.

    •             This article was first published in www.aa.com.tr

  • Writing public service into the Nigerian consciousness

    Writing public service into the Nigerian consciousness

    In this piece, I want to specifically pose the question of how literature and literary writing can serve the purpose of representing the significance of the public service to the Nigerian public. Narrating the nature, significance and dynamics of the public service, admittedly, is the sphere of the social sciences—especially of political science and public administration. But then, why can literature not come to the aid of the political scientists cum administrative scholar-practitioner in documenting the ups and downs of the public service and its role in enabling good governance?

    Literary writings narrate humanity. the human experiences and endeavors in ways that reveal horizons and frontiers of possibilities while also laying bare the depth and dynamics of the familiar. The literary eye sees beyond the normal and transcends the ordinary. All literature reveals their time and context; and this is why literature is a dangerous endeavor: it poses narrative questions that do not reveal easy answers. And yet these questions enable us, if we keep unraveling them long enough, to find a way out of our mental cocoons, according to Elif Shafak, the Turkish novelist. We can all easily agree with C. S. Lewis therefore: “Literature adds to reality; it does not simply describe it. It enriches the necessary competencies that daily life requires and provides; and in this respect, it irrigates the deserts that our lives have already become.”

    Read Also: North, coalition formation and presumptions

    Is the writer then a revolutionary? From Chinua Achebe to Naguib Mahfouz, Wole Soyinka to Mariama Ba, from Niyi Osundare to Abdulrazak Gurnah, from Ngugi wa Thiong’o to Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie and from Nadine Gordimer to Odia Ofeimun, we have writers who have championed a rebellious forthrightness in narrating the conditions for the existence of their postcolonial existence and future. We have writers who enable us to see our ordinary experiences and to transcend them. Let us take Odia Ofeimun’s The Poet Lied (1980) as a starting example. That poetry collection signals Ofeimun’s sensibility as a poet who has a deep understanding of the sociopolitical and economic anguish Nigerians have been going through for much of Nigeria’s sixty-five years of existence. As a poet, according to him, “I cannot blind myself/To putrefying carcass in the market place.” In the poet titled “A Foot Note,” Ofeimun laments:

    In our model democracy

    The magic promises of yesterday

    Lie cold like mounds of dead cattle

    Along caravans that lead nowhere…

    More specifically, in “A Civil Servant,” Odia Ofeimun highlights a critical dimension of any civil and democratic government in terms of the machinery that makes any government function efficiently. This is in terms of policy formulation and service delivery of the dividends of democracy to the citizens.

    A dull day:

    you sit on the dung-heap

    of boredom, a lizard

    basking in the cold sunshine

    of banal precedents.

    Your lymphatic smile

    is decorated with the painless anguish

    of pedestrian hours

    An idle star

    streaks across your sky

    This dull day

    you bear the unproductive patience

    of a dismantled industrial spider

    you cannot say, for certain, what you want.

    This poem represents not only a scathing critique of the neglect of the civil service by any Nigerian government, a neglect that makes the civil servant “sit on the dung-heap of boredom” like a lizard basking in a “cold sunshine.” It is also a poem that hits very hard and poetically at what I have called the bureau-pathology of the Nigerian public service, and its capacity for blind conformance at the expense of productive efficiency. A civil servant, Ofeimun aptly remarks, bears the “unproductive patience” of a “dismantled industrial spider”!

    In Niyi Osundare’s “My Lord, Tell Me Where to Keep Your Bribe,” written in 2016 at the height of the corruption scandals that traumatized the sensibility of Nigerians, and especially the undermining of the professional integrity of the Nigerian judiciary. Imagine a servant bowing constantly in fake submissiveness, and asking, “My Lord, where should I keep this bribe?” merely asking that question, with the two contraries of “Lord” and “bribe”, already implies a deep and bruising moral judgement. When we conjoin that with the suggestions of the various hiding places, then we see that the judge being addressed has already, in the space of that monologue, been stripped of all honour. In “No Hiding Place for Politicians,” Osundare was at his poetic height in railing against corruption, embezzlement, clientelism and the betrayal of democratic trust. Take just these lines:

    When the man of power

    Tells you his tale

    Ask him to wait till

    You bring a sieve

    ****

    Whoever believes what the politician says

    His ear is blocked by the carcass of truth

    A politician tells you to wait

    And you heed his words…

    Your sole will tell you

    The biting pains of folly

    These few lines already project not only the politician’s alienation from truth, but also the futility of listening to any form of “politicspeak” by which politicians have deceived Nigerians from independence to date. The “biting pain of folly” is what has indeed attended the constant optimism which has characterized Nigerians’ trust in the politicians who come, make noise, get our votes and then turn to stab us all in the back. But then, it behooves the poet, and the writers that a nation has produced, to bring the citizens to awareness. This is exactly what Barbara Kingsolver had in mind when she said, “What a writer can do, what a fiction writer or a poet or an essay writer can do is re-engage people with their own humanity.”

    Wale Okediran, who celebrates his entry into the septuagenarian circle this year, provides a larger and more experiential context for examining the mindset of an average Nigerian public servant. In his Tenants of the House (2010), Wale Okediran fictionalized his short-lived experience as a member of the Nigerian House of Representative. That was an experience, we can say, that was stranger than fiction. We get to read the fictional account of what we all know has been going on—the greedy consumption of Nigeria’s commonwealth by a few who translated democratic stewardship into a license to steal and loot. What makes Odia Ofeimun’s and Wale Okediran’s literary accounts so graphic and significant is that both have traversed the public service space in Nigeria for a while. They were not just fictionalizing hearsays and the fecundity of their imagination. Any Nigeria, from what we daily encounter about the shenanigans of the political class, can fictionalize their misdeeds. But when one had walked the corridors of power and perceived the dark odor of political corruption, the literary imagination becomes even more effective than it could have been when fashioned on the imagination alone.

    Nigerian literature serves as the handmaiden of social scientific and humanistic inquiry into the state of the Nigerian sociopolitical affairs. As a social commentary, it provides a complementary analysis of where the rain began to beat us as a nation, to quote Chinua Achebe. Indeed, the Nigerian literary space itself suffers significantly from Nigeria’s bureaucratic pathology and policy inchoateness.

    We all know the cost implication of getting published by a traditional publishing firm today. Many of Nigeria’s literary figures, from Chimamanda Adichie to Nnedi Okoroafor, get published elsewhere. This provides an occasion, therefore, to memorialize the great and persevering efforts of the Association of Nigerian Writers (ANA) for keeping the Nigerian literary spirit alive, and for serving as the breeding ground for literary effervescence.

    Nigeria is a literary space; the precarity and suffering instigated by misgovernance and the policy somersault of consecutive administrations in Nigeria provide the occasion for rebellion of the literary imagination. In fact, I am very glad to call on the literary figures in Nigeria as collaborators in the institutional reform of the Nigeria state and its public service machinery. I have often written that institutional and governance reformer is a lonely figure even in social scientific analysis. For more than twenty years, I have been raising the alarm about the debilitating state of the public service in Nigeria, and how institutional reform, as well as the political will of any government, can reverse the rot and restore the machinery of government to an efficient state.

    However, these critiques and analyses cannot compare with the fictional narration of Nigeria’s democratic struggles, the greed of its political class and the suffering of Nigerians. Chris Abani’s Graceland (2004) tells the story of Elvis Oke and his struggle to overcome the poverty, violence and corruption of ghetto life in Lagos. Wole Soyinka’s Chronicles of the Happiest People on Earth (2021) consummates his damning and devastating literary chronicling of the political corruption that has perpetuated a season of anomie in Nigeria since independence. And there are more: Chika Unigwe, Abubakar Adam Ibrahim, Helon Habila, Chinua Achebe, Unoma Azuah, and many others. When even an average Nigerian encounters these writers and their fictional narration of the inefficiency of the Nigerian government and the suffering it engenders, the novels and short stories mirror their experiences. There is no Nigerian lady who will not empathize with Sisi, Efe, Ama and Joyce, the three ladies –in Unigwe’s On Black Sisters Street (2011)—who left Nigeria to become sex workers in Belgium in order to make a good life for themselves.

    Literary activism is the response of Nigerian literature to institutional reform that demands that the administrative dynamics must be responsive to the yearning and aspirations of Nigerians. Literary activism encounters the Nigerian public service as the seat of misery and of transformation. Most Nigerians encounter the Nigerian state from the deficiencies of infrastructural debilitation—bad roads and highway networks, inefficient healthcare facilities, inadequate education sector, etc. Literature engages politics from the perspectives of literary visions of possibilities. We can tell the stories of the civil servant who refuses bribes; the Oga who stands up to the powers that be for the sake of efficiency; the public servant who champions transparency even at the cost of losing her legislative slot; a group of civil servants who presents alternative policy implementation blueprints, and many other possible stories of administrative events that can inspire.

    Here, ANA has a lot to still do in terms of its commitment to literary activism as a mode of speaking truth to power. I think that the genre of the administrative literary genre should be added to existing genres. Rather than the appearance of the public service as a monolithic endeavor in the literary imagination, ANA can encourage Nigerians to harness their experiences of the multifaceted dynamics of the Nigerian public service system to articulate poems, novels and short stories that speak specifically to civil servants, procedures, departments, and systemic experiences and narratives. I will be glad to see special calls for literary editions around the public service and its dynamics. Such special literary editions can elevate the consciousness of Nigerians on what it means to reflect imaginatively on the present and future of the public service in relation to human flourishing in Nigeria.

    For the Russian poet, Boris Pasternak, “Literature is the art of discovering something extraordinary about ordinary people, and saying with ordinary words something extraordinary.” We owe it to the institutional reformers and literary activists to transform the banality of human suffering in Nigeria to the refreshing discovery of the extraordinary power of social change.

    Let me end with a tribute to Dr Wale Okediran at 70. Dr. Okediran has come a long way and has blazed many trails so consistently that at a beautiful age of seventy, he has achieved a sublime legacy that embodies existential fulfilment.

    Dr Okediran is in my estimation Nigeria’s answer to C. P. Snow’s two-culture thesis. According to that thesis, there is a significant and unbridgeable divide between the humanities and the natural sciences in ways that ensure seeming lack of communication between the two. The literary intellectuals and the natural scientists pride themselves on their inability to understand each other, and this, Snow argues, leads to an inhibited intellectual progress. In Wale Okediran, we have a fluid and exemplary personification that firmly undermine that thesis. Dr Okediran fluidly incorporates the love for science and the humanities. He is the very embodiment of the renaissance man—the multi-talented man imbued with a secular sensibility that draws on the human condition to articulate an Afropolitan sensibility of humaneness, compassion, strength, open-mindedness, passion and empathy.

    It was almost inevitable that Dr Okediran’s love for medicine and literature would be deployed in the service of the humanity in Nigeria and on the continent. Medicine is not just physiological and psychological, at least not in Africa. Medicine ministers to the brutalized bodies of Africans. As a medical doctor therefore, Dr Okediran has the unenviable space to confront the many psychotic manifestations of governance failure in Nigeria. His literary interests and skills provide the opportunity to tell the postcolonial Nigerian stories as he encountered them over the course of his own personal existential and professional trajectories. And this explain Dr Okediran’s path into politics; what better way to effect significant changes than being in the corridor of power?

    One could only wonder how long a man of such literary sensibility would last within the murky space of Nigerian politics. Fortunately, public service is not restricted to being a member of the House of Representatives. Dr Okediran’s public service space encompasses the local, the national and the regional—from the National Old Student Association of Olivet Baptist High School to the Pan African Writers Association (PAWA). Dr Wale Okediran’s literary sensibility enables him to build a community of service. The Ebedi International Writers Residency at Iseyin is unique defining sense a built metaphor for Okediran’s enlarged sensibility that draws in people and create possibilities.

    (Being Statement delivered at the Association of Nigerian Authors – ANA – Abuja Chapter 70th Birthday Event/Celebration of Dr. Wale Okediran and a Reading/Writers Dialogue held at the Mamman Vatsa Village, Abuja, on the 19th of April, 2025)

  • IP and Music: A living partnership

    IP and Music: A living partnership

    By Adebambo Adewopo

    As World IP Day marks a record two and half decades in the mission of raising awareness about the role of IP with this year’s theme ‘IP and Music: Feel the beat of IP”, the world of music deservedly takes another front seat after it made its debut ten years ago with the earlier theme “Get up. Stand up. For Music”. This recognition is a testament to the remarkable power and allure of music as one of man’s most potent forms of creative expression. The chequered legacy of intellectual property itself has had a historic connection with the musical genre and remains inextricably tied to the universality and global compact of music as a creative life-force naturally meant for the promise that copyright holds, among all other forms of creativity eligible for protection. The power of music is seen and felt everywhere but at no other time as today has that power proven as impactful and forceful in the pursuit of happiness and every area of life, be it personal, spiritual, social, business, political and more. Shakespeare wrote of music as ‘the food of love’. Music is not just the food of the human soul; it has become the food of life – a nourishment at the core of human existence. Music secured by IP has brought fame and fortune to generations of music creators worldwide. Expounding the interplay of music and IP as this year’s theme, WIPO declares “From the rhythms that invite us to dance to the lyrics that echo our emotions, music enriches every aspect of our lives. Music is a universal form of creative expression and intellectual property (IP) rights play a pivotal role in supporting a vibrant and diverse music landscape. Music permeates every sector, and IP fosters the presence of music beyond its own realm”. Beyond the metaphor, music has continued to add value, serve humanity and foster societal peace and harmony. In concrete terms, it functions across industries – entertainment, technology, fashion, sports, video games, commerce, marketing and branding, advertising, and more.

    Since the early days, music has entered the universe of copyright and gingerly remains there, gaining momentum with the increasing dominance of global recording industry. Without copyright, the law’s recognition of the power and culture of music would have remained largely elusive, given the complexities and the dynamic trajectories of IP and music in the last half a century. The normative role of IP has been salutary to music as a creative entity eligible for protection and the incentives to music creators, the music industry, as well as public interest. From its origin in the prohibition of unauthorised copying of sheet music to the protection of musical composition in the 1800s, to the institution of exclusive rights in public performances, broadcasting, making of sound recordings in any medium, including the rights of making available in file sharing and streaming with the advent of digital technology, copyright regime for music has expanded inexorably. Live performances and expression of folklore, commonly referred to as ‘neighbouring rights’ have readily joined the web of protection in many jurisdictions and internationally. The increased term of protection, as well as the realm of infringement and liability under copyright law, has benefited music creators and the recording industry worldwide. IP as the primary legal framework for the protection of creativity comprising IP rights, administration and enforcement, including collective management systems, the more recent fair use doctrine, secondary liability and anti-circumvention rules of the digital era, has played indispensable roles in navigating the emergent environment. This legal gamut implies that IP and copyright in particular are indeed the cornerstone of the music industry.

    Read Also: Trump, immigration and capitalism’s global crisis

    Significantly, a trilogy of developments in WIPO’s norm-setting annal across 200 years best attests to WIPO’s fidelity to the international protection of music as a creative enterprise. That, for the most part, was a watershed in the normative evolution of music-copyright complex and the promotion of the narrative that copyright is the bedrock of the music industry. First, it began with the seminal Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works (1886), including music and its Berlin Revision of 1908 which further reinforced music protection with the inclusion of sound recording, among others, in the categories of protected works under the Berne. The second development was defined by two of WIPO’s treaties; the Rome Convention for the Protection of Performers, Producers of Phonograms and Broadcasting Organisations (1961) and the Performances and Phonograms Treaty (1996) which signposted music copyright for the new technological environment that ushered in 21st century full-blown digital dispensation. This was joined by WTO’s TRIPs Agreement of 1995. The third phase was the WIPO’s first treaty of the 21st century, Beijing Treaty on Audiovisual Performances (2012), though expanded the economic and moral rights of audiovisual performances, also extended protection for performers’ rights of musicians and singers alike. This international legal architecture lies at the heartbeat of IP protection for the music industry and has resonated in the rapid succession of copyright reform across jurisdictions both in the strength of IP law and policy-making and the campaign against piracy and counterfeiting, the twin menace of the creative industries worldwide. The exponential growth of copyright in the last 100 years into the digital age has influenced the current copyright debate about the global music industry and fortunes of generations of the world’s music talents and musical revolution, in particular the Afrobeats renaissance on the Continent. Today, the gravity of Afrobeats as a global phenomenon that is increasingly felt cannot be locked in the shadows of IP. The prospects of a new dawn now await the emerging generation of African and Nigerian music talents, Afrobeats’ leading exponents, as the world embraces the sound of Africa such that neither IP itself nor its long-standing tensions with traditional knowledge (TK) protection can diminish any longer.

    To the eternal credit of IP reform, the progressive expansion of the ‘exclusive rights’ that have shaped the protection of musical works and sound recording has responded to the massive explosion of the music industry as a cultural and economic powerhouse, and a net contributor to the global knowledge economy. Today, official reports point to the pivotal role of the music industry and the value of the rights of musicians, composers and producers in the ever-competitive global and digital marketplace. In 2024 alone, the over USD29 billion mark in revenue of the global recorded music industry represents an increasing growth trajectory that is largely driven by digital evolution through streaming and performing revenue. Afrobeats industry, again, has made significant inroads as a frontier economy, and by all means, has continued to contribute to wealth creation, enhanced revenue streams, cultural influence and soft power. With over N728 billion in the combined contribution of the Nigerian creative industry to the national economy, the social, economic and cultural power of music is not lost on the recent reforms taking place in the IP and creative ecosystem. WIPO’s theme ‘feel the beat of IP’ therefore is a clear reflection of the present momentum and certainly comes alive in the rapidly evolving Nigerian music industry that has continued to engage global attention as it compels new and innovative models of governance, transformative engagement and building collaboration in the spirit of the historic partnership between IP and music.

    • Professor Adewopo (SAN) is a former Director General of Nigerian Copyright Commission (NCC).

  • Climate change: Education and Public Awareness (2) Governments’ side of the task

    Climate change: Education and Public Awareness (2) Governments’ side of the task

    By Adebayo Adeleye

    As the world grapples with the challenges of climate change, education and public awareness have emerged as crucial tools in the fight against this global phenomenon. Climate change is no longer just an environmental issue, but a pressing concern that affects every aspect of our lives, from health and economy to security and sustainability.

    The science is clear: human activities, particularly the burning of fossil fuels and deforestation, have led to a significant increase in greenhouse gas emissions, resulting in rising temperatures, more frequent natural disasters, and altered ecosystems. However, despite the overwhelming evidence, many people remain unaware of the severity of the issue and the actions they can take to mitigate its effects.

    This is where education and public awareness come in. By educating people about the causes, consequences, and solutions to climate change, we can empower them to make informed decisions and take action to reduce their carbon footprint. This can include simple actions such as reducing energy consumption, using public transport, or recycling, as well as more significant changes like investing in renewable energy or advocating for climate policies.

    In schools, climate change education can be integrated into curricula, teaching children about the science behind climate change, its impacts, and the importance of sustainability. This can help shape the next generation of leaders and citizens who will be equipped to address the challenges of climate change.

    Public awareness campaigns can also play a vital role in educating people about climate change. These campaigns can use various media channels, including social media, television, and print, to reach a wide audience and convey the urgency of the issue. By sharing personal stories, highlighting local impacts, and showcasing solutions, public awareness campaigns can inspire people to take action and demand change.

    Read Also: 5 Unhealthy habits of Gen Z

    Governments, organizations, and individuals must work together to promote climate change education and public awareness. This can involve developing and implementing education programs, supporting research and innovation, and advocating for climate policies.

    Governments around the world have a critical role to play in promoting climate change education and awareness, as well as developing and implementing policies to mitigate its impacts. This article explores the government’s responsibility to promote climate change education and awareness. The intervention of government was found necessary for the following reasons:

    Public Education: Governments have a responsibility to educate the public about the causes, consequences, and solutions to climate change.

    Policy Development: Governments must develop and implement policies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, invest in renewable energy, and promote sustainable development.

    Resource Allocation: Governments must allocate resources to support climate change research, education, and awareness initiatives.

    International Cooperation: Governments must work together internationally to address the global nature of climate change.

    In view of the above reasons, which put the yoke on the government to ensure public education about climate change, the government is bound to be creative in articulating their programs. In this regard, the following initiatives seem perfect for consideration.

    Climate Change Education Programs: Governments can develop and implement climate change education programs in schools, universities, and communities.

    Public Awareness Campaigns: Governments can launch public awareness campaigns to educate the public about climate change and its impacts.

    Climate Change Research and Development: Governments can fund research and development initiatives to improve our understanding of climate change and develop new technologies and solutions.

    Climate Change Policy and Legislation: Governments can develop and implement policies and legislation to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and promote sustainable development.

    Several benefits of Government Intervention include the following:

    Informed Citizens: Government intervention can lead to a more informed and engaged citizenry, which is essential for addressing climate change.

    Economic Benefits: Investing in climate change education and awareness can have economic benefits, such as creating new jobs and industries.

    Environmental Benefits: Government intervention can lead to reduced greenhouse gas emissions and improved environmental outcomes.

    International Cooperation: Government intervention can facilitate international cooperation and coordination on climate change issues.

    Challenges and Opportunities

    Limited Resources: Governments may face limited resources and competing priorities, which can make it challenging to address climate change.

    Public Engagement: Governments must engage the public and build support for climate change initiatives.

    International Cooperation: Governments must work together internationally to address the global nature of climate change.

    Technological Innovation: Governments can support technological innovation and the development of new solutions to address climate change.

    In Conclusion; Governments have a critical role to play in promoting climate change education and awareness, as well as developing and implementing policies to mitigate its impacts. By investing in climate change education and awareness, governments can build a more informed and engaged citizenry, drive economic benefits, and improve environmental outcomes. As the world continues to grapple with the challenges of climate change, government intervention will be essential for addressing this global issue.

    In conclusion, climate change education and public awareness are essential components in the fight against climate change. By educating people about the issue and empowering them to take action, we can build a more sustainable future and mitigate the worst impacts of climate change. As individuals, communities, and nations, we must work together to address this global challenge and ensure a livable future for generations to come.

    • Dr. Adebayo Matthew, Adeleye (Ph.D., Ibadan) Researcher on Environmental Pollution and Control badeleye@gmail.com  +234 803 525 6450.

  • Investing in Tomorrow: Tinubu’s blueprint for youth empowerment, economic prosperity

    Investing in Tomorrow: Tinubu’s blueprint for youth empowerment, economic prosperity

    By Alex Oware

    Nigeria, a nation pulsating with youthful energy, stands at a pivotal juncture. With a median age of 17, our demographic reality underscores a fundamental truth: the future of Nigeria is inextricably linked to the well-being and empowerment of its young people. 

    President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s administration, recognising this imperative, has embarked on a series of ambitious youth empowerment initiatives and transformative economic reforms, laying the groundwork for a prosperous future led by a well-equipped next generation.

    Central to this vision is the launch of the Nigerian Youth Academy (NiYA). This groundbreaking initiative aims to address the nation’s low human capital index and persistent unemployment by providing world-class training in digital literacy, technical skills, entrepreneurship, and the creative industries. 

    NiYA’s mission is clear: to equip millions of young Nigerians with the skills necessary to compete in the global marketplace, transforming them from job seekers to job creators. By fostering a culture of innovation and self-reliance, NiYA is poised to unlock the immense potential of our youth, driving economic growth and social development.

    Complementing NiYA are other critical initiatives designed to provide young entrepreneurs with the necessary financial support and resources. The Youth Investment Fund and the Presidential Initiative for Youth Enterprise Clusters are vital instruments in this endeavour, offering access to capital, mentorship, and business development services. 

    Furthermore, the proposed National Youth Development Bank holds the promise of revolutionising access to finance for young entrepreneurs, allowing them to turn their innovative ideas into thriving businesses.

    Recognising that education and skills development are the bedrock of youth empowerment, the Tinubu administration has prioritised initiatives aimed at enhancing access to quality education and vocational training. The Nigeria Education Loan Fund (NELFUND) is a game-changer, expanding access to higher education for countless young Nigerians who might otherwise be unable to afford it. 

    The Three Million Technical Talent Initiative (3MTT) is another crucial step, focusing on providing globally relevant digital and vocational skills to equip our youth for the demands of the modern economy. 

    The iDICE Programme and the refocused Nigeria Youth Investment Fund (NYIF) also provide critical funding opportunities specifically aimed at tech and creative entrepreneurs, stimulating innovation in key growth sectors.

    These youth empowerment initiatives are not isolated efforts; they are intrinsically linked to the broader economic reforms undertaken by the Tinubu administration. The removal of fuel subsidies, while initially challenging, has freed up significant resources that are now being strategically invested in infrastructure and human capital development. 

    This bold move, along with the floating of the naira and other structural reforms, is aimed at stabilising the economy, improving investor confidence, and creating a more sustainable economic environment for future generations. 

    Read Also: Tinubu greets Sulu-Gambari on 85th birthday 

    The establishment of CreditCorp, designed to enable affordable consumer credit, holds the potential to unlock purchasing power for young Nigerians, stimulating economic activity and creating new opportunities.

    President Tinubu’s focus on developing the digital economy is particularly noteworthy. Recognising the transformative power of technology, the administration is committed to creating an enabling environment for digital innovation and entrepreneurship. 

    The call for the enactment of the Digital Economy and e-Governance Bill 2024 is a testament to this commitment, paving the way for a digitally driven economy that creates jobs and opportunities for young Nigerians. By embracing the digital revolution, we can position our youth at the forefront of global innovation.

    Beyond economic empowerment, the Tinubu administration is also committed to nurturing the next generation of leaders through initiatives that promote youth engagement in governance and development. The National Youth Conference (NYC) provides a platform for young Nigerians to voice their concerns, share their ideas, and contribute to national development. 

    President Tinubu’s direct appeals to the youth for their input and his acknowledgment of their crucial role in the nation’s future underscore his commitment to building a more inclusive and participatory democracy.

    While the challenges facing Nigeria’s youth are significant, President Tinubu’s bold and forward-thinking policies demonstrate a clear commitment to empowering them and securing a prosperous future. 

    The initiatives outlined above, from NiYA to NELFUND, from 3MTT to CreditCorp, are not merely programs; they are investments in the future of our nation. They are a testament to the belief that by equipping our youth with the skills, resources, and opportunities they need to succeed, we can build a stronger, more prosperous, and more equitable Nigeria.

    It is crucial to acknowledge that the success of these initiatives hinges on consistent implementation, transparency, and accountability. It also requires the active participation and collaboration of all stakeholders, including the private sector, civil society, and, most importantly, the youth themselves. 

    As we move forward, we must remain steadfast in our commitment to investing in our young people, ensuring that they have the tools and opportunities they need to realise their full potential and lead Nigeria into a brighter future.

    President Tinubu’s vision is clear: to build a Nigeria where every young person has the opportunity to thrive. By empowering our youth, we are not just investing in their future; we are investing in the future of our nation. Let us embrace this vision and work together to create a Nigeria where the dreams of our youth become a reality, ensuring that the generations to come inherit a nation that is prosperous, equitable, and filled with boundless opportunities.

    Alex Oware is the Regional Director, YP4T.

  • Artificial Intelligence and the future of Nigeria’s public service

    Artificial Intelligence and the future of Nigeria’s public service

    There is no doubt that we are now in the age of the artificial intelligence, or precisely the Digital Age. Indeed, in scholarship, scholars are already signaling the arrival of a posthuman world within which machines and digital technologies would have taken over most of the intelligences that are usually associated with humans. Whether there will be such a world when machines would challenge human intelligence is still a moot point. What is obvious now is the rate at which artificial intelligences are deployed in the performance of several cognitive functions that are traditionally associated with human capacities. From Siri and Alexa to the driverless bicycle and car, and from social media algorithms to ChatGPT, AI is gradually getting launched in several areas of human endeavor—education, manufacturing, architecture, entertainment, governance, healthcare, sports, and many more.

    It is definitely inevitable that public administration has to confront and engage with the utility of AI in achieving performance and efficiency. The pioneering innovation in both AI and public administration has already been done by Herbert Simon, 1978 Nobel Laureate, especially in his research on organizational knowledge, decision making and human performance. For example, in his theory of administrative behavior, Simon argues that since decision makers and managers are not perfect beings, public administrators cannot be expected to make perfect decisions and choices. On the contrary, this is because they do not have the capacity to think and know everything all at once at any given point. The limitations to their thinking and knowledge imply that they work within this “bounded rationality.” Thus, public managers make administrative choices that are “satisficing”—they are the smart choice not because they are the best ones, but because they are the most satisfactory given the available limitations.

    Within this Herbert Simon’s understanding of administrative behavior and decision-making, we can then begin to imagine how the limitation can be reduced through the deployment of AI. In other words, how does AI intervene in administrative and managerial operations in terms of improving operational efficiency, facilitating informed and evidence-based decision-making, efficient delivery of personalise public services, resource use optimisation and therefore organisational productivity, while promoting efficient, secure, and citizen-centred and modernised systems and work processes?

    Read Also: FULL LIST: UK Introduces new English tests for visa, citizenship applicants

    Public administration 2.0 is the forerunner especially in the application and deployment of technologies in fast tracking administrative and managerial processes and operations. Through the use of data analytics, and especially user-generated content and interactivity in Web 2.0, public administration and the public sector is better enhanced in terms of citizen-engagement in the administration of government; decision-making is facilitated through data analytics, open data that makes for transparency; and administrative processes that are streamlined for efficiency through the use technologies. With the addition and application of AI, the administration of the public sector, and most significantly of the public service, is provided with a powerful tool for transforming the public sector into a mechanism for effectively and efficiently delivering democratic governance. Let me outline a few of such possibilities.

    The first possibility is in the area of managing administrative routines and processes, by articulating heuristic models that reduce costs and man-hour, especially in terms of lowering labour and operational costs that have a significant bearing on performance and national productivity. For example, through AI-based virtual assistants, administrators can adequately manage their calendars, book appointments and send reminders. AI document management system streamlines document scanning, organisation, storage and retrieval processes. Second, AI provides the possibility of stimulating several scenario modelling tools that public sector administrators can utilize in simulating and evaluating various courses of actions and potential outcomes through the deployment of predictive analytics that assist in forecasting future trends, risks and opportunities. This implies therefore that administrators and managers are able to use AI tools to enhance strategic intelligence for problem-solving decision-making that anticipates challenges, gets early warning signals, and proactively devises strategies to mitigate risks or take advantage of emerging trends.

    Third, AI facilitates a near-seamless workplace efficiency, communication and team relations. In using AI-powered chatbots and virtual assistants, any public administrator and manager is able to significantly inject administrative sanity into the workplace to resolve complex cooperative matters, instigating effective communication, and evaluate inefficient patterns, processes and practices for critical review and improvement. AI also assists in facilitating seamless interaction among team members through the possibility of remote work dynamics, messaging, video conferencing and file sharing as enabled by such applications as Zoom, Slack and Microsoft Teams, etc.

    The fourth fundamental possibility generated by AI in the workplace is the enhancement of performance management. There is the possibility of enhancing data-rooted policy intelligence and decisions through using AI to generate reports and dashboards information around key performance indicators, trends and anomalies. The automation of workflow management goes a long way in harnessing AI-powered project management tools that activate task assignment, resource allocation, the planning and tracking of projects for updates, and the identification of systemic and human-induced impediments and bottlenecks. AI can also enable regulatory governance through the automating of compliance processes and standards monitored in real-time to ensure adherence to regulatory requirements and organisational policies. This proactive approach can significantly reduce the risk of compliance violations, enhance organisational resilience and trustworthiness.

    The proactive initiatives of the Tinubu administration—through the Ministry of Communication, Innovation and Digital Economy—are critical and commendable in trying to fast track Nigeria’s functional participation in the global AI ecosystem. We have the development of the national AI strategy and roadmap, from the 2023 Data Protection Act to the signing of the Bletchley Declaration on AI, that situate Nigeria within the capability readiness to deploy the best in global and national AI developments and initiatives that will energize governance and public institutions. What is needed more is the political will and the institutional reform frameworks to push the bounds of the capacity of AI to impact public administration and the public sector in Nigeria. One most immediate point of engagement for AI tools is Nigeria’s anti-corruption campaign. One need not wonder too much why this is so. The civil service all around the world specifically and the public sector at large is still plagued with systemic and structural bottlenecks that incentivise corrupt practices. It is not different in Nigeria. Bureaucratic corruption undermines and undercut budgetary and policy investments in the welfare of Nigerians through the drastic reduction in the quality of infrastructural development. Applying AI tools to the anti-corruption campaign will not only effectively enable the detection of corruption through the sophisticated analysis of financial transactions—suspected financial inflows and anomalies—in government business and the economy. These tools will also enhance government’s capacity to achieve optimal tax collection through automatic detection of tax evaders and tax audit optimisation.

    AI tools and technologies can equally be deployed in achieving security objectives. This will derive from their capacity to monitor crime patterns, predict security threats and enable crime detection using algorithmic protocols and the intelligence these protocols are able to generate to improve rapid responses during emergencies. Artificial intelligence and digital technologies also have significant implications for healthcare delivery through enhanced disease diagnosis and prognosis, treatment planning and public health analysis. The same goes for the administration of service delivery in the education sector by improving personalized learning experiences and improving learning outcomes. In agriculture, AI can be deployed to analyze farming trends and patterns, optimize crop yields and improve food production.

    When Elon Musk took over the running of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) in the US, he was aware not only that he had a herculean task ahead of him to rationalize and optimize a large federal bureaucracy. He was also aware of the capacity of AI to assist his policy intentions and objectives. When he deployed the AI-powered chatbot, GSAi, and demanded the upgrade of the technological software of entire government workforce, it was a smart move that would cut in half the possible bottlenecks that such a downgrading might experience. This is to enable federal employees efficiently create talking points, summarize text, and write code. This then becomes the basis for expanding the AI tools not only, for example, for achieving efficiency in contract management and procurement, but also for enabling a hitch-free downsizing objective. In other words, the GSAi enhance the capacity of the government to identify and deal with waste and redundancies. Elon Musk insists that “a trillion dollars can be saved just by addressing waste, fraud and abuse.”

    It then becomes very clear what the lessons are that the Nigerian government can learn from this imperative of deploying AI to the urgent necessity of tackling cost of governance and waste management. And again, it requires the most pre-emptive and proactive measures that the political will of the Tinubu administration can muster to bring the public sector up to speed in terms of the benefits of AI. This requires the government taking fundamental steps in institutional and governance reforms. The public service, for example, needs to add AI to the list of its urgent twenty-first century competences, skills and literacies, especially competences in specialized data science, machine learning, AI engineering skills, and data privacy, governance and data security management. This is to the extent that Nigeria needs a critical mass of public officers who understand the technical and administrative significance and operational imperatives of AI in public administration and in the public service. Failure to do this means that despite government’s willingness to sign on to global and regional treaties on AI, not strengthening this willingness by pragmatic institutional reform steps will leave Nigeria behind in the global AI transformation. There is, for example, the need for government to put strong and attractive talent management strategies and incentives in place that will first counteract the perception of government as a terrible employer of labour, retain the talents that are already struggling in government employment, and then draw talents especially from the private sector.

    As usual with almost all organizational and institutional dynamics, AI and the change management strategies required to bring it on board will meet with significant resistance by both the public servants and the citizens. It is the responsibility of government and its reform experts to articulate a change management that enable a speedy and friendly AI adoption. For instance, the government needs massive investment that ensures data availability and the need to build data culture nation-wide. The dynamic will also require the building of strong and intelligent support systems especially in the public service to enhance staff learning and for problem-solving to address critical challenges before they escalate and make a mess of the entire national programme.

    Finally, the downside of digital technologies and AI usage is their vulnerability to cybersecurity threats, data breaches and hacking that compromise sensitive official and national information and data. The government therefore needs an adequate security systems and framework—and new offices and positions—that will ensure the appropriate management and protection of AI tools and government data. New roles required will be that of Chief AI Officer, AI Security Office, AI Regulator, and so on, who will be charged with the supervision and monitoring of AI deployment across the MDAs, as well as the implementation of the necessary legislation and guidelines. 

    AI is the future of government and public administration. It is one means by which the Tinubu administration can instigate a significant jumpstarting of the Renewed Hope Agenda by dragging AI into its implementation and into the institutional reform blueprint to make it successful.