Category: Commentaries

  • Bad roads and their toll on our economy

    Bad roads and their toll on our economy

    Sir: Drive anywhere in Nigeria, and it won’t take you long to find evidence of a broken system: cracked highways, cratered city streets, and rural roads that are somehow impassable. For decades, the conversation around bad roads has centred on inconvenience and traffic. But there’s a deeper and less talked-about consequence, and this is the toll these bad roads are taking on our economy.

    Road transportation remains the backbone of commerce in Nigeria, and over 90% of goods and passengers are moved by roads, according to the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS). Yet, many of these roads are in poor condition, making delivery times slow, increasing fuel costs, and the lifespan of vehicles drops dramatically. So, who pays for this inefficiency? The consumers, business owners, and the government all lose in different ways albeit.

    A 2022 report by the World Bank estimated that Nigeria loses about $1 billion annually due to poor road infrastructure. This includes losses from increased travel times, higher vehicle operating costs, and goods damaged in transit. Can a developing economy afford such a loss year after year? Especially when capital budgets are shrinking and inflation is rising? This and is clearly NO.

    Let’s even consider the agricultural sector. Farmers in Benue or Taraba often struggle to get their produce to markets in Lagos or Port Harcourt due to inaccessible rural roads. And the result of that is definitely food waste. The Nigerian Stored Products Research Institute even estimates that up to 40% of food produced in the country never reaches the final consumer, largely due to transportation and logistics challenges. Isn’t this concerning, particularly for a country not free from food shortage?

    Read Also: Report suspected illegal investment schemes to us, SEC charges Nigerians

    In urban areas, the economic cost translates to lost productivity. Workers spend hours in traffic jams caused by bad roads. This isn’t just about time, it’s about GDP. How many work hours are lost daily due to roads that were either poorly constructed or left unrepaired for decades? How much value is drained from the economy by this everyday inefficiency?

    We need to talk about inaction. The federal and state governments often announce ambitious road projects, but completion rates remain low. According to BudgIT’s 2023 report on capital projects, over 50% of road projects funded between 2015 and 2022 were either abandoned or under-delivered. Yet mouth-watering amount were budgeted for these roads. At this point accountability should not be elusive in such a critical sector.

    To surmise, fixing Nigeria’s roads is not just a matter of convenience, it’s an economic imperative. The country’s future competitiveness depends on how efficiently goods, services, and people can move. Shall we continue to tolerate the quiet economic sabotage that these bad roads inflict, or will we finally see infrastructure as the foundation of growth it truly is?

    •Babatunde Yusuf, maplebyautos@gmail.com

  • Atedo’s clannish nationalism

    Atedo’s clannish nationalism

    Atedo Peterside, smart banker and illustrious son of Rivers, is angry.  Why? 

    “So, a man leaves Cross River State, comes to Rivers in an inflamed situation to help achieve stability and healing,” he said of the Rivers Sole Administrator, Admiral Ibok Ete Ibas (rtd) on Arise TV, “but he might be inadvertently adding fuel to the fire.”

    How?  Again, hear from the horse’s mouth: “We know ourselves in Rivers State.  You make appointments from the people you’ve chosen.  I can tell you, with due respect to the people he appointed, in my personal opinion, they are riff-raffs.”

    But can appointees be “riff-raffs” just because Peterside disagreed with the way the Sole Administrator — don’t forget: from Cross River! — appointed them? Or because they have specific flaws, which make them “riff-raffs”?

    It would appear they are “riff-raffs” because Peterside did not like the way they were picked.  An opinion, in a democracy, is no crime.  Hardball just wished Peterside would be humble enough that his opinion can’t hold true for others.

    Though he didn’t dismiss Ibas as a “riff-raff” as his Rivers appointees, it was clear Peterside thinks so little of Ibas’s appointment as Sole Administrator.

    To him, Ibas “emerged in an irregular manner”.  Then, the “executive” — read the Presidency– “were misguided”.  Then, the legislature — including members from Rivers — used the “rascality” of “voice vote to confirm his appointment.”  The case is now sub-judice.  But who knows what Peterside’s judgment would be, when it’s decided?

    Read Also: FULL LIST: Top 15 European scholarships Nigerians can apply for in 2025

    Still, wait a minute!  Hardball, thought Peterside was a banker of the purest crust!  When did he morph into a jurist, making sweeping pronouncements in such legal matters?

    It’s all blather and bluster, of course, from an angry and irate son of Rivers!  Fair enough.  Even then, isn’t Peterside’s anger coming a tad too late?

    When Siminilayi Fubara, the suspended governor, was pulling down the Rivers House of Assembly, did Peterside raise his voice?  When he was spending unappropriated money for two years running?  When he seized legislators’ salaries — were the victims too from Cross River?  And when the so-called Rivers elders were talking from both sides of the mouth?  Of course, Peterside’s own contribution was a loud quiet!

    This latter-day Rivers nationalism, hinged on hollow, clannish condescension, is all so unnecessary.  Ibas is not the enemy here.  It’s Rivers people themselves — or more appropriately, the elite — that hee-hawed, instead reining in the wild breed in their public space.

    The enemy is right inside, not some stranger from Cross River.  Let Rivers subdue own demons, instead of blaming others.  Atedo, grumble to the right quarters.

  • Pope Francis: A quintessential religious and secular leader

    Pope Francis: A quintessential religious and secular leader

    • By Sunday Olagunju

    Sir: According to world’s renowned novelist and playwright, Shakespeare, “Life is a stage and every man or woman plays his or her part and leaves the stage”. But few leave the stage better than they met it and late Pope Francis was among the very few.

    Pope Francis was a quintessential world and religious leader who in his life time depicted the Rotarian motto “He benefits most who serves best”. Pope Francis was the Head of State of the Vatican and the head of the Roman Catholics throughout the world, yet he died with only $100 in his bank account.

    Representatives from over 170 nations attended his funeral, not just as a Catholic pontiff, but as one quintessential world leader who symbolized Jesus example of a good servant leader. Leadership is service and not enrichment at the expense of the people.

    African leaders, especially our own leaders at home, must learn a great lesson from the life of Pope Francis. Looking at the political landscape, a bemused Nigerian once retorted: “every four years Nigerians go to the poll to elect their executioners”.

    Greed and rapacious living and lifestyle is antithetical of a compassionate and committed leader who like Pope Francis, would live for the mitigation of the less privileged and the preponderantly vulnerable poor citizens that daily eke a living in a country flowing with milk and honey.

    Described as the Pope for the poor because of his compassion and commitment for the world’s vulnerable poor, Pope Francis was a bridge builder across world’s religions, especially between the followers of the world’s two greatest religions, Islam and Christianity.

    Read Also: EFCC warns Nigerians: Greed makes you target for ponzi schemes

    He strove throughout his Papacy to build a beneficial and complementary relationship between their followers. Few remember that the Pope was the head of State of Vatican, world’s smallest state and the head of the Roman Catholic faithful.

    He combines the divine responsibility to the Catholic Church and a leader’s duty to the citizens of the world, and he never reneged in either of them. Most world leaders don’t profess any religion and so owe God no explanation for their leadership, but yet as head of state of their respective people, most fail in their duties towards them.

    Pope Francis death is a further confirmation that: “we bring nothing to the world, and we will take nothing away from the world but good name and laudable deeds”. Pope Francis exemplifies the teaching of Jesus Christ that, a leader can be poor so that his followers can be rich. Most African leaders prefer to be rich while the nations and citizens under them quiver to breathe.

    •Sunday Olagunju,

    Ibadan, Oyo State.

  • What Qatar cannot do—exists

    What Qatar cannot do—exists

    • By Charles Dickson

    Sir: When Qatar won the bid to host the 2022 FIFA World Cup, sceptics questioned its capacity. A decade later, the world watched in awe as Doha unveiled state-of-the-art stadiums, a seamless metro system, and the architectural marvel that is Hamad International Airport. This airport, with its futuristic design, indoor gardens, and 40,000-square-meter retail space, is more than a transit hub—it’s a statement. Qatar invested over $200 billion in infrastructure, diversifying its economy beyond oil and gas into tourism, finance, and education.

    Yet, this progress came at a cost. Reports of exploited migrant workers, restrictive labour laws, and censorship cast shadows over Qatar’s triumphs. However, the nation’s leadership demonstrated an unwavering vision: a willingness to spend, plan, and execute projects that transcended short-term politics. Qatar’s success lies not in perfection but in its ability to align resources, ambition, and global branding—flaws notwithstanding.

    Nigeria, Africa’s largest economy and most populous nation, mirrors Qatar in potential. With vast oil reserves, a youthful population, and cultural influence, it could be a continental beacon. Yet, decades of corruption, inept governance, and infrastructural decay tell a different story.

    Consider airports: While Hamad Airport symbolizes Qatar’s ambition, Nigeria’s airports—like Lagos’ Murtala Muhammed International—remain stuck in the 1970s, plagued by power outages, leaking roofs, and bureaucratic inertia. Qatar’s leaders see infrastructure as nation-building; Nigeria’s political class views it as a piggy bank. The $461 million Abuja CCTV contract, the Ajaokuta Steel Mill, and the Lagos-Ibadan Expressway delays are monuments to graft and incompetence.

    Read Also: Shettima, Ganduje, APC govs storm Delta Monday to welcome Oborevwori, Okowa, others to APC 

    The divergence stems from leadership and vision. Qatar’s monarchy, though autocratic, prioritizes legacy projects that outlive individual rulers. Nigeria’s leaders, however, are consumed by short-term gains—embezzling oil wealth, politicizing development, and weaponising ethnicity. Qatar invests in education (Education City hosts branches of Georgetown and North-western); Nigeria’s universities languish through endless strikes. Qatar leverages its small population (2.7 million) for cohesive growth; Nigeria’s 220 million people endure fractured governance, where state allocations vanish into personal pockets.

    Cultural attitudes also differ. Qatar maintains its infrastructure meticulously; Nigeria’s “maintenance culture” is an oxymoron. Stadiums built for the 2003 All Africa Games lie in ruins. Refineries do not work, despite billions spent on repairs. We celebrate “potential” as an anaesthetic for failure.

    As a Nigerian, this comparison stings. It’s not about Qatar’s wealth but its will. Nigeria has no excuse: Our oil reserves surpass Qatar’s, our diaspora excels globally, and our creativity dominates music and film. Yet, we falter where focus and integrity are required.

    The problem isn’t resources—it’s accountability. Qatar’s World Cup spotlight forced labour reforms; Nigeria’s leaders face no such pressure. Citizens endure hardships while elites stash billions abroad. Our institutions, from the judiciary to the police, prioritize patronage over service.

    Qatar’s story proves that transformation is possible with vision and sacrifice. Nigeria’s redemption requires a leadership revolution—not just in government but in civic responsibility. We must demand transparency, punish corruption, and invest in human capital.

    The Hamad Airport wasn’t built by magic but by intentionality. Nigeria can rise, but only when we confront our demons: greed, tribalism, and apathy. The world saw Qatar’s ambition; it’s time to show them ours. As hurt as I am, I still believe—because Nigeria’s greatest resource isn’t oil. It’s her people. And our story isn’t over yet.

    Qatar has done loads of things right, but one thing it cannot do is make Nigeria do right, if it will happen.

    •Prince Charles Dickson PhD,

    <pcdbooks@gmail.com>

  • Nigeria’s poverty of enlightened followership

    Nigeria’s poverty of enlightened followership

    • By Leonard Karshima Shilgba

    Sir: When discussing Nigeria’s enduring national crises, fingers instinctively point to the failure of leadership. Yet, beneath this well-worn narrative lies a greater, more dangerous tragedy: the poverty of enlightened, rational, and intelligent followership. Leadership, after all, does not materialize in a vacuum. It is a mirror of the intellectual, moral, and cultural climate of the society from which it emerges. A shallow, uninformed populace will invariably produce shallow, uninformed leaders.

    Nigeria’s leadership crisis is not merely about corrupt individuals or broken institutions. It is a systemic crisis rooted in the deficiencies of the followership. Emotional reactions to complex national issues, widespread embrace of rumours, and a pervasive reluctance to read or study critically characterize a large portion of the Nigerian citizenry. Thus, the pool from which leaders are recruited is dominated by individuals who themselves lack enlightenment, rationality, and depth.

    This reality makes it almost impossible for consistently visionary, strategic, and competent leadership to thrive.

    One might expect that Nigeria’s educated class would anchor the nation’s critical reasoning and demand for accountability. Sadly, academic education often does not translate into intellectual rigour. Many degree holders react emotionally rather than analytically, rely on hearsay rather than verified facts, amplify rumours without cross-checking sources, even on national television or radio, demonstrate tribal and religious bias even in professional discussions.

    Read Also: EFCC warns Nigerians: Greed makes you target for ponzi schemes

    Instead of using education as a springboard for independent thought, too many treat it as a badge of social status devoid of corresponding civic responsibility.

    The Nigerian public discourse is awash with emotionalism and rumour-mongering. Politicians, recognizing this weakness, manipulate public sentiments—ethnic loyalty, religious identity, and historical grievances—at the expense of rational dialogue and policy debate.

    A citizenry addicted to emotional triggers, sensationalism, and conspiracy theories cannot consistently demand accountable leadership. Instead, it rewards emotional populists and punishes thoughtful reformers.

    Critical reading, which cultivates informed decision-making, patience, and nuanced understanding, is increasingly rare. A society allergic to reading is a society allergic to thinking.

    Without a culture of sustained study, citizens fall for simplistic explanations of complex issues, public debate remains shallow, electoral choices are based on charisma, ethnic affiliation, or fleeting anger rather than reasoned policy analysis.

    This intellectual famine ensures that public conversations remain superficial—and so too does leadership selection.

    The consequence is a self-perpetuating vicious cycle: poor followership produces poor leadership, poor leadership destroys educational systems (we see this even within our universities and other higher education institutions, where leadership selection has been reduced to political patronage), a deteriorated educational system breeds more intellectually weak citizens, and these citizens reproduce poor leadership again and again.

    Without a deliberate effort to break this cycle, Nigeria risks remaining trapped in a downward spiral of underdevelopment, no matter how many elections are held or how many constitutions are rewritten.

    True national transformation must begin at the foundation of followership. To break the vicious cycle, critical thinking must be introduced early in education and reinforced throughout life (academic institutions must insist on, and introduce a pragmatic general education portfolio where courses relating to critical thinking are offered and must be taken by all students irrespective of their chosen majors. Additionally, students must be allowed the latitude of independent studies), national reading campaigns must be launched to revive a culture of study, civic education must go beyond patriotism and focus on evidence-based reasoning, media literacy must be taught to equip citizens to verify facts and resist emotional manipulation, especially by television and radio hosts and guests that specialize in spinning truth on the head, and manipulating the citizenry, and intellectual achievement must be celebrated, and thoughtful dissent protected and honoured.

    Sadly, every so often, Nigerians descend upon holders of views with which  they disagree with excoriating vulgarities and imputation of unholy motives. What public intolerance! Some highly cerebral Nigerian minds, who can’t stand this public ridicule, have decided to “siddon look”, and the nation loses thereby.

    Only an enlightened, rational, and intelligent populace can elect, support, and sustain enlightened leadership. Nigerians are often too quick to give up on the leaders they elect, because, being undiscerning and amenable to easy manipulation, they can’t discern the deep-rooted administration of solutions to the complex national problems, but being impatient that the symptoms linger in spite, they become easy prey to predatory manipulators who point to the lingering symptoms as evidence that their leaders have not applied the right remedies.

    Until Nigerians demand depth, competence, and vision from themselves first, they will continue to receive from their leaders what they themselves embody: emotionalism, mediocrity, and short-sightedness.

    •Prof Leonard Karshima Shilgba,

    Admiralty University of Nigeria, Ibusa, Delta State.

  • Nigeria’s child prisoners

    Nigeria’s child prisoners

    Children in Nigeria’s correctional centres are among disturbing aspects of the country’s justice system. The Minister of Interior, Olubunmi Tunji-Ojo, recently expressed concern over the issue at a high-level inter-agency stakeholder meeting in Abuja. 

    He cited a 2024 report indicating that an alarming 26,000 children had been held annually in the country’s  correctional facilities over the past five years. He said this figure represented over 30 percent of the total inmate population, raising serious concerns about violations of child protection laws. He noted that the laws mandated “their placement in borstal institutions so that they can undergo reformation in line with their age.”

    The Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Interior, Magdalene Ajani, also observed that between 2018 and 2022, an average of 26,000 children and young adults were held in Nigeria’s custodial centres annually. “These statistics are not just numbers, they represent vulnerable lives in urgent need of intervention,” she said.

    Read Also: Shettima, Ganduje, APC govs storm Delta Monday to welcome Oborevwori, Okowa, others to APC 

    Also, she underlined the need to promote non-custodial measures and diversion programmes as viable alternatives to detention, sharing best practices and strengthening legal frameworks to ensure detention is a measure of last resort, in line with Article 37(b) of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child and Nigeria’s Child Rights Act of 2003.

    Notably, Segun Olowookere, who controversially spent 10 years on death row before he was pardoned by Osun State Governor Ademola Adeleke in December 2024, drew attention to the presence of minors in prison in an interview published after his release.

    He was 17 years old at the time of his arrest in November 2010, which means that he was a minor. Children, as defined by Nigeria’s Child Rights Act (2003), are any persons under the age of 18.

    He was in Ilesa Prison, Osun State, “throughout the trial of the case,” which suggests that he may have spent part of his years as a minor in prison.  He said police and courts “should consider the implications of throwing minors and small offenders into prison.”

    At the Abuja meeting, the minister said breaches would be investigated and that institutions failing to comply would face consequences, adding that the Federal Government was committed to reforming Nigeria’s correctional system, particularly focusing on the growing number of children in correctional facilities.

    International and national laws emphasise that the juvenile justice system should prioritise rehabilitation over punishment. Concerns about children being held in adult correctional facilities are valid as such detention can expose them to harm and hinder their rehabilitation.

    The country needs to urgently review its juvenile justice system, and ensure that children do not end up in adult correctional centres when they should be in juvenile detention facilities.

  • Pope Francis: The reformist who divided opinion

    Pope Francis: The reformist who divided opinion

    By Aysu Bicer and Esra Tekin

    When Jorge Mario Bergoglio became Pope Francis in March 2013, his election was considered unexpected.

    At 76, he was older than many anticipated, and as a Jesuit from Argentina, he was a relative outsider to the Vatican establishment.

    But his selection was historic — he became the first pope from Latin America and the first member of the Jesuit order to lead the Catholic Church.

    Over a decade into his papacy, Francis remained a figure of both admiration and controversy.

    He died at age 88 after suffering a prolonged illness, the Vatican announced on Monday.

    He suffered a “prolonged asthma-like respiratory crisis” associated with thrombocytopenia, according to a previous Vatican statement.

    Francis sought to reform the Vatican’s bureaucracy, tackle corruption, and address some of the church’s most pressing challenges.

    While he had been hailed for his humility and commitment to social justice, his leadership also drew sharp resistance from conservatives within the church and beyond.

    A life shaped by faith, struggle

    Born in Buenos Aires on Dec. 17, 1936, to Italian immigrant parents, Jorge Mario Bergoglio was drawn to religious life from an early age.

    Read Also: North, coalition formation and presumptions

    He studied in Argentina and later in Germany before being ordained as a Jesuit priest in 1969.

    Unlike many Vatican figures, he had little international exposure early in his career, spending most of his time in Argentina, where he gained a reputation as a humble, austere leader deeply committed to social justice.

    His early years were marked by personal hardship.

    As a young man, he suffered a severe lung infection and lost a part of his right lung. Despite this, he remained physically active and later became Archbishop of Buenos Aires in 1998.

    As a cardinal, Bergoglio was known for his simple lifestyle, often taking public transport instead of using a chauffeur.

    His sermons frequently addressed inequality and the struggles of the poor, subtly criticizing governments that failed to protect the most vulnerable. He was seen as a voice for social inclusion, which later became a defining theme of his papacy.

    First Pope born outside Europe in more than a millennium

    Francis, the Catholic Church’s 266th pope, was the first non-European pope since Gregory Ill, who was born in modern-day Syria and elected in 731.

    He chose the name Francis in honor of St. Francis of Assisi, a 13th-century monk known for his charity and kindness to animals.

    He studied philosophy and earned a master’s degree in Chemistry from the University of Buenos Aires. He taught literature, psychology, philosophy, and theology before becoming the Archbishop of Buenos Aires, the Argentine capital.

    In his youth, he enjoyed dancing tango with his girlfriend before discovering his religious vocation.

    As a student, he worked as a bouncer in a Buenos Aires bar and had a stint as a janitor.

    He was also known for washing the feet of AIDS patients during his time as archbishop — echoing Jesus, in the Bible, washing the feet of his disciples.

    A papacy of reform

    From the beginning, Pope Francis set a different tone. He chose not to live in the Apostolic Palace, opting instead for a modest guesthouse in the Vatican.

    He rejected many of the formalities of the papacy, signaling a shift toward a more accessible, down-to-earth leadership style.

    His early popularity was bolstered by his focus on key reforms. He took swift action to tackle financial corruption within the Vatican, particularly in the scandal-ridden Vatican Bank.

    He also restructured the Curia — the church’s administrative body — reducing its bureaucracy and making it more transparent.

    Child sex abuse scandals

    One of his most significant challenges had been addressing the church’s child sex abuse scandals.

    He removed bishops accused of covering up abuse and created a Vatican commission to address the issue. However, critics argue that his actions had not gone far enough, pointing to the slow pace of justice for victims.

    Francis also consistently spoke out on global issues beyond the church.

    He criticized free-market capitalism, calling it a system that often “kills” the poor.

    He urged governments to take stronger action on climate change and was an advocate for migrants, going so far as to compare European migrant detention centers to concentration camps. These statements sparked a backlash from conservative politicians and business leaders.

    Despite being seen as a progressive, Pope Francis remained firm on key Catholic teachings. He upheld traditional positions on abortion, same-sex marriage, and the role of women in the church, showing that he was not a liberal in the way some expected.

    His willingness to replace high-ranking conservative cardinals with more progressive voices fueled further resistance. Some Vatican insiders accused him of marginalizing traditionalists in favor of his own reformist agenda.

    Long before his papacy, Bergoglio’s role during Argentina’s military dictatorship (1976-1983) was a subject of debate.

    As head of the country’s Jesuits during this period, he was accused by some of failing to protect two kidnapped priests. Another allegation suggested he did not follow up on a request to help find the missing baby of a woman who was kidnapped and later killed.

    The Vatican strongly denied any wrongdoing on his part.

    Nobel Peace Prize-winning human rights activist Adolfo Perez Esquivel, who was jailed and tortured during the dictatorship, defended Pope Francis, saying there was no evidence he collaborated with the regime.

    Since becoming pope, Francis had taken steps to acknowledge the church’s role in Argentina’s past. He initiated the beatification process for priests murdered by the regime and ordered the Vatican to open its archives to victims and their families.

    For sure, Pope Francis remains one of the most influential figures in global Catholicism.

    His push for reform had won him both admiration and fierce opposition. His social and economic views continue to divide opinion, and his leadership style has reshaped the Vatican in ways that will have lasting effects.

    •             This article was first published in www.aa.com.tr

  • Writing public service into the Nigerian consciousness

    Writing public service into the Nigerian consciousness

    In this piece, I want to specifically pose the question of how literature and literary writing can serve the purpose of representing the significance of the public service to the Nigerian public. Narrating the nature, significance and dynamics of the public service, admittedly, is the sphere of the social sciences—especially of political science and public administration. But then, why can literature not come to the aid of the political scientists cum administrative scholar-practitioner in documenting the ups and downs of the public service and its role in enabling good governance?

    Literary writings narrate humanity. the human experiences and endeavors in ways that reveal horizons and frontiers of possibilities while also laying bare the depth and dynamics of the familiar. The literary eye sees beyond the normal and transcends the ordinary. All literature reveals their time and context; and this is why literature is a dangerous endeavor: it poses narrative questions that do not reveal easy answers. And yet these questions enable us, if we keep unraveling them long enough, to find a way out of our mental cocoons, according to Elif Shafak, the Turkish novelist. We can all easily agree with C. S. Lewis therefore: “Literature adds to reality; it does not simply describe it. It enriches the necessary competencies that daily life requires and provides; and in this respect, it irrigates the deserts that our lives have already become.”

    Read Also: North, coalition formation and presumptions

    Is the writer then a revolutionary? From Chinua Achebe to Naguib Mahfouz, Wole Soyinka to Mariama Ba, from Niyi Osundare to Abdulrazak Gurnah, from Ngugi wa Thiong’o to Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie and from Nadine Gordimer to Odia Ofeimun, we have writers who have championed a rebellious forthrightness in narrating the conditions for the existence of their postcolonial existence and future. We have writers who enable us to see our ordinary experiences and to transcend them. Let us take Odia Ofeimun’s The Poet Lied (1980) as a starting example. That poetry collection signals Ofeimun’s sensibility as a poet who has a deep understanding of the sociopolitical and economic anguish Nigerians have been going through for much of Nigeria’s sixty-five years of existence. As a poet, according to him, “I cannot blind myself/To putrefying carcass in the market place.” In the poet titled “A Foot Note,” Ofeimun laments:

    In our model democracy

    The magic promises of yesterday

    Lie cold like mounds of dead cattle

    Along caravans that lead nowhere…

    More specifically, in “A Civil Servant,” Odia Ofeimun highlights a critical dimension of any civil and democratic government in terms of the machinery that makes any government function efficiently. This is in terms of policy formulation and service delivery of the dividends of democracy to the citizens.

    A dull day:

    you sit on the dung-heap

    of boredom, a lizard

    basking in the cold sunshine

    of banal precedents.

    Your lymphatic smile

    is decorated with the painless anguish

    of pedestrian hours

    An idle star

    streaks across your sky

    This dull day

    you bear the unproductive patience

    of a dismantled industrial spider

    you cannot say, for certain, what you want.

    This poem represents not only a scathing critique of the neglect of the civil service by any Nigerian government, a neglect that makes the civil servant “sit on the dung-heap of boredom” like a lizard basking in a “cold sunshine.” It is also a poem that hits very hard and poetically at what I have called the bureau-pathology of the Nigerian public service, and its capacity for blind conformance at the expense of productive efficiency. A civil servant, Ofeimun aptly remarks, bears the “unproductive patience” of a “dismantled industrial spider”!

    In Niyi Osundare’s “My Lord, Tell Me Where to Keep Your Bribe,” written in 2016 at the height of the corruption scandals that traumatized the sensibility of Nigerians, and especially the undermining of the professional integrity of the Nigerian judiciary. Imagine a servant bowing constantly in fake submissiveness, and asking, “My Lord, where should I keep this bribe?” merely asking that question, with the two contraries of “Lord” and “bribe”, already implies a deep and bruising moral judgement. When we conjoin that with the suggestions of the various hiding places, then we see that the judge being addressed has already, in the space of that monologue, been stripped of all honour. In “No Hiding Place for Politicians,” Osundare was at his poetic height in railing against corruption, embezzlement, clientelism and the betrayal of democratic trust. Take just these lines:

    When the man of power

    Tells you his tale

    Ask him to wait till

    You bring a sieve

    ****

    Whoever believes what the politician says

    His ear is blocked by the carcass of truth

    A politician tells you to wait

    And you heed his words…

    Your sole will tell you

    The biting pains of folly

    These few lines already project not only the politician’s alienation from truth, but also the futility of listening to any form of “politicspeak” by which politicians have deceived Nigerians from independence to date. The “biting pain of folly” is what has indeed attended the constant optimism which has characterized Nigerians’ trust in the politicians who come, make noise, get our votes and then turn to stab us all in the back. But then, it behooves the poet, and the writers that a nation has produced, to bring the citizens to awareness. This is exactly what Barbara Kingsolver had in mind when she said, “What a writer can do, what a fiction writer or a poet or an essay writer can do is re-engage people with their own humanity.”

    Wale Okediran, who celebrates his entry into the septuagenarian circle this year, provides a larger and more experiential context for examining the mindset of an average Nigerian public servant. In his Tenants of the House (2010), Wale Okediran fictionalized his short-lived experience as a member of the Nigerian House of Representative. That was an experience, we can say, that was stranger than fiction. We get to read the fictional account of what we all know has been going on—the greedy consumption of Nigeria’s commonwealth by a few who translated democratic stewardship into a license to steal and loot. What makes Odia Ofeimun’s and Wale Okediran’s literary accounts so graphic and significant is that both have traversed the public service space in Nigeria for a while. They were not just fictionalizing hearsays and the fecundity of their imagination. Any Nigeria, from what we daily encounter about the shenanigans of the political class, can fictionalize their misdeeds. But when one had walked the corridors of power and perceived the dark odor of political corruption, the literary imagination becomes even more effective than it could have been when fashioned on the imagination alone.

    Nigerian literature serves as the handmaiden of social scientific and humanistic inquiry into the state of the Nigerian sociopolitical affairs. As a social commentary, it provides a complementary analysis of where the rain began to beat us as a nation, to quote Chinua Achebe. Indeed, the Nigerian literary space itself suffers significantly from Nigeria’s bureaucratic pathology and policy inchoateness.

    We all know the cost implication of getting published by a traditional publishing firm today. Many of Nigeria’s literary figures, from Chimamanda Adichie to Nnedi Okoroafor, get published elsewhere. This provides an occasion, therefore, to memorialize the great and persevering efforts of the Association of Nigerian Writers (ANA) for keeping the Nigerian literary spirit alive, and for serving as the breeding ground for literary effervescence.

    Nigeria is a literary space; the precarity and suffering instigated by misgovernance and the policy somersault of consecutive administrations in Nigeria provide the occasion for rebellion of the literary imagination. In fact, I am very glad to call on the literary figures in Nigeria as collaborators in the institutional reform of the Nigeria state and its public service machinery. I have often written that institutional and governance reformer is a lonely figure even in social scientific analysis. For more than twenty years, I have been raising the alarm about the debilitating state of the public service in Nigeria, and how institutional reform, as well as the political will of any government, can reverse the rot and restore the machinery of government to an efficient state.

    However, these critiques and analyses cannot compare with the fictional narration of Nigeria’s democratic struggles, the greed of its political class and the suffering of Nigerians. Chris Abani’s Graceland (2004) tells the story of Elvis Oke and his struggle to overcome the poverty, violence and corruption of ghetto life in Lagos. Wole Soyinka’s Chronicles of the Happiest People on Earth (2021) consummates his damning and devastating literary chronicling of the political corruption that has perpetuated a season of anomie in Nigeria since independence. And there are more: Chika Unigwe, Abubakar Adam Ibrahim, Helon Habila, Chinua Achebe, Unoma Azuah, and many others. When even an average Nigerian encounters these writers and their fictional narration of the inefficiency of the Nigerian government and the suffering it engenders, the novels and short stories mirror their experiences. There is no Nigerian lady who will not empathize with Sisi, Efe, Ama and Joyce, the three ladies –in Unigwe’s On Black Sisters Street (2011)—who left Nigeria to become sex workers in Belgium in order to make a good life for themselves.

    Literary activism is the response of Nigerian literature to institutional reform that demands that the administrative dynamics must be responsive to the yearning and aspirations of Nigerians. Literary activism encounters the Nigerian public service as the seat of misery and of transformation. Most Nigerians encounter the Nigerian state from the deficiencies of infrastructural debilitation—bad roads and highway networks, inefficient healthcare facilities, inadequate education sector, etc. Literature engages politics from the perspectives of literary visions of possibilities. We can tell the stories of the civil servant who refuses bribes; the Oga who stands up to the powers that be for the sake of efficiency; the public servant who champions transparency even at the cost of losing her legislative slot; a group of civil servants who presents alternative policy implementation blueprints, and many other possible stories of administrative events that can inspire.

    Here, ANA has a lot to still do in terms of its commitment to literary activism as a mode of speaking truth to power. I think that the genre of the administrative literary genre should be added to existing genres. Rather than the appearance of the public service as a monolithic endeavor in the literary imagination, ANA can encourage Nigerians to harness their experiences of the multifaceted dynamics of the Nigerian public service system to articulate poems, novels and short stories that speak specifically to civil servants, procedures, departments, and systemic experiences and narratives. I will be glad to see special calls for literary editions around the public service and its dynamics. Such special literary editions can elevate the consciousness of Nigerians on what it means to reflect imaginatively on the present and future of the public service in relation to human flourishing in Nigeria.

    For the Russian poet, Boris Pasternak, “Literature is the art of discovering something extraordinary about ordinary people, and saying with ordinary words something extraordinary.” We owe it to the institutional reformers and literary activists to transform the banality of human suffering in Nigeria to the refreshing discovery of the extraordinary power of social change.

    Let me end with a tribute to Dr Wale Okediran at 70. Dr. Okediran has come a long way and has blazed many trails so consistently that at a beautiful age of seventy, he has achieved a sublime legacy that embodies existential fulfilment.

    Dr Okediran is in my estimation Nigeria’s answer to C. P. Snow’s two-culture thesis. According to that thesis, there is a significant and unbridgeable divide between the humanities and the natural sciences in ways that ensure seeming lack of communication between the two. The literary intellectuals and the natural scientists pride themselves on their inability to understand each other, and this, Snow argues, leads to an inhibited intellectual progress. In Wale Okediran, we have a fluid and exemplary personification that firmly undermine that thesis. Dr Okediran fluidly incorporates the love for science and the humanities. He is the very embodiment of the renaissance man—the multi-talented man imbued with a secular sensibility that draws on the human condition to articulate an Afropolitan sensibility of humaneness, compassion, strength, open-mindedness, passion and empathy.

    It was almost inevitable that Dr Okediran’s love for medicine and literature would be deployed in the service of the humanity in Nigeria and on the continent. Medicine is not just physiological and psychological, at least not in Africa. Medicine ministers to the brutalized bodies of Africans. As a medical doctor therefore, Dr Okediran has the unenviable space to confront the many psychotic manifestations of governance failure in Nigeria. His literary interests and skills provide the opportunity to tell the postcolonial Nigerian stories as he encountered them over the course of his own personal existential and professional trajectories. And this explain Dr Okediran’s path into politics; what better way to effect significant changes than being in the corridor of power?

    One could only wonder how long a man of such literary sensibility would last within the murky space of Nigerian politics. Fortunately, public service is not restricted to being a member of the House of Representatives. Dr Okediran’s public service space encompasses the local, the national and the regional—from the National Old Student Association of Olivet Baptist High School to the Pan African Writers Association (PAWA). Dr Wale Okediran’s literary sensibility enables him to build a community of service. The Ebedi International Writers Residency at Iseyin is unique defining sense a built metaphor for Okediran’s enlarged sensibility that draws in people and create possibilities.

    (Being Statement delivered at the Association of Nigerian Authors – ANA – Abuja Chapter 70th Birthday Event/Celebration of Dr. Wale Okediran and a Reading/Writers Dialogue held at the Mamman Vatsa Village, Abuja, on the 19th of April, 2025)

  • IP and Music: A living partnership

    IP and Music: A living partnership

    By Adebambo Adewopo

    As World IP Day marks a record two and half decades in the mission of raising awareness about the role of IP with this year’s theme ‘IP and Music: Feel the beat of IP”, the world of music deservedly takes another front seat after it made its debut ten years ago with the earlier theme “Get up. Stand up. For Music”. This recognition is a testament to the remarkable power and allure of music as one of man’s most potent forms of creative expression. The chequered legacy of intellectual property itself has had a historic connection with the musical genre and remains inextricably tied to the universality and global compact of music as a creative life-force naturally meant for the promise that copyright holds, among all other forms of creativity eligible for protection. The power of music is seen and felt everywhere but at no other time as today has that power proven as impactful and forceful in the pursuit of happiness and every area of life, be it personal, spiritual, social, business, political and more. Shakespeare wrote of music as ‘the food of love’. Music is not just the food of the human soul; it has become the food of life – a nourishment at the core of human existence. Music secured by IP has brought fame and fortune to generations of music creators worldwide. Expounding the interplay of music and IP as this year’s theme, WIPO declares “From the rhythms that invite us to dance to the lyrics that echo our emotions, music enriches every aspect of our lives. Music is a universal form of creative expression and intellectual property (IP) rights play a pivotal role in supporting a vibrant and diverse music landscape. Music permeates every sector, and IP fosters the presence of music beyond its own realm”. Beyond the metaphor, music has continued to add value, serve humanity and foster societal peace and harmony. In concrete terms, it functions across industries – entertainment, technology, fashion, sports, video games, commerce, marketing and branding, advertising, and more.

    Since the early days, music has entered the universe of copyright and gingerly remains there, gaining momentum with the increasing dominance of global recording industry. Without copyright, the law’s recognition of the power and culture of music would have remained largely elusive, given the complexities and the dynamic trajectories of IP and music in the last half a century. The normative role of IP has been salutary to music as a creative entity eligible for protection and the incentives to music creators, the music industry, as well as public interest. From its origin in the prohibition of unauthorised copying of sheet music to the protection of musical composition in the 1800s, to the institution of exclusive rights in public performances, broadcasting, making of sound recordings in any medium, including the rights of making available in file sharing and streaming with the advent of digital technology, copyright regime for music has expanded inexorably. Live performances and expression of folklore, commonly referred to as ‘neighbouring rights’ have readily joined the web of protection in many jurisdictions and internationally. The increased term of protection, as well as the realm of infringement and liability under copyright law, has benefited music creators and the recording industry worldwide. IP as the primary legal framework for the protection of creativity comprising IP rights, administration and enforcement, including collective management systems, the more recent fair use doctrine, secondary liability and anti-circumvention rules of the digital era, has played indispensable roles in navigating the emergent environment. This legal gamut implies that IP and copyright in particular are indeed the cornerstone of the music industry.

    Read Also: Trump, immigration and capitalism’s global crisis

    Significantly, a trilogy of developments in WIPO’s norm-setting annal across 200 years best attests to WIPO’s fidelity to the international protection of music as a creative enterprise. That, for the most part, was a watershed in the normative evolution of music-copyright complex and the promotion of the narrative that copyright is the bedrock of the music industry. First, it began with the seminal Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works (1886), including music and its Berlin Revision of 1908 which further reinforced music protection with the inclusion of sound recording, among others, in the categories of protected works under the Berne. The second development was defined by two of WIPO’s treaties; the Rome Convention for the Protection of Performers, Producers of Phonograms and Broadcasting Organisations (1961) and the Performances and Phonograms Treaty (1996) which signposted music copyright for the new technological environment that ushered in 21st century full-blown digital dispensation. This was joined by WTO’s TRIPs Agreement of 1995. The third phase was the WIPO’s first treaty of the 21st century, Beijing Treaty on Audiovisual Performances (2012), though expanded the economic and moral rights of audiovisual performances, also extended protection for performers’ rights of musicians and singers alike. This international legal architecture lies at the heartbeat of IP protection for the music industry and has resonated in the rapid succession of copyright reform across jurisdictions both in the strength of IP law and policy-making and the campaign against piracy and counterfeiting, the twin menace of the creative industries worldwide. The exponential growth of copyright in the last 100 years into the digital age has influenced the current copyright debate about the global music industry and fortunes of generations of the world’s music talents and musical revolution, in particular the Afrobeats renaissance on the Continent. Today, the gravity of Afrobeats as a global phenomenon that is increasingly felt cannot be locked in the shadows of IP. The prospects of a new dawn now await the emerging generation of African and Nigerian music talents, Afrobeats’ leading exponents, as the world embraces the sound of Africa such that neither IP itself nor its long-standing tensions with traditional knowledge (TK) protection can diminish any longer.

    To the eternal credit of IP reform, the progressive expansion of the ‘exclusive rights’ that have shaped the protection of musical works and sound recording has responded to the massive explosion of the music industry as a cultural and economic powerhouse, and a net contributor to the global knowledge economy. Today, official reports point to the pivotal role of the music industry and the value of the rights of musicians, composers and producers in the ever-competitive global and digital marketplace. In 2024 alone, the over USD29 billion mark in revenue of the global recorded music industry represents an increasing growth trajectory that is largely driven by digital evolution through streaming and performing revenue. Afrobeats industry, again, has made significant inroads as a frontier economy, and by all means, has continued to contribute to wealth creation, enhanced revenue streams, cultural influence and soft power. With over N728 billion in the combined contribution of the Nigerian creative industry to the national economy, the social, economic and cultural power of music is not lost on the recent reforms taking place in the IP and creative ecosystem. WIPO’s theme ‘feel the beat of IP’ therefore is a clear reflection of the present momentum and certainly comes alive in the rapidly evolving Nigerian music industry that has continued to engage global attention as it compels new and innovative models of governance, transformative engagement and building collaboration in the spirit of the historic partnership between IP and music.

    • Professor Adewopo (SAN) is a former Director General of Nigerian Copyright Commission (NCC).

  • Climate change: Education and Public Awareness (2) Governments’ side of the task

    Climate change: Education and Public Awareness (2) Governments’ side of the task

    By Adebayo Adeleye

    As the world grapples with the challenges of climate change, education and public awareness have emerged as crucial tools in the fight against this global phenomenon. Climate change is no longer just an environmental issue, but a pressing concern that affects every aspect of our lives, from health and economy to security and sustainability.

    The science is clear: human activities, particularly the burning of fossil fuels and deforestation, have led to a significant increase in greenhouse gas emissions, resulting in rising temperatures, more frequent natural disasters, and altered ecosystems. However, despite the overwhelming evidence, many people remain unaware of the severity of the issue and the actions they can take to mitigate its effects.

    This is where education and public awareness come in. By educating people about the causes, consequences, and solutions to climate change, we can empower them to make informed decisions and take action to reduce their carbon footprint. This can include simple actions such as reducing energy consumption, using public transport, or recycling, as well as more significant changes like investing in renewable energy or advocating for climate policies.

    In schools, climate change education can be integrated into curricula, teaching children about the science behind climate change, its impacts, and the importance of sustainability. This can help shape the next generation of leaders and citizens who will be equipped to address the challenges of climate change.

    Public awareness campaigns can also play a vital role in educating people about climate change. These campaigns can use various media channels, including social media, television, and print, to reach a wide audience and convey the urgency of the issue. By sharing personal stories, highlighting local impacts, and showcasing solutions, public awareness campaigns can inspire people to take action and demand change.

    Read Also: 5 Unhealthy habits of Gen Z

    Governments, organizations, and individuals must work together to promote climate change education and public awareness. This can involve developing and implementing education programs, supporting research and innovation, and advocating for climate policies.

    Governments around the world have a critical role to play in promoting climate change education and awareness, as well as developing and implementing policies to mitigate its impacts. This article explores the government’s responsibility to promote climate change education and awareness. The intervention of government was found necessary for the following reasons:

    Public Education: Governments have a responsibility to educate the public about the causes, consequences, and solutions to climate change.

    Policy Development: Governments must develop and implement policies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, invest in renewable energy, and promote sustainable development.

    Resource Allocation: Governments must allocate resources to support climate change research, education, and awareness initiatives.

    International Cooperation: Governments must work together internationally to address the global nature of climate change.

    In view of the above reasons, which put the yoke on the government to ensure public education about climate change, the government is bound to be creative in articulating their programs. In this regard, the following initiatives seem perfect for consideration.

    Climate Change Education Programs: Governments can develop and implement climate change education programs in schools, universities, and communities.

    Public Awareness Campaigns: Governments can launch public awareness campaigns to educate the public about climate change and its impacts.

    Climate Change Research and Development: Governments can fund research and development initiatives to improve our understanding of climate change and develop new technologies and solutions.

    Climate Change Policy and Legislation: Governments can develop and implement policies and legislation to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and promote sustainable development.

    Several benefits of Government Intervention include the following:

    Informed Citizens: Government intervention can lead to a more informed and engaged citizenry, which is essential for addressing climate change.

    Economic Benefits: Investing in climate change education and awareness can have economic benefits, such as creating new jobs and industries.

    Environmental Benefits: Government intervention can lead to reduced greenhouse gas emissions and improved environmental outcomes.

    International Cooperation: Government intervention can facilitate international cooperation and coordination on climate change issues.

    Challenges and Opportunities

    Limited Resources: Governments may face limited resources and competing priorities, which can make it challenging to address climate change.

    Public Engagement: Governments must engage the public and build support for climate change initiatives.

    International Cooperation: Governments must work together internationally to address the global nature of climate change.

    Technological Innovation: Governments can support technological innovation and the development of new solutions to address climate change.

    In Conclusion; Governments have a critical role to play in promoting climate change education and awareness, as well as developing and implementing policies to mitigate its impacts. By investing in climate change education and awareness, governments can build a more informed and engaged citizenry, drive economic benefits, and improve environmental outcomes. As the world continues to grapple with the challenges of climate change, government intervention will be essential for addressing this global issue.

    In conclusion, climate change education and public awareness are essential components in the fight against climate change. By educating people about the issue and empowering them to take action, we can build a more sustainable future and mitigate the worst impacts of climate change. As individuals, communities, and nations, we must work together to address this global challenge and ensure a livable future for generations to come.

    • Dr. Adebayo Matthew, Adeleye (Ph.D., Ibadan) Researcher on Environmental Pollution and Control badeleye@gmail.com  +234 803 525 6450.