Category: Dayo Sobowale

  • Elections, succession and expectations

    Nigeria’s  former Democracy  Day or Obasanjo’s  Democracy Day, May  29, has  come  and gone with the fanfare of swearing in of   our   second term  President,  new governors as well as second term governors  all  over Nigeria. It  was  a fantastic day  for   first  ladies  and   families in the state  capitals as well  as the First Lady in Abuja, the outspoken  blunt lady,   who  stayed calmly and dignified as the husband our second term president took  the oath of office for a second term. However and  quite  inexplicably,   the    brooding  shadow   of Obasanjo  hovered around the occasion in Abuja  although Obasanjo  himself  was absent  at the event. The first time I think  he would  be absent  at  his   personally  decreed   and nationally   observed   May   29 Democracy Day. But  the reason was  not far to see. The new  second term  president had  changed  the Democracy  Day  from May  29 to  June  12,  the day  Obasanjo’s  Egba  kinsman, the irrepressible  MKO  won the election that was adjudged the freest and fairest in Nigeria and  that  did  not  go down well with Obasanjo.  That  could explain his absence  as a simple  case of sour  grapes  over  MKO who  he  bitterly  resented  as the   purported  ‘ Messiah  of  Nigeria’ in the heady days of the June  12  brouhaha.  Again,  that  could also explain  why the President did not give an Inaugural  Address  as usually  expected  on  May  29.  Ostensibly  that  would be done on the new and vastly  popular June 12 Democracy  Day  that    has become  Obasanjo’s  bitter  pill  to  swallow.

    All   the same, that was  not the only reason why the former Nigerian  Head of State was absent at the swearing in of the Nigerian President for  a second term. The  occasion  was  an event  or  a  record that Obasanjo  held in Nigerian politics  till  the reelection of President  Muhammadu  Buhari  for a second term in the 2019 elections. Until the reelection of PMB, Obasanjo  was the only Nigerian leader  who  had  been  both  a military  Head of    State  and an elected  and reelected  president.  Obasanjo     was elected president   20   years  after  his tenure  as a  military   dictator   and PMB  30 years   after  his  military    regime was overthrown.  Again, even   that alone could  not  explain the absence  of  OBJ  at  the  swearing in of PMB  this  week  and that is  a  major  part of our discussion  today.

    Before  the swearing in of PMB this week  Obasanjo  had thrown  spanner in the works  for the Nigerian president  in a manner that would have made  his presence  most  unwelcome and avoidable  at  the May  29  swearing   in, this week. Obasanjo  dropped  a  security  bombshell  at an  Anglican  Synod in Etsako,  Edo  state when he   said  that  the true  reason for the emergence of Boko  Haram was not poverty  or the Almajiri in the North  as we had thought  and  even  that  has evolved  into the’ Fulanisation of  West  Africa  and the Islamisation of  Africa ‘all  of which  have now metamorphosed into gun running, drug  running, human trafficking , kidnapping, all  dovetailing into  the high  security  risk  of regime  change.  Having  accused the reelected president of negligence  on  security  and collusion  on his watch  in his first term, Obasanjo  must  have deemed it safer  to stay  at a safe distance while   the man  he has lambasted  so  mercilessly  on connivance  on security  matters of the nation, is being reinvested with fresh powers  to  tackle the  pervasive insecurity bringing the nation to  its heels right before  our eyes. The  absence  could  not be called cowardice on the part  of Obasanjo  because  even  those who hate  his guts, and they are many all  over Nigeria,  agree and  applaud   that  courage is  one virtue  that the man  who accepted  the surrender of Biafra  has in  abundance.  This  time  however  I think  that  OBJ  simply decided that discretion  is the better part of valour  and  stayed  away  in the interest of national  security.

    Nevertheless,  Obasanjo’s bombshell  and accusation of the Nigerian  government and his charge of  Fulanisation   and  Islamisation are  the bag  and baggage  that  the Buhari  administration  is carrying  into its  second  term.  The  issues  raised are of  paramount  importance  and  the President  should  show  that  even  though he is  Fulani,  he is for all Nigerians and  he belongs to all  the ethnic groups in Nigeria and  not the Fulani  alone. The  issue of a dedicated radio to  communicate with the Fulani herdsmen  who  have a reputation for killing people more than tending their cattle,  must  stop in the national  interest. Similarly, Myetti  Allah, the umbrella  organization for the Fulani  herdsmen must  be called to order  by our  security apparatus and shown  clearly  that it is not a state  within a state.  The  statement  credited to the Chief  of  Defence Staff that the state of insecurity in the nation is such that  the unity of the nation is at risk,   must  be addressed  to prevent the break up of Nigeria. In  addition  to the war on corruption, the   Buhari  federal  government, at its second coming must show that Nigerians  are equal  individually  and in terms of their diverse ethnicity before  the law in Nigeria  and there is no ‘master  race’ before   which other Nigerians must tremble  and  cower as  the  Fulanisation and Islamisation charges  seem  to imply.

    Let  us now  look   some  election results in  India  where  the winner  was  reelected on a fresh  mandate  and his connection with the emergence of  nationalist leaders all over the world.  We   shall    look   later  at some unique  states  where new incumbents emerged  as governors  and the baggage they  have brought in with their  elections.  We  shall  look at  Lagos, Kano, Zamfara  states  and  explore  lessons to be learned  in the succession battles that  made  their  elections peculiar  and interesting. Today  however  we look at  Lagos state  and the emergence  of  Jide  Sanwoolu as the new governor.

    In  India the  Prime Minister Narendera Modi  won reelection on a huge  margin that consigned the former ruling party, the Congress Party,  to  the dust  bin of history. The  result effectively ended dynastic politics  involving  the Nehru and  Gandhi families that have produced at least three PMs in India.  According to Modi  in thanking Indians for his election – ‘there  are now two castes in India, the poor and those who  want  to get them out of poverty  and it is our  duty to empower  both’. In  addition according  to some voters they voted for Modi  although there  is little  development  but’ Indians  feel  safer  and  can  hold their  heads  high ‘.  Such  confidence  and patriotism is what Nigerians need  from PMB  on  his reelection and inauguration on June  12  when  he  makes  his Inaugural  speech as expected and  must, at least,  thank  Nigerians for reelecting him.

    The  swearing  in of Jide Sanwoolu  as  Lagos  State  governor was  a festive occasion in  Lagos at  the Tafawa  Balewa Complex which  was built for such state pageantry but neglected when the capital  was moved to Abuja.  Yet  Lagos  remains the commercial  heart throb of Nigeria  and its  politics  matter in the scheme  of things. Sanwoolu  as governor  should  build  a bridge for Lagosians and his  party in terms  of  continuity  in  government and control  of  Lagos  state  by the party.  That  bridge was broken when  his predecessor failed  to  get  a second term  and he Sanwoolu  was drafted as it were  to fill  a leadership  vacuum. He  must  boldly complete the projects his  predecessor put on the ground in terms of the people’s  welfare  and claim  credit for  completion of such  projects because  they  were built by the Lagos  tax payers and the electorate  and not the personal  wealth of his  predecessor.  Lagos  is  not like some states where  governors  built   sign posts that – this  road or  bridge   was  constructed by Governor X or Y.  In   addition,  the new  governor  should remember that he is fulfilling the second term of a governor from his party  based on the need  for a Christian  governor  for Lagos state. He  must  not forget that mandate and  should  govern  as such, as  the buck  stops on his table.  He should be in control  and make consultations but  there is no room for a two  in one governor   as   the  new  governor  must respect the wisdom of the party elders  and leaders  who  made the arrangement possible   for  a Christian  governor  in the last two  guber  elections in the state. I wish  the new governor  a happy  and  successful tenure .Once  again  long live the Federal  Republic of Nigeria.

  • Politics, confrontation and democracy

    Let me muse today on the nature of politics and its practice in certain parts of the world. Certainly  US President Donald  Trump  and his brand of   confrontational  politics both at home and abroad takes pride of place in the scheme of things on such  a discussion. This is because Trump  has given the status  quo of world politics and trade a huge kick  in the ass by taking on both China  and Iran  on  trade and security  at the same  time and yet there is no world war  neither  have the heavens collapsed as usually  predicted on such   challenges,  before  the   highly  volatile Trump  era  of our  time. Similarly  in Nigeria the Minister of Information   Lai  Mohammed  cautioned the opposition  party   PDP on  its brand of politics which  he thought  was destabilizing and undemocratic  and the opposition  PDP  in return  thought that was insulting and  threatened to go to court  to redeem its image.

    Also  during the week  Nigerian senators  at  their red chamber  in Abuja   suddenly  became  unusually  patriotic and concerned about the widening gap  between  the rich  and the poor in Nigeria,  the colossal  rate of unemployment  of  Nigerian  youths  as  well as our inaccurate  controversial  census  figures  and called  for  a state of emergency  to   tackle these   serious issues.  At  the same time Myetti  Allah  the confrontational  umbrella  body of  herdsmen killing and  destroying farms all  over the nation announced that once herders are not allowed  to graze their cattle they  will  fight back  to earn a living  anyhow  and  cannot be blamed for that. Their  spokesman then highlighted that the so called offer of 100bn  said  to have been offered his organization was by the Jonathan Administration   but it was not for amnesty as wrongly  deduced  by the public,  but for  the   establishment of grazing sites   all over the country   and that was  why they  voted then  for  Jonathan   Administration  and the offer was available  for the   present Buhari Administration to adopt.

    Today  then  we shall  look  briefly  at  the Trump brand  of confrontational  politics  both on the domestic  scene as well as international  politics  and its effect on American  and global  democracy.  We  shall  also  look at why  Lai Mohammed  has branded  PDP’s  politics as  subversive  and   appraise that  party’s umbrage at  such characterization of its democratic  role at this point in time in Nigeria’s  power  transition politics.  We  shall  again examine  the  lamentation  of Nigerian  senators over  poverty, unemployment  and census to  see if they  are genuine  or crocodile tears   and take  on Myetti  Allah  on its unapologetic  support  for  herders who  seem  to be killing innocent Nigerians more than they  tend their  precious cattle. Indeed  on Myetti  Allah  it is enough to say that  it sees itself as a state within the Nigerian  state and it is up to the Nigerian security  apparatus to cut it to size with regard to its confrontational  politics and its   crude   challenges to  the  collective security   of     our     multiethnic  federal democracy.

    Starting with US President Donald Trump let me say that I find  his confrontational policies and politics somewhat productive  in terms of his campaign promises locally  and   peace promoting. He  has decked the US Supreme  Court with his allies  as judges in majority and is poised to take on gay rights as well  as abortion  as the banning of abortion in Alabama  has  shown  as  well as the baker’s  case on religious freedom . The US economy is booming  under Trump  and  he can  boastfully  claim  –  it’s the economy stupid to show  he is on course. On  the international scene he has brokered nuclear peace with N Korea  and last week the Russians said  they  want to  revive  good relations with the US.  He  is taking on China  on  counterfeiting, copyrights   and    technological   security  with  his emergency  order meant  to snare Chinese telecom giant Huawei.  With regard  to  the threatened war  with Iran  over the Straits of Omuz, Trump  has asked  the Iranians  to call him and has endorsed the Swiss as arbiters for negotiations. If  his unconventional  diplomacy  yield  such  unexpected prospects for world  peace, I can  only  doff my hat in admiration,  no matter how grudgingly.

    On   the  alleged  sabotage  of the Buhari  administration  by  the  Minister  of Information,   I  think  the Minister overstepped  his  bounds. He  was an  opposition spokesman  for  the APC  and  he was a very robust  and outspoken  one and  his present charge of sabotage against   the opposition   party smirks of hypocrisy and  intolerance. He  should  develop a healthy  respect for dissent  and take the PDP  on, on the issues  as fearlessly and eloquently as he did against  the Jonathan Administration as party spokesman  for the virile  opposition that the APC  was then.  As  for the PDP going to court  I want  to see  the SAN that  will go  and prove  to the courts  that   commenting on a court case such as the presidential  election petition  going on,  inherent in the present sabotage charge against  the PDP,  is not sub judice  and as such not   contemptuous on the part  of both parties.  Surely  both  parties must know that those who live in glass  houses  should  not throw  stones.

    With regard  to  the concern of the Nigerian  senators on  the welfare  of Nigerians one can  only thank them  for their concern and  patriotism.  They  even  acknowledged  that  something be done urgently  so as to avoid a looming violent  revolution.  Which  in a way  is a statement of fact and inevitable if the poverty gap  is not closed urgently. But  why the state of emergency and how? Will  the senate or  government be closed for the emergency to prevail and take drastic  measures to bridge the poverty gap ?Who  will bell  the cat? Definitely the senators  can blaize a trail  by letting us know their emoluments and fringe benefits and what percentage cuts they  want  to offer as their sacrifice  to  improve the poverty line of  the Nigerian  masses  in order to avoid the looming violent revolution they  see approaching  Nigeria. A  stitch in time saves nine and  I pray  the senators  have  not  closed the stable doors after   the horses have bolted.

  • Infallibility, security and politics

    Infallibility is the notion that someone or institution cannot  make mistakes or do something wrong. It  was a concept  used to sustain the authority of the Catholic Pope  when the Church  was the state and Papal  Infallibility was the doctrinal  instrument of  authority. Nowadays  however it is a  best  forgotten piece of history  with no relevance  to  modern politics and society.  For  anyone to talk of it nowadays is to make a mockery  of democracy  and insult  the intelligence of modern society,  individually and collectively.  To  invoke  the infallibility  of the Pope  in modern  times  is  to behave like the proverbial  ostrich  which  buried its head in the sand   and thought no one was seeing its  body  or motive which  was not lost  in plain sight. Such  invocation is sheer  hypocrisy  and is a futile  attempt   to  make mischief  with authority   and  make  a fool  of  intellectual  integrity, again individually  and  collectively.

    In   politics,  both ancient and modern,  the  concept  of infallibility is associated  with  absolutism  or  absolute  monarchy  a concept  adequately  and bloodily  dealt  with in history  by the French  Revolution  of  1789.  A   time when  the French  Revolutionaries  invented the guillotine  to behead royalty, the rich and mighty in French  society  and usher in mass  participation  in politics  and democracy  and the government of the people  by the people and for the people.  In  my  view   infallibility   is the antithesis  of  democracy  and human progress  and  should be allowed to rot  in hell where  the French  confined it   historically,    albeit    to the admiration and    global   applause    of  an  admiring international   community, from   then  till   now   even  in  2019.

    I   intend  to show  today  incidents  and   event   that  connote infallibility  in actions  and utterances   and proceed  to condemn them as fallacies  and illogicalities in terms  of leadership  goals and objectives. The  first  is the reported carving of the empire of the Emir  of Kano  into six  different  emirates  by the governor of  Kano   State. The  second  is  the reaction of Senator  Shehu  Sani   of  Kaduna  State   to  the sermon by the Imam of the Aso Rock  Mosque to the effect  that the present  pervasive   insecurity  in the nation  is because  Nigerians have sinned . The  third  is  the  retort on insecurity  by our President that  the Inspector  General  of  Police  has lost  weight because  of  his  concern  and  actions to battle  insecurity.   The fourth  is  the show down  by the US House  of  Reps  with  the US  President over  the infallibility of the Legislature to overlook the actions of the government  through  summons and subpoenas and the resistance  of this by the current  Trump   Administration  which  is unapologetically anti political  correctness  and as such   no  respecter   of  any  notion  of  institutional   infallibility.

    We  go back  to the  dismantling of the Kano Emirate and the dissipation of the authority of the Emir of  Kano.  It  is a logical   progression of  democratic  politics that traditional  institutions must  wither and decay to give way to  modern representative institutions in  a democracy. In  a way, the  creation   of the  Kano six  emirates on equal  footing  with the sole  Emir may  have political  undertones and   malice  but it  has shown  that the Emirship is  not  infallible  and is indeed  under the control  of a  modern democratic  government. The   distribution   of authority   is also  bound   to  improve the  management    of  security    which  in these  days   of  Boko  Haram    is   a Kano   government  priority.  Which    is  a sharp  departure  from  the  infallibility of the Emir    during  colonial   rule when the British   used  the colonial policy  of divide  and rule and Indirect  Rule to  make  the Northern Emirs absolute  rulers  over their  subjects  as long as they play ball and implement  the policies of the colonial  government.  Now, what is good for the goose is good for the gander  and the Emirs  must   now  play  ball with an elected  government  of the people  called  democracy in  Kano  State.

    In  Kaduna State  Senator Shehu  Sani  was reported as lambasting the Imam of  Aso    Rock  Mosque  who  preached that the recent  killings and kidnappings were   a test  from  Allah.  The senator disagreed  and said the insecurity  was the result  of a failure of leadership which  I found logical. This  is because    it is the duty of government to provide  security for the people that elected it into power in any democracy including  Nigeria.  According  to the senator ,   religious  leaders fail  to tell  Nigerian leaders the truth but talk to the poor in a fiery  manner .According  to  Sani ‘ it is the way  of state clergies to preach  to power  with flowers  and  the poor  with  flames’ and that they ‘ reshape  the gospel to  comfort and exculpate  power‘.  Of  course  such  sermons  and false  advice  are  not infallible  as the good senator has shown and  the bitter  truth is that until  the religious  institutions speak  truth  to  power   on the dire condition of our national  security, the rulers will persist  in their infallibility in thinking that they  have done their best   and  they  can  not  do  any more.

    Such  negative  attitude  must  have been  read into  the joke  of the Nigerian  president  on his return   from his recent  overseas trip  when  he said   that  the Inspector  General  of  Police in charge  of  our national  security has  lost weight in  finding solution to the pervasive insecurity in the land.  Some  have accused the president of treating the issue of security  with levity and showing  the trait  of infallibility  on the  matter. I  beg  to disagree and see things  differently . Some  have even gone on to assert that since  some security chiefs are  pot bellied and overweight it shows from  the President’s description of the IGP’s  weight  and work that overweight security  bosses are  not  diligent like the IGP. I  beg  to  disagree  and will show why.

    To  me the President’s observation on the IGP’s weight   showed  empathy  and  understanding of the mammoth  security  problem  facing the IGP. In  addition the President as Commander In Chief in charge of security is also  accepting responsibility on behalf of the IGP  for  any  shortcomings on the matter. The  president is saying that he has delegated responsibility to the IGP but  he has not abandoned that responsibility and he has trust  in his IGP.  That  can  only spur the IGP  to  aspire  to do better  and that gives us hope that there is no infallibility  on the part of government  with regard  to the killings in the nation.  We  can only pray  that the chain of security  command  and  management  is  tight   and   productive   enough   in the short  run,  rather    the  longer    term ,  to deter the criminals and hoodlums  who  are challenging the authority of the Nigerian  state so  boldly   in protecting  its people.

    Lastly  US  President  Donald  Trump  has shown the US  Lower  House  that  his Administration  will  not  be cowered  by  the perceived infallibility of  the oversight  functions of the House in summoning government  officials for questioning even  when  the law  protects such  officials.  That  has led to the Attorney  General  failing to show up and  his arraignment  for contempt  before the House.  In addition Trump  has invoked his executive powers to protect state security  and operational   matters in the face of the assumed infallibility of the House to probe as it wills.  That is the   presidential system  of  checks  and balances at play  in uncharted  waters.  This     definitely  shows  that pragmatic  politics can make a mess of untested authority camouflaging in the guise of tradition,  protocols and blatant  infallibility even  in a free wheeling  and time tested democracy like the US.  Once again long live the Federal  Republic of Nigeria.

  • Pensions, justice and the rule of law

    The  Bayelsa State governor,  Mr   Seriake  Dickson during the week refused to give assent a  to a bill passed by  the  state  House of Assembly asking for  life pension   for  both serving and past  legislators in the state. The governor said the bill violated a section of  the Nigerian constitution, was not a priority on the list of the myriads of serious economic problems  facing the state and would  be creating a special  class  of  people in a democracy where equality and freedom  are  the driving spirit.   In  my view the Bayelsa   governor is a shining example of  a champion of democracy  upholding the rule of  law  and justice  and his refusal  to give assent  to the bill brought by  self  serving   Bayelsa legislators is a beacon  of  hope  that  God  is  not  finished with  Nigeria yet. This   is    in spite of  the overwhelming predisposition of the Nigerian   political class   for  self  perpetuation,  and  self  promotion   of their  class  once they  get elected into  any   office  either in   the executive or legislative arm  of  government, in  all  categories  of  governance  in the Nigerian  political  system.

    In  upholding  the rule of law at  great expense to  his political authority and tenure   I put  Governor Dickson of Bayelsa  state on the lofty platform  of some other legal  minds and lawyers on the global scene who  this week  stated boldly and  clearly  what  the rule of  law  is  and what  it is not.  The  first  is  Rod  Rosentein  the Deputy Attorney General  of  the US who  appointed the  Attorney Mueller  who   led the Mueller Inquiry which   recently   submitted its report on its findings on  whether Russia  assisted Donald  Trump  to win the 2016 US presidential  election  or  not. The  second  is the US Attorney  General William  Barr  who  received  the  Muller  Report and released  an  abridged  version  of it  as required by the US constitution.  The  third  is the US House of  Representatives dominated by the Democrats which is using  subpoenas to battle  the presidency  of  the US President Donald  Trump  Administration   while  the Trump  appointees in government  have refused to  honour  some  subpoenas thus  exposing themselves  to  charges of  contempt  of the law  with regard  to  legislative authority.  With  regard  to  the US AG Barr’s  role  and  that of the US House  of  Reps,  partisanship  has  blinded proceedings on both sides  such  that the rule of law is   in   serious  jeorpardy.  We  shall  therefore  dwell   here on the Rosentein resignation letter  later.

    The  comparison  with Governor  Dickson  stems  from  the fact  that the Bayelsa  governor  is  boldly    trying to defend  the people  who  voted Bayelsa  legislators  into office   against   the   misusing   and abuse  of    their   trust     with    legislative powers  aimed  at  looting   the state treasury. Thus    making  an ass of  the law in creating life pensions  for themselves  outside  the provisions of  the Nigerian  constitution.  According to  the Governor  in his statement  on refusal  of assent, the bill  is inconsistent  with Section 124  of the Nigerian  constitution  and ‘ I am  not  convinced  of its legality’.  The  legislature  is made up  of  22  members  of  the PDP,  the governor’s  party  and 2 members of  the opposition APC  which  means  that  the legislators   from  the governor’s   party  can  impeach  him  for daring to stop  the bill. That  makes  the governor a public   spirited  and patriotic  Nigerian  in  my view.  What  I do  not agree with   however is his  insistence that  Bayelsa   will  be the first  state to give  pension to political  office  holders. It is an open  secret  that governors and deputy governors in many states  have houses and cars when they leave office and have cars renewed  after  two  years in some  states. It  is  a situation similar  to  that in Bayelsa and is equally   condemnable   as  it is not only  a drain  on the resources  of the states  concerned but is an abuse  of  the concept of contributory  pension system  which  is meant as a cushion and incentive  for the effects of  long  meritorious  service.

    A  recent  White  Paper in the UK  called  for a review  of pensions for  the old with a view  to cutting some perks  such as TV  licence payments  so  that there  can  be provision  for  young people  who  are largely  unemployed and uncatered  for  by the state. The recommendation is meant to  care  for  young  unemployed  youths in  order to make  life  easier  for them in  society  in order  to minimize  antagonism against  a society that creates social  tension in the face of rising youth  unemployment and joblessness.  That  to me is a step  in the right direction in the UK  and is what  Nigeria  should  emulate  and  adopt   instead  of  creating   extravagant   pensions   for politicians  who  serve very    short  political   terms. This  is imperative  and urgent  with the developments in Algeria  where restless, angry   and unemployed  protesters,  mostly  youths  toppled the decades old regimes of Boumediene and Sudan  where  a similar   overthrow    of  government   was led  by youthful  doctors and other  professionals. This  is the handwriting on the wall  that the Bayelsa governor   has read  and has stopped  his wayward  legislators  in their  quest  to make an  ass of the law and line their pockets with the resources of the state  as pensions  for life.

    In  similar  vein the outgoing US  Deputy  Attorney  General Rod  Rosentein   who  initiated the Mueller probe  and was perceived as an antagonist  by the US President  resigned as expected but his resignation  letter  was a lesson  in objectivity and respect  for  the rule of law.  Rosentein  whose resignation takes effect on  May  11  noted  that  ‘the rule of law  is  the foundation of  America.’ In  the  concluding part  of his released resignation  letter he gave clear  albeit    grudging endorsement  to the US   President Donald  Trump   who  vilified  him  as  a  witch  hunter most  of the time. Rosentein  praised  the US Department of  Justice  he was leaving thus –‘ We  enforce the law  without fair or favour  because evidence is not partisan  and truth is not determined by opinion polls.  We  ignore fleeting distractions and focus our attention on the things   that  matter,  because  a republic that matters is not governed  by the news cycle. We  keep  the faith, we  follow  the rules and we always put America first ‘ I  am  sure  that even  Trump  must  have  been dazed   and pleasantly    surprised   by the unexpected adoption of his America First slogan  by a man he mistrusted  most  of his time in office.  But  that is the best  way to uphold the rule of law  in any clime  or polity  as shown by both  Governor Dickson of Bayelsa   on life  pension  for   legislators in  Nigeria  and Rod  Rosentein of the US  Department  of Justice. Once  again long live  the Federal Republic of  Nigeria.

     

  • Anger, protests and power

    Imagine Baba  Sala the famous Nigerian comedian defeating MKO, the winner of the famous   June 12  election,  in a presidential election and you will get an idea of what happened in the real presidential election in Ukraine recently.  Similarly imagine our security chiefs resigning because of street protests in Abuja and Lagos and you see the gravity of the situation in  Sudan where protesters in  Khartoum, the capital have not only forced their president out of office, but have also forced his replacement and some generals to resign in the same  Sudan. Now   cap   these  imaginations  with   the    real    and   working    visit   this  week   of  the  Nigerian  president   to  Maiduguri  and  Lagos    the  capitals  of two  states,  and  Borno  and  Lagos,  both  of  which  suffer  respectively    from  the  notorious  terrorism  of  Boko  Haram,  and the    provocative    nuisance  of  trailers making life and traffic a  real  drudgery   for  citizens  and  workers  in  Lagos,  and  you  have a feeling of my mood as I write  today  on this  vibrant  topic.

    By   now  you  would  have sensed   that   I   am  trying   to  make sense   and   reason  out  of  a form  of  anger politics  in democracies  around the world  that has  thrown  up  unexpected leaders  and strange    winners  of  elections  in  many   political systems.  It  is my contention   today   that  a new Arab  Spring    of   2011  is back  in modern  global   democratic  politics . It  may  not exactly   be  bloody, violent  and   dismissive  like the French  Revolution    of   1789   but  it  is  angry and vitriolic  enough against  established  and well  known sources and origins of power  in  contemporary   modern  society.  Even  in  France  the nation of    Revolutions   it  has taken  its fresh  toll in planting a   political  nonentity in power  in France’s  last  presidential  election. Even  then, the revolution  is not finished  with him  and France  yet, as the  angry   and  violent  Yellow vests  have shown  that unlike the French  revolution of  1789,   the  new  French did not elect a Napoleon  Bonaparte into  power  to build  climatic   empires  abroad at the expense  of the hard working suffering  masses of  France, when  they  elected Emman Macron  as president in France’s   last  presidential election.

    It  is my contention again  that the global anger against  the established  political order in any political system is so intense   that it does not  care who  takes  over or who wins elections as long as the   existing, known  and    repugnant political   order and failed system  is swept  away  and replaced.  That  is what happened this week  in Ukraine where a clown, Volodymyr Zelensky  who  played  the role of president in   fictional  films in reality  became  an elected president by  defeating the incumbent  president, Petro  Poroshenko who  campaigned woefully  on the clown’s  incapability  to  understand  the rudiments of  governance.  But  the clown   Zelensky is now  president and  has defeated the incumbent billionaire president, Poroshenko in claiming  electoral  victory in a nation’s  rare  and new    fit  of anger against  a non  performing political order. That    in a   way   seems  to  be the order of the day in many  political  systems  nowadays   and  it is in   such tautological terms that one should  see  the emergence of a Donald  Trump in the 2016 US  presidential  elections and the many problems of the American political system thereafter.

    Let  me postulate  again,  that  in reality, political  anger in terms of protests  and sit ins and even violent  protests,   do not always achieve their  objectives  successfully  as in Algeria and Sudan  recently. Egypt  is a  good  example  of  a revolution   that  misfired. The Arab Spring   of 2011   started   in Tunisia    and  toppled the Mubarak regime in  Egypt   and the Egyptian  army played  along  initially   as a friend of the revolution.  An  elected government, the first democratic government in Egypt was put in place, headed  by millionaire Morsi. That  democratic  government  was later toppled  by the Egyptian  army as  the leader of that   army  General  Fattah Al  Sisi  played  ball  in toppling  his   former  boss Mubarak   and  came to power.  Protesters  were then sentenced to death or jailed and tramautised in all aspects of Egyptian life. This  week,   the  army  Commander and  now President Sisi  has amended  the Egyptian   constitution  in a  referendum to make him remain in power till  2030.  That  is a good  example  of  a counter productive revolution or a protest  that  went haywire, a major potential  risk  of any  anti – .government protests nowadays.

    Let  us now  let the chicken come home to roost here in Nigeria with the visits  of our president to Lagos  and Maiduguri  to commission infrastructure projects before  jetting out to London reportedly from Maiduguri.  The  two cities visited  by the president  to launch  infrastructural  projects  are  significant  for  the  purposes of this  topic  for two  reasons. One  has to do with traffic congestion and deterioration of the quality of  life both private  and public for  the citizens of  Lagos. The  other  has to do with security  as well as the safety of life and property in  Maiduguri  where Boko  Haram has made life a horror  for the citizens with suicide bombers,  such  that  the Shehu  of Borno  once complained to  the president on a similar visit,  that nobody  is safe from the bombings and suicide attacks within the confines of  Maiduguri. This was an ancient  city protected by the Emperors  of the ancient Karnem Bornu Empire against  the Jihad of the Sokoto  caliphate  such  that  the Sokoto  Caliphate  Jihad  never  conquered the Karnem Bornu Empire. Nowadays  however  that ancient city trembles  under the terrorism of  Boko Haram  and Maiduguri  citizens and their rulers feel unsafe and unprotected. They  have   nevertheless  shown their  doggedness and resolve in supporting democracy and supporting  the president in the last elections when  they trooped out en mass to  reelect  the president with   more  votes   than the safer parts   of  the nation.  The  projects  commissioned by  the president   this week  should  in my view   be such  that will  guarantee the safety of life and property  of the citizens of  Maiduguri  from the bloody  terrorist  fangs and suicide  bombs of Boko Haram.  Otherwise   the projects will  become sitting ducks for  Boko  Haram  terrorism because  development  and human  progress  can only stagnate in an environment  where  government  cannot    guarantee  the safety of life  and property of its citizens at any time –  and that  is overdue in Maiduguri  and its environs in the face  of unrelenting and furious Boko Haram  insurgency.

    However  the city of  Lagos  faces  a different challenge both  to its rulers and citizens. The  challenge is not terrorism  as in Maiduguri   with the menace of Boko  Haram.  But  it is equally  debilitating  and  energy  sapping enough to make  Lagosians  feel  like  the living dead in their environment. It is traffic  congestion of the worst  order especially  on the main three bridges  that  workers,  traders, school  children, students take to work, schools, markets   and their places of  abode.  At  key  points and parts of the city and  at  the bridges ends, and on  them, lines of trailers clog  the flow of traffic in  and out of Lagos Island,  the key  commercial  heart throb  of commercial  Nigeria. The trailers look   menacing and hostile and have  caused numerous  accidents  both when they  are  mobile or packed at  night without any light or hazard  caution. The  names on them  are notably  those  of Dangote and some leading Nigerian companies, which  appear unfazed by the poor  or hostile  corporate image their long lines of packed trailers on Lagos bridges  convey in the public mind in Lagos.  Even   on Ikorodu Road the main traffic  artery out of Lagos  into Nigeria, the trailers  have taken  over along the vast  express  way. What  is insulting to the intelligence of Nigerians is the fact  that trailers are cleared  for  visits like that of the president last week and resume their nuisance, cruel   and  disturbing presence even  before the president has boarded his plane  in Ikeja  back to  Abuja.  Again  it is my view that whatever the president came to commission in Lagos  should solve  the menace of trailers clogging the traffic in Lagos state  and making  every  day  living and commuting, an  unhealthy  experience  for those living in Lagos, the real  commercial capital  of Nigeria. Once again, long live the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

  • Politics, tenacity of office and performance

    As state governments transit to change hands after the last presidential elections in Nigeria it is now clear how many governors  are migrating from the seat of power in our state capitals to the Nigerian  senate   in  Abuja. To  such  former governors it is  a  positive development for it keeps them in power  and perhaps  at a more  prestigious level   at  the federal  level  than  their  posts  in the state  capitals.  For  them  the saying on  Julius   Caesar, Emperor   of  the   Ancient Roman  Empire   that –  for  Caesar it  is better  to be first  in a village  than  second  in Rome –  is  not  applicable.  This is   because   in Abuja,  in our very  Imperial red  seat senate  they  are still  very  much in  power in the legislature  as part of the checks  and balances of our  presidential  system  of  government. That  is what  I want  to label  as tenacity of office  today.   I  will  then go   on to  show  that  it is not that condemnable as long as the new  senators bring impeccable credentials to the senate as former  governors who  performed in  their  previous  assignments  to have earned such  power  promotion  to their new political  assignments.

    Interestingly  the desperation of governors to get  to the senate in Nigeria is best illustrated by the plight of the Imo  State  governor   Okorocha  who  allegedly  put a gun to the head  of the INEC conductor of his election to announce  him winner. A misdeed    for which INEC refused to give him a winner’s  certificate and   for   which  a court in which he filed  a protest  has refused  to consider his case, such  that  he is in a quandary  on how  he  can fulfill  the power  fashion of  governors  becoming senators after their tenures  as governors in Nigeria.

    As  I said  before  performance  matters in the way and manner governors resurrect in our  senate  after their  tenure. This is just plain common sense in that even a primary school student knows that to be  promoted he  must  earn  that  promotion by passing his exams which  indicate good performance.  That  was the humorous way  that  Chief Igbinedion  campaigned for the reelection of his son Lucky  as governor of  Edo  state by  saying  rhetorically  that  if he had  performed in office he  should  be given  another term of office as a reward. So  on the face of it  I  do  not quarrel  with tenacity of office  provided it is anchored on  good  performance which  can  be echoed in the saying  that you  do  not change  a winning team  in  football.  It  is   definitely the same  in politics according to the rules  of tenure  and succession.

    Given  that  the presidential  elections  have come and gone  and the incumbent  president  has  been  reelected one can  safely assume that  the reelection is a reward  for performance in the last  four years of  his first  term  of  office. That  would be a fair and realistic  assessment. But  it is not all  that glitters that is gold and the ruling and victorious party  the  APC  knows that. One  could point out constraints, unexpected,  that made optimum performance impossible like the president’s  sickness;  or  the hijacking of the senate by the senate president and the defections  that  made  the resurrection of  PDP possible  as the war against corruption floundered in the absence of the president and anti  corruption forces rallied and fought back  so  massively  that  the PDP, infamous  for  corruption  got  more states than it deserved in the 2019  elections.  But  every  cloud   has its silver lining.  That  of the APC is the fact  that it  has not allowed itself  to slip into  complacency   in  retaining power  now and in the future. That  is how  I see the   call  by  the National  Leader of the APC  Senator Bola Ahmed  Tinubu   for  the government  to review its policy  on power such  that  Nigerians  can  be able to  thank it as an  agent  of  change  and  economic   empowerment  of Nigerians.  It  is in the light of meaningful  performance in office that one should  view  the call  by the Jagaban  on his government  not to increase  VAT because  of  its dire  economic  consequences  on our productive resources  and the sectors that   are the goose that lays Nigeria’s  golden  eggs in all ramifications for  the Nigerian  economy. In  a way  the Jagaban has played his  part like  the  American  general who  rallied his troops  after a failed assault  by  telling them home  truths  on  their deficiencies  and  prodding them  to victory  with  the admonition   –‘ we  have seen  the enemy  and the enemy  is US.‘

    Let  us  leave Nigeria  for a while  and look  globally  on the way  today’s  topic is playing out in some capitals  of  the world  and  with  their leaders.  In  terms of leaders  who  have not performed  but are  clinging   to power   tenaciously  there is insurrection against  their  tenure in Algeria  and  Sudan.  In Israel  where an  election just  took place the  incumbent PM   Benjamin  Netanyahu  won  a  famous but  close victory by  making  security  and nationalism  his last  ditch  political  assault. In  the  US embattled President  Donald  Trump  who  just  survived the Mueller Investigations on his election in 2016  took  the fight to his enemies  by  prompting his Attorney  General to probe   those  who initiated the Mueller Probe  of his election on the ground of plotting a coup against  his election   thereby   committing treason.  I will   examine  these global events serially.

    In  Algeria 82  years  old   President  Abdelaziz   Bouteflika   after   20  years   in office  finally  gave in and agreed to quit office after weeks of protests  by Algerian  youths  who  said he was too old  to govern  and has ruined their  present and future by  his  poor  leadership that  has made their  economy  moribund  and the youths  massively  jobless. Bouteflika  had stroke and had not  been seen  in public till  the protests  started. Instead  of reading  the handwriting on the wall for him to go,  he came out to sack  his cabinet and clung to power. But the protests continued and he had  to  give  in this week.  A good example on how tenacity of office  cannot  survive  poor leadership  performance.

    That  was  the  situation in Sudan  too where the army propped up the Omar  Al  Bashir ‘s dictatorship  for over three decades and   finally  toppled  it this week. Protests against bread and fuel  prices started in Khartoum, Sudan’s old capital weeks  ago. They  were led by professionals in Sudan especially  doctors who were severely   beaten and manhandled by Bashir’s  henchmen  and security  forces. This week  they used real arms to disperse the protesters and the army finally  asked Bashir  to quit  after 30  years  of ruling without economic progress.

    I  skip  Netanyahu’s victory  for now  and end up with a good example of  leadership performance  in terms of  economic progress   and  good   tenacity  of office,  albeit in controversial  circumstances. That  example is  US President  Donald  Trump who  I initially  labeled  before his election, which I predicted, as the Nemesis of American  politics . Before you  call  me names let  me  give you  a quote from him on his inability to disclose his tax returns  because he is under  audit,  which he claims the US laws  allow. According  to Trump  – I built  a great  company, one of the best companies. I  have some of the  greatest  assets in the world. I did  a good job  and now frankly I don’t care about them. I only  care  about the United States.’ How  many world leaders can  boast  so  credibly    and boldly  on top of a performing economy  in the two  years he had  been in office  against  all  the odds?.  Certainly,  not  many.  But  that is the way  that tenacity of office  can  be beneficial  without protests in any democracy. Once  again, long live the Federal  Republic of Nigeria.

  • Legitimacy, power and democracy

    In politics  and indeed in any  democracy, winning power  is one thing.  Securing  that power  however  is  another  matter. Ensuring  that power is won  and  won in the right  way and manner is the  main  ingredient  of  legitimacy  and the  rule  of  law. Some  world  leaders  are  locked  in a  grip  of  a fight  to protect  the power  that they  won at elections  and  are  as it were fighting for their  political  lives  as such.  Others  have such overwhelming victories at elections that  their  legitimacy  is assured  if not  already  taken  for granted. In effect  then the acquisition  of  power  in elections and the keeping or loss  of it thereafter is the crux  of our discussion  today.

    Nothing illustrates our  topic  today  more  vividly  than  two events,  first  in Osun  State  in  Nigeria  last week,  as  well as the Mueller Report in the US which  literally cleared US  President Donald  Trump  of collusion  with  Russia  in winning  the US  2016 Presidential  election.  The  two  events  are also  two sides  of the same coin. One  removed  legitimacy  from the Osun State incumbent governor  Olugboyega  Oyetola  in  Osogbo  the other in Washington affirmed  the legitimacy of the American president’s election  two  years  ago . .  We  shall  examine the two  events alongside  Brexit  Adventures  and Deals of UK PM  Theresa  May in clinging to  the legitimacy  of the Brexit Referendum at  all  costs and branding those  MPs  opposing her  as anti  democracy  and against    the  declared  interests  of the British  people.  We also  examine the challenge posed to the new  mandate of President Muhammadu  Buhari  of  the APC  by  the  court case  brought  after the election by his defeated  opponent  who  gave figures purportedly from INEC  server thereby  claiming to have won the  2019 presidential  elections in Nigeria.

    It  is well known  that the legitimacy  of an elections  flounders when  the  integrity  of  its fairness  and  legality  is successfully  assailed in a court  of  law.  Yet  it is not only in a court  of  law  that electoral  integrity  can  be  attacked  or undermined. Public  opinion  too  can drag  legitimacy  in the  mud as the CNN, Washington Post  and New  York  Times  have shown  the US President over alleged  Russian Collusion  in  the  last two  years.

    Belief  in the legal  system  or its opposite  can  also  tax  the legitimacy  of any newly  elected leader when  post  election  legal battles  begin as is the case  in both  Osun  and the last presidential  elections in  Nigeria. In  all  these  scenarios  and in any political  system,  legitimacy,  the affirmation and conclusion  that  a leader has been  elected in a free and fair election  according to the electoral  rules  is the icing on the cake in any democracy  in our  world as we know it  today.

    We  go back  to the Osun  guber  election  where  the Court ruled that the incumbent  governor  Olugboyega Oyetola  should vacate  office and his  opponent  Ademola  Adeleke  who  lost  the election earlier should  be given a fresh  mandate  certificate  by INEC  which appears  to  be a straight  forward  situation.  Until  INEC announced  that it would  not do this yet  because the displaced incumbent  governor  has 21  days to  appeal  according to the law.

    Which  he has done, meaning  the status quo remains  and the incumbent  governor remains  in  office  till  the  case is decided in the Supreme  Court  at a time no  one can  certainly  predic. That  simply  means that the incumbent  governor’s  legitimacy  is fractured  even  as he rules  as governor  in borrowed  robes. Unless of course  the  Supreme  Court  overturns  the verdict  that stripped  him  of  legitimacy  later. For  now  according to our  law,  the new  winner must brood  over what  he  thinks  is  his stolen  mandate  and legitimacy.  Certainly  he  and his supporters must  think  of  the law  as an  ass  in this  case, at  least  for now. But  if  the  Court  of  Appeal  or  Supreme  Court  affirms his  verdict  and  he assumes  his  mandate  he  can  certainly refer  gladly  to the legal  saying that says the mills  of  justice may grind  slowly  but they grind  exceedingly  fine.

    Certainly  Donald  Trump  can  also echo  the  view  point on the mills  of justice  on his clearance  by the Mueller  Inquiry  on Russian  Collusion. But  one  must commend  the doughty US  President for  the fierce way  he  defended his  mandate  and legitimacy  all along.  Undoubtedly  if  he  had  been  quiet  I doubt  if  the decision  would have  favoured  him. He  fought  the  anti  Trump Press with  a huge barrage of tweets  never  seen  or  used  before by any  President in the US or  even  our entire world.  His counter  Charge of  ‘fake news’  and’ witch  hunt’  were  catch phrases  he used  to blackmail  his media  opponents  and to secure his  legitimacy  which  the Russian Collusion charge  threatened mightily. He  has my  grudging  admiration  in this  regard  as well as my  pity on what he has been  made to go through  since his election.  He  is certainly  a good  lesson  for  Political  Science and  politicians  on how  world  leaders  should  fight  for their mandates  and power, secured in a free  and fair  election in any democracy.

    Let  us  now  look  at  the Brexit  issue  and especially  the role of the British  PM, Theresa May  on her  many  deals  that Parliament never  bought till  she pitched in  her resignation as the ultimate price of approval. She  has  thus    literally    given  her head on a platter  of  gold  for  a lamentable  reason  and a  pitiable  excuse. In  a way  she has turned  legitimacy  and democracy  on their  heads by insisting on the Brexit  Result  of  a  Referendum that the British  people now no  longer want. In  insisting on that Brexit  Result  she  is  pursuing  a false  legitimacy  for  which history  would  judge  her harshly  as unduly rigid  and frigid  or even  blind  on the direction of  public  opinion and the true wishes of the British  people on  Brexit.  She  has taxed  the patience  of MPs, the  loquacious  but    brilliant  Speaker, the taciturn EU leaders  and she  has  lost  her  leadership  role cheaply  and quite deservedly  for  the  wrong  reasons  including that the British  people  must  fall  on their  sword  for  voting Brexit. Her  act  is a wonderful  and unbelievable one in  how  to be a  poor  first  amongst equal  in the Cabinet  System  that  has been the backbone  and  legitimacy of  the  British  Parliamentary Democracy  that  has  now  crashed  with  her handling of  Brexit.

    It  is not sad  at  all  in my view  to see her exit as  PM over Brexit. Good  riddance would  indeed  be an understatement. On  the  presidential  election    appeal, the  charge  by the spokesman  of  the ruling  APC  that  it was criminal  for the PDP  to access  the server of INEC    to  collate  a result  different from that  announced by INEC  as election  results for  the presidential election makes interesting  reading.  First  the APC  Spokesman  is a well  known  lawyer  and should  know that the  case  is already in  court  and commenting on it is  subjudice. But  since  he  has broached  a crucial  issue  one  must  ask if  it is wrong  to  access

    election  results on a public server  especially  in an election. The issue  at stake is the integrity  of  the figures. That  is what APC  should dispute and  INEC  should  affirm or  disprove.

    Nigerians are  watching  to  see that justice  is  done one way or the other.  That  is the mark  of  legitimacy  in any  democracy  and Nigeria is not an exception. Once  again, long live the  Federal Republic  of Nigeria.

  • Terrorism, identity and democracy

    I start  and stand  today  with  the view  that  with regard  to Democracy  one man’s  food  is another  man’s  poison.  I  also lace that with  the dictum  that a  hero  in  an environment  can  be a villain to others,  in the same environment. Given  the title  of today’s  piece  it is not difficult  to guess the events  that engaged  my thoughts  and agitated  my mind  on the world  scene in the last  week.  These  are happenings  in the world at large  that have tasked  peaceful communal  living under  democracy  as we practice  it in various  parts of the world including Nigeria.

    These events have raised serious doubts about how democracy  is getting on with the rule of law and  are challenging the virtues of tolerance, and respect for dissent which have hitherto been the main selling point of democracy as the best ideology in the world as we know it today.  It  is  not  an issue  or development  that can  be explained  away  by apologetic concepts  like the Clash  of  Civilisations  or  the End  of  History,  because  these are  issues  that  have arisen  unexpectedly  in various  parts  of  the world  seemingly  unexpectedly  but in reality  were    bound  to  happen  sooner  than  later,  given the unusual  scenarios  that  preceded  them.

    For  today’s  analysis  I will  like to give  my own  definitions  of the concepts  I  have  chosen  for discussion,  namely  Terrorism , Identity  and Democracy,  mainly  for  today’s  discussion.  Which means I cannot  be held accountable  for  any  different  meaning thereafter.  Just  like the Nigerian Chief  Justice  Fatai  Williams ruled  that his  judgement  in the infamous  two  thirds  of  13 case  cannot  be taken  as a precedent  in  one of  Nigeria’s  many post  election  cases  that  make  you  wonder if  post  election verdicts  were  about  events that happened elsewhere and  not  in Nigeria  right before  our  eyes. This is  important  to  note especially  as we  enter  the season  of  post election litigations in  Nigeria.  This  undoubtedly    is  a very  lucrative  festive season  for  the  Nigerian  legal  system  and  the  judiciary.

    Not  to  mention the  ebullient array    of  Men  In  Silk called Queen’s  Counsels  elsewhere,  but  more  famously  prodigiously known as  SANs –  Senior  Advocates  of  Nigeria  –  in  our  great nation. This  then  is the background  of  my  conceptual definitions  today.

    I  define  terrorism not  only as killing of innocent  people  for whatever  causes  or motive  but  all  violations of set  rules  and values  of  democracy by  force  within  the state or  polity. I define Identity  as the nationality or  tribe  which  sets  one set of  people apart from another within the nation  state.  I  also define  democracy  as  government  of the people,  by the people and  for  the people  flowing from  free  and  fair  elections.

    Given  these  definitions  then  let  me highlight  the incidents to illustrate  them.  The first  is the prevalent  charge of militarization  of the last 2019  elections in  Nigeria  and the introduction  of the dubious  terminology  of’  inconclusive elections ‘ in many states  of  the Federation.  The  second  was the slaughter  of innocent  people in Europe  namely  New  Zealand and Netherlands  and the use  of such  tragic  events  for propaganda  and  electoral  campaign  by  Turkey’s  President Tayyip Erdogan. The  third  is the state of  leadership of  Nigeria’s  temple of  justice, the Judiciary as  we  enter  the era  of  post  election  litigation, after  surviving  or sailing    through  the much feared  era  of  post election  violence ,  literally  effortlessly.

    Let  me state  clearly  that    I  put  militarization  of politics, especially  elections  on the same pedestal  as terrorism by  Boko Haram  or  ISIS.  I  hold  the same view  on inconclusive elections when  it is  apparent  one side or  the other  is on the verge of  winning.  This  is because all involve the dehumanization  of  human  beings. One  – that    is terrorism – does  this  bloodily  and with blood  letting . The other  does it by killing the  voters    right  of  choice  of  those to give power to rule them. Both  castrate  human  values    and  make  nonsense of  the rule  of  law  and a mockery  of  democracy.  In  the last election  it  was apparent  that the state  was being  used  against the state in the deployment  of soldiers  to  guarantee  the security of  the elections  so  that people  can  go  out  to  vote. They went  out in the presidential  elections and stayed indoors in the state assembly  and  governorship  elections. That  is  not how democracies  work  and Nigeria  is  Africa’s  biggest  democracy.

    In  Rivers  state the Army  issued  a statement  to  accuse INEC  of bias.  It  must  have  been  hard  pressed to  do  that  and  the statement  was  bitter  and  had  a tinge  of betrayal  by INEC. That  incident  should  be probed  further  to know who  betrayed democracy and if  the referee, which  is  INEC  took  sides  in the election.  Such  actions  are  subversive  of  democracy and  are treasonable  as elections,  free  and fair,  are  the source of legitimacy, which is the end product  of  democracy  and which becomes  questionable when  elections are not free  and  fair  or are  abandoned to favor one group  of  contestants  or  another.

    Voters  in any  democracy should  not  be intimidated  or deterred from  coming to  polling  booths.  Such  actions are  as bad  as plain  rigging  and stand  shoulder  to  shoulder  with terrorism in devaluing  and  dehumanizing  voters and  humanity in the march towards  inequality  and  justice  which  are  the essence of any democracy.

    The  killing  of  worshippers in two  mosques  in  New  Zealand and three people  in a tram  in Utrecht in the  Netherlands  are  both tragic  and  condemnable  and the  leaders in both nations have shown that such  acts  are  not  part  of their  culture  or  way  of  life.  But  the truth  is that  the issue  of  identity  and  nationalism are  behind  both  events.  The  killers  are  really  mad  but they  are basically  mad  at  the influx  of  migrants  into their environment.  Such  killings are totally  uncalled  for  as  voters have a right  and duty  to vote  out pro or  anti migration  political parties  at  elections when  they  become due  and  that explains why new  parties  are  coming  to  parliaments  based  on these  anti immigration  concern  of  those  who think  that the EU  is for Europeans and  no one  else.  Yet  it is equally  objectionable the way  the Turkish  president  is  politicizing  the  issue  and making it look like  a religious  warfare. That  is blatant escalation of  religious  hatred  and is  dangerous  for  world peace  and  Turkey’s  Erdogan  should  be called  to order in the comity  of  nations.

    Thirdly  one  cannot  but  wonder  how  the judiciary  would handle our post  election  petitions  and litigations  when  it  is virtually  headless.  The  Acting  CJ  reportedly  defended his appointment  by saying  he was right  to make himself  available  for swearing  in because  he  is acting  and the Substantive CJ is just on  suspension.  But  the suspended CJ is  also  on trial  for  false declaration  of  assets. Yet  justice  on political  petitions  need a transparently  free  and fair  environment  to  thrive  and justice  must  not only be done  but  be seen  to  have been  done.

    For  now  given  the configuration of  leadership  of  our judiciary in this    election    petition  era,  one  can  only  repeat that  ancient  saying  that ‘the hood  does  not  make the monk. ‘ Which    really    is  a great  pity.  Once  again, Long live the Federal Republic  of  Nigeria.

  • Elections, power and democracy

    The much  awaited  2019  elections  have come and gone and the APC is still  the ruling party  and President  Muhammadu  Buhari  is still  in power  even  though  his defeated opponent has gone to the courts  to  contest  his electoral  victory. That  in  a nutshell puts Nigeria in the league of nations  where  the rule of  law prevails  and  constitutionalism,  transparency  and accountability  are  the indices  of  the  march  into  democracy, the prevailing norm  and ideology  of  our  time.  Really  in  spite of  all  the problems which  beleaguered  our 2019  elections  I  feel proud  of the fact that it has come  and gone  peacefully  and the transition and Inauguration  are  up  and  coming.  I  say  this sincerely without  any  sarcasm  and insincerity  and you will  soon see  why.

    To  appreciate  what we have achieved  as a nation  on these elections  you  just  have  to  look at events in many  nations of the world  today  which  just went through elections or  are contemplating new  ones,  to know that  we  have achieved our  own indoor  miracle in landing in one piece  as a nation. Even  as the winners  and victors  celebrate  and the losers  count their losses and moan  in silence, wondering why their  luck  deserted  them  so much, this time  around. We  are  lucky  that  Nigerians  feel a sense  of relief  that the elections  have come  and gone  and  we are still  at  peace with each other despite the gloomy  predictions of  some so  called civilized nations and observers  who  have  come to  view  our elections as tourists in a foreign  zoo  in Africa.

    When  indeed  their own  brand of politics  and  values especially  on gay  rights  and sexual  equality  have turned their  environment into an arena of  cultural  Marxism versus  the rest, in a way  and manner  that shows  the decay  and decadence of  the democracy  they sold  so  gladly  to  us at  colonialism  and  globalization.

    I  therefore  want  to  highlight political  events in the US, Britain,  and    Venezuela  to show  that  comparatively  we have managed our politics  and elections  better  than  these  places. And like the lizard  that    landed flat  on its stomach  from  a great height  proverbially  said,  we  can  congratulate  ourselves  even if  no  one is going to applaud  our  electoral  feat.  Which again  I  say  with  all  seriousness is  no  mean  feat.

    Let  us  look  at  America  or  the United  States  of  America  [USA] which  some  have dubbed the Divided States of  America  [DSA] because  of  the deep  division  in the American  society  since the election of President Donald  Trump  in the 2016  presidential elections two  years  ago.  I  read  an  article recently in which the writer  was appealing  to liberal  and conservative democrats alike    in the US  to try and see  the other  side’s  point of  view instead of  seeing  those  with a different  point of view as devils incarnate.  The  writer  in particular  frowned  at  the slander, insult  and ridicule  with which  a section of the American  press covers the presidency  of  Donald  Trump  who  too believes  that  the press  is Public Enemy  No  1  and  has  tarnished  their professional  integrity  by calling them  fake news. The  point  I am  making is that two years  after their  presidential  elections Americans  are still at each others’  throat  over Russian meddling in the election  even  as they prepare  for  the  approaching  2020 presidential  elections. Yet  the US embassy  in  Nigeria  behaved as the international  albeit    unofficial  referee  of  our  2015 elections in which  power changed hands  and the 2019  election in which  power  was  consolidated,  with  Nigeria  maintaining  its head  as a nation  and  living up  to its motto of unity in diversity.

    In  Britain  where  Brexit  holds  sway in terms of  political discourse  and confusion, one  can  only feel  sorry  for Parliamentary  democracy  because the Brexit debate  and debacle has  shown  the Achilles  heel  of this  type  of  democracy. Indeed the  British  Parliament  has overreached itself  and has shown that  too many debates    lead  to  verbosity  and that  in the end breeds  confusion  and  leadership  misdirection. The  British  PM’s Brexit  Plan,  amended and not, has  been  defeated  several  times and yet  she is  planning another one even  though the Opposition leader  has suggested  a  general  election to choose  a government that    knows  what  it should  do  on Brexit.  Quite  interesting was the veiled  threat  by the Speaker  that  he would  veto a discussion on the PM’s  next  Brexit  Plan  if he sees  that the plan was just  the earlier debated  one  with  just  a change  of words.

    Worse  still  was  the observation by  an  MP  that  the PM said  it would be undemocratic to have  another referendum on leaving the EU or  not. Yet the PM did  not  see  it  undemocratic  to bring a defeated Brexit  Plan  for  debate  twice  or thrice. Again  the lesson  is that Britain  bungled a democratic  process  that was uncalled  for  because some of its  party  leaders  have  a false sense  of  Britain’s  importance  and relevance  in  the world. Yet despite  the  appalling  failing  voice  of its PM  in  Parliament no one  especially  no  gentlemen dared  query  her physical  capability for  leadership  because  that would be sexist  challenge.  That is  how  far  British  civilization  has  led itself  even  as they too sent observers  to  watch  our elections when  they  do  not know what they  want to do with the result  they  voted  for  with  Brexit.  Really,  charity  could  begin at home in Britain.

    In  Venezuela  there  is  confusion after  the last  presidential elections  of 2018  which the Speaker of the National  Assembly claimed  was rigged  and  which  the incumbent  President Nicolas Maduro  claimed  he won.  The Speaker Juain Guuado    proclaimed himself president  and the EU  and  US  have  recognized  him  as Interim  President  while  the incumbent  president  has thanked the military  for  standing by him and keeping him in  power.  Venezuela is  a socialist    country  and  China, Russia and  Turkey  are backing  the incumbent  and newly  elected  president.    Since  the election over 3m  Venezuelans  have fled    the  country.  So there is no peace in Venezuela  since their  last  election  in 2018 as they have two  internationally  recognized  presidents.

    In  effect  then  while  we  may  moan  about  our  many  electoral shortcomings  and  inadequacies  over these 2019  elections, we as a nation can  thank  God    for the peaceful elections we  just  went through.  This  does  not mean  we have swept  our  problems with our peculiar brand of democracy where  might is right  under the table. It  is a way  of thanking  God  that it could have been  worse. Once again, long live  the Federal  Republic  of  Nigeria.

  • Elections, personalities and prospects

    It  is  my  guess  that  the  gubernatorial and State Assembly elections  today  will  certainly show  how  Nigerians perceive the democracy they are participating in for  the 2019  presidential  and general  elections. If  the turn  out  is better  than  that of  the recent  2019  presidential  elections,  then  it shows  confidence in the  electoral  process  as well  as confidence in INEC.  If  the turn  out is poor then  it  is  a sign  not  only  of voter  fatigue,  but  of voter  apathy. Which  then  means something needs to be done to resuscitate voter  participation  to  sustain confidence in our  electoral  system  and revitalize our  democracy.

    Undoubtedly this time around it is not a two horse race as we saw in the presidential election.  Each  state    has  its unique amalgam  of  parties and  candidates being pushed  by incumbent governors, either    outgoing  or  seeking reelection  and  Federal legislators, both just  elected as  well  as those just  defeated, who  are  on the field,  in the state  capitals  rooting  for their political  parties  in the battle to take over  the state  houses and assemblies  in the 36  states  in Nigeria  today.

    In  many ways,  today’s  guber  and state assembly  elections will have  hangovers  and carry  overs  from the presidential  campaign and these  are  not  necessarily  that straight  forward    or    flowing normally, from  the performance the two major  parties  in the presidential  elections.  In  political  terms the political equations    may  not  be the same. Meaning 2  plus 2  may  be 5 as  in Synergy  and not  necessarily  4  as in Arithmetic. That  can be illustrated by the fact  that in states  where  the APC lost  the presidential  elections  party  stalwarts still  celebrated  the overall    victory  of  the president after  the elections massively.  In  today’s  election  there  are former  governors  who  have secured senate  seats in the last  elections and there  are  those who have lost.  Both  will  be very  active in todays’ election. A good example  will  be the Governor  of  Ogun state  who  has a senate  seat  in hand and that  of  Oyo  State  who  failed to secure a senate  seat. Both  will  be active in seeing  who  will  succeed them. Rivers  too  provide a unique  example where  the  ruling party  has  no candidate but  has of late  adopted  that  of  another party  in  what  is a do or  die  matter  for  the incumbent governor  and the Minister  of  Transport.

    In  a way  I expect  the turn  out  today    to be far  more  than that  of the presidential elections  because  of  the many  local or state political  squabbles involving  party  leaders  in the state  houses and  the  broken loyalties  of  incumbent  governors  to their  many  successors  in the state  capitals. Anyway  the die is cast  and today  the battle fields  are  the polling booths all  over Nigeria. The Games  have begun.

    Whilst  I  pray  for another peaceful  election  I  want  to highlight  the electoral  battles in some  states  because  of  some unique  and unusual  events  that  preceded  the emergence  of  the governorship  contestants in today’s  elections.  These  states are Kano, Rivers,  Lagos, Ogun,  and  Oyo  States.  The happenings  in these  states  reflect    the nature  and structure of power  acquisition and  distribution    in  Nigeria,  as  well  as its  challenges  and dynamics  in our peculiar  brand of participatory  democracy. I  will  use  the issues involved  to hazard  a guess  on the prospects  of the guber candidates  as well as their  parties  in today’s  elections.

    In  Kano,  a  regular  high  voter  turn- out state in Nigeria, it is  not  only  a straight  fight between  the APC  and PDP  but a proxy fight  between former  governor Kwankwanso  and his  successor Ganduje, who  is the incumbent  governor. But  Kwanwanso  has defected to the PDP  from  the APC  after  a brilliant  two  term tenure  after  which  he handed  power  to his trusted Deputy Governor.  But  now things  have changed since the days of the Kwakansiyya  and  the incumbent  governor  is ascendant  in Kano politics as the massive turn  out to elect  the president last  week has shown  in Kano. It  promises  to  be  a tough fight  today  in Kano  but  expect  the power of incumbency  to favor  APC  and  its candidates  a lot  in  Kano’s  volatile  politics  which  has changed  a lot  since  the  days  of  Aminu  Kano  and  the irrepressible  Abubakar  Rimi  of the  PRP  fame.

    In  Rivers  state  the stakes  are  high  but  again  the  APC  by proxy  and  PDP  are  locked  in a fierce battle  that  makes the prospect  of a peaceful  election quite  dim.  The security  forces must  be at their  best  and be prepared  to  be fair  and even handed  or else there  will  be great  violence.  That  is the bitter  truth.  This  is because  this is a stage  today  for  a fierce  show  of  power  between  federal  might  and state power  or incumbency  and  really  it is anybody’s  guess  as to  who  the winner  or  the loser  will  be. Really  it  is  going  to  be a close call  between  the  APC  by  proxy  and the PDP in  today’s guber  elections in  Rivers state.

    In  Lagos  state the  APC has  been  the party in power  for  long and the  obvious  party  of  choice  for  the  Lagos  electorate. But  today  is not  a straight  fight  between  the two  major parties namely APC  and PDP,  although  their  two  candidates Jide Sanwo Olu (APC) and Jimi  Agbaje    are  the best  known. There  are other  fringe parties    populated  by  defectors from    both APC and    PDP.  However. Sanwo  Olu  is  a time tested technocrat  who could or should  have been  governor  ages ago,  going by the brilliance  and dexterity  which  he outlined his  THEME  agenda  at the interactive section with members of the Yoruba  Tennis Club  last week. He  was  given  a challenge  by a member  of the Club, Ladi Kotun who  asked him what he would  do  for Lagos  Island  given  the fact that  the last  two Lagos governors catered  for  their  core areas  namely  BRF  for Suru  Lere  and Ambode  for  Epe. That  is  a core problem in this  election    and it  bothers    Lagosians immensely. It    is a problem  that  is  there  for  Jimi  Agbaje of the PDP to  exploit. Also  given  the fact  that an  Igbo  was  the running mate  of the loser in last week’s  presidential  election  has meant  that the Igbos  are  rooting for  Agbaje,  who  too is well known  having  contested twice  for  governorship  elections in the state  unsuccessfully  before.  The  issue  of  the rejection of incumbent  governor  Ambode for  a second term is another  grouse of some APC  supporters  and even  non partisan  residents of  the state.

    So  it is understandable  that  Sanwo  Olu  himself  at the YTC event  called  on voters  to  come  and vote today  and not  take victory  for granted. It  is a wise  call and the major  insurance for  his  election  today  given  the  rumblings  going  on in some quarters to  do  an  Otedola  for  the APC in  today’s election and  give Agbaje  a  very  rare  opportunity  to  govern Lagos  state. All  the same I  expect  the APC  to  weather  the storm  and    lead    its well  groomed    and  grounded candidate    to  a vote  that will  to allow  the  electorate  to reap  the benefit  of continuity in power  of  the APC  leadership in the state.

    Ogun  state  is a very  unique  battle  ground  today. Governor Amosun  is a lesson  in  party  defiance but  a successful  one  so far. He  has defied  his party in  campaigning for  a governorship candidate  from another party.  He  won a senate  seat  himself  and for his party. For  Amosun  you can  say a bird in hand is worth  two in the bush.

    Which  is not something you  can  say  to the Oyo State  governor  who  lost  his senate  seat  and the presidential election  for the APC.  If  Amosun’s  candidate  wins  today  and defeats  the APC  candidate  and others, then  you can  call  Amosun the Jagaba of Ogun  politics  and  a real  rival  to  the original Jagaba  of  the  South west  based  in  Lagos.  If  his  candidate loses then  the  APC  must  celebrate  a famous  victory  and  task Amosun  for  rebellion but  must  be cautious  to  apply  justice with  mercy in  dealing with  a powerful  rebel. As  for the Governor of Oyo  who  lost his  senate  bid,  Biola  Ajimobi, he should  know  now  that the Ibadans  cherish  their  traditional  line of succession  mightily  and do  not forgive  any  governor  who tampers  with  it. The  governor  should leave them  in  Ibadan  with their  Mapo  politics  and like an  old friend of  mine that  he is, just come back  to  Lago. Once  again  long  live  the  Federal Republic  of  Nigeria.