The Nation Newspaper

Category: Politics

  • We cannot defeat Tinubu in 2027 divided, says Edo PDP

    We cannot defeat Tinubu in 2027 divided, says Edo PDP


    Stakeholders of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in Edo State, on Monday, rose from a meeting with the conclusion that internal crisis rocking the party would make it a difficult to defeat President Bola Tinubu in 2027.

    The stakeholders spoke at a meeting attended by party leaders from the 18 local government areas and presided over by
    Dr. Tony Aziegbemi.

    Aziegbemi reported that the PDP did all it could in the legal battles to retrieve its mandate but the party was deprived of victory. 

    Aziegbemi commended party members for standing firm despite the setback but said the battle ahead was on how to unseat President Bola Tinubu.

    He said: “The next thing is, how do we get Tinubu out in 2027. We cannot continue with the way things are being run in the country”.

    A former Commissioner for Local Government and Chieftaincy Affairs, Jimoh Ijegbai, cautioned the PDP leaders not to deceive themselves.

    “If you are saying we should remove Tinubu from office, which vehicle are we going to use? 

    “If we are going to continue, we must know where we belong in the PDP that is divided. Unless we do that, we will be deceiving ourselves,” Ijegbai, an ex-Deputy Chief of Staff to former Governor Godwin Obaseki.

    Alberta Okonofua urged the PDP to put its acts together and wondered how the party planned to defeat Tinubu.

    “If we don’t put our house properly I don’t know how we are going to oust him (Tinubu). The party has two factions in Edo which makes the task of unseating Tinubu difficult. 

    Read Also: Makinde mourns Buhari, commiserates with Tinubu, ex-president’s family

    Former Campaign Director General, Asue Ighodalo Campaign Organization, Hon. Matthew Iduoriyekemwen, insisted thay the party must fashion out ways on how to win election in 2027.

    Iduoriyekemwen foreclosed victory for the PDP in next month’s by-election in Edo State.

    “We cannot continue like this. Mr. Chairman, if we must solve PDP problem, it must be solved from the National. If Asue’s votes didn’t count, I see any election that will count. So, we must sit down and take a decision. The PDP we have today does not have the capacity to stand in opposition to the APC”, he added. 

    But Ighodalo, differed stating the PDP would win any election with over 70 percent of the votes.

    He assured that the PDP would decide what was in the best interest of Edo State. 

    “The leaders will meet and return to the people. Nobody would dictate to anybody. We would collectively decide where to go,” he said. 

  • APC closes national secretariat to honour late President Buhari

    APC closes national secretariat to honour late President Buhari

    In honour of the late former President Muhammadu Buhari, the All Progressives Congress (APC) has announced the closure of its National Secretariat in Abuja.

    The former president passed away on Sunday in a London hospital after a prolonged illness, prompting a wave of national mourning.

    According to a statement issued on Monday by the party’s National Publicity Secretary, Felix Morka, the closure was directed by the Acting National Chairman, Hon. Bukar Dalori.

    “The All Progressives Congress (APC) announces the closure of its National Secretariat in Abuja in honour of the late former President Muhammadu Buhari, GCFR,” the statement read.

    READ ALSO; Adeleke slams Aregbesola Over 2026 guber threat, labels his tenure worst in Osun history

    Morka added that the closure takes effect from Monday, July 14, with normal activities scheduled to resume on Thursday, July 17, 2025.

    The party called on members and supporters to observe the mourning period with solemnity and reflection.

    “We urge Party faithful to use this period of national mourning for quiet reflection and prayers for the repose of the soul of our departed leader,” it stated.

    President Buhari, who led Nigeria from 2015 to 2023, was a founding figure of the APC and remained an influential voice in national affairs long after leaving office. His death has been met with an outpouring of tributes celebrating his legacy of service, discipline, and dedication to the country.

  • Coalition of politicians without existential and humanistic philosophy

    Coalition of politicians without existential and humanistic philosophy

    • By Bamidele Atoyebi

    A new political front has emerged loud, self-righteous, and curiously united. But what binds them isn’t ideology. It isn’t patriotism. It certainly isn’t love for the people. Their only shared ambition is to stop President Bola Ahmed Tinubu by any means necessary. Welcome to the African Democratic Congress (ADC): a shelter for politicians who failed Nigeria and now hope Nigerians have forgotten.

    Let’s not be fooled. This is not a coalition of hope. It is a coalition of men with no existential meaning and no humanistic legacy, just bruised egos, recycled bitterness, and a desperate grab for relevance.

    When we talk about existential philosophy, we speak of the idea that life has no built-in, meaning that people must create value through their actions. Humanistic philosophy, in contrast, teaches that leadership should centre on compassion, dignity, and respect for human worth. It believes people are inherently good and should be served with empathy, not manipulated with power.

    So, what meaning did these politicians make out of the offices they once held? What good did they offer? What humanity did they leave behind?

    Atiku Abubakar was Vice President of Nigeria for eight years under President Obasanjo. During that time, he chaired Nigeria’s privatization program, but many state assets were sold to cronies at giveaway prices. A Senate report linked him to the diversion of Petroleum Technology Development Fund (PTDF) money to companies connected to him. Even Obasanjo himself warned Nigerians, saying, “If you hand over Nigeria to Atiku, he will sell it.” That wasn’t just political rivalry it was firsthand regret. Atiku once openly declared he would sell public assets to his friends. This wasn’t a gaffe; it was a glimpse into his mindset. His legacy is not one of progress but of plunder. Let him name just five roads that were started and completed under his watch. He cannot because there aren’t any.

    Peter Obi, on the other hand, likes to present himself as the monk of governance frugal, modest, incorruptible. But under his watch as Governor of Anambra State, health workers went on strike while he was busy saving billions. He refused to conduct local government elections, choosing instead to run the grassroots with caretaker committees loyal to him. He handed over public schools to Catholic and Anglican missions without building consensus or establishing inclusive oversight. And security? It was nothing to write home about.

    Obi often speaks of savings. But governance is not banking it is service. He existed in power but did not create meaning for those who needed government most. Should we talk about Awkuzu SARS, where many Anambra youths were allegedly killed and dumped in rivers under his watch? Or the Pandora Papers scandal, where he was indicted for failing to declare offshore assets and companies to the Code of Conduct Bureau? This wasn’t mere oversight it was a serial violation of the law, as reported by Premium Times on October 4, 2021.

    Read Also: Opposition coalition good development for democracy — Gbajabiamila

    Even his academic records are questionable. While it is widely known that he studied philosophy and reportedly graduated with a third class from the University of Nigeria, Nsukka, it came as a shock when he submitted only his O’Level results as his highest qualification to INEC. These are not the traits of the transparent technocrat he claims to be. There is much more to be said, but this is not the time to go into greater detail.

    David Mark had the privilege of serving as Senate President for eight uninterrupted years. With that power, he oversaw national budgets and had the capacity to direct development to his region and beyond. Yet the Abuja–Makurdi Otukpo road, which leads directly to his home, remained a death trap. Meanwhile, under his leadership, National Assembly salaries and allowances skyrocketed while poverty deepened nationwide.

    His detachment was once summed up in a now-infamous quote: “Telephones are not for the poor.” For a man who had all the tools to write a legacy, what did he leave behind? Empty budgets, rich senators, and forgotten constituents. Lest we forget, he was also Governor of Niger State and Minister of Information. We must also remember his crucial role in the June 12 annulment and his disdain for Moshood Abiola and all his supporters.

    Then there is Nasir El-Rufai, a man whose governance of Kaduna State deepened existing wounds. Southern Kaduna was repeatedly attacked under his watch, leading to the deaths of hundreds and displacement of thousands. Rather than prosecute the attackers or offer justice to the victims, El-Rufai admitted to paying Fulani herdsmen to stop reprisal attacks, a policy widely condemned as rewarding violence.

    Local leaders, elders, and clergy accused his government of pursuing a silent war against Christian communities, dismantling their traditional structures and blocking development. He refused to conduct local government elections for over seven years, appointing loyalists instead and shutting down grassroots democracy. He was accused of jailing critics and ruling with a sense of entitlement confusing authoritarian control for leadership.

    An elder in Southern Kaduna once said, “We are not at war with the government, but the government acts like it is at war with us.” El-Rufai’s tenure was not one of reconciliation, justice, or peace. It was marked by calculated dominance and emotional detachment. Few of his old ways came back to haunt him when his nomination as minister was rejected during Senate screening. Instead of reconciling with his past, he now sees President Bola Ahmed Tinubu as the weapon fashioned against him. But “the wicked runneth when no one pursueth.”

    And then we have Abubakar Malami, the former Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice. He had one sacred duty: to defend the Constitution. Instead, he turned the law into a weapon against political opponents and a shield for the politically connected.

    He disobeyed court orders on multiple high-profile cases, including those involving Dasuki and El-Zakzaky. He interfered with anti-corruption investigations, especially when allies were involved. Asset recovery became opaque and full of out-of-court settlements that smelled of backdoor deals. Malami’s time in office was tainted by allegations of self-enrichment, suspicious property acquisitions, and a blatant disregard for the rule of law. He didn’t just fail in his duty he reversed it.

    So here we are. A coalition of former vice presidents, governors, senators, and ministers who had every opportunity to transform Nigeria but chose instead to serve themselves. These are not the victims of a broken system. They are the architects of our brokenness.

    They have no shared ideology, no policy clarity, and no philosophical vision. *Their only mission is to stop Tinubu because his success reminds Nigerians of their failures.*

    President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, for all his imperfections, is doing what these men never had the courage to do: making tough reforms, absorbing the backlash, and laying the foundation for real national renew He is building where they destroyed. Reforming what they corrupted. Stabilizing what they neglected.

    *And that is why they hate him. Because he is a mirror to their mediocrity.*

    Leadership is not about saving money while hospitals collapse. It’s not about selling public assets to friends. It’s not about neglecting your people and preaching unity only after you’ve left office. If leadership is about meaning, these men created none. If it’s about humanity, they left it bleeding.

    The ADC is not a forward-thinking party. It is a coalition of expired ambition, dressed up as a movement. Nigerians must see it for what it is and move forward. Let us not allow those who wasted our past to define our future.

    • Atoyebi, the Convenor of the BAT Ideological Group, engages in accountability and policy monitoring while also serving as a social worker, criminologist, maritime administrator, and philanthropist. 
  • Abu Ibrahim: Bridge Between APC’s founding ideals and future stability

    Abu Ibrahim: Bridge Between APC’s founding ideals and future stability

    • By Gbenga Ashaolu

    In Nigerian politics, the name Abu Ibrahim has been central to some of the most consequential political realignments in Nigeria’s democratic history. His credentials are not only rooted in longevity but in ideological consistency, political discipline, and a rare understanding of Nigeria’s delicate political fabric.

    The name is once again on the front burner, this time regarding the chairmanship of the All Progressives Congress (APC) following the resignation of the erstwhile chairman, Dr. Abdullahi Ganduje. Ganduje’s resignation created not only a vacancy at the top but also an opportunity—a moment of reckoning for a ruling party that must now choose between short-term political expediency and long-term institutional credibility. As the APC charts its path forward, it is time to look inward and return to its roots. That return must be led by one of the party’s foundational minds and quiet architects—Senator Abu Ibrahim.

    Before proceeding, it would be imperative to have a Birdseye understanding of how important the position of the chairman of a political party is; in this case, that of the APC. This background reckoning is necessary in order to have a full grasp of the important issue at stake.

    The position of the National Chairman of the APC is both strategically important and politically significant, not just within the party but also in the wider landscape of Nigerian governance. As the head of the ruling party in Africa’s most populous country and largest economy, the APC National Chairman wields enormous political influence and plays a critical role in shaping national policy, managing power dynamics, and sustaining democratic stability.

    The APC National Chairman serves as the chief political administrator of the party, overseeing structures from the National Working Committee (NWC) to state chapters. This includes supervising membership registers, congresses, conventions, primaries, and internal disciplinary processes. Whoever occupies this position controls the levers of internal party democracy, which is often the gateway to national elective and appointive power.

    Given that the President Bola Ahmed Tinubu emerged from the APC, the party chairman plays a crucial liaison role between the party and the presidency. While not a government official, the chairman often participates in policy consultations, aligns party ideology with governance priorities, and ensures the President’s policies enjoy institutional party support. The chairman also mediates between executive and legislative arms when there are tensions, ensuring party cohesion across branches of government.

    In Nigeria’s multi-ethnic, multi-religious, and often fractious political environment, the APC National Chairman is tasked with maintaining equilibrium among powerful interest groups, including governors, national assembly members, zonal blocs, and political godfathers. The position requires the skills of a negotiator, conflict manager, and consensus builder to avoid implosions like those that led to the downfall of previous ruling parties.

    Read Also: Akpabio hands over APC leadership in A’Ibom to Eno

    The National Chairman also coordinates party mobilisation for elections, including candidate selection (primaries), campaign planning, voter engagement, and alliance-building. Under the APC constitution, the chairman plays a key role in nominating members of the National Campaign Council, setting electoral strategy, and aligning funding and resources across the country. As seen in past elections (2015, 2019, and 2023), the chairman is instrumental in shaping the party’s narrative, unity, and ground game during national contests.

    It is instructive to also note that the APC chairman is the public face of the party, especially in times of crisis or national political debate. He defends the party’s policies, engages with the media, addresses dissent, and provides ideological clarity on issues. When there is turbulence—whether electoral, legal, or factional—the chairman becomes the voice of stability and reassurance. The chairman’s role also reflects zonal balancing, a sensitive issue in Nigeria’s federal politics. The person selected must often reflect the political, religious, or regional interests of a major constituency within the APC. Thus, the choice of chairman can be both symbolic and strategic, reflecting the party’s commitment to national inclusiveness and power-sharing.

    In essence, the position of APC National Chairman is not ceremonial. It is one of the most powerful non-elective political offices in Nigeria, capable of influencing the direction of governance, the fortunes of political aspirants, and the unity of the party that controls the federal government and the majority of state governments. The occupant of this office must be more than a party manager—he must be a visionary strategist, principled mediator, loyal institutionalist, and national statesman. That is why the vacancy left by Dr. Abdullahi Ganduje is such a critical moment for the APC and for Nigeria’s political stability.

    This is why the name of Abu Ibrahim is becoming louder again. At a time when many were content with opposition fragmentation, it was Abu Ibrahim—alongside a few other visionaries—who pushed for the creation of a mega-party to challenge the dominance of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP). He worked tirelessly behind the scenes to midwife what would become the APC, engaging in the delicate negotiations that merged the Congress for Progressive Change (CPC), Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN), All Nigeria Peoples Party (ANPP), and a faction of APGA. His fingerprints are all over the formation of the APC, not for personal gain but to birth a truly national political platform.

    But founding a party is only part of the story. In the decade since, Senator Abu Ibrahim has remained one of the APC’s most loyal and stabilising voices. While others have oscillated between parties or pursued personal political ambition at the expense of collective unity, he has offered a model of quiet, principled leadership—always available for consultation, never driven by factionalism.

    His political career, spanning decades, includes service as a senator representing Katsina South, where he chaired critical committees such as Labour and Police Affairs. His legislative footprint and national stature extend well beyond his home state of Katsina. He has cultivated a pan-Nigerian image, a unifier whose experience cuts across party organisation, parliamentary governance, strategic grassroots mobilisation (he was the chairman of the Independent Campaign Council—ICC— during the 2023 election and chairman of the Coalition of Buhari Support Groups in the 2019 election), and national policymaking. Importantly, he commands the respect of both senior statesmen and the emerging generation of political leaders.

    Abu Ibrahim’s first term in the Nigerian Senate (1999–2003) was more than a personal milestone—it marked the entry of a policy-minded reformer into an institution still reeling from years of military manipulation. His work as a senator quickly earned him a reputation as one of the few who fused technical literacy with political maturity. Unlike many of his colleagues who viewed the Senate as a staging ground for gubernatorial or ministerial ambitions, Ibrahim approached it as a legislative laboratory. His interventions were not always frequent—but they were always substantive. Ibrahim’s low profile belied his influence in building internal consensus. Whether navigating budget impasses, calming partisan tensions, or shaping the leadership of key committees, his strength lay in his ability to disarm opponents with reason, not rhetoric.

    At a time when the APC must manage delicate internal dynamics—balancing power blocs, regional interests, religious sensibilities, and ideological direction—Senator Ibrahim represents the steady hand and reconciliatory temperament that the moment demands. His closeness to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, forged during their joint efforts in building the party, also positions him as a natural bridge between the presidency and the party apparatus—crucial in aligning governance with party vision.

    But perhaps most significantly, Abu Ibrahim brings something desperately needed in today’s political space: credibility and integrity. His career has been free of scandal. He is not tainted by internal party controversies. He is not beholden to any cabal. He is respected precisely because he is not loud—but effective, strategic, and focused on the big picture. As the APC looks toward the 2027 general polls, it needs a chairman who understands the party’s soul, who was there at its birth, and who can guide it toward maturity. That Chairman is Senator Abu Ibrahim. His emergence would not only return the APC to its founding ethos of progressive nationalism but also signal a commitment to institutional discipline, ideological clarity, and national cohesion. At a time when cynicism about political leadership is at an all-time high, Abu Ibrahim offers a counter-narrative: that of the statesman who builds rather than breaks, who unites rather than divides, who serves rather than rules.

    For the APC, this is more than a leadership selection. It is a test of identity—and history will remember whether the party chose a stabiliser steeped in grassroots mobilisation which is the hallmark of Nigerian politics. As one of the founding fathers and ideological custodian of the APC, Senator Abu Ibrahim is a strategic midwife of its formation. His early advocacy for unity among progressive forces marked him out as a long-term thinker and ideologue—someone who understands the spirit and letter of the party’s mission. He has remained ideologically consistent, resisting political drift even during the party’s turbulent phases. Senator Ibrahim’s political pedigree transcends narrow ethnic or regional lines. With extensive legislative and political networks across Nigeria, he has always been known for his bridge-building capacity, national political stature and diplomatic experience.

    At a time when the APC must navigate delicate internal balancing acts—between old and new power blocs, North and South, Christian and Muslim demographics—Abu Ibrahim represents a steadying and unifying force. His tenure will not only restore internal cohesion but also re-energise the grassroots machinery that brought the party to power in 2015, 2019 and 2023.

    This is why the APC requires a chairman with both patience and gravitas—someone who can reconcile competing interests without becoming a participant in factionalism. Senator Ibrahim’s entire political career is marked by mature discretion, strategic humility, and fierce loyalty to the party and its leaders. Even when sidelined or misunderstood, he has never wavered in his support for the party’s institutional integrity. His loyalty to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu—dating back to their days as senator of the Federal Republic during the botched Third Republic, the pre-merger negotiations and consolidated through their mutual support for progressive governance—makes him uniquely suited to harmonise party structures with government priorities without compromising internal democracy.

    Having served multiple terms in the Senate and chaired influential committees, Senator Ibrahim possesses both the policy acumen and organisational skill required to run a complex party bureaucracy. He understands legislative-executive dynamics, grassroots mobilisation, and political consensus-building. He is known for his strategic mind and ability to organise quietly but effectively, preferring substance over noise. This further makes him an ideal candidate to lead the APC into a new era of internal reform, institutional strengthening, and electoral preparation for the 2027 general elections.

    In a political culture often riddled with scandals and self-interest, Abu Ibrahim stands out as a man of integrity. His relatively controversy-free career is a testament to his principled approach to public service. At the same time, he commands respect among older political figures and credibility among younger leaders seeking mentorship and ideological grounding. His emergence as chairman would provide a generational bridge, uniting founding elders with the rising class of APC technocrats, digital campaigners, and emerging political voices.

    As the APC charts its future course amid shifting political tides and internal recalibrations, it must choose not just a leader but a symbol of its founding vision, resilience, and national relevance. Senator Abu Ibrahim embodies the party’s best instincts—loyalty without sycophancy, consensus without compromise, and vision without vanity. His chairmanship would restore internal discipline, reinvigorate the party’s ideological compass, and project the APC as a disciplined, policy-oriented force in Nigeria’s democratic consolidation.

    The moment calls for maturity, depth, and a return to the founding ethos. It calls for Senator Abu Ibrahim, an author of soon to be released two volume books on President Bola Ahmed Tinubu.

    • Ashaolu, the Author of this Article is a Public Affairs Analyst and Media Management practitioner .
  • Nigeria’s BRICS partner status and initial gains

    Nigeria’s BRICS partner status and initial gains

    • Tunde Rahman

    President Donald Trump never ceases to amaze with his haughty and self-aggrandising governance style, endless huffing and puffing, brinkmanship, and tendency to weaponise America’s often-stated exceptionalism and unilateralism.

    Last weekend, as member states of the fledgling association of the Global South and a growing economic bloc, otherwise called BRICS, were holding their 17th Summit in the Brazilian city of Rio de Janeiro, Trump threatened to impose a fresh tariff hike on them, labeling the group a gang-up against America. 

    He warned that any country aligned with the policies of the BRICS alliance that diverge with US interests, would be hit with an extra 10% tariff. “Any country aligning itself with the anti-American policies of BRICS will be charged an additional 10% tariff. There will be no exceptions to this policy,” Trump wrote on his Truth social media.

    Trump’s threat emerged after BRICS members criticised US tariff policies, proposed some reforms to the International Monetary Fund (IMF), and discussed how major currencies are valued. After the two-day meeting in Rio de Janeiro, BRICS Finance Ministers issued a statement criticising tariffs as a threat to the global economy. They noted that they have brought “uncertainty into international economic and trade activities.”

    Trump has always been disdainful of the BRICS since its formation. In 2024, he threatened 100% tariffs on BRICS countries if they moved ahead with their currency to rival the US dollar. After the association’s recent meeting, he uttered the same threat, saying members of the group were out to de-legitimise the US dollar.

    The BRICS nations must demonstrate unity of purpose in responding to President Trump. More than ever before, they need to be focused, act in unison, and continue to harp on their collective interest. It’s just as expedient that BRICS members demonstrate they are driven by the need to get a fair deal for their countries within the international system, and that the association is by no means a gang-up against America.

    BRICS was designed to enhance the member nations’ economic interests and promote their international standing. This may be interpreted as a push against the US and Western Europe, but BRICS nations also have a responsibility to pursue and defend their interests.

    Read Also: Nigeria, Brazil sign landmark health sector cooperation pact at BRICS summit

    In this context, one key advantage of BRICS nations is their large population, which translates to a bigger market. BRICS member states account for more than half of the world’s population.

    Last year, the list of BRICS member countries expanded beyond the original group of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa to include Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates. In January this year, Nigeria became BRICS’ ninth partner country, joining Belarus, Bolivia, Cuba, Kazakhstan, Malaysia, Thailand, Uganda, and Uzbekistan.

    Because of this partner-country status, President Bola Tinubu attended the 17th Summit of BRICS last week at the invitation of Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula Da Silva. The Nigerian leader arrived in Rio de Janeiro on Friday, July 4. The next day, July 5, he went into a bilateral meeting accompanied by some of his ministers and governors with the Brazilian leader and some of his cabinet members.

    Along with the President, cabinet members, including Ambassador Yusuf Tuggar, Minister of Foreign Affairs; Senator Abubakar Kyari, Minister of Agriculture; Balarabe Abbas Lawal, Minister of Environment; and Idi Mukhtar Maiha, Minister of Livestock Development; and Mohammed Mohammed, Director-General of the National Intelligence Agency (NIA), participated in the summit.

    State governors such as Hyacinth Alia (Benue), Prince Dapo Abiodun (Ogun), Babajide Sanwo-Olu (Lagos), Sheriff Oborevwori (Delta), and Mohammed Umar Bago (Niger) were also present at the bilateral talks.

    During the meeting, President Tinubu informed his Brazilian counterpart, Lula Da Silva, that all bottlenecks hindering the agricultural sector’s potential, including livestock production, would be removed to enhance food security and exports.

    Noting that bureaucracy and administrative hiccups contribute to delays in realising the agricultural sector’s well-acknowledged potential, the President disclosed that Nigeria was already undergoing reform to reposition the economy for global competitiveness, particularly in agriculture, where it already has a comparative advantage.

    Discussions at the meeting centred mainly on agriculture, including livestock development, environment, aviation, trade and investment, and the Green Initiative, which designs climate-positive migration solutions for addressing climate change risks, market challenges, and innovation opportunities.

    All the technicalities in actualising the agreements between Nigeria and Brazil, according to President Tinubu, will be streamlined and fast-tracked in areas of trade, aviation, energy transition, food and agricultural development, as well as mining and natural resources exploration.

    President Lula, on his part, promised that all agreements with Nigeria would be regularised, and MOUs would be updated and signed without delay during President Tinubu’s next visit to the country. He also pointed out that the lingering bureaucratic delays between the two countries would be removed for quick results.

    Brazil has recorded tremendous achievements in research and development. The country is easily regarded as one of the top global producers of food and other agricultural products. President Tinubu’s visit demonstrates Nigeria’s readiness to establish a strong partnership with Brazil to tap into this feat to stimulate growth in food production and animal husbandry.

    However, on Sunday, July 6, while addressing the BRICS summit, President Tinubu restated his position on global trade, international financing, climate change, and healthcare, as well as his belief in and support for BRICS. 

    The President advocated a re-evaluation of the current global financial system and healthcare distribution, calling for more consideration, equity, and inclusion for the poor and emerging economies, particularly in Africa.

    According to President Tinubu, environmental degradation, climate crisis, and inequalities in the healthcare system deserve more attention, as they contribute to hindering growth and development in Third World countries.

    At the Summit, President Tinubu affirmed Nigeria’s support for the position of BRICS on the need to focus on collective, fair and equitable global development. “Nigeria, therefore, associates with what I have heard here today, and all that has been taking place in BRICS. 

    The next issues are financial restructuring and re-evaluation of the global structure,” he told the BRICS member–states, pointing out that environmental deprivation, climate crisis, and global healthcare inequalities were shared concerns pertinent to Africa.

    “Africa has contributed the least to global emissions but suffers the most,” the President said, adding: “The African continent is creating the path through the African carbon market initiative and the Great Green Wall. We believe that eventually, COP-30 will strengthen our resolve to embrace a healthy global environment strategically.”

    Nigeria, the world’s sixth-most populous country and one of Africa’s major economies, undoubtedly shares convergent interests with other BRICS members.

    President Tinubu affirmed this much: “Nigeria strongly believes in South-South cooperation. We can, therefore, not be passive participants in global decision-making. So, issues such as financial restructuring, debt forgiveness, climate change, environmental ruin, and global healthcare must be resolved. We must be the architects of a future that addresses the specific needs and concerns of youths, who represent 70 per cent of our population in Nigeria. Therefore, Nigeria remains guided by our long-term vision, 2050, and nationally determined contribution.

    “We are taking bold steps to accelerate renewable energy adoption, mainstream climate action, promote nature-based solutions, strengthen urban resilience, champion South-South cooperation, align with global renewal framework and achieving universal health coverage for all.”

    It is instructive that President Tinubu has used every opportunity on the international scene to demand an equitable global trade, accessible financing, sustainable technology transfer, and climate justice. 

    He canvassed the same issues while addressing the 78th United Nations’ General Assembly in New York in September 2023, at UN Climate Change Conference, otherwise called COP28 in Dubai, United Arabs Emirates, in January 2024 and at the 19th Summit of the Non-Aligned Movement in Kampala, Uganda, also in January 2024, where he was represented by the Minister of Budget and Economic Planning, Senator Atiku Bagudu, among other international forums.

    Indeed, the gains of attending the recent BRICS Summit and President Tinubu’s friendship with President Da Silva are already manifesting in many respects. Firstly, on the heels of President Tinubu’s visit to Brazil last year, Brazil’s Vice President, Geraldo Alckmin, visited Nigeria this year to build on the agreements reached between Presidents Tinubu and Da Silva, particularly on the Green Initiative.

    Secondly, on the sidelines of the 17th BRICS summit, the Managing Director of Nigeria’s Bank of Agriculture, Ayo Sotinrin, met with his counterpart from Brazil, where he was informed that President Lula had given a firm directive to Brazilian agricultural institutions and companies to invest heavily in Nigeria.

    Even back at home, the impact has been no less. 

    On June 25, 2025, the Presidential Implementation Committee on Technology Transfer represented by Dr. Dahiru Mohammed officially signed a strategic partnership agreement with Brazil’s renowned Campos Group to provide technical expertise for the Irrigate Nigeria programme.

    For some years now, agriculture has been among the highest contributors to Nigeria’s GDP. This collaboration is thus a big boost for Nigeria’s quest to strengthen the agricultural value chain and reduce import dependency through large-scale technology-enabled farming. Campos Group, known for its central role in Brazil’s agricultural revolution under the PRODECER Programme, brings over four decades of expertise in developing irrigated agricultural zones and transforming previously under-utilised lands into thriving agro-industrial hubs.

    There is much more. But to further reinforce these agreements and consolidate the initial gains, signing a Bilateral Aviation Safety Agreement (BASA) between Nigeria and Brazil has become imperative. 

    This is an ample pathway to bilateral cooperation in various aviation areas, including maintenance, mutual flight operations, and environmental certification. We can glean from the foregoing what a full membership of BRICS would yield for Nigeria. Notwithstanding President Trump’s misguided threat, it will help the country reap the full benefits of associating with the group.

    • -Rahman is Senior Assistant to President Tinubu on Media & Special Duties.
  • Plateau: Tinubu will defeat coalition group in 2027 – Bishop Katung

    Plateau: Tinubu will defeat coalition group in 2027 – Bishop Katung

    The President and founder of the Living Stone Assembly church in Jos, Bishop Jonas Katung  has described the coming together of Nasir El-rufai , Atiku Abubakar  and others to work against Tinubu’s re- election in 2027  will not succeed.

    According to Bishop Katung in an interview said President Tinubu is not Jonathan and that President Tinubu despite the forces that fought against him in 2023 general election, won the Presidency.

    According to Bishop Katung, it would not be simple to defeat him now that he is operating from inside Aso Rock.

     “They  are not angels, he said former governor El- Rufai ruled kaduna State for eight years and caused so many religious problems in the state and that peace could only return to the state when his predecessor governor Uba Sani came onboard.

    He said what them  Opposition are doing in coalition group is to whip up tribal sentiment

    “Tinubu should probe members of the coalition by investigating their past activities.”

    Bishop Katung who is Secretary General of Council of Northern Pentecostal Bishops said that going by their past activities, he said the people in coalition group should not be in power, describing them as a group of vampires who should not be allowed to take over  Power in Nigeria.

    According to him, the key figures in the coalition are former members of the PDP and APC and that they have nothing new to offer Nigerians.

    Read Also: Tinubu back in Abuja after Saint Lucia state visit, 17th BRICS Summit in Brazil

    He said after the First Lady Mariam Babangida’s pet project better life for Nigerian Rural women, the next First Lady that is doing well is Senator Remi Tinubu, going from state to state to launch her project ‘Renewed Hope Agenda’ to support her husband to succeed.

    He said the combination of the president and his wife is what Nigerians want at this moment.

    He added that in the last two years “we have seen what the government could do compared to what the past government did, saying why are the coalition members playing with the rest of Nigerians?;

    ” It is good to go with what we can see than empty promises from empty vessels with the heart of deceit who are only after their selfish interest.” he stressed.

    According to him, the coalition group is dead on arrival because they are going no where, all their  members have questions to answer about their past roles  in government. Bishop Katung stressed.

  • Oyebanji’s achievements will earn him second term– Ekundayo

    Oyebanji’s achievements will earn him second term– Ekundayo

    The Director General, Ekiti State Office of Transformation and Service Delivery, Dr John Ekundayo, has said achievements of Governor Biodun Oyebanji will earn him a second term in office.

    Speaking in Ado-Ekiti at the Ekiti Future Agenda Special Roundtable on Political Governance and Socio-Economic Development “BAO: How far, How well so far?”, Ekundayo explained that the state has witnessed measurable progress in all sectors of the economy.

    He emphasized that the leadership style of Governor Oyebanji is rooted in deep public service and an unwavering commitment to the progress of the state adding that he has championed inclusive participatory governance, transparency, infrastructural renewal and economic diversification.

    “In appraising Governor Oyebanji’s leadership journey, it is evident that Ekiti has made measurable progress in governance, infrastructure, social welfare, and economic diversification. Tools like the Ekiti Dashboard have improved transparency, while endorsements from labour, community groups, and national agencies reflect growing public trust.

    “However, this journey is far from complete. Ekiti 2026 represents both an opportunity and a responsibility. The success of this vision depends not solely on the governor or his administration but on every citizen, institution, and stakeholder playing their part.

    Read Also: Oyebanji, Fayemi not for ADC, says aide

    “Ekiti must be allowed to continue on the trajectory of unbroken progress and development. As we all move in the trajectory towards the “Shared Prosperity” mantra: Let us celebrate what has been achieved. Let us speak honestly about what remains to be done. And let us commit-collectively-to building a prosperous, inclusive, and transparent Ekiti State. The Ekiti of our dream is ours to shape”, he added

    The Convener of Ekiti Future Agenda, Adesina Adetola said the event themed: is targeted at evaluating the performance of the governor ahead of the 2026 governorship election.

    He said, “There is obviously a need for more resourceful engagement of the people, where there will be a robust but genuine appraisal and sincere evaluation of the incumbent administration. Most especially, as it is evident that the incumbent is seeking a re-election.

    “In this regard, it is appropriate to look at what the incumbent has done and see how far he has kept his campaign promises before we set for another electoral exercise. It is our belief that re-election should be on achievements, it must come with evidence of work done. This is what we are promoting and we are doing this in a very realistic way, devoid of political partisanship or sentiment.”

  • Bauchi 2027: Tough battle ahead for Foreign Minister Tuggar

    Bauchi 2027: Tough battle ahead for Foreign Minister Tuggar

    As the 2027 elections draw near, Foreign Affairs Minister Ambassador Yusuf Maitama Tuggar is being considered as a potential governorship contender in Bauchi State. Though he brings national and international experience, some observers argue that the 58-year old diplomat lacks strong local ties and grassroots support. With other aspirants gaining ground, Tuggar could face an uphill task in a race that’s already heating up. DAVID ADENUGA reports.

    Several politicians in Bauchi are already showing interest in the 2027 governorship contest—some publicly, others quietly. Among those testing the waters behind the scenes is Tuggar. He is not new to Bauchi politics and remains a possible contender, although it’s still unclear if he’ll join the race once the political tempo increases.

    Tuggar is no stranger to ambition. He previously ran for governor under the now-defunct Congress for Progressive Change, CPC. He was also a member of the Nigerian House of Representatives, representing Gamawa from 2007 to 2011, and made two attempts to run for Governor of Bauchi State.

    He once ran against former Governor Isa Yuguda in the 2011 governorship election. Yuguda, then his political mentor, won convincingly with 771,503 votes. Tuggar, representing CPC, came second with 238,462 votes.

    Despite his political history, insiders believe Tuggar who hails from Gamawa Local Government Area may face major hurdles. First, some perceive him as difficult to work with. Second, they say he’s disconnected from the grassroots.

    Some political analyst in the state says  that he rarely visits Bauchi outside election seasons and has little engagement with locals or fellow politicians.

    His strained relationship with Governor Bala Mohammed is also believed to have complicated things. Though Bala is in the opposition party,  the People Democratic Party, PDP,  he controls the state’s machinery and commands loyalty.

    “Tuggar will struggle in a PDP-controlled Bauchi,” one political analyst who spoke anonymously noted.

    Both  Tuggar and Bala Mohammed  began their political journey in 2007 under Yuguda’s mentorship. They later joined different parties but remained friendly and respectful. Bala rose to national prominence for his role in helping Goodluck Jonathan become president during a constitutional crisis as a Senator then. Tuggar aligned with Buhari and contested for governor.

    However, their relationship soured recently when Bala began criticizing President Tinubu’s government, especially on tax issues. Tuggar, a minister under Tinubu, fired back, accusing Bala of using federal failures to mask his shortcomings. Bala’s government dismissed Tuggar’s reaction as political noise.

    The rift peaked at a wedding attended by high-profile guests, including the Vice President. Bala reportedly confronted Tuggar on the way there, leading to a public spat between the duo.

    The Deputy Governor, Auwal Jatau allegedly had to be restrained from physically attacking Tuggar. Afterwards, the minister refused to return to Government House with the group.

    READ ALSO; Top 10 busiest airports in the world by passenger traffic

    Sources say the clash was about campaign visibility. Bala accused Tuggar of starting campaigns too early. Tuggar, in turn, questioned Bala’s constant political activities.

    Despite once supporting Bala, it’s believed that Tuggar may not receive the same backing now, making Bala a key obstacle in his path.

    Within the All Progressive Congress,APC , Tuggar is also expected to face strong rivals like Senator Shehu Buba representing Bauchi South district and Health Minister Prof. Ali Pate. Pate is believed to have major support, including from President Tinubu, and backing from global figures like Bill Gates and Aliko Dangote. These connections could boost his chances of securing the party ticket.

    Though Tuggar has more experience than Pate, many see Pate as friendlier and more popular with the people. Tuggar is viewed as distant, and lacking the kind of network-building necessary for electoral success.

    There are also insinuations in some quarters that Governor Bala is  mending ties with the Tinubu administration, possibly to avoid post-tenure political risks.

    There are even speculations that he might defect to the APC. If Bala supports Pate, Tuggar could find himself isolated, despite his earlier start in politics.

    “Tuggar’s political struggle boils down to two issues,” one observer said. “He’s seen as  inflexible, unwilling to compromise or listen. And he’s not close to the people. He rarely visits or connects with grassroots politicians except during elections.”

    The source continued: “As long as Bala is governor, Tuggar will have a tough time. The state’s political structure and security apparatus are under Bala’s control. With such influence, it won’t be easy for Tuggar to push his ambition.”

    “In addition to this, competition within the APC is stiff. Senator Buba and Prof. Pate are strong contenders. Pate, especially, is said to be Tinubu’s preferred candidate. His ties to international leaders, and Tinubu’s recent honour to Bill Gates, suggest he is being groomed for a bigger role.”

    “There is  speculation that Governor Bala may switch to APC under pressure or to avoid future persecution. If he defects and backs Pate, it could further weaken Tuggar’s position. In Nigerian politics, party shifts are common, and loyalty is often fluid.”

    “While Bauchi Central has never produced a governor, Pate may change that. He has the funds, federal backing, and international connections. However, he must spend wisely and build strong local support. Money alone won’t win an election—it must be used strategically.”

    “In Nigeria, politics is driven by money and relationships. Tuggar may have the experience, but without public goodwill and grassroots backing, he could struggle. Unless he changes his strategy and builds alliances, 2027 may be a steep climb.”

    “Though Tuggar entered politics before Pate and holds more experience, his image and people skills are lacking,” said another political analyst.

    “In politics, connection with people is vital. If you appear cold or unapproachable, your expertise won’t help.”

    Some say Tuggar has not leveraged his national positions to benefit Bauchi. Despite his status, he hasn’t attracted investments or jobs to his hometown, Gamawa. Critics point out the absence of federal job placements or empowerment programmes tied to his name.

    “One of Tuggar’s key advantages is his past as a lawmaker,” one source said. “He comes from a political family and has potential. But political power is about using your position to help others. You must show results that positively affect your community.”

    Critics argue that Tuggar has failed to build a visible political base or help strengthen the APC in Bauchi. His detachment raises concerns that if the party gives the ticket based on wealth instead of public appeal, it could lose the election.

     “As a senior cabinet member for nearly two years, he hasn’t made a major impact. Nigeria’s foreign policy hasn’t improved significantly under him. Instead, we’ve seen strained relations, especially with the Niger Republic.” a source said.

    “He hasn’t invested in his political future either. No empowerment programs. No support for those who could back him. And no real effort to grow the APC in Bauchi, which badly needs a revival to remain relevant.”

    “Interestingly, others with lower positions have done more for their communities. Many now believe buying delegates may not work this time. The APC must choose a candidate who can win beyond the primaries—a truly marketable option.” he added.

    “If the APC allows money to influence its choice and gives the ticket to Tuggar, it might cost them the election,” the source concluded.

    However, a loyalist to the Minister ,Bala Juwara, commended Tuggar’s political track record, describing him as well-suited for the role due to his distinguished service as a former member of the House of Representatives, Ambassador, and currently a minister.

    “We are confident in Tuggar’s capacity to lead. He has served all segments of Bauchi State commendably, even though he hails from the North Senatorial Zone,” Juwara said, urging members to intensify grassroots mobilization efforts.

    Similarly, Former Bogoro local government chairperson Hon. Simon Taimako also endorsed Tuggar, applauding the group’s commitment to unity and inclusion and expressing confidence in Tuggar’s qualifications and leadership qualities.

    He reiterated the need for power rotation and described Tuggar as a unifying figure with broad support across the state.

    “We are convinced Ambassador Tuggar is the most qualified to lead Bauchi State in 2027. His political pedigree is unmatched,” Taimako concluded.

  • Sokoto Assembly’s relationship with Aliyu based on mutual respect – Bodinga

    Sokoto Assembly’s relationship with Aliyu based on mutual respect – Bodinga

    Honourable Tukur Bala Bodinga is the Speaker of the 10th Sokoto State House of Assembly. He represents Bodinga North Constituency. Two years down the line, he is not only presiding over a rancour-free House, but he has also led it very productively.  Bodinga maintains a robust relationship with the other arms of government, especially with the Executive. In this interview with BELLO IBRAHIM, Bodinga speaks about the fundamental and constitutional functions of the Assembly, the challenge of managing the members of the Assembly, and other issues.

    How has it been as the Speaker of the Sokoto State House of Assembly?

    Glory be to Almighty Allah for giving us the wisdom and ability to successfully steer the affairs of the Sokoto State House of Assembly. As the Speaker, I understood very early and clearly that I am first amongst equals, so I knew I had to treat every member with utmost respect.  This has helped manage the House. The stability and the focus of the House are attributable to the fact that every member understands that, as representatives of the people that we must take our constitutional responsibilities seriously, these have largely made my job of leading the House very easy. I remain eternally grateful to them. The  House leadership from the very outset adopted the principle of inclusiveness, transparency and accountability. Also,  the fact that we see every member as a stakeholder in the development of our dear state, even if he is of the minority party. The majority would have their way, but the minority would have their say. Again, the members have exhibited a high degree of responsibility. We have informal conversations and share opinions, and these have helped us in building consensus on issues that ordinarily would have precipitated a crisis.

    What is the relationship between the House of Assembly and the Executive?

    The relationship between the Executive and the Legislature is very cordial, and it’s the same with the Judiciary, even though our interaction, for obvious reasons, is limited. We are three arms of government with different roles, but united by the constitution to work in harmony for the good of the people. We are partners in progress who must work together in the overall interest of our people.  A lot of credit for the smooth working relationship goes to the governor, Ahmed Aliyu Sokoto, who has continuously treated the Honourable House as partners in progress and with utmost respect.

    It’s welcoming news that the governor sees the Sokoto State House of Assembly as partners because in other states, the story is different…

    I won’t be dragged into commenting about other Houses because I don’t know the factors responsible for their failure to work together. In Sokoto State, Governor Sokoto not only sees us as partners but also values our contribution. In return, we have always ensured that by our actions and contributions that we earn his respect, and this is very important for any House of Assembly.

    That means the Sokoto State House of Assembly has no reason to complain…

    Not at all, because the governor gives to Caesar what’s due to Caesar, and like they say, respect is reciprocal- so we equally respect him as the Chief Executive, and he, in return respects us as the legislature, the representatives of the people.

    What feedback mechanism does House have that helps it gauge the opinion of the people on its performance?

    The House has quite a number of feedback mechanisms, including public hearings, town hall meetings; we also have a website where every member can be reached by his or her constituents. It’s a functional and interactive website, so members of our various constituencies interact with us online, in real time. We also maintain constituency offices with staff whose duties include bringing to our attention issues affecting our communities.  Without the people, we can’t be members. So we have several ways of communicating with the people. And this is something we take very seriously.

    READ ALSO: 10 African countries without an operational national airline

    And being grassroots people, we meet during weddings, funerals, and we always have conversations. They also know that they can present bills through their members. The feedback mechanism is working well. And we are very happy.

    In the 10th House of Assembly, how many of your members returned from 2019?

    More than 16 members came back from the 2019 set. It’s important to stress that some members, for personal reasons, decided not to seek re-election, some members died, and of course, some didn’t get their party ticket to contest in 2023. So the number of those who returned goes to show that we are truly in tune with our people. The casualty rate is not as bad as that of the National Assembly. However, Nigerians must understand that there are several other reasons why many members don’t go back. For instance in some constituencies practising zoning, a member elected in 2023 won’t spend beyond one term. The high turnout of members is a tragedy because it affects the capacity of the legislature. We need to do something about this.

    How would you rate the current Sokoto State House of Assembly?

    I can beat my chest that we have, and the evidence is in our work, which is obvious. And I am happy that the governor and the people agree that we have always stood by them and solidly aligned ourselves with the interests of the state. Though for some Nigerians, a harmonious relationship means that the legislature has been compromised. On the whole, the Sokoto State House of Assembly has kept its covenant with the people of Sokoto State.

    Are there laws that the executive wanted passed and the House refused because it’s not in the interest of the people? And then in terms of debating the budget estimates, are there issues that you have included or removed and the executive accepted in good faith?

    First, it’s important for Nigerians to understand that the annual budgets, for instance, are essentially estimates submitted by the executive arm and which the House has a constitutional responsibility to legislate on, before it can become a law. So when necessary, we have effected amendments to the budget estimates and other bills after public hearings. The point is that we don’t have a monopoly on knowledge, and we are grateful to the governor for sharing this fact. In the case of budget estimates, what the executive usually presents to us is a draft estimate which we debate, and subject to scrutiny and after necessary amendment(s)  , we pass and forward to the governor for his signature. 

    Did the House tinker with some laws and the budget to show that it is not a rubber-stamp legislature?

    Absolutely no. Again, let me fundamentally address the issue of the rubber stamp legislature. The Sokoto State House of Assembly has never subjected any bill to unnecessary amendments just to prove a point. I must also commend the executive for sending us well-researched and crafted bills. In fairness to the governor, he is always ready to listen to our opinion. For instance, during the debate on the 2025 budget, we discovered that some important areas were not included- an oversight, and we pointed this out, and the governor was very okay with our observations. I think it’s essentially a matter of approach. And this has reduced areas of friction. Thankfully, there hasn’t been any issue that we haven’t been able to amicably resolve because of the good communication between both branches.

    And you carry out your oversight functions?

    The House takes its oversight functions very seriously. We have a responsibility on behalf of the people to effectively monitor the executive on behalf of our people. It’s a sacred mandate. I don’t think there’s any other House that gives priority to its oversight functions like this assembly. I must commend my colleagues because they take this and every assignment very seriously. 

    How about funding?

    We are not autonomous. But the House is well-funded.

    Do the commissioners and other appointees appear before the House when summoned?

    The governor has made it abundantly clear to his appointees that they must promptly honour our invitations. It’s mandatory, and on our part, we only invite them when it’s necessary. 

    What are the accomplishments of the 10th House of Assembly to date?

    The House in the last two years has passed 25 bills, of which 22 were assented to by the governor. The remaining three will soon be transmitted to the governor for assent.

    Do the outstanding bills include that on mandatory and compulsory pre-marital medical screening? And would you say that you have achieved your major legislative priorities for the current session of the House?

    Yes, and it’s important to stress that the bill is a private member’s bill. Yes, we have substantially achieved our major legislative goals for this year. And we are satisfied with our performance. So- far- so- good. But if something comes up and we are on holiday,   we will immediately report for duty. Once the executive sends a bill to us, we have no choice because every issue touches on the life of our electorate directly.

    Do your members regularly get trained? And do you organise working visits to other State Houses of Assembly?

    We take capacity building for our members as seriously as we take our assignments as lawmakers. We don’t joke with training.

    Was the Sokoto State Community Security Corps bill an executive bill, and was it a challenge?

    Yes. That’s another consequential bill that we passed, and we rose to the challenge because the House of Assembly is about the welfare and security of the people. Once the governor intimated us about his plans, we quickly went to work. We immediately sent some members on a study tour to states with similar bodies. This tremendously helped us in crafting the bill, and the governor wasted no time assenting to the bill. This is what synergy is all about.

    Are you satisfied with the contribution of the Sokoto State Community Corps to the security of the people?

    Yes, because the members of the corps are from the communities being harassed by these insurgents, they are giving it their all. The other advantage is that they know the terrain.

     The opposition has accused the governor of not doing much in terms of security. What is your take on this?

     I don’t think the opposition elements have been fair to the governor, who has been up and doing on the issue of insecurity confronting the state and indeed the other North-West states. By the way, you don’t expect the opposition to be fair to the government. There are certain security actions that, for obvious reasons, I can’t disclose. But it’s public knowledge that the state government has provided the security agencies with critical logistics support – over 140 buffalo vehicles, and thousands of motorcycles. The governor built a military base at Illela for the army because it would help in the war against the bandits. There is also financial support for the security agencies. The noticeable reduction in the activities of these bandits is because of the huge investment of the Sokoto State government and the determination of the governor to secure our people. Governor Sokoto has never held back his support for the security agencies.

     Meaning it is political when they say the governor is not doing enough?

    It’s highly political. And we expect them to increase the volume of their falsehoods as the 2027 elections draw closer. On his part the governor will remain focused on delivering projects.

     Recently, the House passed a bill mandating compulsory pre-marital medical screening for intending couples. Under the proposed law, intending couples must undergo tests for HIV/AIDS, hepatitis, sickle cell, genotype, and other related health conditions before marriage. How have the people received this bill- has there been a push back? What informed the decision of the House to pass the bill and has the governor signed it?

    The bill has been passed by the House, but it is yet to be transmitted to the governor for his signature, so it is not yet a law. What informed the passage of the bill by the House is the social and health challenges that the society is facing as a result of the failure of intending couples to carry out these tests. Science has helped us to know that if two people with AS genotypes marry that there is a very high probability of them having sickle cell children, and this would be a huge stress to the family and the society. It’s the same with HIV/AIDS…so these are the justifications for the bill. It’s to help save families and society from the trauma and stigma associated with these issues. The legislation has been well received by the public. And I must confess that the support of critical stakeholders like the health personnel, traditional and religious leaders have been overwhelming. We have no doubt that the governor will sign the bill once we transmit it to him.

    That’s a very thoughtful bill. And is it the same with the bill to curb extravagant marriages?

    They are two different bills. We all live in the same society and so we are  very much aware of the happenings.

     Last year,  the Sokoto State House of Assembly passed some  consequential amendments: the Sokoto State Discrimination Against Persons with Disability Law,Sokoto State Local Government 2009 Law, Land Tenancy, Zakat and Rural Roads …unfortunately that of the local government generated some controversy….

    This goes to prove that the Sokoto State House of Assembly is a very productive assembly. Like they say when you want to kill a dog you give it a bad name, so to derail the good intentions of the governor the opposition went to town that the amendment was targeted at the Sultan of Sokoto,as a prelude to his deposition. Unfortunately,   based on their mischief and falsehoods they succeeded in overheating the polity. The  laws that we passed include the Discrimination against Persons with Disability Commission’s Law, the Zakat and Endowment Commission’s Law, the Tenancy Control and Safety of Persons Commission Law, which by their functions can only function as agencies of government and not as commissions like the Attorney General and Commissioner of Justice said in his presentation during the consideration of the amendment to the bills. The amendment was absolutely necessary in order to bring these  laws into conformity with the Nigerian Constitution. And the House wholeheartedly agreed with his submission and that of other stakeholders. After the local government bill was passed, I am happy the people finally understood that they were misled by the opposition despite our efforts to convince them that the bill had nothing to do with the Chieftaincy Appointment and Deposition Law, which is the one that relates to the removal of the Sultan. Thankfully, we stood our ground and everyone is enjoying the benefits of all the bills that we have passed. As a result of the rural roads law the governor has been able to construct several roads. Those roads wouldn’t have been possible without the instrumentality of the law.

    What lesson did you learn from that amendment to the local government law of 2009?

    The big lesson for the House was the need for us to constantly consult critical stakeholders and to be always guided by public good. Again we have always known that while we can’t please everyone, that we should continue to focus on the interest of the majority and our conscience. So we have no apology for carrying out our constitutional responsibilities that our  people elected us  to discharge. Once we are convinced that an issue is in the greater interest of the people we don’t look back.

    You relate closely with Governor Ahmad Aliyu Sokoto. What’s your honest impression of the governor?

    He is a good man, firm and decisive. Highly religious and principled. The governor is calm, and a good listener,who also consults widely before taking any decision. He’s a democrat and he takes his assignment as governor seriously. For him the people elected him to be governor and that’s what he is committed to doing…bettering the life of the people is his preoccupation. He is focused on his assignment and he is giving it his all. The governor has more than justified his election and this is a general consensus of the people.

    If you agree that Governor Sokoto has done fantastically well, why hasn’t the Sokoto State House of Assembly moved a motion that Governor Sokoto should run unopposed as the APC’s candidate in the 2027 gubernatorial election?

    The House will soon pass a vote of confidence on the superlative performance of the governor. The vote of confidence is the Sokoto State House of Assembly’s way of saying that he is doing fantastically well and that he deserves another term in order to complete the good job that he has started for the state. One good term deserves another.

    Message to the people of Sokoto State?

    This is a very big one….All I can say is that we owe the people of Sokoto State a bouquet of thanks for their unwavering support. They have been extremely wonderful in their support, and that has made governance a lot easier for the governor and indeed for everyone. Because they have been supportive, in return, the government, the executive, and the legislature would continue to work for them. In 2024, the government delivered over 250 projects, and in 2025, the governor is even more determined to positively touch their lives. They should continue to support and pray for Governor Ahmad Aliyu Sokoto’s administration. They have seen what he can do …he is not a propaganda governor, and he means well for Sokoto State. He is a compassionate leader whose agenda is the development of Sokoto State.

  • Stakeholders hail LASIEC for peaceful council poll

    Stakeholders hail LASIEC for peaceful council poll

    Despite being largely peaceful, the chairmanship and councillorship elections held in Lagos State on Saturday witnessed late arrival of materials and voter’s apathy.

    In many local governments monitored by The Nation, the elections scheduled to commence by 8am did not start in most polling units.

    Voting materials and electoral officers arrived late at many polling units in Lagos during Saturday’s local government elections in the state.

    Officials of the Lagos State Independent Electoral Commission (LASIEC) were not seen at many polling units visited in Mushin, Ikotun, Igando, and Iba as at 9am.

    Although some voters and party agents were waiting for the LASIEC officials to commence the voting process, no officials were present in many locations.

    At Adeo-Oyo Street in Mushin, LASIEC officials were seen inside a bus with electoral materials, trying to locate their designated polling units around 9:45am.

    Many voters noted that it was unusual for electoral officers to arrive late for duty on Election Day.

    Read Also: Tight security presence at LASIEC headquarters as Lagos council poll begins

    Those who spoke with The Nation said they were waiting patiently for LASIEC officials to set up the election process. One man said he had been waiting since 8:15 a.m. at his polling unit.

    Some residents had mounted canopies at their polling units in preparation for the officials’ arrival.

    The Nation observed that adequate security was in place as promised by the Lagos State Commissioner of Police, CP Olohundare Jimoh.

    Police officers were seen at all the locations visited, including Iyana-Ejigbo, Isolo, Ikotun, Igando, Iba, and Isheri.

    The Chief of Staff to Lagos Governor, Mr Tayo Ayinde, attributed the delays to logistic issues. 

    He spoke with reporters shortly after casting his vote in Polling Unit 014, Ikeja GRA.

    He acknowledged that there can be room for improvement going forward in future elections.

    According to him, the election has been peaceful so far and commended LASIEC for proper organization.

    Ayinde expressed confidence in his party’s, the All Progressives Congress (APC) success in the poll.

    He said: “I pray that by the grace of God, our party is going to come out victorious at the end of the day. Going by the magnitude of the work and the achievements of this present government in Lagos State and going by what all what our council chairmen are doing presently in Lagos State, I think by the grace of God, we will carry the day.”

    He praised the peaceful exercise.

     “So far, so good; it has been so peaceful. People came out to vote on their own, and I’m sure that they voted for their choices,” Ayinde stated.

    A commissioner with the Lagos State Local Government Service Commission, Hakeem Bamgbola, hailed LASIEC for organizing a peaceful and credible election.

    Bamgbola, however, called for more youths engagement and grassroots development.

    Despite the lower turnout, the Commissioner expressed optimism about the party’s performance, stating, “We are very hopeful and I can assure you that we are going to win all the positions in the local government. Our party candidates will be declared winners.”

    The commissioner expressed strong confidence in a clean sweep, but also highlighting critical areas for improvement, particularly concerning voter’s turnout among the youths and the need for robust grassroots development.

    Meanwhile, he praised the election officials for their efficiency, noting, that they were on time and prompt in the distribution of materials. 

    “Voting commenced around 8am in my area, and while initial turnout was low, more people steadily came out to cast their votes at various polling booths. The process was largely peaceful with no major incidents reported.”

    He added that the visibly low voter turnout, especially compared to federal elections, was a point of discussion. “Sometimes, in council elections, oppositions’ supporters don’t come out as much, but they turn out en masse for federal elections,” he explained, adding “We’ve worked hard to mobilize our people, and their efforts to bring voters out have been commendable.” 

    He stressed the importance of civic responsibility, lamenting, apathy among eligible young voters, with many seen playing football in the streets rather than participating in the electoral process.

    He said: “We still need a lot of communication and enlightenment for our youths. They are the leaders of tomorrow, yet when we expect them to vote, we see them blocking roads and showing disinterest.

    “You can’t be a citizen, a youth, and not come out to cast your vote for the candidate of your choice, and then complain about bad governance. We need a lot of enlightenment and meetings with the youth before the 2027 general election. Their participation is paramount for us as a party.” 

    He also commended women for their active participation, noting their presence at various local government areas.

    Chairman of Apapa-Iganmu Local Council Development Area, Alhaja Funmilayo Akande-Muhammed, said voters’ turnout was impressive in her council.

    She lauded LASIEC for staging a free, fair, credible exercise.

    She said:  “Apapa-Iganmu is a bit different because larger percentage of residents are actively involved in politics, so we take these elections very seriously. Our people turned out well, and we are confident in the results.”

    She said the results coming in so far showed APC in clear lead.

    “The difference is clear! We don’t have strong opposition,” she said.

    This, she said, was as a result of her impactful administration.

    “Everyone can confirm this. Even during the presidential election, when it comes to elections, the people come out fully for APC,” she said.

    APC Candidate in Apapa-Iganmu, Saliu Jimoh, described the poll as nothing short of perfect. 

    “We’ve seen significant improvements in the election process in Lagos State over time and today’s conduct is a testament to that progress. It was well-organized and truly commendable,” he said.

    According to him, “The turnout has been massive. Anyone who witnessed my rallies would have seen the overwhelming public acceptance I’ve received.”